Education Department says it will not garnish Social Security of student loan borrowers in default
'The Trump Administration is committed to protecting Social Security recipients who oftentimes rely on a fixed income,' Keast said.
Advocates encouraged the Trump administration to go further to provide relief for the roughly 5.3 million borrowers in default.
Advertisement
'Simply pausing this collection tactic is woefully insufficient,' said Persis Yu, executive director of the Student Borrower Protection Center. 'Any continued effort to restart the government's debt collection machine is cruel, unnecessary and will further fan the flames of economic chaos for working families across this country.'
Student loan debt among older people has grown at a staggering rate, in part due to rising tuition that has forced more people to borrow heavily. People 60 and older hold an estimated $125 billion in student loans, according to the National Consumer Law Center, a sixfold increase from 20 years ago.
That led Social Security beneficiaries who have had their payments garnished to balloon from approximately 6,200 beneficiaries to 192,300 between 2001 and 2019, according to the CFPB.
Associated Press writer Collin Binkley contributed to this report.
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
41 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Billionaire GOP megadonor Ken Griffin is confused: Why is the US trying to bring back 'jobs that'll never pay much'?
Ken Griffin had no good answer. The billionaire founder of the $66 billion hedge fund Citadel and its sister company, market maker Citadel Securities, Griffin is a megadonor to the Republican Party and was excited for the American economy after President Donald Trump's election. Less than half a year since Trump's inauguration, Griffin said he was asked during a recent visit to China, "Why are you trying to be like China?" He said there isn't a logical reason the US would want to bring manufacturing "jobs that'll never pay much" to the country, but that seems to be the goal of the tariff policies pursued by Trump's administration. "It's one thing to make Nikes, it's another thing to make F-35 fighters," he said Thursday morning at the Forbes Iconoclast conference in Manhattan. Griffin has been critical of the administration's tariff policies in recent months, calling them a mistake that will hurt the economy and consumers. He said Thursday that they were an "anti-growth agenda," and the expected growth of the US economy has been cut in half since Trump took office. He continued his criticism of Trump, whom he voted for, focusing on the current tax bill, which was passed by the House of Representatives and is now in the Senate. Griffin said it will add "several trillions" of dollars to the deficit and lacks "tough decisions." "The United States' fiscal house is not in order," Griffin said, questioning the decision to cut taxes on small and medium-sized businesses when the deficit was rising. He said credit markets have noted the uncertainty plaguing the US thanks to the administration's policies, noting that "the risk of a US default is priced the same as Italy or Greece." "There's just no words for it," he said. If there was any optimism in his talk, it was about the resilience of American CEOs. He said hiring and capital expenditures will slow as long as there is uncertainty from Washington. Still, he was impressed with how individuals like Doug McMillon, the CEO of Walmart, explained the impact tariffs would have on the consumer. "We should not criticize CEOs for being honest," he said, adding, "shame on the administration" for scolding McMillon and other CEOs for talking about the tariffs' impact. There's still time for Trump and his team to return to pro-growth economic policies, he said, and there's no time to wait. "The United States desperately needs growth" to pay for entitlements like Social Security, he said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Retirement Funds Boomers Rely on Most — and Why Rising Generations Will Need a New Strategy
Whether retirement is like a sunrise on a distant horizon or you can already feel its golden rays warming your golden years, one thing is clear: Your money needs to be ready. While there are universal pillars of smart saving, such as keeping savings in a high-yield savings account, investing consistently and maintaining an emergency fund, each generation approaches retirement saving a little differently. For You: Check Out: When GOBankingRates teamed up with New York Life to understand how people are feeling about their finances today, one insight stood out. In a survey of more than 1,000 Americans ages 18 and older, only 20.81% of respondents age 65 and older said they rely on a 401(k) for income. In contrast, 43.93% said they receive income from an employer pension. If you're thinking that Gen Z or Millennials might not have the same access to pensions, you're right. The way people save for retirement is changing — and future retirees will need a more self-directed strategy. In the survey, respondents of all age groups were asked about their sources of household income. Unsurprisingly, older respondents — those in the 65-and-older group — reported high reliance on Social Security (90.17%) and pensions (43.93%). More surprising? A relatively small portion of Baby Boomers — just 20.81% — reported income from a 401(k). That figure is nearly on par with the catch-all category of 'other savings.' But that may not be shocking to those familiar with how retirement planning has evolved. As retirement writer Donna Fuscaldo noted in a piece for Kiplinger, 'For many of the baby boomers' working years, they had access to pensions and a strong job market. They didn't have to worry about where their income in retirement would come from.' Explore More: Fuscaldo pointed out that by the time Gen X entered the workforce in the '80s and '90s, many companies were shifting away from pensions and toward 401(k) plans. Essentially, the onus for saving for retirement began falling to the employee instead of the employer. Boomers also came into, and out of, the workforce during a time when Social Security largely seemed secure, or at least, not something they had to worry about long-term, giving them one more reason to feel financially secure in retirement. It's only natural that younger generations — Millennials, Zoomers, and even Gen X — rely mostly on income from their current jobs. While they're not withdrawing from their retirement accounts just yet, it's