logo
Breakingviews - Political meddling changes euro-bank M&A playbook

Breakingviews - Political meddling changes euro-bank M&A playbook

Reuters30-06-2025
LONDON, June 30 (Reuters Breakingviews) - Is major bank M&A politically possible in Europe? That's what dealmakers and CEOs across the continent are wondering after politicians in Berlin, Madrid and Rome erected obstacles to some 60 billion euros ($70 billion) worth of possible deals. The takeaway from the recent flurry of activity is that bank takeovers can still happen, but dealmakers and bidders may need to refine their tactics.
After a quiet decade for tie-ups between European lenders, BBVA (BBVA.MC), opens new tab Chair Carlos Torres Vila fired the starting gun last April with a share-based bid for 14-billion-euro Banco de Sabadell (SABE.MC), opens new tab. Then, in September, UniCredit (CRDI.MI), opens new tab CEO Andrea Orcel snapped up a stake in 30-billion-euro Commerzbank (CBKG.DE), opens new tab as a prelude to a possible takeover, before launching an unsolicited all-share offer for Banco BPM (BAMI.MI), opens new tab, currently worth 15 billion euros.
All three situations were effectively hostile, and at least two of them now seem likely to go nowhere. Orcel has accepted that his BPM hunt may have ended, after Rome handed down painful conditions, including selling his Russian business and maintaining the target's loan-to-deposit ratio. Equally, his Commerzbank tilt seems over for now after Chancellor Friedrich Merz's recent criticism of what many in Germany saw as a hostile raid.
BBVA's planned takeover of Sabadell, meanwhile, is looking increasingly complicated. The Spanish government, ostensibly fearing job losses and fewer small-business loans, last week said, opens new tab 70-billion-euro BBVA could not integrate its target for three to five years if it goes ahead with a deal. That pushes out some of the 850 million euros in planned cost savings, making it harder for Torres to raise his bid, which seems necessary since the current offer looks low.
It would be rash, however, to conclude that governments simply don't want bank deals to happen. Some tie-ups are proceeding without drama, including BPCE's recent purchase of 6-billion-euro Novo Banco. That deal, with a French buyer, works for Portugal because Lisbon is worried about Spanish dominance of its financial system and has no reason to fear the Gallic interloper. And Italy's government seems to have no issue with Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena's (BMPS.MI), opens new tab hostile 15-billion-euro Mediobanca (MDBI.MI), opens new tab play, made in January. That may be because it aligns with Rome's mission of creating a third major bank to rival twin 90-billion-euro giants Intesa Sanpaolo (ISP.MI), opens new tab and UniCredit. The common thread is that the deals that seem more probable also seem to fit a pre-existing government agenda.
