New Survey Reveals 83% of Users Prefer AI Search Over Traditional Google Searches
The survey findings come at a time when traditional search is experiencing notable disruption. According to data from Statcounter cited in the report, Google's global market share fell below 90% for the first time since 2015 in October 2024, with the growing popularity of AI-driven search tools like ChatGPT, Grok, and Perplexity AI likely contributing to this decline.
Key findings from the Innovating with AI survey include:
'AI snippets answer my questions more efficiently and equally accurately at least 75% of the time, and they're only going to improve,' said Rob Howard, CEO of Innovating with AI. 'This is a good thing for consumers, because there were tons of ethical problems with SEO content, which was often predicated on commissions from products featured on popular pages.'
The research indicates that AI search tools are gaining momentum by providing answers in plain language, summarizing complex information, and eliminating the need to navigate through pages of SEO-driven content. Traditional search engines are now responding by incorporating AI-generated summaries into their own results, with Google's AI overviews reaching 1.5 billion monthly active users.
However, the study also identifies challenges facing AI search adoption. The phenomenon of AI 'hallucinations'—where language models generate incorrect information—remains a significant concern. Research cited in the report shows that even advanced models can produce false information up to 33% of the time, leading some users to continue relying on traditional search for fact-critical queries.
Despite these challenges, industry experts interviewed for the study suggest that AI search represents an evolution rather than a replacement of traditional search methods. The technology excels at answering exploratory questions and summarizing unfamiliar topics, while traditional search maintains advantages for browsing current news and accessing specific sources.
The full survey report is available at: https://innovatingwithai.com/is-ai-search-replacing-traditional-search/
About
Innovating with AI is a premier publication dedicated to exploring the latest developments in artificial intelligence technology and its impact on business and society. Through in-depth analysis, original research, and expert insights, Innovating with AI helps readers understand and navigate the rapidly evolving AI landscape.
Media Contact
Full Name: Rob Howard
Title: CEO
Company Name: Innovating with AI
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: +1 (720) 900-1030
Website: https://innovatingwithai.com
Release ID: 89164998
In case of identifying any errors, concerns, or inconsistencies within the content shared in this press release that necessitate action or if you require assistance with a press release takedown, we strongly urge you to notify us promptly by contacting [email protected] (it is important to note that this email is the authorized channel for such matters, sending multiple emails to multiple addresses does not necessarily help expedite your request). Our expert team is committed to addressing your concerns within 8 hours by taking necessary actions diligently to rectify any identified issues or supporting you with the removal process. Delivering accurate and reliable information remains our top priority.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
26 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Your chats with Meta's AI might end up on Google — just like ChatGPT until it turned them off
OpenAI's ChatGPT raised some eyebrows this week when people realized that certain chats were able to be found by Google search. Although people had checked a box to share the chats publicly, it seemed likely that not everyone understood what they were doing. On Thursday, OpenAI said that it would stop having shared chats be indexed by Google. Meanwhile, Meta's stand-alone MetaAI app also allows users to share their chats — and it will continue to allow Google to index them, meaning that they can show up in a search. I did a bunch of Google searches and found lots of MetaAI conversations in the results. The Meta AI app, launched this spring, lets people share chats to a "Discover" feed. Google crawlers can "index" that feed and then serve up the results when people use Google search. So, for instance, if you do a site-specific search on Google for " and the keyword "balloons," you might come up with a chat someone had with the MetaAI bot about where to get the best birthday balloons — if that person tapped the button to allow the chat to be shared. As Business Insider reported in June, the Meta AI Discover feed had been full of examples of chats that seemed personal in nature — medical questions, specific career advice, relationship matters. Some contained identifying information like phone numbers, email addresses, or full names. Although all of these people did click to share, based on the personal nature of some of the chats, I could only guess that people might have misunderstood what it meant to share the conversation. After Business Insider wrote about this a few weeks ago, the Meta AI app made some tweaks to warn users more clearly about how the Discover feed works. Now, when you choose to share a conversation, you get a pop-up with the warning: "Conversations on feed are public so anyone can see them and engage." The additional warning seems to be working. Scrolling through the Discover feed, I now see mainly instances of people using it for image creation and far fewer accidental private text conversations (although there seemed to still be at least a few of those). Meanwhile, Daniel Roberts, a representative for Meta, confirmed that Meta AI chats that were shared to its Discover feed would continue to be indexed by Google. He reiterated the multi-step process I just described. For now, Meta AI can only be used via its mobile app, not the web. This might lead people to think that even the Discover feed exists as a sort of walled garden, separate from "the internet" and existing only within the Meta AI app. But posts from the Discover feed (and only those public posts) can be shared as links around the web — and that's where the Google indexing comes in. If this sounds slightly confusing, it is. That may also be confusing to users. Now, it's possible that some people really do want to share their AI chats with the general public, and are happy to have those chats show up on Google searches along with their Instagram or Facebook handles. But I'm still not sure I'd understand why anyone would want to share their interactions — or why anyone else would want to read them.
