logo
March Madness 2025 betting, odds, lines: Three key storylines for the NCAA tournament

March Madness 2025 betting, odds, lines: Three key storylines for the NCAA tournament

Yahoo17-03-2025

[Full NCAA tournament bracket revealed | Printable bracket]
Selection Sunday has passed, the 2025 NCAA tournament bracket has been released and it's officially March Madness. As usual, there were several surprises during the bracket reveal (Indiana? Didn't make it. North Carolina? Squeezed in to the First Four on Tuesday and are four-point favorites against San Diego State), but we're here to talk betting — and specifically some of the notable storylines coming out of the opening odds.
Here are three storylines that stood out after the bracket was revealed and sportsbooks put up their Round 1 odds:
The Auburn Tigers are the No. 1 overall seed, according to the selection committee, but it's another No. 1 seed — the Florida Gators at +350 odds — who are the betting favorites to win March Madness at BetMGM, followed by the No. 1 seeded Duke Blue Devils (+360), Auburn (+400) and No. 1 seed Houston (+600). Two-time defending champion UConn is a No. 8 seed and 50-1 to win it all again at BetMGM.
'We're definitely rooting against St. John's,' Thomas Gable, BetMGM sportsbook director at The Borgata in Atlantic City, told Yahoo Sports on Sunday night. 'They've been extremely popular and we have a lot of liability on them. They were 50-1 through the vast majority of the season and 25-1 going into the conference tournament. Houston has been in single digits, but we've built up a little bit of liability on them. We do have liability on Duke, but if Auburn or Florida wins, we're in great shape.'
Duke and Auburn are tied at +350 for the best title odds at DraftKings Sportsbook, while at several sportsbooks nationally and in Las Vegas, the Blue Devils are the favorites. Houston is the team with the highest power rating according to Bart Torvik, while Ken Pom has Duke clearly as the top squad in the nation.
I spoke with three different oddsmakers on Sunday evening and all of them had Duke as their highest power-rated team, with one making Duke a 3.5-point favorite over his No. 2 team, Florida, on a neutral court.
The biggest futures wager I've heard so far is a $100,000 wager at BetMGM on Florida at +900 odds. That bet would pay $900,000 if the Gators end up cutting down the nets.
Here are a couple other notable futures wagers at Caesars:
A New York bettor wagered $1,000 on Georgia (750-1) to win the NCAA championship for a potential $750,000 win
A Nevada bettor wagered $300 on UC-San Diego (1,000-1) to win the NCAAchampionship for a potential $330,000 win
A Colorado bettor wagered $10,000 on Houston (22-1) to win the NCAA championship for a potential $220,000 win
A Nevada bettor wagered $30,000 on Auburn (+350) to win the NCAA championship for a potential $105,000 win
An Arizona bettor wagered $10,000 on UConn (+900) to win the NCAA championship for a potential $90,000 win
[Yahoo Fantasy Bracket Mayhem is back: Enter for a shot to win up to $50K]
Favorites ended up going 18-3-1 against the spread in Round 1 last year, and there were eight games in which a higher-seeded team closed as a favorite.
This year, there were only two of those games with opening lines that fit the latter mold — No. 12 Colorado State (-2.5) vs. No. 5 Memphis, and No. 9 Baylor (-1.5) vs. No. 8 Mississippi State — and the Baylor-Mississippi State game had already moved to pick 'em at several Las Vegas books Sunday night.
Underdogs had quite a first round in last year's NCAA tournament. There were 11 outright upsets in 32 overall games — including No. 13 Yale (+14) over No. 4 Auburn, and No. 14 Oakland (+13.5) over No. 3 Kentucky — which was tied for the third most in a single year in the Round of 64, according to ESPN Stats & Information. But it was a very easy (and profitable) go of it for the top three seeds, which went 11-1 straight up and 10-1-1 ATS in the first round.
Here is the SU/ATS records for teams in Round 1 of the 2024 NCAA tournament, sorted by seed:
No. 1 seeds: 4-0 SU/4-0 ATS
No. 2 seeds: 4-0 SU/3-0-1 ATS
No. 3 seeds: 3-1 SU/3-1 ATS
No. 4 seeds: 3-1 SU/2-2 ATS
No. 5 seeds: 2-2 SU/1-3 ATS
No. 6 seeds: 1-3 SU/1-3 ATS
No. 7 seeds: 3-1 SU/3-1 ATS
No. 8 seeds: 1-3 SU/1-3 ATS
After all those upsets in the first round last year, though, favorites went a remarkable 15-1 SU and 11-5 ATS in the Round of 32. What will this year hold?
There is always plenty of line movement in March Madness spreads on Sunday night, as some sportsbooks open odds before others and offer higher limits. Two of the sportsbooks in Las Vegas known to open early and cater to respected action are the South Point and the Westgate Las Vegas SuperBook. I spoke to Chris Andrews, sportsbook director at the South Point, on Sunday night and these were the five games he received sharp action on and moved the lines:
No. 14 Montana +23 to +16 vs. No. 3 Wisconsin
No. 15 Omaha +21 to +18 vs. No. 2. St. John's
No. 13 Yale +10 to +7.5 vs. No. 4 Texas A&M
No. 14 UNC-Wilmington +18 to +15 vs. No. 3 Texas Tech
No. 8 UConn -2 to -4.5 vs. No. 9 Oklahoma
Respected bettors at the SuperBook took positions on No. 1 Houston -28, No. 8 Mississippi State +1, No. 15 Bryant +18.5, No. 13 Akron +14 and No. 14 Troy +11, in addition to No. 11 Xavier -1.5 in Wednesday's First Four game against Texas.
The biggest line move at the BetMGM sportsbook at The Borgata was No. 8 Gonzaga steaming up as a favorite against No. 9 Georgia.
'Gonzaga got hit here very fast,' Gable said. 'I opened them -4.5, took a couple limit bets right away and we're up to -6.5.'
One other interesting line is No. 5 Michigan, winners of the Big Ten tournament, installed as a 3.5-point favorite over No. 12 UC-San Diego — a line that had already gone down to -2.5 on Sunday night. However, maybe even more interesting is that Gable actually makes UCSD a 1-point favorite by his numbers.
'UCSD is going to be a popular 'dog," Gable said. "We opened at Michigan -3.5, now down to -2.5, and I wouldn't be surprised if this goes a little bit lower.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

