logo
Senate Republicans weigh billions of dollars in spending cuts

Senate Republicans weigh billions of dollars in spending cuts

USA Today16-07-2025
On Wednesday's episode of The Excerpt podcast: Senate Republicans are considering billions in cuts, targeting programs from public broadcasting to global health initiatives. USA TODAY National Immigration and Border Reporter Lauren Villagran discusses some of the new lengths immigrants are going to for legal fee fundraising. USA TODAY Breaking News Reporter Karissa Waddick takes a look at reparations for atom bomb victims 80 years after the Trinity Test. We take a look at the collision that created the biggest black hole merger yet. The Emmy nominations are here. Who got snubbed?
Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.
Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here
Taylor Wilson:
Good morning. I'm Taylor Wilson, and today is Wednesday, July 16th, 2025. This is USA TODAY's The Excerpt. Today Senate Republicans weigh billions of dollars in spending cuts, plus hear how some immigrants are raising funds to cover legal expenses. And after 80 years, Trinity test atom bomb victims will receive reparations.

Senate Republicans are weighing billions in spending cuts targeting programs from PBS to global health initiatives in response to a request from President Donald Trump. The proposal to claw back about $9 billion in federal funding reflects a portion of the cuts pursued by the Department of Government Efficiency. The bill currently under consideration would impact the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which funds NPR and PBS, and foreign aid agencies, including the World Health Organization and US Agency for International Development. Lawmakers have until Friday before Trump's request officially expires and current funding remains in place. From GoFundMe to OnlyFans, immigrants are going to new lengths to raise funds to cover legal fees. I spoke with USA TODAY National Immigration and Border Reporter Lauren Villagran for more. Thanks for joining me, Lauren.
Lauren Villagran:
Thanks Taylor.
Taylor Wilson:
All right. So just starting with this, how are immigrants turning to GoFundMe to pay for deportation defense? And why is this necessary?
Lauren Villagran:
This is something I've been watching for a while, from the very beginning of the ramped up enforcement that we've seen under the administration of President Donald Trump. But in the past few months, it really does seem to have accelerated. You're seeing more fundraising, more frequent campaigns, and larger sums of money. A USA TODAY analysis of GoFundMe fundraising campaigns this year found nearly 100 different campaigns set up by the loved ones of people detained by ICE, or community members, raising in just the last three or four months, $1.7 million.
Taylor Wilson:
All right. And how about OnlyFans? I know there's, I guess, a similar approach that we're seeing there.
Lauren Villagran:
I met a man who was visiting his wife, who was detained in South Florida by ICE and sent to a Louisiana detention center. And they, like many immigrant families around the country, are struggling under the weight of the cost of deportation defense and the legal process to stay in the country. They went to OnlyFans, the adult content site. The husband, who wishes to remain anonymous, as does his wife, who is from Colombia, decided to upload some of their own personal content and photos of her to the adult content site in hopes of generating subscriptions that could help pay her bond.
Taylor Wilson:
Lauren, you write that public generosity to the fundraisers appears to be growing as the president's mass deportation campaign has intensified. I guess these folks are having some success raising money in this way?
Lauren Villagran:
So there was definitely a marked difference between fundraisers started in June and July on GoFundMe versus those from April and May, which generated in some cases sort of lower level of funding. In June and July, you start to see fundraisers get over $100,000 in donations. I spoke with one advocate in Kentucky who was looking to raise money for the defense of a young man, a recent high school graduate. He was a refugee. He was here in the country legally, and was still picked up by ice. She decided to hit send on the GoFundMe campaign, and within 48 hours had raised more than $20,000 for him. He was eventually released back into his community, but it certainly something that family members, loved one's, community members are looking to do, because Taylor, bond can range from $1,500 to over $10,000.
Taylor Wilson:
Lauren, what else do you hear from migrants about their fundraising experiences in some of these spaces?
Lauren Villagran:
So US Immigration and Customs Enforcement under the Trump administration has prioritized for arrest anyone who is in the country illegally, and in some cases those who may be in a legal process but without firm status. There's a variety of stories. Everything from the student who had recently graduated high school to a Mexican father of 11 who was picked up on the way to his drywall business in North Carolina. He was eventually released. GoFundMe helped him get the $4,000 he needed to pay that bond. And then in the case of this couple, the American man from South Florida and his Colombian wife, well, it's a shot in the dark, but they are turning to essentially an adult content site. So the desperation is real among some of these families. The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment on fundraising for legal defense for immigrants from USA TODAY, but the department has been very clear about the scope of its enforcement.
Taylor Wilson:
Did you hear from GoFundMe or OnlyFans about their respective roles in these spaces?
Lauren Villagran:
We did not hear back from OnlyFans. We know really of only one immigrant detained woman who is using the site for this purpose at this point. GoFundMe declined to comment on any increase in fundraising related to immigration defense, but did work with USA TODAY to verify more than a dozen accounts related to immigration detention fundraising.
Taylor Wilson:
All right. Lauren Villagran covers the border and immigration for USA TODAY. Listeners can find a link to the full version of this story in today's show notes. Thank you, Lauren.
Lauren Villagran:
Thanks Taylor.

