logo
Even Karl Marx respected the rich more than Rachel Reeves

Even Karl Marx respected the rich more than Rachel Reeves

Telegraph18-05-2025

Labour owes more to Methodism than Marxism. Or so its general secretary from 1944 to 1962, Morgan Phillips, famously postulated.
The Welsh ex-miner himself was not a paragon of Wesleyan virtues. Alongside his Labour colleagues, Nye Bevan and Richard Crossman, he sued The Spectator for libel in 1957 for suggesting that the threesome exhibited an insatiable capacity for downing whisky while attending a socialist conference in Venice.
The Labour men won, and the magazine only narrowly avoided closure – Crossman's posthumously published diaries revealed The Spectator's claims were true.
Nevertheless, a moralising streak has long been at the vanguard of Labour thinking, and the party's attacks on the rich ever since it first came to power have been at least as much motivated by the notion that accumulating great wealth is just wrong than by socialist ideology. Today's Labour Party is far removed from the muscular Christianity of the chapel.
But its attitude to wealth and the rich displays a closer affinity to the moral judgments of stern church elders than to the strictures of Karl Marx. A secularised, bastardised version of Christian morality holds sway in the party, and indeed the wider Left. It sees riches as sinful, a moral failing that requires earthly retribution, or rather redistribution.
But the quest for immodest terrestrial riches has arguably been the greatest engine of progress in human history. And one does not have to be a starry eyed pro-market zealot to believe this. It is something the 19th century German sage well understood.
Surprising as it may sound, Marx and Friedrich Engels' The Communist Manifesto, published in London in 1848, contains one of the finest paeans to the achievements of the capitalist class ever penned: 'The bourgeoisie... has been the first to show what man's activity can bring about. It has accomplished wonders far surpassing Egyptian pyramids, Roman aqueducts, and Gothic cathedrals...
'The bourgeoisie, during its rule of scarce one hundred years, has created more massive and more colossal productive forces than have all preceding generations together.
'Subjection of Nature's forces to man, machinery, application of chemistry to industry and agriculture, steam-navigation, railways, electric telegraphs, clearing of whole continents for cultivation, canalisation of rivers, whole populations conjured out of the ground – what earlier century had even a presentiment that such productive forces slumbered in the lap of social labour?'
Ayn Rand, the author of the cult pro-capitalist novels The Fountainhead and Atlas Shrugged, could have proudly put those words into one of her heroes speeches. Why was the very font of anti-capitalist thought championing capitalists?
Marx's condemnation of the bourgeoisie was predominantly not a moral one. For our Karl, history is very much not just a tale of one damn thing after another. He had inculcated the pre-existing nostrum that history has a predestined direction and is shaped not by individual choices, but by vast impersonal forces.
And capitalism is one of the essential stages, an unavoidable prerequisite, leading to the eventual communist nirvana.
Marx believed that capitalism's overthrow would come about through its own success. The market – and this is where old Charlie got it spectacularly wrong – would eventually satiate all bourgeois demand. Overproduction, and counter-intuitively mechanisation (he was also quite wrong about this), would reduce the capitalists' profits.
Marx's adoption of the labour theory of value – the idea that the worth of any good is determined by the amount of work put into it, a nostrum that was already losing its lustre during the lifetime of socialism's founding father – meant that the bourgeoisie would only have one option to maintain their riches.
And that is scalping a larger share of what the workers' labour has produced. The eventual result of the proletariat's consequent immiseration would be world revolution.
For many Marxists, the big question for the last 180 years has been, when will this crisis of capitalism come? Every downturn and every slump, the communists among us hope, may finally be corroboration of their apostle's creed. But somehow the markets always bounce back. The demise of the bourgeoisie has been endlessly foretold – and endlessly delayed.
When some of those Labour figures most deeply pickled in Marxist dogma, people like Ken Livingstone, the former London mayor, state that socialism has not failed, but is yet to come, this is what they mean.
It is not just a hopeful refrain that true socialism will make a comeback. It is a profound belief that Marx's grand schema is still working through its modes and history has not played its last hand yet.
The Marxist Left – or at least some of them, communists as a breed are more schismatic than any Christian denomination – understand what capitalism has achieved. The most enlightened of them even appreciate that capitalists may still have a good long run left in them.
But instead of this understanding, for today's Labour Party, the accumulation of wealth is a morality tale, or rather a saga of immorality. Those who become rich must somehow be perfidious and squalid.
And thus wealth taxes, non-dom crackdowns, and VAT on school are the least that they deserve. The fact that such taxes make society poorer as a whole can safely be ignored as sinners must be punished.
When Peter Mandelson proclaimed that he was 'intensely relaxed about people getting filthy stinking rich', he wasn't actually speaking out of turn. That sentiment has a very good Left-wing pedigree, Marx would certainly have agreed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wales' poverty crisis deepening as more than 1 in 5 living in hardship, new report reveals
Wales' poverty crisis deepening as more than 1 in 5 living in hardship, new report reveals