LSU's Opening Round Opponent Revealed
LSU's Opening Round Opponent Revealed

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

LSU's Opening Round Opponent Revealed

LSU's Opening Round Opponent Revealed originally appeared on Athlon Sports. The LSU Tigers and Arkansas Razorbacks are set to square off in the opening round of the Men's College World Series this weekend. Advertisement After knocking off West Virginia in two games, the Tigers advanced to their 20th Men's College World Series. They're set to take on the highest remaining seed, the Arkansas Razorbacks, in the first round on Saturday night. Jay JohnsonVasha Hunt With Super Regionals officially over, the NCAA announced the schedule for the first round of the Men's College World Series on Monday afternoon. The Tigers and Razorbacks, the two top seeds left in the tournament, will be the final game of the first round with the first pitch being thrown at 6 p.m. CT on Saturday. Here's the full first round schedule: It seems a bit flawed that the two top remaining seeds have to go head-to-head in the first round, but since they don't reseed once they reach Omaha, that's what has transpired. One of the top-two seeds in MCWS will start with a loss and be on the back foot the rest of the way. Advertisement Winning game one will be paramount, which is why I would expect Anthony Eyanson or Kade Anderson to start. If the Tigers can take game one, all they need to do to reach the MCWS finals is win two more games in a row. If they lose game two like they did in 2023, they'll still have to win three in a row, but that's much better than losing game one, where they'd have to win four games in a row to advance to the finals. This game could go a long ways to deciding who wins the championship. One of the top-two teams left will have an incredibly tough road to win it all while the other will control its own destiny out the gates. Related: The LSU Tigers Are Headed to Omaha Related: Paul Skenes Decimates Philadelphia in 2-1 Win This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.

