A beer pioneer, South Africa's first Black female brewery owner trains a new generation
'When you are brewing you must constantly check your mixture,' Nxusani-Mawela instructs them. 'We are looking for a balance between the sugar and the grains.'
The 41-year-old Nxusani-Mawela is an international beer judge and taster, and is believed to be the first Black woman in South Africa to own a craft brewery, a breakthrough in a world largely dominated by men and big corporations. Her desire is to open South Africa's multibillion-dollar beer-brewing industry to more Black people and more women.
At her microbrewery in Johannesburg, she's teaching 13 young Black graduates — most of them women — the art of beer making.
The science behind brewing
The students at the Brewsters Academy have chemical engineering, biotechnology or analytical chemistry degrees and diplomas, but are eager to get themselves an extra qualification for a possible career in brewing.
Wearing hairnets and armed with barley grains and water, the scientists spend the next six hours on the day's lesson, learning how to malt, mill, mash, lauter, boil, ferment and filter to make the perfect pale ale.
'My favorite part is the mashing," said Lerato Banda, a 30-year-old chemical engineering student at the University of South Africa who has dreams of owning her own beer or beverage line. She's referring to the process of mixing crushed grains with hot water to release sugars, which will later ferment. "It's where the beer and everything starts.'
Nxusani-Mawela's classes began in early June. Students will spend six months exploring beer varieties, both international and African, before another six months on work placement.
Beer is for everyone
Nxusani-Mawela's Tolokazi brewery is in the Johannesburg suburb of Wynberg, wedged between the poor Black township of Alexandra on one side and the glitzy financial district of Sandton — known as Africa's richest square mile — on the other.
She hails from the rural town of Butterworth, some 1,000 kilometers (621 miles) away, and first came across the idea of a career in beer at a university open day in Johannesburg. She started brewing as an amateur in 2007. She has a microbiology degree and sees beer making as a good option for those with a science background.
'I sort of fell in love with the combination of the business side with the science, with the craftsmanship and the artistic element of brewing,' she said.
For the mother of two boys, beer brewing is also ripe for a shakeup.
'I wanted to make sure that being the first Black female to own a brewery in South Africa, that I'm not the first and the last,' she said. 'Brewsters Academy for me is about transforming the industry ... What I want to see is that in five, 10 years from now that it should be a norm to have Black people in the industry, it should be a norm to have females in the industry."
South Africa's beer industry supports more than 200,000 jobs and contributes $5.2 billion to South Africa's gross domestic product, according to the most current Oxford Economics research in 'Beer's Global Economic Footprint.' While South Africa's brewing sector remains male-dominated, like most places, efforts are underway to include more women.
One young woman at the classes, 24-year-old Lehlohonolo Makhethe, noted women were historically responsible for brewing beer in some African cultures, and she sees learning the skill as reclaiming a traditional role.
"How it got male dominated, I don't know,' Makhethe said. 'I'd rather say we are going back to our roots as women to doing what we started.'
With an African flavor
While Nxusani-Mawela teaches all kinds of styles, she also is on a mission to keep alive traditional African beer for the next generation. Her Wild African Soul beer, a collaboration with craft beer company Soul Barrel Brewing, was the 2025 African Beer Cup champion. It's a blend of African Umqombothi beer — a creamy brew incorporating maize and sorghum malt — with a fruity, fizzy Belgian Saison beer.
'Umqombothi is our African way, and everybody should know how to make it, but we don't,' she said. 'I believe that the beer styles that we make need to reflect having an element of our past being brought into the future.'
She's used all sorts of uniquely African flavors in her Tolokazi line, including the marula fruit and the rooibos bush that's native to South Africa and better-known for being used in a popular caffeine-free tea.
'Who could have thought of rooibos beer?' said Lethabo Seipei Kekae after trying the beer for the first time at a beer festival. 'It's so smooth. Even if you are not a beer drinker, you can drink it.'