Forbes
26 minutes ago
- Forbes
Android Circuit: Galaxy Z Fold 7 Reviews, Nothing Phone (3) Controversy, Epic's Google Play Victory
Taking a look back at this week's news and headlines across the Android world, including Pixel 10 Pro pricing, Galaxy Z Fold 7 review, iPhone Fold's market impact, Nothing Phone (3)'s controversial redesign, Epic's Google Play victory, and Microsoft updates Windows 11's Android connectivity. Android Circuit is here to remind you of a few of the many discussions around Android in the last seven days. You can also read my weekly digest of Apple news here on Forbes. Pixel 10 And Pixel 10 Pro US Pricing Google will launch the Pixel 10 family later this month. The evolutionary handsets look to have small tweaks to the design, but there's one area that's going to remain unchanged. Google is keeping to the same prices as the Pixel 9 family, albeit with one option missing from the line-up: "As suspected, Google is dropping the 128 GB model for the Pixel 10 Pro XL. While it was not listed in European pricing, there was a question whether this was a regional quirk, but with European, US, and Canadian pricing all missing the 128 GB option, the higher starting price on the Pixel 10 Pro XL is because there's no 128 GB to 128 GB comparison possible. However, note that the 256 GB to 256 GB price is matched from the Pixel 9 Pro XL." (Forbes). Galaxy Z Fold 7 Review Samsung's latest foldable brings several changes from last year's model, including upgraded hardware and software in the camera, a new OLED screen, a lower profile and weight reduction. And they all add up to something significant. For many reviewers, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 is now a practical if expensive option for consumers: "For the first time, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 feels like a viable alternative to a flat phone, at least in terms of hardware. The new design is as thin and light as many flat phones, and the cover display is large enough to do anything you'd do on non-foldable devices. Plus, you have a tablet-sized display on the inside with serious multitasking chops. We lament the loss of S Pen support, but it was probably necessary to address the chunkiness of past foldables." (Ars Technica). The iPhone Fold And The Galaxy Z Samsung has another advantage in the current crop of foldables… Apple's iPhone Fold. Tim Cook's move into the origami world, but the potential of this iPhone os going to boost the market this year: "While the Galaxy handsets go on sale today, Apple's iPhone Fold is not expected until September 2026 at the earliest. If there's one thing that many who buy at the top end of the technology portfolios are known for, it's a magpie-like fascination with anything shiny and new. If it's there, they want it right now. There's no iPhone Fold right now, but there is the Galaxy Z Fold 7 that's ready for purchase." (Forbes). Nothing Phone (3)'s Controversial Changes Nothing Tech's CEO Carl Pei is pushing back against the reviews of the Nothing Phone 3. Many are picking out the lower specification chipset and the stripping away of the unique design elements all taking price against a rising price and the perception of 'gimmick' additions to the interface: "That encapsulates the Phone 3 as a whole. It's a fine Android phone, and one whose design stands out from the crowd. But flagship phones need to be great on all fronts. The Phone 3 is good enough at most things, but lacks a special trick that might set it apart from better-known smartphone competitors. The Glyph Matrix, at least in its current form, isn't that." (Bloomberg). Epic Wins Google Play Store Appeal Google has lost an appeal in its ongoing legal battles with Epic Games and must change how it approaches partnerships between manufacturers and the Google Play Store ecosystem: "The ruling by the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals on Thursday means the Google Play store will need to lift restrictions that prevent app developers from setting up rival marketplaces and billing systems. The injunction against Google has been on hold since last year during the appeal. (Bloomberg). And Finally... Microsoft has updated its Windows 11 desktop app that links to your Android smartphone with more features and utility added to both sides of the connection: We've reimagined the Link to Windows app as a connected PC experience hub — a central place where you can access, share, and control content between your Android phone and Windows PC. [Including] Recent activity, PC at a glance and Remote actions." (Microsoft). Android Circuit rounds up the news from the Android world every weekend here on Forbes. Don't forget to follow me so you don't miss any coverage in the future, and of course, read the sister column in Apple Loop! Last week's Android Circuit can be found here, and if you have any news and links you'd like to see featured in Android Circuit, get in touch!
