Ageas Re partners with Slovenian insurer Triglav Group in connection with the Motor insurance business distributed by Italian Insurtech Prima
Ageas Re partners with Slovenian insurer Triglav Group in connection with the Motor insurance business distributed by Italian Insurtech Prima
Today, Ageas Re, the reinsurance arm of Ageas Group, concluded a reinsurance agreement with Slovenian insurer Triglav Group in connection with the partnership entered into by Triglav Group with leading Italian direct Motor insurance distributor, Prima Assicurazioni S.p.A. (Prima), with the objective to expand its business portfolio and to contribute to the Ageas's Elevate27 profitable growth ambitions.
Under to the agreement, Ageas Re takes an 80% Quota Share on the Prima business underwritten by Triglav Group in 2025, commencing in the coming weeks.
Prima is a rapidly growing, profitable insurance distributor that began distributing personal lines policies, mainly Motor, in 2015. Since then, it has become the number 1 in the Italian Direct Motor business. In 2024, the company generated EUR 1.3 billion gross written premiums, servicing over 4 million customers, and EUR 104 million Group EBITDA.
This agreement is in perfect alignment with Ageas's Elevate27 strategy to achieve profitable growth in an attractive European Non-Life market. The Italian Motor insurance market generates premiums in excess of EUR 15 billion, with consistent profitability. Through this partnership, Ageas Re teams up with a tech-driven, local champion, with proven track record, providing immediate market entry with considerable scale.
Ageas Re anticipates inflows from this transaction in excess of EUR 500 million in 2025 and a Net Operating Result of around EUR 15 million, spread over 2025 and 2026. The impact on Group Solvency is estimated to be no more than -4 points in 2025.
Hans De Cuyper, CEO of Ageas stated: The agreement with Triglav Group aligns well with many aspects of our newly launched strategy, Elevate27. This collaboration enables us to enter a promising European growth market in Non-Life insurance and achieve profitable growth through a partner with a strong market position.'
Joachim Racz, CEO of Ageas Re continued: 'I am pleased to announce this partnership. Along with the entire Ageas Re team, I look forward to establishing a successful collaboration, offering high-quality insurance products to the Italian customer distributed by Prima. We would also like to thank Howden Re for the excellent management of the process and transaction.'
George Ottathycal, CEO of Prima said: 'Prima Assicurazioni has experienced remarkable growth in the Italian motor insurance market, surpassing 4 million active customers in just ten years. This success is the result of our sophisticated and rigorous pricing and underwriting, outstanding user experience, and, most importantly, our carefully selected strategic partners who fully align with our cutting-edge, technology- and data-driven business model. Not only will the solidity and trust of the new partners Triglav Group and Ageas Re further expand our growth, but will also deliver significant value to our entire network of agents and brokers—and, above all, to our customers.'
Andrej Slapar, President of the Management Board of Zavarovalnica Triglav, commented: 'Our strategic ambition is to grow beyond existing markets and enhance Triglav Group's international recognition. The Italian motor insurance market presents a strong opportunity to support this goal, and we are pleased to be working with well-established partners Prima and Ageas Re. The Triglav Group will continue to explore opportunities for further growth and for delivering on the other objectives set out in our strategy.'
Ageas is a Belgian rooted listed international insurance Group with a heritage spanning of 200 years. It offers Retail and Business customers Life and Non-Life insurance products designed to suit their specific needs, today and tomorrow, and is also engaged in reinsurance activities. As one of Europe's larger insurance companies, Ageas concentrates its activities in Europe and Asia, which together make up the major part of the global insurance market. It operates successful insurance businesses in Belgium, the UK, Portugal, Türkiye, China, Malaysia, India, Thailand, Vietnam, Laos, Cambodia, Singapore, and the Philippines through a combination of wholly owned subsidiaries and long-term partnerships with strong financial institutions and key distributors. Ageas ranks among the market leaders in the countries in which it operates. It represents a staff force of about 50,000 people and reported annual inflows of EUR 18.5 billion in 2024.
