Meet America's new boss, Elon Musk
For a pathological narcissist, who recently pulled off the biggest political comeback of modern times, winning both the electoral college and the popular vote, and beating the rap in a string of court cases, such derision must be intolerable.
Bad enough, at any rate, for him to despatch his press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, to tell Fox News that 'President Trump is the leader of the Republican Party. Full stop'. As Ronald Reagan used to say: 'If you're explaining, you're losing'.
What is remarkable is that he continues to indulge Musk's power grabs and divisiveness. On Saturday, he intervened in an escalating row between Musk and hardcore MAGA nativists over skilled immigrant workers – on the side of the tech tycoon. 'I have many H-1B visas on my properties,' he told the New York Post . 'I've been a believer in H-1B. I have used it many times. It's a great program.'
It is probable that Trump was mixing up the H-1B scheme, which allows skilled workers to work for three years in the US and is cherished by the tech sector, with the H-2B programme, which is mostly used for domestic staff and gardeners. But the point of his remark was purely political – to settle a vicious argument within his own tribe, triggered by the appointment of Sriram Krishnan, an Indian-born venture capitalist, as his AI adviser.
On one side are Laura Loomer, the far right conspiracy theorist who was at Trump's side at key moments of the campaign; the ultra-conservative commentator, Ann Coulter; and Steve Bannon, his former chief strategist, who deplores the influence of tech tycoons upon the president-elect, insisting that 'you can't run a country by algorithm'.
On his War Room podcast last Friday, Bannon denounced the H-1B scheme as an absolute betrayal of America First ideology: 'This thing's a scam by the oligarchs in Silicon Valley to basically take jobs from American citizens, give them to what become indentured servants from foreign countries, and then pay them less'.
On the other side are the tech and venture capital titans who have recently swarmed around Mar-a-Lago, Trump's 'Dark Camelot' in Palm Beach, Florida. In a post on X on Saturday, Musk told his opponents to '[t]ake a big step back and FUCK YOURSELF in the face. I will go to war on this issue the likes of which you cannot possibly comprehend'.
More lucidly, but no less provocatively, his co-chair of the Department of Government Efficiency, Vivek Ramaswamy, attacked '[o]ur American culture [that] has venerated mediocrity over excellence for way too long… A culture that celebrates the prom queen over the math olympiad champ, or the jock over the valedictorian, will not produce the best engineers'. Well, that's most of Middle America told, then.
For more than 18 months, Trump campaigned ferociously on immigration and border policy, promising mass deportation of undocumented migrants and much stricter controls on legal incomers. And yet here he is, not yet in office, siding with the more liberal position on work visas taken by his new tech allies – led by Musk.
No less remarkably, the president-elect has allowed his sharp-elbowed adviser, a private citizen who has never held elected office, to bully Congress over an all-important funding bill that, if not passed, would have shut down the federal government over Christmas.
Last Wednesday, Musk posted more than 150 times to his 209.6 million followers on X about the original bill, declaring that any lawmaker who supported it 'deserves to be voted out in 2 years' – no empty threat from a man who just spent $277m supporting Trump and other GOP candidates.
In the process, he has utterly humiliated Mike Johnson, the Speaker of the House, who was reduced to claiming on Fox & Friends that 'I was communicating with Elon last night… Elon, Vivek and I are on a text chain together'.
To rub salt into the wound, a group of Republican lawmakers, led by the Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, have suggested that Johnson be replaced by Musk – since, technically, the Speaker is not required to be an elected representative. 'Nothing would disrupt the swamp more,' posted Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky.
In any case: Musk does not need to be Speaker to become the most powerful businessman in the history of the Republic. Of the Founding Fathers, John Adams was most fearful of such oligarchs, whom he called 'the few'.
In 1896, the mighty cartel of JP Morgan, Andrew Carnegie and John D Rockefeller engineered the election of president William McKinley. After his assassination, McKinley was replaced by Theodore Roosevelt, who, in contrast, was opposed to 'the men of swollen fortune' and determined that 'America must not be 'the civilization of a mere plutocracy, a banking-house, Wall-Street-syndicate civilization'.
Substitute 'Silicon Valley' for 'Wall Street' and witness Roosevelt's nightmare come true in Musk's hyper-capitalist ascendancy. He is not only one of the federal government's biggest contractors. He will now have sweeping power over its budget (which he and Ramaswamy plan to cut by 'at least $2tn') and huge influence over the regulations and procurement rules that shape his own businesses' fortunes. Since the election, his personal wealth has soared by 70% to $450bn.
What is the spell that Musk has cast over Trump? The president-elect has long been mesmerised by the sheer shininess, futurism and plutocracy that the tech colossus personifies. Four years ago, he spoke protectively of him in an interview with CNBC: 'I was worried about him, because he's one of our great geniuses, and we have to protect our genius – you know we have to protect Thomas Edison, and we have to protect all of these people that came up with originally the light bulb, and the wheel, and all of these things'.