Some deals will always be politically tricky. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, for example, relies on support from politicians in the Catalan region, where Sabadell has a deep history. That made it unlikely that his government would look kindly on a takeover of the smaller lender. Rome, meanwhile, doesn't seem to want either of its banking behemoths to get bigger domestically. And Berlin has always been sensitive about the perceived risk of its banks being infected by supposedly riskier southern European rivals stuffed with Mediterranean government bonds. Those aren't necessarily good reasons to oppose M&A, but for dealmakers they're a fact of life.
Still, some of the bidders' tactics haven't always helped. Orcel continued upping his exposure to Commerzbank, through derivatives, even after his initial approach met opposition. That gave German politicians an easy way to kick a potential deal without even debating its merits.
And both Orcel and Torres adopted a hard-nosed approach to valuation and returns which, while justifiable from their own shareholders' perspective, made it easier for their targets to resist. UniCredit's BPM offer came with a scant 0.5% premium. Meanwhile Torres, for now, is sticking with a price that represents effectively no premium after accounting for the overall rise in Spanish bank shares since last April, even though the target's earnings forecasts have risen more than its rivals. BPM and Sabadell are trading some 1% and 6% respectively above the offers, suggesting that investors either expect a bump or judge the targets' standalone prospects to be more valuable than the bids.
The charitable telling is that BBVA and UniCredit had to force the issue to get a hearing, given the target boards' likely recalcitrance. Yet from governments' perspective, hostile campaigns can seem destabilising in a highly sensitive sector, raising the odds of intervention. Rome, Berlin and Madrid would probably be less likely to meddle in deals that both acquirer and target have already agreed. Having a relatively low bid on the table, or none at all in the case of Commerzbank, also means the targets' boards don't have to worry about angry phone calls from investors eager to get their hands on a juicy premium.
So one lesson for future would-be acquirers, like 60-billion-euro Dutch lender ING (INGA.AS), opens new tab, is that hostile deals should only be a very last resort – and may even be more hassle than they're worth. The alternative is to try harder to offer to share more of the merger goodies upfront to win target boards over, with a higher price. That may ultimately mean lower returns than the 15% or so that Orcel was targeting in his deals. The good news, however, is that bank takeovers typically generate larger synergies than bidders typically expect. Intesa, for example, initially pencilled in about 700 million euros of annual cost savings from buying UBI Banca, but raised that number to over 1 billion euros in 2021.
Of course, a more generous approach does not guarantee that politicians will stay out of the picture. Dealmakers may simply need to learn to live with a more interventionist state. From now on, getting deals done will require more diplomacy – and financial generosity.
Follow Liam Proud on Bluesky, opens new tab and LinkedIn, opens new tab.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Italian dash! Wealthy London bankers are being lured to Milan by VERY generous tax incentives
The Italian dash! Wealthy London bankers are being lured to Milan by VERY generous tax incentives

