Timing of California's $750 Million Film Tax Credit Plan in Doubt as State Budget Cuts Weigh Down Process
But there isn't a clear answer on what 'soon' means, as the co-authors of the California Film & TV Jobs Act are racing to get their bill past the remaining legislative hurdles and get funding approved. The budget process has been thrown into uncertainty by factors ranging from the Trump Administration's tariffs to Los Angeles wildfire recovery efforts that have left lawmakers unclear on whether the full amount — about double the current tax credit — will be funded.
State Assembly members Isaac Bryan and Rick Chavez Zbur, two co-authors of the Jobs Act, told TheWrap on Wednesday they are very confident that the bills that would expand the types of productions eligible for tax incentives and offer a 35% tax rate to Los Angeles-based productions will pass, along with the proposed increase of the program's cap from $330 million to $750 million.
'Our colleagues know we can't let this industry slip,' Bryan said, adding: '$750 million, while it's a lot of money and a desperately needed amount of money to keep the jobs that this industry is producing, is a small fraction of our overall budget.'
Language that called for that cap increase was removed from the two Jobs Act bills during budget committee hearings prior to their nearly unanimous floor vote passage this week. But the lawmakers said the language was ultimately unnecessary as the cap increase is still included in Gov. Gavin Newsom's revised budget proposal released last month.
Despite Bryan's remark, the local industry has already slipped significantly. Only about 20 percent of US movie and TV production is now made in California, a steep slide over the past 20 years, according to industry studies. FilmLA, which tracks production in Los Angeles, has said that 2024 was the worst year on record for local filming, with the first quarter of 2025 declining another 22% year over year.
The state's film commission says that between 2020 and 2024 California lost an estimated $1.6 billion in production spending due to limited tax credit funding.
But despite the urgency, apparently nothing in government is easy.
Newsom first threw his support behind the cap increase in October and has repeatedly expressed his support for it, including after President Trump knocked Hollywood for a loop last month floating the possibility of levying tariffs against productions shot outside of the U.S.
The question is when exactly that money earmarked for the tax incentive program will get final approval in Sacramento and give the California Film Commission the green light to begin the process of implementing the new program. That timetable is unclear because the tax credit legislation, while widely supported, is one of dozens of budget items that Sacramento has to get through, some of which are still the topic of protracted debate.
California is in a race against time as other states and overseas locations update their own programs to stay ahead in a global competition for production money.
Last week, Louisiana's legislature, months after lowering the cap of its program to $125 million, passed a bill that raised the base tax rate for productions that shoot there to 25%, with an additional 15% credit available towards labor costs if Louisiana residents are hired. Last month, New York raised its program cap to $800 million amidst increased competition for local productions from New Jersey.
Bryan explains that the main budget bill that state law requires the legislature to pass and for the governor to approve by June 15 is followed by a period in which the legislature handles 'trailer bills,' which work out the finer details on certain areas of state spending.'The first stab at the budget on the deadline is the bigger, overarching framework of how we're spending the biggest resources to uplift and protect Californians,' Bryan explained, adding that previous changes to the state production tax incentive got final approval through trailer bills passed after that main deadline.
The challenge for Bryan, Zbur and other legislators trying to keep Hollywood a major priority is that the trailer bill process is expected to be even more complicated than it usually is, and it's not clear at this time when exactly the trailer bill for the incentive program could come up for a vote.
That's because a lot of the guidance that lawmakers have on how much revenue and federal funding it will have for the year has been upended by uncertainty on Wall Street over Trump's tariffs – which affects state capital gains taxes – and suspension of property taxes in parts of Los Angeles affected by January's wildfires, among other factors.
Newsom's revised budget projected a $12 billion deficit, leading the governor to call for cuts in a wide range of areas outside of Hollywood, including changes to Medi-Cal that could result in millions of residents, including those who are undocumented, losing coverage.
As the larger budget debate plays out over the coming month, the Jobs Act co-authors say they are meeting with legislative leaders, including Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas and Senate President Pro Tem Mike McGuire, to discuss ways to expedite the bills as they head to opposite houses following their first floor votes. If the Jobs Act goes through the usual legislative process of waiting for committee and floor votes, it is likely they would not reach Newsom's desk for signature until the end of the legislative session in September, meaning that the expanded incentive program might not get into full swing until early 2026.