ITV News

time25 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Wales' poverty crisis deepening as more than 1 in 5 living in hardship, new report reveals

Poverty in Wales is deepening, according to a new report from the Joseph Rowntree Foundation (JRF) and the Bevan Foundation. The study also claims there has been little progress in reducing poverty in Wales over the past 20 years, with poverty rates remaining at around 21–22%. According to the 'Poverty in Wales' report, published on Tuesday, more than 1 in 5 people in Wales (22%) – which is around 700,000 people – are living in poverty. Of these, 400,000 are working-age adults (21%), 200,000 are children (31%) and 100,000 are pensioners (16%). The report warns that if no action is taken, child poverty in Wales could reach 34% by 2029-30, which would make it the highest rate of all UK nations. The highest child poverty rates by local authority are Blaenau Gwent (34%), Merthyr Tydfil, Ceredigion and Newport (32%), and the Isle of Anglesey and Pembrokeshire (31%). The Welsh Government says it is determined to do all it can to prevent people from going into poverty and to help those who need support the most. The findings also reveal that nearly half a million people in Wales lived in deep poverty in 2020-23, with 310,000 in very deep poverty. Households below 50% of the median household income are defined as living in deep poverty and those living below 40% are defined as being in very deep poverty. Dr Victoria Winckler, Director at the Bevan Foundation, said: "It is shocking that there has been no progress reducing poverty in Wales in the last twenty years. "Even worse, more people are in deep poverty than ever before, forced to use food banks, unable to heat their homes, watching every penny. 'The report shows that the root causes are many years of cuts to social security coupled with a severe shortage of decent jobs and affordable housing. The steps taken by the Welsh Government to alleviate poverty are welcome, but there is much more to do. 'As political parties gear up for the next Senedd election, we urge them to commit to practical, deliverable action to end poverty." Chris Birt, JRF Associate Director for Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland said: "Deepening poverty and a child poverty rate of almost one in three in Wales should be a stark wake up call to both the UK Government and all parties aspiring to form the next Welsh Government. "The Senedd has significant powers that contribute to improving people in Wales's standard of living. Driving down costs, better connecting communities, providing affordable housing and breaking down barriers to employment are all things they can do to reduce poverty. 'But the scale of the challenge needs to be met by the scale of the response. The same is of course true of the UK Government. The threadbare social security system is their responsibility, and it drives much hardship. A good place to start reversing that would be casting the two-child limit into history as quickly as possible. 'There is much work to be done by both the Welsh and UK Governments, but the prize is a Wales where people are able to explore their potential and be free from hardship – something that is miles from reality for far too many people today.' In response to the report, the Welsh Government says it recognises that it is a "challenging time" for many children, families and communities in Wales, and is determined to do all it can to prevent people from going into poverty and help those who need support the most. A Welsh Government spokesperson said: "Our commitment is backed by substantial investment of nearly £7bn between 2022-2026 to reduce costs and maximise incomes for Welsh families. "Our child poverty strategy sets out how we will use the levers we have to deliver against our ambitious objectives to support families most in need. "We will continue to call for positive changes in social security policy to tackle child poverty, particularly seeking a commitment to end the two child benefit rule."

Paternity pay in UK is one of the lowest in the developed world, MPs say
Paternity pay in UK is one of the lowest in the developed world, MPs say

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Paternity pay in UK is one of the lowest in the developed world, MPs say