Taylor Wilson:
Today marks 80 years since the Trinity test. And more Americans are now eligible for compensation for health problems linked to radiation exposure from the Atomic Weapons Program. I spoke with USA TODAY Breaking News Reporter Karissa Waddick to learn more. Karissa, thanks for joining me today.
Karissa Waddick:
Yeah, thanks for having me.
Taylor Wilson:
Let's go back to the Trinity test. What kind of exposure did folks in this area face?
Karissa Waddick:
So the Trinity test, as you know, was the first time a nuclear bomb was ever detonated. It was detonated in an area of New Mexico that scientists thought was pretty remote, pretty isolated from people, and they chose the location because of the relatively predictable wind patterns. They also kept the test completely secret, even to residents in the area. And so there are a lot of stories out there of people who heard the thunderous roar that morning, July the 16th 1945. And the flash of light, and they looked from their yards, and they saw this giant mushroom cloud in the sky. And they had no clue what it was. The reports talk about this flower-like debris falling on everything. And that was actually radioactive material. It fell into crops, into water supplies, onto laundry lines, everything. So people ingested these radioactive materials and became sick years later. Within the next couple of decades, people living in these areas of New Mexico, within 40 or so miles of the test site became sick with rare forms of cancer and other serious illnesses.
Taylor Wilson:
So Karissa, the government publicly downplayed the potential consequences of the nuclear bomb test for people in this area, right? I mean, how so?
Karissa Waddick:
They kept it completely secret. Nobody was told before it happened, and nobody knew really what it was until after the US dropped the atomic bomb a month later on Hiroshima in Japan. The day of the test, the military said the explosion involved pyrotechnics. But in the initial reports after the test, there was this physicist who was in charge of the safety aspects for personnel on site. And he said in a letter to one of the military officials that radiation was found near homes. He recommended that the next test be conducted at least 150 miles away from populated areas. And to give some context on that, hundreds of thousands of people lived within the 150-mile range of the Trinity test. And so it wasn't until 1979, it was actually elite Senator Edward Kennedy from Massachusetts who said during a hearing in Congress that the federal government had minimized the effect of the fallout from the Trinity test for years. And some of these reports came out.
Taylor Wilson:
Who did you speak with for this story Karissa, and what did you take away from those conversations?
Karissa Waddick:
I spoke with some descendants of people who live in the Tularosa Basin in New Mexico, which was about 40 miles away from the test site. There's this one woman, Edna K. Hinkle, her father Jess, who is still alive, he's 94 years old. He lived in the Tularosa Basin, and he was 14 years old when the bomb went off. Fast-forward years later, and at least 25 members of Hinkle's family descended from her father and his five siblings have had some form of cancer, from thyroid cancer to stomach cancer, breast cancer, skin cancer. Edna, she had beat breast cancer, and had seven skin cancers, and had her thyroid removed at the recommendation of a doctor who said that it was better to remove it in case it became cancerous later.
Taylor Wilson:
A measure in the recently enacted Republican tax bill expands who is eligible for a program that compensates people who have health problems linked to radiation exposure from the Atomic Weapons Program. What can you tell us about this recent development?
Karissa Waddick:
You're exactly right. Congress passed the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act a couple of decades ago, but it previously only applied to people who are living in certain parts of Nevada, Utah, and Arizona. And it didn't include people who are impacted by the Trinity test in New Mexico, or some uranium miners who are living on Navajo lands in Arizona and some other areas. So the new law expands the number of people who are eligible to a slew of new states. It includes all of Utah, New Mexico and Idaho, and more people living in Nevada, Arizona, Missouri, Tennessee, Kentucky, and Alaska. And it also includes a number of other people who worked in uranium mines as well throughout the later part of the 20th century. And the new act also increases the amount of compensation, so people who are eligible could receive up to $100,000 from the federal government for the health related problems that were linked to the exposure.
Taylor Wilson:
All right. Well, I want to get a better sense of the tangible impact on the lives of some of these folks. What impact will this money have on their lives, Karissa? What did you hear from some folks you spoke with?
Karissa Waddick:
Edna, who I spoke about earlier, she mentioned just how many people this affects in her area of New Mexico. And she talked about how that area is relatively poor. New Mexico is one of the poorest states in the country, and people there to pay for their medical bills can be difficult sometimes. And I mentioned that one of her neighbors needed to pull together money to take a car ride up to Albuquerque to get medical treatment. She said that the $100,000 would be life-changing. It would essentially feel like millions of dollars to some people in this area.
Taylor Wilson:
Important story here. Folks should go check out the full version with the link in today's show notes. Karissa Waddick covers breaking news for USA TODAY. Thanks, Karissa.
Karissa Waddick:
Thanks so much.

