
US-China trade pact brings relief to tech sector
The tech industry is breathing a sigh of relief after the U.S. and China agreed to substantially lower tariffs, underscoring the prospect of de-escalation in a trade war that has been particularly challenging for the sector.
The two countries appear to be walking back from a costly tit-for-tat exchange on tariffs, announcing a 90-day reduction in import taxes as they continue to negotiate a more lasting deal.
The tech sector saw its stocks tumble earlier this year as massive tariffs threatened to strain supply chains and raise consumer prices.
While it received some relief last month when President Trump exempted electronics from the import taxes, the industry's outlook is even more optimistic now as tensions ease.
'It's a relief valve for U.S. Big Tech,' Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives told The Hill. 'It takes the nightmare supply chain situation off the table.'
The U.S. and China announced Monday that they had agreed to reduce tariff rates for 90 days amid negotiations. The U.S. will lower tariffs on Chinese goods from 145 percent to 30 percent, while China will reduce import taxes on American goods from 125 percent to 10 percent.
The trade truce marks a sharp departure from months of escalation between Washington and Beijing.
'It's de-escalation from what could have been an incredibly damaging set of outcomes for both China and the United States if those tariffs stayed in place at those very high rates. So, in my view, cooler heads are prevailing,' said Ed Brzytwa, vice president of international trade at the Consumer Technology Association.
While trade tensions were rising between the two countries in the first few months of President Trump's second term in office, they took a turn for the worse when Trump announced wide-ranging 'reciprocal' tariffs in early April.
This included a 34 percent tariff against China, which, when coupled with an earlier 20 percent import tax, brought the total rate on Chinese goods to more than 50 percent. The two sides went tit for tat on tariff increases before settling at rates well above 100 percent.
The hefty tariffs on Chinese imports spooked the tech industry, whose supply chains are heavily reliant on China.
Trump also levied tariffs on India and Vietnam, where tech firms have increasingly relocated their manufacturing in recent years to diversify their supply chains and shield them from potential disruption.
The president ultimately put most of his 'reciprocal' tariffs on hold amid widespread market panic. However, he left the China tariffs, along with a baseline 10 percent import tax, in place.
Trump later exempted electronics from the tariffs, although the victory was short-lived for the tech industry, after Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick signaled plans to implement sector-specific tariffs.
The recent detente between the U.S. and China has many in and around the tech sector hopeful about the possibility of a larger trade deal and greater economic stability and certainty.
'Our hopes and prayers are that of course this a forerunner to a more negotiated deal,' David Warrick, executive vice president of Overhaul, a software-based supply chain solutions company, said.
'The hope from the tech sector perspective is that this is a really good starting point,' Warrick added. 'Now, how well can we negotiate to get us to a more balanced agreement?'
The Information Technology Industry Council (ITI) touted the recent development as 'meaningful progress toward reducing bilateral tensions and stabilizing the global economy.'
'Importantly, the significant temporary tariff pause from both parties will help bring certainty to business operations and economic markets,' ITI President and CEO Jason Oxman said in a statement.
'The tech industry welcomes the constructive and serious approach both governments have taken and urges leaders from both sides to leverage tech sector input and feedback as they continue negotiations,' he added.
Following the announcement, Trump said he spoke to Apple CEO Tim Cook, who he said plans to open more plants in the U.S.
Apple was particularly vulnerable to the tariffs, as the iPhone maker manufactures the vast majority of its products in China. Cook previously promised to invest more than $500 billion in the U.S. over the next four years, including through building a new facility in Texas.
However, some experts are still voicing caution, emphasizing that the future of U.S.-China trade relations remains uncertain.
'The reduction in tariffs and apparent progress to a wider trade deal reduces the risk of further tariff escalation, but does not remove it completely,' Chris Rogers, head of supply chain research at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said in a statement to The Hill.
Tariffs are still relatively high compared with previous rates, and the tech industry faces the prospect of additional sector-specific import taxes down the line.
'Let's just keep in mind that, yes those tariff rates are really high, but the tariff rates that are now going to be in effect as of tomorrow are also very high historically speaking,' Brzytwa said.
'This is still relatively complex and, depending on what the tariff is for any given product, it still might be high enough where a company decides that tariff payment isn't worth the cost of importing it,' he continued. 'The company might not be able to even sell the product in the United States.'
'We're not out of the woods yet there,' he added of the sector-specific tariffs. 'That is also a source of uncertainty and unpredictability for us. It's still difficult for our companies to plan around this.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
36 minutes ago
- Business Insider
The U.S. Stock Market Has Made an Impressive Comeback, but Will It Last?