Daily Mail​

time18 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

The Italian dash! Wealthy London bankers are being lured to Milan by VERY generous tax incentives

Wealthy bankers and city workers in London are flocking to Italy to take advantage of hugely lucrative tax break incentives dubbed the country's 'best-kept secret'. Italy has been on a relentless drive to attract high earners to up sticks and decamp from Britain and start up a new life in places like Rome, Milan or Naples. It's flat-tax scheme - dubbed 'svuoate Londra', or 'empty London' - has already bagged a large cohort of bankers from the English capital. However, another tax incentive, that's been around for almost 15 years, has arguably had an even greater impact, attracting a staggering 10 times as many talented professionals. The 'Rientro dei Cervelli' scheme - which literally translates to the 'return of the brains' – was launched to attract top employees into the country through lower income tax rates. Despite slight fluctuations between 2019 and 2023, those moving to the south of Italy could pay tax on just 10 per cent of their income, while those in the north pay it on 30 per cent. And Britons who have taken advantage of it say it has given them a marked increase in the quality of their life, with some taking home 80 per cent of the gross pay. Even with a slight change to the scheme after December 2023, which saw those moving to Italy now charged tax on 50 per cent of their income, the move remains hugely popular among top earners. According to the Italian ministry of finance, by 2023 around 50,000 people were signed up to the tax break scheme - with experts saying there is a 50:50 split between returning Italians and new non-Italian residents. Meanwhile, the nation's flat-tax scheme has only seen around 4,000 people applying for the €200,000 (£173,000) relief initiative. Many are still benefitting from the more generous pre-2023 version of the 'return of the brains' tax scheme. Among them is 36-year-old Daria, who did not want to share her surname. She had been living in Hackney, east London, for 13 years before making the shift south. She moved to the picturesque historic town of Bari, in the south-east Italian region of Puglia, with her partner - a commodities trader - to benefit from a 90 per cent exemption for 10 years just before the rules changed. 'When travelling we met people who were optimising their finances. Some were going to Dubai, but my work is in Europe and we heard about the "impatriati" scheme and realised it was a bit of a well-kept secret,' Daria told the Sunday Telegraph. The naturalised British citizen is now living in a two-bedroom flat she rents out for €1,400 a month, with her and her partner now enjoying regular swim or paddle-board trips past the city's historic waterfront before work. However, since Daria moved to Italy, the rules have been tightened on tax, which has seen regional difference scrapped in favour of a 50 per cent tax exemption for up to five years. Those applying have to meet certain criteria. For instance, they cannot benefit if their earnings are more than €600,000 per year (£520,000). Applicants must not have been a resident in Italy for three years - or up to seven if transferring with the same company. And those seeking to take advantage of the scheme must remain in the country for four years or they will be forced to pay some of the benefits back. This is a marked increase from the length of time required for to remain in Italy for those who are on the pre-2023 arrangement, where the timeframe was just two years. The 2023 amendment also introduced the need for applicants to have a higher education qualification or an EU Blue Card - a work permit and residence permit for non-EU residents. Most people now living on the scheme have set up homes across Italy's business and industrial hubs in the north, in places like Milan, Padua and the wider Lombardy region as well as in the capital or Rome. When the five-year relief scheme comes to an end, those remaining in Italy will see their tax payments jump significantly. For instance, those earning around €150,000, would see tax payments balloon from €24,890 a year to €57,140 – or 17 per cent take to one of 38 per cent. Not everyone has found the scheme worthwhile, with one British citizen reportedly moving back from Tuscany to London after only two years, citing a 'nightmare' of paperwork and difficulties with the language barrier. Italian native Francesca Inglima also moved back to the UK after just two years. Italy's generous tax relief schemes have reportedly attracted wealthy banker from the UK (pictured is the Bank of England's HQ in London) She had been working for more than a decade in London as a top-tier investment banker when she opted to move to Milan in 2021 and 2023. 'I had a lot of European clients. The tax incentive made it a no-brainer,' the 32-year-old told the Sunday Telegraph. But she admitted she wanted to start her own business and said that Italy was 'not the place' to do this. 'After London, returning to Italy felt like taking a step back. I missed the fast pace, the ambition, the easier bureaucracy,' she added.