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal Reserve economists aren't sold that AI will actually make workers more productive, saying it could be a one-off invention like the light bulb
A new Federal Reserve Board staff paper concludes that generative artificial intelligence (genAI) holds significant promise for boosting U.S. productivity, but cautions that its widespread economic impact will depend on how quickly and thoroughly firms integrate the technology. Titled 'Generative AI at the Crossroads: Light Bulb, Dynamo, or Microscope?' the paper, authored by Martin Neil Baily, David M. Byrne, Aidan T. Kane, and Paul E. Soto, explores whether genAI represents a fleeting innovation or a groundbreaking force akin to past general-purpose technologies (GPTs) such as electricity and the internet. The Fed economists ultimately conclude their 'modal forecast is for a noteworthy contribution of genAI to the level of labor productivity,' but caution they see a wide range of plausible outcomes, both in terms of its total contribution to making workers more productive and how quickly that could happen. To return to the light-bulb metaphor, they write that 'some inventions, such as the light bulb, temporarily raise productivity growth as adoption spreads, but the effect fades when the market is saturated; that is, the level of output per hour is permanently higher but the growth rate is not.' Here's why they regard it as an open question whether genAI may end up being a fancy tech version of the light bulb. GenAI: a tool and a catalyst According to the authors, genAI combines traits of GPTs—those that trigger cascades of innovation across sectors and continue improving over time—with features of 'inventions of methods of invention' (IMIs), which make research and development (R&D) more efficient. The authors do see potential for genAI to be a GPT like the electric dynamo, which continually sparked new business models and efficiencies, or an IMI like the compound microscope, which revolutionized scientific discovery. The Fed economists did cautioning that it is early in the technology's development, writing 'the case that generative AI is a general-purpose technology is compelling, supported by the impressive record of knock-on innovation and ongoing core innovation.' Since OpenAI launched ChatGPT in late 2022, the authors said genAI has demonstrated remarkable capabilities, from matching human performance on complex tasks to transforming frontline work in writing, coding, and customer service. That said, the authors said they're finding scant evidence about how many companies are actually using the technology. Limited but growing adoption Despite such promise, the paper stresses that most gains are so far concentrated in large corporations and digital-native industries. Surveys indicate high genAI adoption among big firms and technology-centric sectors, while small businesses and other functions lag behind. Data from job postings shows only modest growth in demand for explicit AI skills since 2017. 'The main hurdle is diffusion,' the authors write, referring to the process by which a new technology is integrated into widespread use. They note that typical productivity booms from GPTs like computers and electricity took decades to unfold as businesses restructured, invested, and developed complementary innovations. 'The share of jobs requiring AI skills is low and has moved up only modestly, suggesting that firms are taking a cautious approach,' they write. 'The ultimate test of whether genAI is a GPT will be theprofitability of genAI use at scale in a business environment and such stories are hard to come by at present.' They know that many individuals are using the technology, 'perhaps unbeknownst to their employers,' and they speculate that future use of the technology may become so routine and 'unremarkable' that companies and workers no longer know how much it's being used. Knock-on and complementary technologies The report details how genAI is already driving a wave of product and process innovation. In healthcare, AI-powered tools draft medical notes and assist with radiology. Finance firms use genAI for compliance, underwriting, and portfolio management. The energy sector uses it to optimize grid operations, and information technology is seeing multiples uses, with programmers using GitHub Copilot completing tasks 56% faster. Call center operators using conversational AI saw a 14% productivity boost as well. Meanwhile, ongoing advances in hardware, notably rapid improvements in the chips known as graphics processing units, or GPUs, suggest genAI's underlying engine is still accelerating. Patent filings related to AI technologies have surged since 2018, coinciding with the rise of the Transformer architecture—a backbone of today's large language models. 'Green shoots' in research and development The paper also finds genAI increasingly acting as an IMI, enhancing observation, analysis, communication, and organization in scientific research. Scientists now use genAI to analyze data, draft research papers, and even automate parts of the discovery process, though questions remain about the quality and originality of AI-generated output. The authors highlight growing references to AI in R&D initiatives, both in patent data and corporate earnings calls, as further evidence that genAI is gaining a foothold in the innovation ecosystem. Cautious optimism—and open questions While the prospects for a genAI-driven productivity surge are promising, the authors warn against expecting overnight transformation. The process will require significant complementary investments, organizational change, and reliable access to computational and electric power infrastructure. They also emphasize the risks of investing blindly in speculative trends—a lesson from past tech booms. 'GenAI's contribution to productivity growth will depend on the speed with which that level is attained, and historically, the process for integrating revolutionary technologies into the economy is a protracted one,' the report concludes. Despite these uncertainties, the authors believe genAI's dual role—as a transformative platform and as a method for accelerating invention—bodes well for long-term economic growth if barriers to widespread adoption can be overcome. Still, what if it's just another light bulb? For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