Taylor Wilson:
It's nearly 10 billion light years away, and you won't see it in the night sky, but the collision of two massive black holes detected in 2023 has created a third one, with 225 times the mass of our sun, the largest black hole merger ever charted. The event has astrophysicists, rewriting record books and rethinking theories on how objects form in space. The collision is especially noteworthy, because the two black holes were larger than those in previous collisions. The two black holes were spinning at about 400 times faster than the Earth's rotation when they collided billions of years ago. You can read more with an awesome graphic story by clicking a link in today's show notes.

The Emmy nominations are here. Drama Severance led the way with 27 nods followed by The Penguin with 24, and The Studio and The White Lotus tied for third place. Meanwhile, eighty-three-year-old Harrison Ford earned his first Emmy nod for his role as the ornery therapist on the show Shrinking. There were plenty left on the outside though, including Squid Game. The massively popular show was an Emmy darling in its first season, grabbing a best drama series nomination and a trophy for star Lee Jung-jae. But the second season of the series, which streamed in December of 2024, couldn't score a nomination in a single category. You can take a look at some of our nomination takeaways with a link in today's show notes.

And later today, discussions of body positivity online have shifted back toward unrealistic weight loss goals, despite efforts by TikTok and other platforms to ban such content.
Alyssa Goldberg:
Now it feels like with the skinny talk, the skinny influencer, it's becoming more normalized again to be able to show this desire for thinness and go to extreme measures to get there.
Taylor Wilson:
USA TODAY Wellness Reporter Alyssa Goldberg sits down with my colleague Dana Taylor, to look at how diet culture is evolving, and why it's newest trends on social media are even harder to stop. You can hear their conversation today, beginning at four PM Eastern Time right here on this feed.

And thanks for listening to The Excerpt. You can get the podcast wherever you get your audio, and if you're on a smart speaker, just ask for The Excerpt. I'm Taylor Wilson, and I'll be back tomorrow with more of The Excerpt from USA TODAY.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Biden's top aides lived in ‘fog of denial' over president's cognitive decline: insider
Biden's top aides lived in ‘fog of denial' over president's cognitive decline: insider

New York Post

time9 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Biden's top aides lived in ‘fog of denial' over president's cognitive decline: insider