The road ahead after the NCAA settlement comes with risk, reward and warnings
The road ahead after the NCAA settlement comes with risk, reward and warnings

NBC Sports

time2 hours ago

  • NBC Sports

The road ahead after the NCAA settlement comes with risk, reward and warnings

ORLANDO, Fla. — Two days after the approval of a groundbreaking $2.8 billion antitrust settlement, thousands of athletic directors and department personnel traveled to Orlando, Florida, for the annual National Association of Collegiate Directors of Athletics convention. The hot topic, of course, was the influx of changes both threatening and beneficial for schools across the country. According to NCAA President Charlie Baker, approval of the settlement may be the biggest change in college sports history. On July 1, schools that opt in to the settlement will embark on a new era of revenue sharing, changing the game both on and off the field. Rewards A handful of convention attendees breathed a sigh of relief on Friday night when U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken announced her decision. It's a quick turnaround and a period of trial and error is anticipated, but Division I athletic directors welcomed the news. 'The best thing is clarity,' UCLA athletic director Martin Jarmond said. 'The best thing about July 1 is we now have clarity on the rules of engagement, what we're allowed to do, how we can move forward. Does it solve everything? No, it doesn't. But when you have clarity, you can operate more efficiently and effectively.' Kentucky AD Mitch Barnhart was relieved to get the agreement in hand. 'We've been trying for so long to be part of this,' Barnhart said. 'Maybe, just maybe, on July 1, we'll sort of all know where we are on this one.' Barnhart added that the College Sports Commission, an entity that will enforce compliance and set market value for NIL deals, will be a major positive. 'The College Sports Commission and the way that is coming around gives us guardrails and enforcement in a way that we can move forward collectively, together, for college sports,' Barnhart said. Risks In a settlement where high-revenue sport athletes have the most to gain, Title IX has emerged as a topic to watch. The 75-15-5-5 formula has emerged as a popular revenue-sharing formula, meaning that schools are likely to allocate 75% of revenue-share funds to football, 15% to men's basketball, 5% to women's basketball and the remaining 5% dispersed to other programs. If a school spent the full $20.5 million allowed this coming year, that would mean a breakdown of $15.4 million for football, $3.1 million for men's hoops and about $1 million each for women's hoops and everyone else. Montoya Ho-Song, an attorney for Ackerman LLP who specializes in higher education issues, expects Title IX lawsuits to come, just like one filed this week by eight female athletes. The area has shifted again under President Donald Trump, with guidance suggesting the federal government won't hold schools to rigid requirements to distribute proceeds equitably between men and women. 'There are definitely going to be legal challenges related to this revenue-sharing model. I always tell my clients, look, your student athletes' perceptions are their reality. If they think that they are not being treated equally, they will raise those concerns,' Ho-Song said. She warned that the 75-15-5-5 formula shouldn't be a one size fits all and suggested dividing revenue based on how it comes in isn't a valid argument. The majority of rev-share funds going to football and basketball programs, especially when coupled with losing records, will inevitably stir the pot. 'Just because there is a 75-15-5-5 budget breakdown, that does not mean that that's going to work on all campuses,' she said. 'The analysis under Title IX is making sure that it is available and everyone has the same type of access to non-grant funds. So, you do have to figure out a way to creatively divvy up those funds, but always keep in mind, if someone feels as if they're not being treated correctly, then that is always a legal risk.' Warnings Attorney Mit Winter, a college sports law specialist with Kennyhertz Perry, said it is paramount that athletic departments present an organized, united front. Since the launch of name, image, and likeness compensation four years ago, Winter said, he has encountered several instances where athletic departments are giving conflicting statements and numbers to current and prospective athletes. That can lead to legal headaches, too. 'You need to have a plan that everyone is on board with and that everyone knows,' Winter said. 'As a school, you don't want to have a situation where five different people are talking to an athlete about how much they're going to pay him or her. I think that needs to be much more formalized. The coach, assistant coaches, GM, everybody needs to be on the same page.' St. Bonaventure men's basketball general manager Adrian Wojnarowski and coach Mark Schmidt know exactly what their roles are — and aren't. 'I will never talk to a player or a parent or an agent about playing time, their role,' Wojnarowski said. 'During the season, if someone is disappointed in playing time and they call, the only conversation I'm having with a family member is supporting the head coach, supporting the coaching staff. And in the end, that's a conversation for their son to have with the head coach. Then economically, we have to have one clear message in negotiations and finances.' Impacts There are concerns that the revenue-sharing era will have multiple impacts on college rosters. Few athletic directors were willing to talk in any detail about plans for their campuses, but some of the moves have already begun in the search for more money to fulfill the details of the NCAA settlement: UTEP dropped women's tennis, Cal Poly discontinued swimming and diving, Marquette added women's swimming and Grand Canyon shuttered its men's volleyball program. The athletic director at Cal noted the school expects to lose about 100 athletes. Just how many of the so-called non-revenue sports — the ones that often feed U.S. Olympic teams — will be affected is also a concern. And many programs will need to find a niche that works for them, even if that means not consistently contending for national championships.