The U.S. stock market has made an impressive comeback since its April slump. In fact, the S&P 500 (SPY), which plunged into correction territory following President Trump's historic tariffs, is now up over 19% from its April low. Carson Group's Ryan Detrick sees this early-year bottom as a sign that 2025 could still finish with strong gains. He compared the current setup to market comebacks in 2009 and 2020, when early-year declines of over 15% were followed by double-digit rallies. '2025 bottomed in April and the slingshot effect is in full motion,' Detrick said. Confident Investing Starts Here: However, some market experts are not as optimistic. Indeed, Dan Niles, the founder of Niles Investment Management, believes that while the current rally could push stocks to new record highs in the short term, risks are building for later this year. He argues that both consumers and corporations have been pulling demand forward to get ahead of price hikes, which may have artificially boosted near-term strength. For example, Niles pointed to when Apple (AAPL) rushed its shipments of iPhones from China to avoid paying tariffs. Looking ahead, Niles warned that the market is overlooking some troubling signals, such as rising Treasury yields and a weakening U.S. dollar. He expects that as the holiday season approaches and the effects of pulled-forward demand fade, stocks could face another sharp downturn. 'The further we get into the year, [investors should] get a lot more cautious and expect another big downdraft,' Niles said. As a result, he is maintaining a defensive portfolio and raising cash in order to prepare for potential volatility. There is no doubt that the next several months will test whether this rally has staying power or if it's running on borrowed time. Is SPY a Buy Right Now? Turning to Wall Street, analysts have a Moderate Buy consensus rating on SPY stock based on 419 Buys, 79 Holds, and seven Sells assigned in the past three months, as indicated by the graphic below. Furthermore, the average SPY price target of $663.03 per share implies 10.6% upside potential.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Supreme Court Grants Musk-Less DOGE Access to Social Security Data
Elon Musk may be persona non grata at the White House, but DOGE lives on. The Supreme Court ruled on Friday that the Department of Government Efficiency should be allowed access to Social Security Administration data, lifting a previously issued injunction that blocked the department from doing so. While the court's majority did not provide a detailed explanation of their ruling, they did write, 'We conclude that, under the present circumstances, SSA may proceed to afford members of the SSA DOGE Team access to the agency records in question in order for those members to do their work.' The three liberal justices dissented, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson questioning the urgency of the application and expressing concerns about the potential privacy risks that would result from the ruling. She wrote, 'In essence, the 'urgency' underlying the government's stay application is the mere fact that it cannot be bothered to wait for the litigation process to play out before proceeding as it wishes.' The Trump administration had previously argued that DOGE employees needed access to SSA data in order to halt fraudulent payments, but a federal judge in Maryland ruled that DOGE being granted such access violated federal law and put millions of people's data at risk. Two unions—the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, and the American Federation of Teachers—brought the lawsuit alongside the Alliance for Retired Americans. The groups argued that allowing DOGE broader access to individuals' personal data would violate the Privacy Act and the Administrative Procedure Act. 'The agency is obligated by the Privacy Act and its own regulations, practices, and procedures to keep that information secure—and not to share it beyond the circle of those who truly need it," their lawyers wrote. The data DOGE employees now have access to includes Social Security numbers, medical records, and tax and banking information. In her dissent, Jackson argued that the Supreme Court had 'truly lost its moorings,' by allowing the move and bending its usual standards to accommodate the Trump administration, adding, 'The Court is… unfortunately, suggesting that what would be an extraordinary request for everyone else is nothing more than an ordinary day on the docket for this Administration.'
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director
Podcaster Joe Rogan was shocked as he read billionaire Elon Musk's wild allegations against President Donald Trump on Thursday. Musk dropped a bomb on social media when he alleged Trump was in the Jeffrey Epstein files after a series of escalating back-and-forth social media messages between him and the president. This accusation occurred as part of a larger tirade against Trump and Republican leaders over the "Big Beautiful Bill." In the episode, which was recorded Thursday but released Friday, a "Joe Rogan Experience" producer interrupted the host's live interview with FBI director Kash Patel to inform him of Musk's Epstein tweet. Watch: Republicans Rally Behind Trump, Continue To Support Musk Amid 'Big, Beautiful' Brawl Rogan read the tweet out loud, "'Time to drop the really big bomb Donald Trump is in the Epstein files, that's the real reason they have not been made public, have a nice day.' "Jesus Christ," he said in shock. Read On The Fox News App "I'm not participating in any of that conversation," Patel said. "Someone should take his phone away," Rogan said as he marveled at Musk's tweet. "Jesus Christ, that's a crazy thing to say. How does he know? Does he know that Donald Trump is in the Epstein files? Does he have access to the Epstein files?" "I don't know how he would," the FBI director said, again insisting he would stay out of the feud. "What the f--- are they doing?" Rogan asked. "I understand he owns Twitter, I think it's bad for your mental health," Rogan said. "I think posting things public all day and arguing with people all day is bad for you." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful BIll because it does not include the policies he wanted," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. "The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." The White House said a source familiar with the Epstein matter said it is widely known that Trump kicked Epstein out of his Palm Beach Golf Club. The source also pointed out that the administration released the Epstein files, which included Trump's name, and nothing was new about Musk's revelation. "If Elon truly thought the President was more deeply involved with Epstein, why did he hang out with him for 6 months and say he 'loves him as much as a straight man can love a straight man?'" the source said. Shortly after Musk posted about Trump being in the Epstein file, Trump posted his response to Truth Social. "I don't mind Elon turning against me, but he should have done so months ago. This is one of the Greatest Bills ever presented to Congress," Trump said, turning his attention to the "big, beautiful bill" that is before the Senate. "It's a Record Cut in Expenses, $1.6 Trillion Dollars, and the Biggest Tax Cut ever given. If this Bill doesn't pass, there will be a 68% Tax Increase, and things far worse than that." "I didn't create this mess, I'm just here to FIX IT. This puts our Country on a Path of Greatness. MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!" the president article source: Rogan reacts live to Elon's 'crazy' Epstein accusation against Trump while interviewing FBI director