Man gets 20-year rigorous imprisonment for raping stepdaughter
On Aug 2, the court of additional sessions judge Ankita Mehta said there was no straightforward formula for sentencing, and both the aggravating and mitigating factors needed to be considered. It also needs to balance the twin objectives of deterrence and reform of the convict, the judge added.
The court was hearing sentencing arguments for the man convicted of raping his stepdaughter in 2023. He was convicted by the court for rape and under sections 6 (aggravated sexual assault) and 9(n) of Pocso Act this June.
The judge also awarded Rs 10.5 lakh as compensation to the survivor, noting that she suffered immense mental trauma and the incident left a lifelong scar on her mind.
You Can Also Check:
Delhi AQI
|
Weather in Delhi
|
Bank Holidays in Delhi
|
Public Holidays in Delhi
Special public prosecutor advocate Vineet Dahiya asked for stringent punishment and submitted that the gravity of the offences increased even more, given that the convict was the stepfather of the survivor and she was subjected to rape/penetrative sexual assault within the four walls of her house, which was supposed to be the safest place for her.
Dahiya said offences against children were on the rise and Pocso Act was enacted by Parliament with the understanding that offenders under it shall be dealt with a heavy hand.
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and s
ilver prices
in your area.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
5 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Calcutta HC seeks report from higher education dept on Jadavpur University security revamp
THE CALCUTTA High Court on Tuesday directed the West Bengal Higher Education Department to file a report regarding the necessity and manner of deploying security personnel inside the Jadavpur University (JU) campus and the steps taken by the state to disburse the required grants in connection with the the installation of CCTVs on campus. A Division Bench of Justices Sujoy Paul and Smita Das De was hearing a Public Interest Litigation regarding the security and safety of the university. The counsel for JU, Ritzu Ghoshal, submitted, 'There was a meeting of the executive counsel on August 11.' The university conducted a survey and said the University needs around Rs 65 lakh for setting up CCTVs on campus. 'We approached the State for the grants. A Communication will be sent to the Higher Education Dept of West Bengal for funds,' Ghoshal submitted. The Division Bench observed, 'The university is to file an affidavit about the meeting and the resolution taken in it and the locations identified for the CCTV installation. Further communication by the University to the state will have to be filed with the affidavit as well.' The next hearing on the matter is slated for September 25.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Cabinet okays bill that seeks to ban ‘online money game'
NEW DELHI: Cabinet on Tuesday approved a bill that seeks to ban "online money game", where users pay a fee or deposit money, proposing a maximum three years in jail or fine of up to Rs 1 crore for those involved in offering, encouraging or inducing players to participate, which also extends to banks facilitating these transactions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now At the same time, Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, which will be introduced in Lok Sabha on Wednesday, seeks to promote e-sports and online social games where no money is involved. A regulator body is planned to oversee the functioning of the sector, sources told TOI. The proposed legislation defines "online money game" as an online game played by a user by paying fees, depositing money or other stakes in expectation of winning. 2 years' jail, ₹50L fine likely for those advertising online games Online social games have been defined as those that don't involve exchange of money, although users may be allowed to pay a subscription or one-time access fee. Govt has proposed the new law considering unregulated online money gaming platforms pose threats to national and economic security as they use digital wallets and cryptocurrencies for money laundering and illicit money transfer, cross-border data flows without compliance of data protection law, sources said. Moreover, offshore entities are seen to be circumventing tax and legal obligations. The proposed legislation also assumes significance as online money gaming poses serious concerns, including addiction among children and youth, mental health issues, financial losses leading to suicides and lack of uniform regulation across states. Law enforcing agencies face problems in tracking and regulating these platforms, particularly those hosted or operated from outside India. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Sources said the govt proposes penalties of up to two years in jail or with a maximum fine of Rs 50 lakh or both for any entity advertising such games in media. For those offering online money games and banks engaged in transactions face violations of the proposed law will be "cognisable and non-bailable" offences. Every subsequent violation after conviction would attract penalties of at least three years' jail and fine of Rs 10-20 lakh. In the case of advertisers, such penalties would be 2-3 years in jail and fine of Rs 5-10 lakh. The bill proposes to hold senior executives of the companies liable, if it's established that the offences have been committed with the consent or connivance or due to their neglect. It also proposes blocking of platforms and money gaming services, if the entities or individuals fail to comply with the law. According to the proposal, the bill seeks to encourage Indian startups to build culturally relevant content, reduce dependence on foreign platforms and promote self-reliance in the digital gaming ecosystem.