Prima Assicurazioni is an insurtech company operating as a specialized insurance agency in the automotive, home, and family sectors, serving over 4 million clients. It has revolutionized the Italian insurance market through innovation, technology, and a data-driven strategy. Thanks to unprecedented growth over its 10-year history, Prima's evolving business model has enhanced the user experience, offering competitive pricing and fostering greater market competition. A leader in Italy's online motor insurance sector, Prima also operates a nationwide network of agents. Since 2022, the company has expanded into the United Kingdom and Spain.
For 125 years, the Triglav Group has earned the trust of clients and other stakeholders through its expertise, experience, and financial strength. It is the largest insurance-financial group in the Adria region and one of the leading groups in Southeast Europe. The Group operates in six countries, with broader international presence through insurance and reinsurance activities. Insurance and asset management are the two main pillars of its operations. The Group employs more than 5,000 people. Its mission is to create a safer future. The core values of the Group are responsiveness, simplicity, and reliability. Its vision is focused on strengthening its identity and recognition as an international insurance-financial group. Through sustainable operations, it provides a development-oriented environment for employees, maintains strong partnerships, and represents a stable, secure, and profitable investment for shareholders. The parent company of the Triglav Group is Zavarovalnica Triglav, a Prime Market issuer on the Ljubljana Stock Exchange.
Attachment Pdf version of the press release
Disclaimer: The above press release comes to you under an arrangement with GlobeNewswire. Business Upturn takes no editorial responsibility for the same.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
What Elon Musk's feud with Trump means for Tesla shareholders
For Tesla investors, Elon Musk's involvement with Donald Trump has been a car wreck that's unfolded in two chapters, one in slow motion, the next on dizzying fast-forward. During Musk's 130 days running DOGE, a crusade whose dogged aggression virtually defined the administration's mindset in the early months, the EV chief infuriated European customers by backing far-right politicians, and as sales dropped in the likes of Germany and France, and severe competition shrank its market share in China, neglected tackling Tesla's mounting problems by doubling down by famously battling to slash departments and headcount from the White House. In his absence, Tesla's stock and earnings tanked. Bad as that episode proved for Tesla, it at least provided a potential upside. 'Even before DOGE, Musk clearly had too many spoons in too many pots through SpaceX, Neuralink, X and his other ventures, then he got even more preoccupied by putting another spoon in another pot,' says Eric Talley, a professor of law and business at Columbia University. 'But being in the White House also included a bit of an insurance policy for Tesla….sitting close to the seat of decision making was a big potential advantage.' Now, says Talley, Musk has singlehandedly turned that 'insurance policy' into a liability—the threat that the administration will penalize the EV-maker, or at best do nothing to protect it. When Musk departed DOGE on May 30 amid the fanfare of Trump's Oval Office sendoff, Tesla shareholders still had little to toast, since the CEO wasn't offloading his empire's myriad duties to refocus on the troubled manufacturer. Then, the Musk-Trump feud that exploded on June 5th, triggered by the former's lacerating takedown of the President's signature budget bill, put Tesla overnight into a spot where it's threatened not only by poor finances but the insults unleashed at his former sponsor that both invite retaliation by Trump and endanger Musk's survival as the enterprise's leader that's so critical to its gigantic valuation. 'The thing that's different in the last 24 hours,' says Talley, 'is that Musk not only walked away from an insurance policy of having a CEO situated high in government. He took out an anti-insurance policy. Any moment could erupt in a flameout from either side over social media that puts a target on Tesla's back.' He notes that Tesla's rivals are confronting the same headwinds from the wind-down in EV subsidies to purchasers subsidies proposed the so-called 'Great Big Beautiful Bill,' but the the overhang from antagonizing the president 'is a target its competitors don't have.' Indeed, the day it detonated, the blowup sent Tesla shares reeling 14.3% in a freefall that erased $153 billion in market cap, the biggest one-day drop in the company's history. Though it clawed back around a third of those losses the following day, the stock's still sitting 40% below its recent summit in mid-December. Charles Elson, founding director of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance at the University of Delaware, and one of the leading experts on the rules and ethics governing boards, told Fortune that in any other major public company but Tesla, Musk would be gone—and the dumping would have happened well before the new hurricane. 