worth noting that 12.78% of respondents aged 55-64 reported 401(k) income, just eight percentage points below the 65-and-older group. As pensions become less prevalent, especially in the private sector, younger generations are expected to lean more on the 401(k) in the future. The survey found that 16.77% of respondents ages 45-54 and 15.43% of those 35-44 reported a 401(k) as an income source. That may sound surprisingly high, especially for those under 45, but it's likely reflective of multigenerational households, where income from a parent's or older relative's 401(k) factors into the household total. Either way, the data underscores the growing importance of self-funded retirement strategies for future generations. Younger generations are also more likely to piece together income from multiple streams. Notably, 36.21% of respondents ages 18-24 said they earn money from side hustles. This age group also reported 0% participation in annuities — a traditional retirement product — compared to 11.56% of Boomers and 6.11% of respondents aged 55-64. This suggests younger Americans could stand to boost their awareness of long-term savings tools. Boomers largely benefitted from a retirement system that included pensions, stable Social Security, and less personal responsibility to actively manage long-term investments. But the same cannot be said for today's rising generations. As Fuscaldo writes, 'In the early days of 401(k)s, people weren't saving, and there wasn't a ton of information available about saving, investing and planning for retirement.' That's no longer the case. Today's workers have access to an abundance of financial education about 401(k)s and virtually every other type of financial product, but they also face more responsibility. And many are skeptical about the long-term viability of Social Security. According to the Nationwide Retirement Institute, 45% of Gen Z and 39% of Millennials believe they'll never see the Social Security benefits they've earned. Perhaps that's why Gen Xers now on the cusp of retirement, as well as Millennials and Zoomers, are embracing new and diverse ways of saving for retirement, from 401(k)s to side hustle savings to life insurance with cash value components. The retirement playbook has changed. And while Boomers may have been able to count on a few key institutions, rising generations will have to get more creative, more informed, and more proactive about their financial and New York Life Insurance surveyed 1,009 Americans aged 18 and older from across the country between March 19 and March 125, 2025, asking twenty-one different questions: (1) What is your current employment status?; (2) Which of the following category or categories best describes your race or ethnicity? (If more than one category applies, please select all that apply); (3) What are the source(s) of income for your household? (Please select all that apply); (4) Please choose the approximate level of investible assets for your household; (5) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'I often take the opportunity to discuss my knowledge of financial products or services with others'; (6) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'I regularly read financial news or financial publications'; (7) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'Thinking about my future sometimes keeps me up at night'; (8) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'I have enough money to live the way I would like to'; (9) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'I believe that The American dream is within reach for people like me'; (10) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'Stories in the media sometimes make me nervous about my financial future'; (11) Using the scale below, how do you feel about the following statement: 'I can't really take risks in my life because I don't have a safety net if things go wrong'; (12) Thinking about the nation's economy, how would you rate economic conditions today?; (13) A year from now, do you think that during the next twelve months we'll have good times financially, or bad times, or what?; (14) Compared to 6 months ago, how has your level of uncertainty changed regarding the following societal and economic issues?; (15) Do you own any of the following products? (Please select all that apply); (16) Do you currently have a financial plan?; (17) On a 1 to 10 scale, where 1 means not at all confident and 10 means completely confident, how confident are you that you will meet your financial goals?; (18) What kind of financial professional have you worked with? (Please select all that apply); (19) Using the slider below, please indicate which statement best describes you.; (20) Using the slider below, please indicate which statement best describes you.; and (21) Using the slider below, please indicate which statement best describes you. In order to take the survey the respondents had to pass two screener questions (S1)Who is the primary financial decision-maker in your household? with the answer being they were at least involved in the households financial decision making and (S2) Which range best describes your total annual household income before taxes? with an answer above $50K. GOBankingRates used PureSpectrum's survey platform to conduct the poll. More From GOBankingRates 4 Things You Should Do When Your Salary Hits $100K If a Financial Advisor Doesn't Ask These 5 Questions in Your Consult, Keep Shopping 5 Steps to Take if You Want To Create Generational Wealth Robert Kiyosaki: 5 Money Habits of People Who Retire Early This article originally appeared on The Retirement Funds Boomers Rely on Most — and Why Rising Generations Will Need a New Strategy
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Timing of California's $750 Million Film Tax Credit Plan in Doubt as State Budget Cuts Weigh Down Process