TikTok to replace trust and safety team in Germany with AI and outsourced labor
TikTok to replace trust and safety team in Germany with AI and outsourced labor

The Guardian

time20 hours ago

  • The Guardian

TikTok to replace trust and safety team in Germany with AI and outsourced labor

TikTok workers in Germany are holding strikes over mass layoffs of the company's trust and safety team. The social media behemoth said it is planning to dismantle its entire Berlin moderation team, which removes harmful content from the platform, and outsource the work to artificial intelligence and contract workers. This means the dismissal of 150 employees. The trade union that represents the TikTok workers, has been pushing to negotiate with TikTok over the past few weeks. Kalle Kunkel, a spokesperson for the Berlin-Brandenburg region, said the union sent a list of demands to TikTok regarding severance for the affected employees and an extension of the layoff notice period to one year. So far, he said, TikTok has refused to come to the table. 'Basically, they said: 'We don't want to talk with you,' so after that, we went on two strikes,' Kunkel said. 'But they still don't react to us.' The Berlin employees cover the German-speaking market, which the union says has about 32 million active users. TikTok has a handful of offices around the country, but the capital city serves as the biggest hub, with about 400 employees overall. The layoffs of the trust and safety team there would constitute nearly a 40% reduction in force. Anna Sopel, a TikTok spokesperson, said the company's proposed layoffs are to 'streamline workflows and improve efficiency' and that 'we remain fully committed to protecting the safety and integrity of our platform'. In Germany, as with other countries around the world, the trust and safety team is in charge of making sure the short-form videos published on the platform don't contain harmful content or violate company policy. That means flagging videos for things like violence, pornography, misinformation and hate speech. The people working on this team review up to 1,000 videos per day, according to the union. This human work is often done in conjunction with AI. Over the past year, TikTok has been cutting trust and safety staff worldwide, often substituting those workers completely with automated systems. In September, the company fired its entire team of 300 content moderators in the Netherlands. In October, TikTok announced it would replace about 500 content moderation employees in Malaysia in favor of AI-powered moderation. This past February, Reuters reported that TikTok was laying off significant portions of its trust and safety teams across Asia, Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The German layoffs come after TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew testified in a hearing before the US Congress in 2024 saying the company would increase spending on trust and safety. He pledged to spend more than $2bn on a team of more than 40,000 people globally. Sopel, the spokesperson, said TikTok is investing another $2bn in trust and safety this year but did not respond to questions on how many employees the team now has worldwide. TikTok, which is owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, is facing a ban in the US unless it's sold to a government-approved buyer, though Donald Trump has granted it multiple months-long reprieves from the ban. Other social media companies including Snap Inc, X and Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, have also made cuts to their trust and safety teams over the past couple of years. In May, NPR revealed that Meta planned to replace 90% of employees working on its product reviews with AI, including those for trust and safety. Meta and X have also terminated their human factchecking programs in favor of notes by other users. 'Replacing people tasked with ensuring that platforms are safe and rights-respecting for all users, including minors, is going to lead to more mistakes and more harmful experiences,' said Aliya Bhatia, a senior policy analyst at the non-profit Center for Democracy and Technology, who studies automated content moderation. Outsourcing this work to AI is problematic, Kunkel said. Employees at TikTok have complained to the union that the company's automated moderation system has classified videos that show things like a rainbow Pride flag as harmful content, which does not violate company policy. Conversely, employees said in union complaints, the AI can skip over actual inappropriate matter. 'AI is not able to really identify problematic pictures or videos, especially when it comes to sophisticated content,' Kunkel said. The EU is more strict than other parts of the world when it comes to regulating tech platforms and content moderation. Under the Digital Services Act, passed in 2022, social media companies, including TikTok, are required to rigorously safeguard their platforms from harmful content or face large fines. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion TikTok says investing in AI-powered moderation means being able to more quickly remove violating content before it's viewed by people on the social network. The company says the technology also helps reduce the volume of harmful videos that human moderators are obliged to review. While TikTok plans to lean more heavily on AI, it says it will still outsource some of Germany's trust and safety work to contractors. Kunkel expressed qualms that these workers, who watch large amounts of graphic content daily, may not have access to in-house health and safety programs. TikTok Germany offers mental health resources, Kunkel said, but most outside contracting companies don't. To put pressure on TikTok to bargain, the union organized two day-long strikes and protests in late July. Kathlen Eggerling, lead negotiator for the TikTok employees, said these actions were necessary to show the company the value of its staff. After the first strike, TikTok employees received a stern warning. The company sent workers a message, seen by the Guardian, that said those who protest during work hours must notify their bosses in advance and request leave. TikTok said in the message that it was reviewing the situation with its legal team and would reach out to workers individually to address violations. Under German law, however, unions announce the strikes and workers are not required to inform their employer if they plan to participate. 'It seems TikTok may need content moderators to factcheck its internal communications as well. We call on management to stop intimidating strikers,' Eggerling said. 'Instead of spreading misinformation, TikTok should finally come to the negotiating table.' The union said TikTok employees will continue to rally. And if the company doesn't meet them at the bargaining table, a longer term strike could be in the works. The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each.

TikTok to replace trust and safety team in Germany with AI and outsourced labor
TikTok to replace trust and safety team in Germany with AI and outsourced labor