Indian Express
35 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How CBI case against Arvind Kejriwal ex-aide hit a wall in approver's bank locker
It started with a raid nearly a decade ago. On December 15, 2015, sleuths from the CBI searched the office and residence of former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal's ex-Principal Secretary Rajendra Kumar in a case related to the award of contracts worth Rs 9.5 crore between 2007 and 2014 to a private company in alleged violation of rules. The CBI also searched 14 locations linked to eight other accused in this case. Among the accused was A K Duggal, who was a managing director at the time of Intelligent Communication Systems India Limited (ICSIL), a PSU through which the contracts under probe were allegedly awarded to Endeavour Systems Pvt Ltd (ESPL). While Duggal was initially an accused, he was granted a pardon by a Delhi Court in November 2016 after the CBI named him an approver. Along with the houses and offices raided, the CBI also searched the bank lockers of all the accused. While the contents of the lockers of all accused persons were eventually made known to the court and to the other accused, what was found inside Duggal's locker still remains a mystery. 'What was in the locker?' Special Judge Manisha Khurana Kakkar, who is hearing the corruption case at Rouse Avenue Court, asked the CBI on July 22 — close to a decade after the case was lodged. 'We don't know, your honour,' came the response of the CBI's counsel. The judge asked the CBI to clarify whether the missing material was 'untraceable'. 'Otherwise, the matter won't proceed further,' she said. Issuing notice for the Investigating Officer to appear, the judge listed the matter for August 26. Court records trace the locker mystery back to 2015 when the CBI submitted a compliance report before the court mentioning that they had seized a 'stainless locker key of a locker maintained at SBI Civil Lines' from the accused Kumar's residence. A similar search conducted at Duggal's residence resulted in two locker keys being found: 'one Locker Key of Canara Bank, Vikas Puri' and another 'Locker Key No. 20756 of State Bank of Patiala, near Janak Cinema Hall, Janak Puri', the agency said. Records show that the mystery unfolded in a series of court hearings: September 2018: The CBI told the court that they were preparing a list of 'un-relied' documents — ie, records not used by the prosecution to build its case but can be accessed by the accused. July 2019: Advocates Rahul Tyagi and Mathew M Philip, who represented Kumar, asked for a list of 'un-relied' documents and a list of all witnesses whose statements were recorded during investigation. April 2022: The court directed the CBI to supply a list of 'un-relied' documents, holding that the accused were 'entitled for the same'. August 2022: The court took on record the list of 'un-relied' documents. In Duggal's case, this included printouts of emails, a debit card intimation, a vehicle insurance certificate, bank documents, receipts of purchase of jewellery, such as diamonds, and a duplicate vehicle registration. What was allegedly found in his bank locker was not mentioned. February 2023: Kumar's counsel approached the court, this time seeking a copy of the compliance report of all the searches and seizures done by the CBI. November 2024: The court directed the CBI to provide a copy of the report — it had no mention of the 'locker operation memo', a record of the contents of Duggal's bank locker. May 8, 2025: Kumar's counsel contended that the absence of the 'locker operation memo' in the CBI's compliance report cast 'a shadow on whether due process was followed by the IO during investigation'. In its reply, the CBI told the court: 'Locker Operation Memos… as seized from the residence of Shri A K Duggal on 15.12.2015 are not traceable despite thorough searches. It is submitted that the aforesaid two locker keys pertaining to Shri A K Duggal have already been returned to him.' The reply further stated that locker operation memos pertaining to all the other accused had been provided. In three of these lockers, nothing had been found, the CBI told the court. It further stated that the original IO who was investigating the case had retired from service and subsequent IOs had left the CBI. '…no articles were seized and the aforesaid both keys pertaining to Shri A K Duggal had already been returned to him…As such, there was no mention of the Locker Operation Memo in the list of un-relied documents. There was nothing intentional for not mentioning the Locker Operation Memo in the list of un-relied documents…the accused Petitioner is lingering the matter by filing such baseless petitions,' the CBI's reply said. On July 22, the CBI counsel told the court: 'The locker operation memo is not part of relied or un-relied upon documents.' It was at this juncture that the judge decided to pause and call for the IO to be present at the next date. The case is significant for the CBI because it was among the first allegations of corruption that was levelled against Kejriwal's aides by the Centre at the time. Rajendra Kumar, a 1989-batch IAS officer who was described by the CBI as the 'kingpin' of the alleged scam, was arrested in July 2016 and later granted bail. The chargesheet in the case was filed in December 2016. According to the CBI, the alleged scam led to a loss of Rs 12 crore for the Delhi government. ESPL, the agency alleged, was a 'front company' floated by Kumar in 2006 along with his purported 'schoolmate' Ashok Kumar. The private firm, along with its directors Sandeep Kumar and Dinesh Gupta, was also named as accused. When contacted, Rahul Tyagi, counsel for Rajendra Kumar, asserted that 'the only plausible reason for not disclosing what was found in the lockers of Duggal is that had these been disclosed, no court would have allowed Duggal to become an approver'. 'It is a travesty that the person, who has awarded the contracts, is a witness and a highly decorated and honest officer like Rajendra Kumar, against whom nothing incriminating has been found, has been made an accused,' Tyagi said.