As a pair of bills to expand California's film tax credit passed their first floor votes in Sacramento this week, confidence is high that the much-touted $750 million benefit will soon be on the way for productions that will keep jobs for entertainment workers in Hollywood. But there isn't a clear answer on what 'soon' means, as the co-authors of the California Film & TV Jobs Act are racing to get their bill past the remaining legislative hurdles and get funding approved. The budget process has been thrown into uncertainty by factors ranging from the Trump Administration's tariffs to Los Angeles wildfire recovery efforts that have left lawmakers unclear on whether the full amount — about double the current tax credit — will be funded. State Assembly members Isaac Bryan and Rick Chavez Zbur, two co-authors of the Jobs Act, told TheWrap on Wednesday they are very confident that the bills that would expand the types of productions eligible for tax incentives and offer a 35% tax rate to Los Angeles-based productions will pass, along with the proposed increase of the program's cap from $330 million to $750 million. 'Our colleagues know we can't let this industry slip,' Bryan said, adding: '$750 million, while it's a lot of money and a desperately needed amount of money to keep the jobs that this industry is producing, is a small fraction of our overall budget.' Language that called for that cap increase was removed from the two Jobs Act bills during budget committee hearings prior to their nearly unanimous floor vote passage this week. But the lawmakers said the language was ultimately unnecessary as the cap increase is still included in Gov. Gavin Newsom's revised budget proposal released last month. Despite Bryan's remark, the local industry has already slipped significantly. Only about 20 percent of US movie and TV production is now made in California, a steep slide over the past 20 years, according to industry studies. FilmLA, which tracks production in Los Angeles, has said that 2024 was the worst year on record for local filming, with the first quarter of 2025 declining another 22% year over year. The state's film commission says that between 2020 and 2024 California lost an estimated $1.6 billion in production spending due to limited tax credit funding. But despite the urgency, apparently nothing in government is easy. Newsom first threw his support behind the cap increase in October and has repeatedly expressed his support for it, including after President Trump knocked Hollywood for a loop last month floating the possibility of levying tariffs against productions shot outside of the U.S. The question is when exactly that money earmarked for the tax incentive program will get final approval in Sacramento and give the California Film Commission the green light to begin the process of implementing the new program. That timetable is unclear because the tax credit legislation, while widely supported, is one of dozens of budget items that Sacramento has to get through, some of which are still the topic of protracted debate. California is in a race against time as other states and overseas locations update their own programs to stay ahead in a global competition for production money. Last week, Louisiana's legislature, months after lowering the cap of its program to $125 million, passed a bill that raised the base tax rate for productions that shoot there to 25%, with an additional 15% credit available towards labor costs if Louisiana residents are hired. Last month, New York raised its program cap to $800 million amidst increased competition for local productions from New Jersey. Bryan explains that the main budget bill that state law requires the legislature to pass and for the governor to approve by June 15 is followed by a period in which the legislature handles 'trailer bills,' which work out the finer details on certain areas of state spending.'The first stab at the budget on the deadline is the bigger, overarching framework of how we're spending the biggest resources to uplift and protect Californians,' Bryan explained, adding that previous changes to the state production tax incentive got final approval through trailer bills passed after that main deadline. The challenge for Bryan, Zbur and other legislators trying to keep Hollywood a major priority is that the trailer bill process is expected to be even more complicated than it usually is, and it's not clear at this time when exactly the trailer bill for the incentive program could come up for a vote. That's because a lot of the guidance that lawmakers have on how much revenue and federal funding it will have for the year has been upended by uncertainty on Wall Street over Trump's tariffs – which affects state capital gains taxes – and suspension of property taxes in parts of Los Angeles affected by January's wildfires, among other factors. Newsom's revised budget projected a $12 billion deficit, leading the governor to call for cuts in a wide range of areas outside of Hollywood, including changes to Medi-Cal that could result in millions of residents, including those who are undocumented, losing coverage. As the larger budget debate plays out over the coming month, the Jobs Act co-authors say they are meeting with legislative leaders, including Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire, to discuss ways to expedite the bills as they head to opposite houses following their first floor votes. If the Jobs Act goes through the usual legislative process of waiting for committee and floor votes, it is likely they would not reach Newsom's desk for signature until the end of the legislative session in September, meaning that the expanded incentive program might not get into full swing until early 2026. While the co-authors haven't settled on a course of action, one option would be to try to make the bills an 'urgency measure,' which would require a two-thirds majority vote to pass but would mean that the bills could take effect immediately once passed rather than on Jan. 1 of the following year. Given that both the Assembly and Senate bills only received one vote against on their first floor votes, the Jobs Act has the support to be enacted faster if this option is taken. 'Bottom line, we are working with the leadership to ensure that the incentive program changes are passed this summer, and come into effect this summer,' Zbur said. The faster Sacramento gives the green light, the better. Once that happens, the California Film Commission still has months of work ironing out how the expanded program will be implemented, including how that $750 million is allocated to different parts of the entertainment industry ranging from feature films to prestige TV dramas and indie productions, as well as new categories like animated projects and half-hour live-action programs that would become eligible with the expansion. For now, the next round of applications for the tax credit program, which opens later this month, will operate under the existing rules and with the current benefit of a 20% tax rate on eligible spending. The post Timing of California's $750 Million Film Tax Credit Plan in Doubt as State Budget Cuts Weigh Down Process appeared first on TheWrap.