'If his name had been Joe Dokes, he'd be gone in a nano-second,' says Elson, 'given the reputational damage he did alienating a good number of customers by going into politics at DOGE. It's a mess. No other board would have let a CEO get involved in that way. You don't have time to be a CEO!' What keeps Musk in the job is his iron grip on the board, says Elson. He notes that Musk controls 30% of the shares, and that his influence extends beyond the power of that stake due to the loyalty built, in part, by awarding directors large options grants that made many of them extremely rich. Elson reckons that it would be extremely difficult for disgruntled shareholders to prevail in lawsuits versus board members that might work toward forcing out Musk. 'The road to winning liability cases against directors is a twisting, bumpy one,' he avows. 'That Tesla re-incorporated from Delaware to Texas makes it much tougher. That's why Tesla moved to Texas. It was a race to the bottom and they ran all the way to the bottom of the barrel.' For Elson, Musk can't be forced to leave, and won't go unless he wants to, 'and there's nothing anybody can do about it.' Nevertheless, the size of Musk's ownership stake that's the source of his control, and his attachment to Tesla going forward that's attached to that position, are being tested by a landmark decisions in the Delaware courts. The rulings, handed down last year, negated the $56 billion stock package awarded by the board in 2018 that accounts for two-thirds of Musk's holdings. Tesla's now appealing to get that comp restored. If the Delaware Supreme Court upholds the decision, Tesla's certain to attempt getting that compensation reinstated. But that route courts much higher risks now. According to Talley, the board under Texas law could either attempt to restore the package unilaterally, or put the issue to a shareholder vote. He reckons that the former, more direct approach is now looking a lot less attractive to the directors than a few days ago. 'The board may prefer now to go with a shareholder vote,' he says, given the potential backlash from rewarding Musk so royally when Tesla's struggling, mainly because of his own actions. 'It might appeal to the board to go that way and count on a rejection,' he adds. A turn down raises another potentially ghoulish outcome. 'If they have a shareholder vote, and it goes negative, then you have a succession problem. You don't want a CEO to take vengeance on the company,' a path the mercurial legend could take. It's also unclear how Musk will react if the Delaware Supreme Court rules against him—same upshot, he owns far less of Tesla, and his incentive to rebuild his the greatest source of his wealth would be greatly diminished. Tesla enjoys a gigantic premium courtesy of Musk's iconic status and the serial promises of delivering self-driving technology that will transform Tesla from a metal-bender into a fabulously lucrative tech player. As I detailed after Tesla reported Q1 results, it actually lost money selling cars and batteries and only managed a tiny profit through the sales of regulatory credits. Its 'hardcore,' repeatable earnings from the auto and battery franchises over the previous four quarters totaled just $3.5 billion, down from $12 billion in 2022. At a PE of 30 that's three times the auto industry average, Tesla—based on bedrock fundamentals—might be worth $100 billion. But even after the recent selloff, its valuation stands at $960 billion. Hence, the difference of well over $800 billion arises from what I'll call the 'Musk magic premium,' created by his promises of epic innovations to come. If Musk were to depart, a big part of that magic premium exits with him. It may be fading already. So for Tesla shareholders, it's bad either way. Musk leaves and a hands-on leader arrives, but the genius' halo no longer shields the stock, or he stays and keeps starting fights that undermine the brand and spreads his time among half a dozen pioneering ventures that he may find more riveting. As Elson puts it, 'Anyone else would be fired after this but he feels he can't be. He has this aura that makes him feel untouchable. He's got a cult status that seems to follow him and make folks think it's okay that he doesn't operate in a normal way.' But, Elson cautions, as Musk's behavior gets more and more outrageous, the burden he's heaping on Tesla, now and what investors increasing perceive is looming, is catching up with him. We've just seen a shocking example of how fast that can happen, and how rapidly the myth can dissolve. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Ford's Hot Hatch Is Now Officially History