The UK has one of the "worst statutory leave offers for fathers and other parents in the developed world", the chairwoman of the Women and Equalities Committee has warned. Sarah Owen said the UK's parental leave system was in "urgent need of an overhaul to fit with the reality of working parents' lives". "The UK's parental leave system has fallen far behind most comparable countries," she added. Her comments come as a new report by her House of Commons committee found that a maximum of two weeks' paternity leave is "completely out of step with how most couples want to share their parenting responsibilities" and "entrenches outdated gender stereotypes about caring". The UK's rate of parental pay is "completely out of kilter with the cost of living, has not kept pace with inflation and is far below rates in most comparable countries", the report states. The Women and Equalities Committee has urged the government to consider raising paternity pay to the level of maternity pay during the first six weeks, which equals 90% of someone's average earnings. It also called on the government to either amend the Employment Rights Bill to legislate for a day one right to paid leave or commit to "considering this vital change within its review" in consultation with employers. The report stated that working parents "will be let down by a review that leads only to tinkering around the edges of the system". In its report, the committee also recommended a phased introduction of increases to statutory pay across the system to improve the rates for all working parents up to 80% or more of average earnings or the real living wage. Additionally, it urged the government to consider options for providing statutory paid leave for all self-employed working fathers as part of its review of the parental leave system, as the lack of provision for self-employed fathers was "deeply unfair". The report suggests considering the introduction of a paternity allowance for self-employed fathers and other parents, similar to the maternity allowance. The upcoming review into the parental leave system must examine the function and necessity of eligibility rules, with a view to "simplifying or removing the employment status, time in service and earnings criteria", the committee added.

Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn
Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

Spending review 2025: Cutting agricultural budget could be 'catastrophic' for nature, farmers and charities warn

The National Trust and RSPB have joined forces with farmers to warn the government that cutting the agricultural budget could be "catastrophic" for nature and rural businesses. In a letter to food security and rural affairs minister Daniel Zeichner, exclusively seen by Sky News, a dozen of the biggest rural industry organisations say they are "deeply concerned" about rumoured cuts that will be made to the agricultural budget in Wednesday's spending review. Chancellor Rachel Reeves will set out budgets for each government department for the rest of this parliament, set to end in 2029. The letter says cutting funding for existing and new environmental farming schemes will be "catastrophic" to the government's aims for the environment. "Many of the environmental features present in the countryside and enjoyed by the public will be under threat and will disappear," the letter says. "This would be a poor legacy for this government." Sir Keir Starmer's government has made getting to net zero by 2050 a key goal, already initiating several policies to restrict carbon emissions and make the UK greener since winning the election last July. However, the government shocked farmers in March when it shut down applications for the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI), which rewards farmers for managing their land in environmentally sustainable ways, with just a few hours' notice as they said a cap had been reached for the year. The rural organisations say the Environmental Land Management (ELM) scheme payments are "critical to the government's statutory targets on environmental improvement", including the main goal of halting the decline of biodiversity. 3:26 The letter states farmers and landowners are fully committed to environmental schemes, with 77,000 live agri-environment scheme agreements, according to the latest government figures, "with millions of hectares under environmental land management". "So much good has been done by these agreements, the oldest of which has run for decades," the letter says. "The unprecedented engagement in the Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) is testament to the appetite of farmers and land managers to rise to the challenge and do more." The letter finishes with: "The industry would like to have your assurances that this critical work will continue to be funded at the same level." David Wilson, a farmer for 53 years, told Sky News it took many years for farmers to get on board with the environmental schemes but they are now joined up, and reducing funding could damage years of work and be a backwards step for not just the UK's environment, but the world's. "This is ultimately about sustainability. To produce good food, you need good ecology and reducing this funding could damage the UK's ecology and our food security," he added. A return to intensive farming Alex Robinson, 39, a farmer from Gloucestershire with 424 hectares, said the schemes have been "a lifeline for nature", with birds, bees and wildflowers returning - including 14 red-listed bird species, many that had not been seen in decades. His farm's soil health is improving, which means he can grow more resilient nutrient dense crops for people to eat. If funding is cut he said he "may have no choice but to return to intensive farming methods sooner than the soils are ready for", with wildflowers and field margins becoming "difficult to justify", which will put the UK's climate, biodiversity and long-term food security "in real danger". Government will be abandoning nature Signatory Victoria Vyvyan, farmer and president of the Country Land and Business Association (CLA), said: "If sustainable farming contracts are cut, government won't just abandon nature - it will abandon its own environmental and legal commitments. "The Sustainable Farming Incentive is working - for farmers, for nature, for the public, and for the Treasury. It's bringing back wildlife, cleaning up rivers, and restoring the health of our soil. "Take away the funding for nature contracts, and farmers will be pushed back to intensive methods - forced to undo years of progress. Nature will suffer as well as farmers, and on the environment, it will go against everything government claims to agree with." The letter has been signed by the heads of The National Trust, the National Farmers' Union (NFU), the RSPB, the Soil Association, the CLA, the Tenant Farmers Association, the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust, the Nature Friendly Farming Network, the Central Association of Agricultural Valuers, the National Federation of Young Farmers' Clubs, the British Institute of Agricultural Consultants and the Agricultural Industries Confederation.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store