As lawmakers continue their investigation into what former President Joe Biden's inner circle knew about his alleged cognitive decline, one insider who's written about the issue says he continues to be stunned by the 'fog of denial' that surrounded the aging president. 'They [just] convinced themselves, in effect, they believed what they wanted to believe instead of their lying eyes, even during the debate when everything went south,' said Chris Whipple, author of the book 'Uncharted,' which chronicled the lead-up to the 2024 presidential election. Advertisement Whipple interviewed several members of Biden's inner circle in the aftermath of his widely criticized debate performance, which ultimately led to the suspension of his re-election campaign. Former chief of staff Ron Klain, who reportedly told House lawmakers this week that Biden had grown 'more forgetful' in office, was among sources who opened up for Whipple's book. 'Despite that devastating debate, which was lights out, game over, everybody knew it, Klain was still all in on Joe Biden's nomination and re-election and somehow thought he could beat Trump,' Whipple told 'America's Newsroom' Friday. 'He's been in the doghouse with Joe Biden and his inner circle ever since he was devastatingly candid to me about Joe Biden's condition in that pre-debate prep at Camp David.' Advertisement Author Chris Whipple said he was stunned by the denial he saw after interviewing former President Biden's top aides about his alleged cognitive decline. AP House Republicans have launched a probe into the former president's cognitive health and have called on former Biden administration officials to testify about what they witnessed. Most of those called have pleaded the Fifth and refused to answer lawmakers' questions, including the former president's physician. But based on his conversations, Whipple does not believe there was a secretive scheme to control the presidency. Advertisement Former Biden chief of staff Ron Klain leaving an interview with the House Oversight Committee Chairman on July 24, 2025. Getty Images 'The notion that this was somehow, you know, Biden's last year was 'Weekend at Bernie's' and that there he was non compos mentis and there was a cabal running the country with an autopen is just silly,' he said. 'The notion that they're [Republicans are] going to be able to prove that there was this dastardly cover-up on the part of Biden's inner circle is just crazy to me. I think the answer is that this thing goes nowhere.'

Calif., Illinois may fight new Texas congressional maps with their own
Calif., Illinois may fight new Texas congressional maps with their own

UPI

time10 minutes ago

  • UPI

Calif., Illinois may fight new Texas congressional maps with their own

1 of 2 | California Gov. Gavin Newsom says he may seek to change his state's congressional maps if Texas redraws its borders. File photo by Jonathan Alcorn/UPI | License Photo July 26 (UPI) -- As the Texas Legislature plans to redraw congressional maps in an effort to increase Republican members in the U.S. House, the governors of California and Illinois may devise their own new borders. Traditionally, the boundaries are changed every 10 years with the latest U.S. Census data but Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has called a special legislative session after pressure from the White House to preserve the GOP majority in the U.S. House. President Donald Trump believes an additional five seats could be created by changing the borders. Of the state's 38 districts, 25 are held by Republicans. Democrats hold seats in big cities of Austin, Dallas, El Paso, Fort Worth, Houston, Laredo, McAllen, San Antonio. Ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, Republicans hold a 219-212 advantage in the House with four vacancies -- three Democrats who died and one Republican who resigned this week. More than a dozen Texas House members flew to Illinois and California -- two blue states -- on Friday for a meeting with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Illinois Gov. JB Pritzkeper, during which they revealed their intentions. "Donald Trump called up Governor Abbott for one simple reason: to rig the 2026 elections. California's moral high ground means nothing if we're powerless because of it," Newsom said after meeting with Democrats from the Texas House. "This moment requires us to be prepared to fight fire with fire. Whether that's a special election, a ballot initiative, a bill, a fight in court. If they proceed in Texas, we will be ready." "This is not a bluff. This is real, and trust me, it's more real after listening to these leaders today, how existential this is," Newsom said. As the most populous state in the nation, California has 43 Democratic members of the house and nine Republican members, while Illinois is represented by 14 Democrats and three Republicans. "Everything is on the table," Pritzer said. The Illinois governor said he doesn't want to redraw the maps but "if they're going to take this drastic action, then we might also take drastic action to respond." "We want the country to understand [that] what's going on in Texas is a national battle," State Rep. Richard Pena Raymond, a Democrat from Laredo, said. Raymond told Pritzner that redistricting is "clearly aimed at affecting the entire country." Responsibility for determining Congressional district maps differs from state to state. In California, an independent commission approved by voters in 2010 works on the maps. Illinois maps, on the other hand, are put together by the state lawmakers have been drawn strongly to favor the Democrat Party in the state. Newsom said he is considering having a referendum to change the rules before the 2026 election, unless the Legislature comes up with another solution, which would take two-thirds of legislators voting in favor of. "We have to fight fire with fire," Newsom said. Other states Two other Democratic governors are considering new maps -- Phil Murphy in New Jersey and Kathy Hochul in New York. "There's other states that are violating the rules," Hochul said during a news conference on Thursday. "I'm going to look at it closely with Hakeem Jeffries," a New York member of the House, as well has House minority leader. In New York, Democrats have a 19-7 advantage as a result of their districting maps. "It's deplorable," Murphy said during an interview at the summer meeting of the bipartisan National Governors Association in Colorado Springs. "If they're going to play these games, we're going to have to be just as aggressive. We can't bring a knife to a gunfight." Democrats hold nine of the 12 seats in New Jersey. In Florida, the state Supreme Court on July 17 upheld its newest congressional map. He said he believes the state had been "malappropriated" and redistricting "would be appropriate" in a few years. Florida's congressional delegation is controlled by Republicans, 20-8. In Ohio, legislators are required to redraw maps before 2026. The GOP has 10 of the 15 seats. Colorado Gov. Jared Polis is against redistricting more frequently. The state's maps are overseen by an independent commission and it's eight U.S. House seats are evenly split 4-4. Texas situation Texas last redrew its borders in mid-cycle in 2003 after the GOP gained control of both chambers for the first time since Reconstruction. In Texas, Abbott noted a July 7 letter from the Justice Department that said majority Black and Hispanic districts in Dallas need to be redrawn based on a decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit last year. The DOJ said those districts are "unconstitutional racial gerrymanders," but Abbott argued the opposite in 2021. In federal court in El Paso, he argued race had not been taken into account there. "We are no longer compelled to have coalition districts," Abbott said in an interview with KDFW in Dallas. U.S. Rep. Joaquin Castro, a San Antonio Democrat, appeared at a state House hearing. "That's what's at stake here, whether you all are going to work for the people of Texas, as we used to do, to try to do, or whether you take your commandments from Donald Trump and the White House," Castro said. "I hope that you all will choose to do the business of the people of Texas, as this body has a history of being independent from the federal government."