___
AP Africa news: https://apnews.com/hub/africa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NASA Is Watching a Huge Anomaly Growing in Earth's Magnetic Field
For years, NASA has monitored a strange anomaly in Earth's magnetic field: a giant region of lower magnetic intensity in the skies above the planet, stretching out between South America and southwest Africa. This vast, developing phenomenon, called the South Atlantic Anomaly, has intrigued and concerned scientists for years, and perhaps none more so than NASA researchers. The space agency's satellites and spacecraft are particularly vulnerable to the weakened magnetic field strength within the anomaly, and the resulting exposure to charged particles from the Sun. The South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) – likened by NASA to a 'dent' in Earth's magnetic field, or a kind of 'pothole in space' – generally doesn't affect life on Earth, but the same can't be said for orbital spacecraft (including the International Space Station), which pass directly through the anomaly as they loop around the planet at low-Earth orbit altitudes. During these encounters, the reduced magnetic field strength inside the anomaly means technological systems onboard satellites can short-circuit and malfunction if they become struck by high-energy protons emanating from the Sun. Related: These random hits may usually only produce low-level glitches, but they do carry the risk of causing significant data loss, or even permanent damage to key components – threats obliging satellite operators to routinely shut down spacecraft systems before spacecraft enter the anomaly zone. Mitigating those hazards in space is one reason NASA is tracking the SAA; another is that the mystery of the anomaly represents a great opportunity to investigate a complex and difficult-to-understand phenomenon, and NASA's broad resources and research groups are uniquely well-appointed to study the occurrence. "The magnetic field is actually a superposition of fields from many current sources," geophysicist Terry Sabaka from NASA's Goddard Space Flight Centre in Greenbelt, Maryland explained in 2020. The primary source is considered to be a swirling ocean of molten iron inside Earth's outer core, thousands of kilometers below the ground. The movement of that mass generates electrical currents that create Earth's magnetic field, but not necessarily uniformly, it seems. A huge reservoir of dense rock called the African Large Low Shear Velocity Province, located about 2,900 kilometers (1,800 miles) below the African continent, is thought to disturb the field's generation, resulting in the dramatic weakening effect – which is aided by the tilt of the planet's magnetic axis. "The observed SAA can be also interpreted as a consequence of weakening dominance of the dipole field in the region," said NASA Goddard geophysicist and mathematician Weijia Kuang in 2020. "More specifically, a localized field with reversed polarity grows strongly in the SAA region, thus making the field intensity very weak, weaker than that of the surrounding regions." Satellite data suggesting the SAA is dividing. (Division of Geomagnetism, DTU Space) While there's much scientists still don't fully understand about the anomaly and its implications, new insights are continually shedding light on this strange phenomenon. For example, one study led by NASA heliophysicist Ashley Greeley in 2016 revealed the SAA slowly drifts around, which was confirmed by subsequent tracking from CubeSats in research published in 2021. It's not just moving, however. Even more remarkably, the phenomenon seems to be in the process of splitting in two, with researchers in 2020 discovering that the SAA appeared to be dividing into two distinct cells, each representing a separate center of minimum magnetic intensity within the greater anomaly. Just what that means for the future of the SAA remains unknown, but in any case, there's evidence to suggest that the anomaly is not a new appearance. A study published in July 2020 suggested the phenomenon is not a freak event of recent times, but a recurrent magnetic event that may have affected Earth since as far back as 11 million years ago. If so, that could signal that the South Atlantic Anomaly is not a trigger or precursor to the entire planet's magnetic field flipping, which is something that actually happens, if not for hundreds of thousands of years at a time. A more recent study published in 2024 found the SAA also has an impact on auroras seen on Earth. Obviously, huge questions remain, but with so much going on with this vast magnetic oddity, it's good to know the world's most powerful space agency is watching it as closely as they are. "Even though the SAA is slow-moving, it is going through some change in morphology, so it's also important that we keep observing it by having continued missions," said Sabaka. "Because that's what helps us make models and predictions." An earlier version of this article was published in August 2020. Related News Jaw-Dropping Image Reveals Dying Stars Entangled Like Serpents This Could Be The First Witnessed Birth of a Supermassive Black Hole Surprise Cosmic Clouds Likened to Finding Ice Cubes in a Volcano Solve the daily Crossword