While the co-authors haven't settled on a course of action, one option would be to try to make the bills an 'urgency measure,' which would require a two-thirds majority vote to pass but would mean that the bills could take effect immediately once passed rather than on Jan. 1 of the following year. Given that both the Assembly and Senate bills only received one vote against on their first floor votes, the Jobs Act has the support to be enacted faster if this option is taken.
'Bottom line, we are working with the leadership to ensure that the incentive program changes are passed this summer, and come into effect this summer,' Zbur said.
The faster Sacramento gives the green light, the better. Once that happens, the California Film Commission still has months of work ironing out how the expanded program will be implemented, including how that $750 million is allocated to different parts of the entertainment industry ranging from feature films to prestige TV dramas and indie productions, as well as new categories like animated projects and half-hour live-action programs that would become eligible with the expansion.
For now, the next round of applications for the tax credit program, which opens later this month, will operate under the existing rules and with the current benefit of a 20% tax rate on eligible spending.
The post Timing of California's $750 Million Film Tax Credit Plan in Doubt as State Budget Cuts Weigh Down Process appeared first on TheWrap.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IN CASE YOU MISSED IT: Kevin Costner slams lawsuit as 'blatant lie'
After a stunt professional accused the Horizon: An American Saga - Chapter 2 director of breaching intimacy protocols, Costner filed a scathing response to her lawsuit this week. In May, lead stunt double Devyn LaBella filed a breach of contract lawsuit against Costner, 70, alleging he had failed to provide a safe working environment, and that she had been forced to perform a "violent" unscripted rape scene without the legally required notice or consent, and without a mandated intimacy coordinator present. This week, Costner's legal team filed a response in the LA Superior Court refuting LaBella's claims.


Chicago Tribune
26 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Target CEO to step down amid company struggles
NEW YORK — Target named an insider as its next chief executive officer Wednesday, a decision that comes as the discount retailer tries to reverse a persistent sales malaise and to revive its reputation as the place to go for affordable but stylish products. Minneapolis-based Target said CEO Brian Cornell, who has led the company for 11 years, would step down on Feb. 1. The board of directors chose Chief Operating Officer Michael Fiddelke, a 20-year Target veteran, to succeed him. Target, which has about 1,980 U.S. stores, has struggled to find its footing since inflation caused pinched shoppers to curtail their discretionary spending. Customers have complained of messy stores with merchandise that did not reflect the expensive-looking but budget-priced niche that long ago earned the retailer the jokingly posh nickname 'Tarzhay.' Consumer boycotts since late January, when Target joined rival Walmart and a number of other prominent American brands in scaling back corporate diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, have compounded its predicament. Some retail analysts were surprised the board did not pick a candidate from outside the company to turn things around. Target's stock price was down more than 8% in early morning trading after the company announced both Fiddelke's appointment and another quarter of disappointing sales. 'The Street was looking for a fresh pair of eyes that might bring a solution to two years of stumbles,' Stacey Widlitz, president of investment research firm SW Retail Advisors, said while noting that she thinks investors should give Fiddelke a chance. During a call with reporters on Tuesday, Fiddelke acknowledged many of Target's problems. For example, he said he thought the company became too focused on basic home goods during the coronavirus pandemic, when demand for cozy furnishings and kitchen tools exploded. Fiddelke said he would step in as CEO with three urgent priorities: reclaiming the company's position as a leader in selecting and displaying merchandise; improving the customer experience by making sure shelves are consistently stocked and stores are clean; and investing in technology. 'When we're leading with swagger in our merchandising authority, when we have swagger in our marketing and we're setting the trend for retail, those are some of the moments I think that Target has been at its highest in my 20 years,' Fiddelke said. Target has reported flat or declining comparable sales — those from established physical stores and online channels — in nine out of the past 11 quarters. On Wednesday, the company said comparable sales dipped 1.9% dip in its latest three-month period, when its net income also dropped 21%. In March, members of Target's executive team told investors they planned to regain the chain's reputation for selling stylish goods at budget prices by expanding Target's lineup of store label brands and shortening the time it took to get new items from the idea stage into stores. 