This aura of cutting-edge dynamism and innovation has undoubtedly been politically useful to Trump – an optimistic counterbalance to his rhetoric of retribution, scapegoating and dread. Following Musk's lead, the giants of Silicon Valley have queued up to kiss the presidential ring.
Mark Zuckerberg, the chairman of Meta, Jeff Bezos, the founder of Amazon and Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI have each donated $1m to Trump's inauguration committee. The tech venture capitalist Marc Andreessen – one of Musk's closest collaborators – has been assisting the transition team at Mar-a-Lago, claiming in podcast interviews that 'it's morning in America'.
Musk, for his part, was not initially sold on Trump, telling CNBC in November 2016 that 'he doesn't seem to have the sort of character that reflects well on the United States'. As his biographer Walter Isaacson writes, he took a 'hopscotch path to the right', encouraged to give the new president a chance by his friend and fellow tech tycoon Peter Thiel.
When Trump withdrew the US from the Paris climate change agreement, Musk resigned in protest from two presidential advisory councils. At the time, he still regarded the 45th president as a joke: 'Trump might be one of the world's best bullshitters ever… If you just think of Trump as sort of a con-man performance, then his behaviour sort of makes sense'.
A pincer movement in his life – partly personal, partly professional – drove him to embrace the right ideologically, and, eventually, Trump as a candidate. His fixation with destroying what he calls the 'woke mind virus' reflected the breakdown of his relationship with his daughter Vivian Jenna Wilson, as she proceeded with her transition and cut off all ties with him.
Meanwhile, Musk was outraged by the restrictive measures taken all over the world during the pandemic, tweeting after his new plant in Shanghai was shut down in March 2020: 'The coronavirus panic is dumb'. He was soon describing lockdowns as 'fascist', and, in May of that year, urged his followers to 'take the red pill' – a metaphor borrowed by the right from the movie The Matrix to suggest awakening from left-liberal delusion to confront reality.
As late as November 2022, he told Isaacson: 'I'm not Trump's fan. He's disruptive. He's the world's champion of bullshit.' But when it became clear that the former president was going to win the Republican nomination, he ditched Ron DeSantis as his favoured candidate and went all in with the Big Orange. After Trump narrowly escaped assassination at Butler, Pennsylvania, on July 13, Musk posted: 'I fully endorse [him] and hope for his rapid recovery.'
The metamorphosis was complete: from a businessman happy to wait six hours in a queue to shake Barack Obama's hand to a ketamine-fuelled toddler prancing in a Dark MAGA baseball hat at Trump's rallies.
And Trump loved it. He welcomed Musk fully into his political inner sanctum and family life, giving him the run of Mar-a-Lago.
In his acceptance speech early on November 6, he raved about his new sidekick: 'Let me tell you, we have a new star. A star is born. Elon. Now he is, he's an amazing guy'.
The president-elect then proceeded – and not for the last time – to go into toe-curling detail about one of Musk's SpaceX rockets ('I saw it come down, and turn around, and it was, you know, it's like 22 storeys tall, by the way, it looks a little smaller than that, but it's big, and it came down and down, and you saw that fire burning and I said: 'Only Elon can do this, it must be an Elon'' etc etc).
Doubtless the real estate developer sees in Musk an interstellar version of himself, building rockets that are the next evolutionary step up from Trump Tower. And though he probably thinks Nietzsche is something you get on a bagel in Queen's, he also has a clear affinity with a man who shares his ruthless will to power.
The only question is how long it will take for the 47th president to weary of Musk. Such co-dependencies are, by their very nature, doomed, and soon curdle into resentment and rivalry. Trump, easily bored at the best of times, will not long tolerate being upstaged.
There are a host of issues that might be the pretext for the sundering – not least US policy on China, where Musk is a hero and has huge commercial interests (according to Bannon, 'he's owned by the Chinese Communist Party'). But their eventual falling out will be personal, not business, as the unstoppable ego finally collides with the immovable megalomaniac.
The twist in the tale is that unlike the many previous advisers and office holders that Trump has cast aside like toys, Musk will simply move on to his next deranged obsession. Already, he is trying to disfigure UK politics by giving Nigel Farage and Reform UK more money than any other party can match.
In Germany, he is backing the far Right AfD. And then there is the 2028 US presidential election to think about.