Medscape
4 days ago
- Medscape
Younger, Smaller Children Show Less Success With ART
Younger children living with HIV with low BMI for their age were more likely than older children to fail first-line antiretroviral therapy (ART), based on new data from the ODYSSEY trial presented at the International AIDS Society Conference on HIV Science. Although the ODYSSEY trial showed superior efficacy of dolutegravir (DTG)-based treatment than standard of care, data on predictors of treatment failure in children starting ART on DTG-based regimens are limited, wrote James Wyncoll, PhD, medical statistician at University College London, London, England, and colleagues in their abstract. The researchers reviewed data on 381 children who started first-line ART: 189 with DTG and 192 with standard of care. Most of the children (82%) were in Africa, 13% were in Thailand, and 5% were in Europe. At baseline, the median age of the children was 10.5 years, and the median CD4 percentage was 20%. The median BMI-for-age z-score was -0.58, and 19% of the participants met the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for stage III/IV disease. The researchers considered the predictive values of baseline characteristics across four domains (anthropometrics, HIV indicators, hematology, and demographics) for treatment failure after 96 weeks. Overall, 75 children experienced treatment failure by 96 weeks, including 24 in the DTG group and 51 in the standard-of-care group. Fewer children treated with DTG experienced treatment failure and the risk declined with increasing age, the researchers wrote. However, predictors of treatment failure were not significantly different between treatment groups, they said. In the domain-specific models, after adjustment for weight and trial arm, independent and significant predictors of treatment failure included low BMI-for-age, low CD4%, WHO stage III/IV events, high neutrophils, and care at a location in Africa. In a multivariate analysis, DTG treatment, lower weight, CD4%, ongoing WHO stage III/IV events, and African region remained as significant predictors of treatment failure ( P < .1). Neutrophils were no longer significant after adjustment for ongoing WHO stage III/IV events, and BMI-for-age was no longer a significant predictor after adjustment for CD4% and region. 'The findings of this study can help clinicians by identifying characteristics at ART initiation which predict a child's risk of treatment failure,' Wyncoll told Medscape Medical News . This study provides information on predictors of treatment failure in children starting ART for the first time, including those starting DTG regimens, he said. Outside of clinical trials, adolescents receiving ART reportedly fared worse than younger children, but the current study showed that the risk for treatment failure declined with increasing age, Wyncoll said. 'We think it's likely that in trials, where participants have increased support, adolescents have good responses to treatment, and it is the youngest children who are at highest risk of treatment failure,' he noted. Reasons for greater treatment failure in younger children may include the need for different formulations, as well as the reliance on caregivers to administer the drugs, which can be difficult, he added. Both CD4% and BMI-for-age are previously recognized predictors of treatment failure. Takeaways and Next Steps The study's findings support previous research showing young age as a strong risk factor for treatment failure with ART, Wyncoll told Medscape Medical News. 'Even with early diagnosis and ART, other studies like the EARTH cohort and the LIFE trial show high mortality in the first 2 years of life, especially within the first 6 months,' he said. 'The EARTH study found that an adverse maternal social environment was linked to poorer outcomes and higher treatment failure in young children, emphasizing the need for strong, sustained support for mothers during pregnancy and early life of infants, including emotional and adherence support,' he noted. Screening for and preventing opportunistic infections such as tuberculosis and giving nutritional support is essential to promote treatment success, and baseline CD4 percentage can help identify children at highest risk for treatment failure, he said. The final model in the current study provides the basis for an online risk prediction tool for treatment failure, Wyncoll explained. Clinicians would enter a child's characteristics (such as treatment type, age, CD4%, and BMI for age) at ART initiation. 'Children are currently left behind when we consider novel treatment regimens,' Wyncoll said. 'Our work highlights the need for innovative approaches and more research into improved treatment for vulnerable children, such as different ART delivery methods or enhanced therapeutics,' he added. Although the researchers concluded that predictors of treatment failure for children in the DTG and SOC groups were the same, the findings were limited by the low rates of treatment failure for the children on DTG, Wyncoll told Medscape Medical News . 