The end is here for Ford's last hot hatch as the company confirmed to Motor1 that every factory build slot for the Focus ST is spoken for. "All Focus ST factory orders until the end of production have now been reserved," European communications manager Finn Thomasen said. Dealers across the Continent may still have a few unclaimed cars hiding in back lots, but once those are gone-and when Focus production stops in November-the book will officially close on Ford's 45-year hot-hatch chapter. The Focus joins a growing list of Ford passenger cars already in the rear-view mirror. The Fiesta bowed out in 2023, the Mondeo in 2022, and the tiny Ka back in 2020. Without them, Ford's European portfolio is dominated by crossovers such as the Puma and Kuga. The shift has taken a bite out of sales: through April, Ford moved 149,601 vehicles in the EU, U.K., and EFTA markets-down 2.2% year-over-year and less than a third of Volkswagen's haul over the same period. Even Hyundai and Kia have pulled ahead, underscoring how much ground Ford has ceded without its affordable hatchbacks. Yes, the seventh-generation Mustang still flies the performance flag, but it's hardly a volume play. EU taxes punish engines bigger than two liters, dogging the 5.0-liter V-8, while the smaller 2.3-liter EcoBoost was pulled from European order books at the end of 2020. The pony car, therefore, lives on as a niche halo, not a substitute for the daily-drivable, budget-friendly thrills once delivered by ST-badged Fiestas and Focuses. Whether Ford ever revisits the hot-hatch formula likely depends on batteries, not boost pressure. Former Ford of Europe boss-now VW sales chief-Martin Sanders has hinted that the Blue Oval could tap further into Volkswagen's MEB electric platform, the foundation for the forthcoming Explorer and Capri EVs. VW has already promised an electric GTI; a battery-fueled Fiesta ST or Focus ST revival isn't unthinkable if the economics line up. For now, though, enthusiasts must look to the used market or pivot to rival brands still flying the internal-combustion hot-hatch flag. The Fiesta Supersport of 1980 lit the fuse; the Escort RS, Fiesta XR2, and decades of ST variants kept the fire roaring. With the Focus ST's curtain call, the combustion-powered Ford hot hatch becomes history. What replaces it, if anything, will almost certainly hum rather than howl. Until that day arrives, the faithful will remember the glory years and, if they're lucky, snag one of the last STs before they're gone. Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Jeff Bezos & Lauren Sanchez's Prenup Expected to Survive Any ‘Legal Challenge'
As Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez's wedding date nears, the businessman gears up with a watertight prenup. The couple will tie the knot in Venice in a lavish three-day ceremony from June 24 to 26. However, a recent report suggested that the businessman refuses to gamble with his fortune. Prominent California lawyer Alphonse Provinziano reportedly claimed that the robust agreement is more complex than business mergers and will survive any 'legal challenge.' RadarOnline exclusively learned from Alphonse Provinziano about Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez's prenup weeks before their wedding. Provinziano, who regularly works alongside celebrities and wealthy A-listers, compared the complexity of the agreement to some business mergers. He claimed Bezos' intention wasn't just to devise any prenup, but one that would 'survive any legal challenge.' The lawyer further explained that certain states mandatorily require prenups to be 'conscionable.' This allows fairness to both parties and proves essential to the side with fewer resources, which is Sanchez in this instance. Provinziano made it clear that Bezos was under an obligation to maintain full disclosure with his fiancée. Additionally, he offered her facilities such as her own team of lawyers and more than enough time to review and analyze the agreement. Alphonse Provinziano disclosed more details about what Jeff Bezos and Lauren Sanchez's prenup and other documentation entail. 'For someone as rich as Bezos, that means preparing documentation of the complex accounting arrangements and business deals he's involved in,' the lawyer announced. He further elaborated that this would prevent the journalist from claiming 'that he hid certain assets from her' if things go south in their marriage. Provinziano said it has been 'a lot of work for teams of lawyers.' The couple is ramping up to say their vows in one of the most extravagant wedding ceremonies. A source aware of the preparations claimed, 'People are almost hysterical with excitement – from water taxis to the hotel concierges.' Reportedly, the nuptials will happen at a centuries-old Italian villa, with guests including the Kardashian-Jenners and other Hollywood A-listers attending. The post Jeff Bezos & Lauren Sanchez's Prenup Expected to Survive Any 'Legal Challenge' appeared first on Reality Tea.