Trump can do plenty of damage in four years, but – unless he defies the constitution and seeks a third term – he will leave the Oval Office for the last time in January 2029, aged 82. Musk, on the other hand, is just getting started. Which country will he buy next?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
23 minutes ago
- BBC News
Shrewsbury in 'advanced talks' with new buyer
Shrewsbury Town chief executive Liam Dooley said the struggling League Two club is in advanced talks with a potential buyer.A takeover deal by an American multi-millionaire collapsed in March following a six-month exclusivity Harris, the owner of Welsh side The New Saints of Oswestry, had also expressed an interest in buying the club from long-serving owner and chairman Roland said the club now hopes to enter into a period of exclusivity with a prospective party "in the coming days and weeks". He told the club website, external: "Since the conclusion of our previous exclusivity agreement, the board has carefully reviewed numerous expressions of interest."The majority did not progress beyond our internal process, which requires prospective buyers to demonstrate both proof of funds and a credible plan for the club."Following this thorough due diligence, we are really excited to have now found a potential buyer who we are close to entering into an exclusivity period with."Dooley added the club was considering scrapping the director of football role after Micky Moore left by mutual consent on helped bring in eight players during the summer, but the Shrews sit 20th in League Two following their relegation last season."As a club we will now take a considered pause to reflect on our footballing structure," Dooley said."We're assessing what has worked well at other clubs and we will weigh up carefully whether to continue with a director of football model or return to a more traditional structure."Dooley said he would oversee transfers until the end of the current window alongside head coach Michael Appleton and the club's recruitment team."Until just a couple of weeks ago, the majority of our supporters rightly believed that recruitment had been strong and that we were well-positioned for the season ahead," he added."And while we understand supporters' frustrations with recent results, our belief in this squad remains firm. It is just a matter of the players clicking and adapting to the new philosophy that Michael is working hard to implement."
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Cristian Romero ends transfer speculation by signing new Tottenham contract
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
European leaders rush to US to help Ukraine avoid 'capitulation'
European leaders may have rushed to Washington ostensibly to throw a protective arm around President Zelensky and head off any repeat of February's Oval Office their real aim is to stop US President Donald Trump threatening long-term European security after his abrupt change of course over how best to end the war in only did Trump drop calls for a ceasefire as a prerequisite for talks about long-term peace, he also - diplomats say - made clear he had no intention of imposing further economic sanctions on short, the travelling European heads of government – plus EU and Nato leaders - want to avoid not just confrontation, but also capitulation. President Macron of France was the latest to use the C word, saying on Sunday: "There is only one state proposing a peace that would be a capitulation: Russia."Follow live updates on this storyIt takes a great deal for heads of government to upend their schedules at short notice – especially in August – when some are on holiday. The French leader was enjoying water sports on the Riviera. The Italian leader, Georgia Meloni, had been in such was the scale of President Trump's change of strategy after meeting President Putin – and the consequent potential threat to Europe – that the European leaders changed their plans say Meloni was first to invite herself along, followed closely by Macron, after which it became inevitable others would have to go leaders spent the weekend working the phones, holding no fewer than five separate group concern was Trump's decision to change the diplomatic goal posts after meeting the Russian leader in officials think the huge impact of these two decisions – which overturned months of western strategy – has been under-priced. Both moves shifted the US position more closely in Russia's favour. "Things have moved very significantly and quite quickly to a timetable that no one was expecting," one European official said."The US sees this as a moment to strike while the iron is hot. Our question is what are we trying to achieve here?"They added: "The European position has long been that Putin needs to show a genuine desire to get around a table and stop the war, and that would involve a ceasefire. But since Friday we have moved on from that. The question now is how we can get out of today without a blow-up. This is a moment of extreme jeopardy."The aim for European leaders, diplomats say, is to shift White House thinking on two the idea that peace can be achieved simply by Ukraine ceding the Donbas to Russia. And two, that this is not just about the future of Ukraine."This is fundamentally about the security of our continent," one British diplomat other words, any discussion about security guarantees – as part of a final deal – would be about ensuring the wider security of Europe and not just means convincing Trump of two things: one, that questions about territory and security guarantees cannot be separated, and two, that security guarantees must be about more than verbal or textual negotiators have talked about giving Ukraine as yet ill-defined Nato-style assurances that the west would come to Kyiv's aid against future Russian aggression."Nobody is clear what Trump means about a security guarantee," one official said."He believes that him simply saying to Putin "don't attack" is enough. That's not good enough for Ukraine or us." The Europeans, instead, are expected to argue that Ukraine's security will be guaranteed only by allowing its army to remain strong, with long-term and substantial allied military and financial would include American weapons bought by Europeans and gifted to Ukraine, plus continued Ukrainian access to US intelligence. By definition, all that would exclude Russian demands for the demilitarisation of risk for the Europeans today is that they push Trump too hard, that he thinks he is being bullied, and that the meetings go European delegation has been thrown together at the last is – one official said – "quite unwieldy", and some differ on how much Europe should commit to Ukraine's future role a future European-based "reassurance" force might play in a post-conflict Ukraine remains the European aim today may be to slow things down and calm fevered talk about land-swap deals that should really be part of the endgame of a some, that would be putting the cart before the the European leaders may look for progress on a possible trilateral summit with Trump, Zelensky and Putin; the carving out of some broad principles of any future deal; and how to have talks about talks deciding the location and framework of any above all, whether this can happen only when a ceasefire of sorts has been agreed.