'Further research is needed using real-world data from children starting dolutegravir to consolidate these findings,' he said. Don't Discount DTG for Children Relatively few studies have examined risk factors for virologic failure in children with HIV, especially those on DTG, said Monica Gandhi, MD, director of the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Bay Area Center for AIDS Research and professor of medicine at UCSF, in an interview. The current study findings showing a lower CD4 count when initiating ART or ongoing advanced HIV (as represented by the WHO stage III/IV events) or lower weight when starting ART were all risk factors for failure and were not unexpected, Gandhi told Medscape Medical News . 'What was surprising was to see DTG-based ART more associated with failure than standard-of-care (SoC) ART, since DTG is more potent and durable in adults,' she said. The clinical takeaway is to try to start ART in children as soon as possible to avoid low CD4 counts or more advanced HIV on ART, both of which are risk factors for failure, Gandhi said. DTG-based ART should still be the standard of care among children, but additional research is need to determine into what kind of formulations work best younger ages, such as a dispersible tablet for oral suspension, she added.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Democratizing space' is more than just adding new players – it comes with questions around sustainability and sovereignty
'India is on the Moon,' S. Somanath, chairman of the Indian Space Research Organization, announced in August 2023. The announcement meant India had joined the short list of countries to have visited the Moon, and the applause and shouts of joy that followed signified that this achievement wasn't just a scientific one, but a cultural one. Over the past decade, many countries have established new space programs, including multiple African nations. India and Israel – nations that were not technical contributors to the space race in the 1960s and '70s – have attempted landings on the lunar surface. With more countries joining the evolving space economy, many of our colleagues in space strategy, policy ethics and law have celebrated the democratization of space: the hope that space is now more accessible for diverse participants. We are a team of researchers based across four countries with expertise in space policy and law, ethics, geography and anthropology who have written about the difficulties and importance of inclusion in space. Major players like the U.S., the European Union and China may once have dominated space and seen it as a place to try out new commercial and military ventures. Emerging new players in space, like other countries, commercial interests and nongovernmental organizations, may have other goals and rationales. Unexpected new initiatives from these newcomers could shift perceptions of space from something to dominate and possess to something more inclusive, equitable and democratic. We address these emerging and historical tensions in a paper published in May 2025 in the journal Nature, in which we describe the difficulties and importance of including nontraditional actors and Indigenous peoples in the space industry. Continuing inequalities among space players Not all countries' space agencies are equal. Newer agencies often don't have the same resources behind them that large, established players do. The U.S. and Chinese programs receive much more funding than those of any other country. Because they are most frequently sending up satellites and proposing new ideas puts them in the position to establish conventions for satellite systems, landing sites and resource extraction that everyone else may have to follow. Sometimes, countries may have operated on the assumption that owning a satellite would give them the appearance of soft or hard geopolitical power as a space nation – and ultimately gain relevance. In reality, student groups of today can develop small satellites, called CubeSats, autonomously, and recent scholarship has concluded that even successful space missions may negatively affect the international relationships between some countries and their partners. The respect a country expects to receive may not materialize, and the costs to keep up can outstrip gains in potential prestige. Environmental protection and Indigenous perspectives Usually, building the infrastructure necessary to test and launch rockets requires a remote area with established roads. In many cases, companies and space agencies have placed these facilities on lands where Indigenous peoples have strong claims, which can lead to land disputes, like in western Australia. Many of these sites have already been subject to human-made changes, through mining and resource extraction in the past. Many sites have been ground zero for tensions with Indigenous peoples over land use. Within these contested spaces, disputes are rife. Because of these tensions around land use, it is important to include Indigenous claims and perspectives. Doing so can help make sure that the goal of protecting the environments of outer space and Earth are not cast aside while building space infrastructure here on Earth. Some efforts are driving this more inclusive approach to engagement in space, including initiatives like 'Dark and Quiet