U.S. Open leader J.J. Spaun is not betting favorite after 18 holes. Instead it's Jon Rahm
U.S. Open leader J.J. Spaun is not betting favorite after 18 holes. Instead it's Jon Rahm

USA Today

time3 hours ago

  • USA Today

U.S. Open leader J.J. Spaun is not betting favorite after 18 holes. Instead it's Jon Rahm

U.S. Open leader J.J. Spaun is not betting favorite after 18 holes. Instead it's Jon Rahm The 125th U.S. Open has 18 holes in the books, with many of the first rounds stretching well past five hours on the Oakmonster, Oakmont Country Club. J.J. Spaun leads after his bogey-free 4-under 66 on Thursday. Thriston Lawrence is a shot back at 3 under and there's a three-way tie for third at 2 under among a pair of Koreans, Si Woo Kim and Sungjae Im, as well as two-time U.S. Open champ Brooks Koepka. You may be inclined to believe that Spaun is the betting favorite after one round, but that's not how BetMGM has things stacked up. Scottie Scheffler opened the week as the runaway betting favorite at +275 but he's slid into the second spot at +650, now that he's seven shots off the lead. Jon Rahm, who opened with a 1-under 69, has moved into the top spot as the betting favorite after 18 holes. The 2021 U.S. Open champ will start his Friday round five shots off the lead. Betting favorites at 2025 U.S. Open after the first round Jon Rahm, 1 under, +550 Scottie Scheffler, 3 over, +650 Brooks Koepka, 2 under, +1100 J.J. Spaun, 4 under, +1200 Collin Morikawa, even, +1400 Bryson DeChambeau, 3 over, +1800 Si Woo Kim, 2 under +2000 Sungjae Im, 2 under +2000 Ben Griffin, 1 under +2500 Jordan Spieth, even +2800 We see you, those of you taking a long, hard look at Spieth's name right there. And if you were curious what the odds are on the guy in solo second at 3 under after one round, how does +5000 sound? Odds at BetMGM as of 9:20 p.m. ET on Thursday. Gannett may earn revenue from sports betting operators for audience referrals to betting services. Sports betting operators have no influence over nor are any such revenues in any way dependent on or linked to the newsrooms or news coverage. Terms apply, see operator site for Terms and Conditions. If you or someone you know has a gambling problem, help is available. Call the National Council on Problem Gambling 24/7 at 1-800-GAMBLER (NJ, OH), 1-800-522-4700 (CO), 1-800-BETS-OFF (IA), 1-800-9-WITH-IT (IN). Must be 21 or older to gamble. Sports betting and gambling are not legal in all locations. Be sure to comply with laws applicable where you reside.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store