'In a world where we operate today, our guests are looking for Tarzhay,' Cornell told investors. 'Consumers coined that term decades ago to define how we elevate the everything everyday to something special, how we had unexpected fun in the shopping that would be otherwise routine.' Before joining Target in August 2014, Cornell spent more than 30 years in leadership positions at retail and consumer-product companies, including as CEO at Michaels, Walmart's Sam's Club and PepsiCo America Foods. He replaced former CEO Gregg Steinhafel, who stepped down months after Target disclosed a huge data breach in which hackers stole millions of customers' credit- and debit-card records. The theft badly damaged the chain's reputation and profits. In September 2022, the board of director's extended Cornell's contract for three more years and eliminated a policy requiring its chief executives to retire at age 65. Fiddelke will become the board's chair when he takes over, and Cornell will transition into the role of executive chair. Cornell reenergized sales by having his team rev up Target's store brands. He focused on better tailoring stores to their local communities. Cornell also spearheaded the company's mission to transform its stores into hubs for shipping or picking up online orders. The move helped to reduce costs and speed up deliveries, but the in-person experience for shoppers suffered as Target diverted store workers to fulfilling orders placed online, according to some analysts. The coronavirus pandemic delivered outsized sales for Target as well as its peers as many people bought items to help them work and entertain themselves at home. Sales continued to surge when shoppers first returned to stores. But the spending sprees eventually subsided. As inflation started to spike, Target reported a 52% drop in profits during its 2022 first quarter compared with a year earlier. Purchases of big TVs and appliances that Americans loaded up on during the pandemic faded, leaving the retailer with excess inventory that had to be sold off. In July 2023, as shoppers feeling pinched by inflation curtailed their spending, Target said its comparable sales declined for the first time in six years. Its sales continued to languish as customers defected to Walmart and off-price department store chains like TJ Maxx in search of lower prices. Although Walmart retreated from its diversity initiatives first, Target has been the focus of more concerted consumer boycotts. Organizers have said they viewed Target's action as a greater betrayal because the company previously had held itself out as a champion of inclusion. In 2023, a customer backlash over the annual line of LGBTQ+ Pride merchandise Target carried also cut into sales. Many analysts think Target stumbled by losing sight of the winning mix of merchandising savvy and competitive price points that had distinguished it from Walmart, the nation's largest retailer. Walmart gained market share among households with incomes over $100,000 as U.S. inflation caused consumer prices to rise rapidly. 'While we think Fiddelke is talented and has a somewhat different take on things compared to current CEO Brian Cornell, this is an internal appointment that does not necessarily remedy the problems of entrenched groupthink and the inward-looking mindset that have plagued Target for years,' Neil Saunders, a managing director at GlobalData Retail, said Wednesday.


Axios
26 minutes ago
- Axios
Truist kicks off a major branch expansion
Charlotte-based Truist is embarking on a major expansion, with 100 new branches and 300 branch renovations planned over the next five years in "high-growth and economically vibrant markets" like Charlotte. Why it matters: With its latest growth, Truist, the 2019 merger of SunTrust and BB&T, aims to expand its offerings for affluent customers, grow its business in hot markets and complement its digital offerings. Zoom out: Aside from Charlotte, Truist is also adding branches in or renovating locations in Atlanta, Austin, Dallas, Miami, Orlando, Philadelphia, and Washington, D.C. Between the lines: Truist is calling the new branches "insights-driven" — with modern designs and new technology. The branches will have "premier" advisers to assist with more complicated financial needs, Truist said in a statement, such as debt management. Zoom out: Banks continue to expand in fast-growing areas with retail locations, even as customers tend to rely on digital banking for everyday needs. JPMorgan Chase, for instance, recently opened a prominent location in SouthPark on the site where Harper's used to be on Fairview Road. "While (customers) enjoy using our digital banking, they place a lot of value in engaging with us in person in moments when they need expertise and advice to solve problems," Dontá Wilson, Truist's chief consumer and small business banking officer, tells Axios. Yes, but: The bank isn't yet saying where the branches will be in those markets. Truist relies on criteria from traffic to incomes to population growth to determine branch locations, Wilson said. That's why you see bank branches crop up in prime spots all over Charlotte, from the U.S. Bank in the former Dean & Deluca spot Uptown to a Fifth Third Bank branch in the former Babalu spot in Dilworth.