Skies', a movement that works to ensure that people can stargaze and engage with the stars without noise or sound pollution. This movement and other inclusive approaches operate on the principle of reciprocity: that more players getting involved with space can benefit all. Researchers have recognized similar dynamics within the larger space industry. Some scholars have come to the conclusion that even though the space industry is 'pay to play,' commitments to reciprocity can help ensure that players in space exploration who may not have the financial or infrastructural means to support individual efforts can still access broader structures of support. The downside of more players entering space is that this expansion can make protecting the environment – both on Earth and beyond – even harder. The more players there are, at both private and international levels, the more difficult sustainable space exploration could become. Even with good will and the best of intentions, it would be difficult to enforce uniform standards for the exploration and use of space resources that would protect the lunar surface, Mars and beyond. It may also grow harder to police the launch of satellites and dedicated constellations. Limiting the number of satellites could prevent space junk, protect the satellites already in orbit and allow everyone to have a clear view of the night sky. However, this would have to compete with efforts to expand internet access to all. What is space exploration for? Before tackling these issues, we find it useful to think about the larger goal of space exploration, and what the different approaches are. One approach would be the fast and inclusive democratization of space – making it easier for more players to join in. Another would be a more conservative and slower 'big player' approach, which would restrict who can go to space. The conservative approach is liable to leave developing nations and Indigenous peoples firmly on the outside of a key process shaping humanity's shared future. But a faster and more inclusive approach to space would not be easy to run. More serious players means it would be harder to come to an agreement about regulations, as well as the larger goals for human expansion into space. Narratives around emerging technologies, such as those required for space exploration, can change over time, as people begin to see them in action. Technology that we take for granted today was once viewed as futuristic or fantastical, and sometimes with suspicion. For example, at the end of the 1940s, George Orwell imagined a world in which totalitarian systems used tele-screens and videoconferencing to control the masses. Earlier in the same decade, Thomas J. Watson, then president of IBM, notoriously predicted that there would be a global market for about five computers. We as humans often fear or mistrust future technologies. However, not all technological shifts are detrimental, and some technological changes can have clear benefits. In the future, robots may perform tasks too dangerous, too difficult or too dull and repetitive for humans. Biotechnology may make life healthier. Artificial intelligence can sift through vast amounts of data and turn it into reliable guesswork. Researchers can also see genuine downsides to each of these technologies. Space exploration is harder to squeeze into one streamlined narrative about the anticipated benefits. The process is just too big and too transformative. To return to the question if we should go to space, our team argues that it is not a question of whether or not we should go, but rather a question of why we do it, who benefits from space exploration and how we can democratize access to broader segments of society. Including a diversity of opinions and viewpoints can help find productive ways forward. Ultimately, it is not necessary for everyone to land on one single narrative about the value of space exploration. Even our team of four researchers doesn't share a single set of beliefs about its value. But bringing more nations, tribes and companies into discussions around its potential value can help create collaborative and worthwhile goals at an international scale. This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit, independent news organization bringing you facts and trustworthy analysis to help you make sense of our complex world. It was written by: Timiebi Aganaba, Arizona State University; Adam Fish, UNSW Sydney; Deondre Smiles, University of Victoria, and Tony Milligan, King's College London Read more: Astronomers have warned against colonial practices in the space industry − a philosopher of science explains how the industry could explore other planets without exploiting them Astronomers have warned against colonial practices in the space industry − a philosopher of science explains how the industry could explore other planets without exploiting them The Starbase rocket testing facility is permanently changing the landscape of southern Texas Tony Milligan receives funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Grant agreement No. 856543). Adam Fish, Deondre Smiles, and Timiebi Aganaba do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment. Solve the daily Crossword
