MEA rejects Pakistan Army's claim over attack in Waziristan
Ministry of External Affairs
(MEA) on Sunday strongly rejected the
Pakistan Army
's claims, where the latter blamed India for the attack that took place in Waziristan.
In a statement issued on Sunday, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said, "Statement regarding Pakistan- We have seen an official statement by the Pakistan Army seeking to blame India for the attack in Waziristan on 28 June. We reject this statement with the contempt it deserves."
Thirteen security personnel were killed in a suicide bombing in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's North Waziristan district on Saturday, carried out by Fitna-al-Khawarij, according to a statement from the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), The Dawn reported.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya
IC Markets
Mendaftar
Undo
Earlier, a statement from the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister's Office confirmed that eight security personnel were killed in the blast. KP Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur condemned the attack and expressed his condolences and prayers for the personnel.
District Police Officer (DPO) Waqar Ahmed told The Dawn that four civilians were injured in the "suicide attack" carried out through a vehicle-borne improvised explosive device. The Dawn reported that the attack comes just days after two soldiers were killed and 11 terrorists were eliminated during an intelligence-based operation (IBO) in South Waziristan. No group has yet claimed responsibility for the latest bombing.
Live Events
The Dawn reported that the attack comes just days after two soldiers were killed and 11 terrorists were eliminated during an intelligence-based operation (IBO) in South Waziristan.
These incidents reflect a broader trend, as Pakistan ranked second in the
Global Terrorism Index 2025
, with a 45 per cent rise in terrorism-related deaths over the past year, reaching 1,081 fatalities. The Pakistan Institute for Conflict and Security Studies recorded 85 attacks in May, compared to 81 in April.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
13 minutes ago
- Business Standard
India to keep buying Russian oil despite Trump's penalty threat: Report
India will continue to buy crude oil from Russia, despite US President Donald Trump's warning of a penalty, according to a report in Reuters, quoting two Indian government sources, who did not wish to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." The New York Times, in its report, quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy. One of the officials, in the news report, said the government had "not given any direction to oil companies" to cut back imports from Russia. The Indian authorities had, on Friday, said their energy decisions are based on national interest and market factors. Trump recently claimed India may stop purchasing oil from Russia, calling it a 'good step' if true. However, India's foreign ministry stated on Friday that no such decision has been made. Speaking to the media on Friday, Trump said, 'I understand that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard — I don't know if that's right or not — but that would be a good step.' His comment followed the US government's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on all goods imported from India, effective from August 1, along with an unspecified penalty. Tougher stance: 100% tariff warning In mid-July, Trump issued a stronger threat, warning of up to 100 per cent tariffs on any country that continues to buy oil from Russia unless there is a complete peace agreement between Russia and Ukraine. Earlier this week, he also criticised India's economic partnership with Russia. Posting on Truth Social, Trump said, 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care.' He repeated long-standing complaints about India's high tariffs, saying, 'Their tariffs are too high, among the highest in the world. The US has done very little business with India for this reason.' On Wednesday, the US officially announced a 25 per cent tariff on all Indian exports to the United States starting August 7. India defends its position Responding to the US statements, India's Ministry of External Affairs said the country decides on oil purchases based on availability, global prices, and domestic needs. 'We look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation,' said foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal during a press briefing on Friday. Russia remains India's top oil supplier Russia continues to be India's leading crude oil supplier, accounting for about 35 per cent of total oil imports. From January to June 2025, India imported around 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil — slightly higher than the same period last year, Reuters reported. Other key suppliers include Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE. India is the world's third-largest importer and consumer of oil. US Senator Marco Rubio calls India's Russia ties a concern US Secretary of State Marco Rubio also expressed concern over India's oil purchases from Russia, saying it is 'most certainly a point of irritation' in the US-India relationship. Speaking to Fox Radio on Thursday, Rubio noted that even among allies, it is normal to disagree on some foreign policy matters. 'India is a strategic partner. Like anything in foreign policy, you're not going to align 100 per cent of the time,' he said. (With agency inputs)
Deccan Herald
43 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
8 Indians deported every day under Trump; sharp rise from 3 during Biden term: Report
Since January till July, the US deported a total of 1,703 Indian nationals, as informed by the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA).
Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump's warm embrace of India turns cold
WASHINGTON—In just a matter of months, President Trump has gone from praising India as a major strategic partner to saying he wouldn't care if its economy implodes. The Trump administration still values the U.S.-India partnership, officials say. But ties between Washington and New Delhi have steadily soured over disputes about trade, Russia and whether Trump deserves credit for brokering a cease-fire following a four-day conflict in May between India and its rival Pakistan. The standoff, fueled by the president's public broadsides against India, threatens to sink a key but complex geopolitical relationship and break the bonds Trump has forged with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The fractures have appeared as U.S. ties with Pakistan have grown in recent months, culminating in a White House meeting between Trump and the country's powerful army chief, Asim Munir, in June. Modi 'must be very, very unhappy," said Manoj Joshi, a distinguished fellow at the Observer Research Foundation, an Indian think tank. India, viewed by the U.S. as a bulwark against China, has rankled Washington with its persistent relationship with Russia. New Delhi purchases Russian oil and weapons, propping up Russia's economy, and along with Moscow is part of a loose, five-nation grouping of nations known as the Brics. As Trump has turned against Russian President Vladimir Putin for not ending the war in Ukraine, he has vowed to impose tariffs on countries that do business with Moscow. India, Trump said Wednesday, would incur a 'penalty" for its continued purchases of Russian goods. 'I don't care what India does with Russia. They can take their dead economies down together, for all I care," Trump added in another social-media post Thursday. President Trump hosted Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi at the White House in February. Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Randhir Jaiswal told reporters Friday that the U.S.-India relationship 'has weathered several transitions and challenges. We remain focused on the substantive agenda that our two countries have committed to and are confident that the relationship will continue to move forward." Still, Trump's comments are a stark shift from the early days of the administration, when officials in both Washington and New Delhi hoped to build on the Trump-Modi relationship established during the president's first term. Mike Waltz called ties between the two countries 'the most important relationship of the 21st century" before Trump tapped him as national security adviser. Trump hosted Modi at the White House in February and praised him as a 'much better negotiator," while Modi mirrored Trump's campaign catchphrase and said he wanted to 'make India great again." High-profile visits to New Delhi by Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and Vice President JD Vance followed. Yet the warm glow faded in the following months, when efforts to swiftly clinch a bilateral trade deal foundered. Trump, current and former officials said, is deeply frustrated by the lack of progress with New Delhi. A point of contention in tariff negotiations is the U.S.'s push to open India's agricultural markets, which employs over 40% of the country's workforce. Opening up the sector, which has long been protected by New Delhi, would anger India's farmers, a powerful voting bloc. That presents a perilous political risk for Modi, who abandoned an effort in 2021 to deregulate the agricultural sector after facing nationwide protests from farmers. Trump said the U.S. and India are still negotiating a trade deal even after the Aug. 1 deadline for an agreement. U.S.-India ties hit another snag in May when India and Pakistan, both nuclear powers, clashed over a four-day stretch. The conflict started after a militant attack in the disputed Indian-administered Kashmir region that Modi's government blamed on Pakistan. Pakistan denied any role in the assault. As the conflict raged, the U.S. received intelligence that India launched the Brahmos cruise missile to strike targets in Pakistan, according to Trump administration officials. The U.S. assesses that the weapon, produced in partnership with Russia, can carry nuclear warheads, current and former officials said, though India says it is solely a conventional missile. Trump feared that India might decide to equip one of the missiles with a nuclear bomb if the crisis spiraled out of control, officials said, or that Pakistan could decide to launch a nuclear device of its own, leading Trump to encourage Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio to call their counterparts. Trump posted on social media that his team brokered a deal that led to a cease-fire on May 10. Pakistan embraced the announcement, praising Trump and nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize. India, by contrast, bristled at Trump's assertions and insisted no outside power dictated the cease-fire. India's insistence that the U.S. role was overblown has privately angered Trump, who has told aides he's upset with Modi for not thanking him. A White House official said Trump leveraged his relationships with both India and Pakistan to secure a cease-fire that the administration insists could have gone nuclear without his involvement. The official wouldn't comment on India's use of the Brahmos missile as the reason for Trump's concerns. Officials at the Indian Embassy in Washington said India has a no-first-use nuclear policy, so its use of the Brahmos missile should have caused no alarm in the U.S. about a nuclear escalation. Trump strained ties even further by offering to mediate the longstanding Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan. 'That was embarrassing for India. India has always rejected the idea of third-party mediation, something that Pakistan has always sought," said Lisa Curtis, a former senior National Security Council official who oversaw South Asia policy in Trump's first term. 'If there had just been one or two tweets on May 10, the two sides could have recovered from it. However, Trump has talked multiple times about the U.S. bringing about the cease-fire." Trump's embrace of Pakistan and pressure on India over its ties with Russia and trade could backfire at just the moment when India was warming up to defense ties with the West. 'It's going to push India increasingly into the hands of Russia," said Derek Grossman, a former U.S. intelligence official and professor on Indo-Pacific security affairs at the University of Southern California. In recent years, India has sought to pivot away from relying on Russia for military equipment, especially after the Ukraine war cut off the ready flow of Russian-made weapons. From 2020 to 2024, India imported 36% of its military hardware from Russia, its largest supplier, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. That was a shift from the 2006-10 period, when 82% of India's military equipment was imported from Russia. The U.S. has previously targeted Indian businesses for allegedly helping Russia evade sanctions by selling dual-use technology that could bolster Moscow's military production. In announcing that the U.S. would place 25% tariffs on Indian goods, Trump also criticized India for purchasing large quantities of Russian oil. India has taken advantage of discounted oil prices from Russia after many Western countries stopped buying or curbed their purchases. In the last quarter of 2024, India accounted for one-third of Russia's oil exports, according to ORF. 'It is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India—not the only point of irritation," Rubio said in a Fox News interview on Thursday. 'With so many other oil vendors available, India continues to buy so much from Russia, which in essence is helping to fund the war effort and allowing this war to continue in Ukraine." The newfound U.S. attention to the matter has put India in a bind. 'Abruptly dropping Russian oil will have consequences for the relationship. On the other hand, the promised U.S. sanctions will have their own impact," said ORF's Joshi. 'Just how to square this circle is a tough one." Write to Alexander Ward at Robbie Gramer at and Shan Li at