The Guardian

timea day ago

  • The Guardian

TikTok to replace trust and safety team in Germany with AI and outsourced labor

TikTok workers in Germany are holding strikes over mass layoffs of the company's trust and safety team. The social media behemoth said it is planning to dismantle its entire Berlin moderation team, which removes harmful content from the platform, and outsource the work to artificial intelligence and contract workers. This means the dismissal of 150 employees. The trade union that represents the TikTok workers, has been pushing to negotiate with TikTok over the past few weeks. Kalle Kunkel, a spokesperson for the Berlin-Brandenburg region, said the union sent a list of demands to TikTok regarding severance for the affected employees and an extension of the layoff notice period to one year. So far, he said, TikTok has refused to come to the table. 'Basically, they said: 'We don't want to talk with you,' so after that, we went on two strikes,' Kunkel said. 'But they still don't react to us.' The Berlin employees cover the German-speaking market, which the union says has about 32 million active users. TikTok has a handful of offices around the country, but the capital city serves as the biggest hub, with about 400 employees overall. The layoffs of the trust and safety team there would constitute nearly a 40% reduction in force. Anna Sopel, a TikTok spokesperson, said the company's proposed layoffs are to 'streamline workflows and improve efficiency' and that 'we remain fully committed to protecting the safety and integrity of our platform'. In Germany, as with other countries around the world, the trust and safety team is in charge of making sure the short-form videos published on the platform don't contain harmful content or violate company policy. That means flagging videos for things like violence, pornography, misinformation and hate speech. The people working on this team review up to 1,000 videos per day, according to the union. This human work is often done in conjunction with AI. Over the past year, TikTok has been cutting trust and safety staff worldwide, often substituting those workers completely with automated systems. In September, the company fired its entire team of 300 content moderators in the Netherlands. In October, TikTok announced it would replace about 500 content moderation employees in Malaysia in favor of AI-powered moderation. This past February, Reuters reported that TikTok was laying off significant portions of its trust and safety teams across Asia, Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The German layoffs come after TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew testified in a hearing before the US Congress in 2024 saying the company would increase spending on trust and safety. He pledged to spend more than $2bn on a team of more than 40,000 people globally. Sopel, the spokesperson, said TikTok is investing another $2bn in trust and safety this year but did not respond to questions on how many employees the team now has worldwide. TikTok, which is owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, is facing a ban in the US unless it's sold to a government-approved buyer, though Donald Trump has granted it multiple months-long reprieves from the ban. Other social media companies including Snap Inc, X and Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, have also made cuts to their trust and safety teams over the past couple of years. In May, NPR revealed that Meta planned to replace 90% of employees working on its product reviews with AI, including those for trust and safety. Meta and X have also terminated their human factchecking programs in favor of notes by other users. 'Replacing people tasked with ensuring that platforms are safe and rights-respecting for all users, including minors, is going to lead to more mistakes and more harmful experiences,' said Aliya Bhatia, a senior policy analyst at the non-profit Center for Democracy and Technology, who studies automated content moderation. Outsourcing this work to AI is problematic, Kunkel said. Employees at TikTok have complained to the union that the company's automated moderation system has classified videos that show things like a rainbow Pride flag as harmful content, which does not violate company policy. Conversely, employees said in union complaints, the AI can skip over actual inappropriate matter. 'AI is not able to really identify problematic pictures or videos, especially when it comes to sophisticated content,' Kunkel said. Sign up to TechScape A weekly dive in to how technology is shaping our lives after newsletter promotion The EU is more strict than other parts of the world when it comes to regulating tech platforms and content moderation. Under the Digital Services Act, passed in 2022, social media companies, including TikTok, are required to rigorously safeguard their platforms from harmful content or face large fines. TikTok says investing in AI-powered moderation means being able to more quickly remove violating content before it's viewed by people on the social network. The company says the technology also helps reduce the volume of harmful videos that human moderators are obliged to review. While TikTok plans to lean more heavily on AI, it says it will still outsource some of Germany's trust and safety work to contractors. Kunkel expressed qualms that these workers, who watch large amounts of graphic content daily, may not have access to in-house health and safety programs. TikTok Germany offers mental health resources, Kunkel said, but most outside contracting companies don't. To put pressure on TikTok to bargain, the union organized two day-long strikes and protests in late July. Kathlen Eggerling, lead negotiator for the TikTok employees, said these actions were necessary to show the company the value of its staff. After the first strike, TikTok employees received a stern warning. The company sent workers a message, seen by the Guardian, that said those who protest during work hours must notify their bosses in advance and request leave. TikTok said in the message that it was reviewing the situation with its legal team and would reach out to workers individually to address violations. Under German law, however, unions announce the strikes and workers are not required to inform their employer if they plan to participate. 'It seems TikTok may need content moderators to factcheck its internal communications as well. We call on management to stop intimidating strikers,' Eggerling said. 'Instead of spreading misinformation, TikTok should finally come to the negotiating table.' The union said TikTok employees will continue to rally. And if the company doesn't meet them at the bargaining table, a longer term strike could be in the works.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store