Democrats desperately look for a redistricting edge in California, New York and Maryland
Democrats desperately look for a redistricting edge in California, New York and Maryland

Politico

time10 minutes ago

  • Politico

Democrats desperately look for a redistricting edge in California, New York and Maryland

Hochul's political allies believe there is little upside to drawing new lines. 'I understand those in New York who are watching what's happening in Texas and Ohio want to offset their unfair advantage,' said New York Democratic Chair Jay Jacobs. But 'the constitution seems pretty clear that this redistricting process should be done every 10 years. I don't know where someone could interpret it as something you can do every two years.' Beyond Texas, Republicans have their eye on picking up seats in other states like Missouri and Florida — which would put Democrats in a tough spot, given they don't have as much leeway to squeeze out extra seats. New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy was noncommittal when asked by reporters earlier this week if he plans to pursue redistricting, noting that it's 'too early to make any definitive statement about it.' But he echoed what many other Democrats across the country have said when talking about the possibility of early redistricting: 'Never bring a knife to a gunfight.' New Jersey has its own constitutional impediment, which states that congressional districts, which are drawn by an independent commission, 'shall remain unaltered through the next year ending in zero in which a federal census for this State is taken.' Even if they were able to circumvent the state constitution, Democrats already have the majority in the New Jersey congressional delegation, and just two seats — the 7th, held by Republican Rep. Tom Kean Jr., and the 9th, held by Democratic Rep. Nellie Pou — are considered battlegrounds. Even some other Hail Mary options seem off the table. State lawmakers in Washington, Minnesota and Colorado balked at the suggestion they should pursue drawing new maps in the next few months. California Gov. Gavin Newsom, accompanied by several members of the Texas state Legislature, calls for a new way for California to redraw it's voting districts during a news conference In Sacramento, Calif., Friday July 25, 2025. | Rich Pedroncelli/AP 'It's just not in the cards,' said Washington House Majority Leader Joe Fitzgibbon, citing the requirement that a two-thirds majority is needed in both the state House and Senate to reconvene the state's bipartisan redistricting commission. And Minnesota State Sen. Aric Nesbitt shut down the idea quickly: 'We're not power-crats, we're Democrats. We should do things that improve democracy, even if that means sometimes we don't get our way.' Democrats hold the governorship and state Senate in Minnesota, but Republicans narrowly control the House.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store