SC directs NEET-PG 2025 to be held in single shift, slams NBE over arbitrariness
New Delhi, May 30 (UNI) In a significant ruling to uphold fairness and transparency in competitive medical examinations, the Supreme Court on Friday directed the National Board of Examinations (NBE) to conduct NEET-PG 2025 in a single shift instead of the previously planned two-shift format.
A Bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjay Kumar, and NV Anjaria said the two-shift model was arbitrary and inherently unfair, as question papers in separate shifts can never be of exactly the same difficulty level, despite claims of 'normalisation".
'Holding examinations in two shifts creates arbitrariness and does not place all candidates on the same level. No two question papers can be identical in difficulty or ease,' the Court stated firmly.
The Court rejected the NBE's argument that logistical limitations, such as the lack of enough centres with online exam infrastructure, necessitated two shifts.
'This is a national exam, not a local one. Given India's technological advancement, we are not ready to accept that sufficient centres cannot be identified across the country,' the Bench asserted.
When the NBE claimed that only a few students had challenged the two-shift format, Justice Sanjay Kumar countered, 'Even if one student has a legitimate grievance, the Court will intervene.'
The Court was hearing a batch of petitions challenging the two-shift NEET-PG 2025 model, with petitioners arguing it violated Article 14 (Right to Equality) and Article 21 (Right to Fair Procedure) of the Constitution.
Senior Advocate Maninder Acharya, appearing for the NBE, claimed that the two-shift exam format was necessary due to infrastructure constraints and online exam requirements. She added that several national-level exams like CAT, INI-CET, JEE, and CUET are also held in multiple shifts with normalisation.
However, the Bench dismissed these comparisons, asserting:
'You cannot compare NEET-PG with other exams. This is a post-graduate medical entrance exam. There has to be zero arbitrariness.'
Addressing NBE's defence of using 'normalisation' to balance shift difficulties, the Court clarified:
'Normalisation may be applied in exceptional cases, but it cannot become the default every year.'
The Court emphasised that the principle of 'merit over luck' must govern competitive exams, and normalisation cannot be used as a blanket justification.
'Why should there be normalisation? Two-shift candidates face different levels of difficulty. That's unfair,' Justice Vikram Nath remarked.
NEET-PG 2025 is scheduled for June 15, and the Court noted that over two weeks remain to arrange for single-shift logistics.
However, it gave the NBE the option to seek an extension if more time is required.
'If the respondents find that they are not able to identify the centres and conduct the examination on 15th June, it will be open to them to apply for extension of time,' the Court clarified.
The petitions filed by students and advocates, including Senior Advocate Shikhil Suri and lawyers Vidhisha Swarup, Dr. Charu Mathur, Avani Bansal, among others argued that the two-shift format leads to inconsistencies in question paper difficulty, giving some candidates an unfair edge.
They cited issues with NEET-PG 2024, which was conducted in two shifts and faced criticism and litigation for uneven question distributions. An analysis by a coaching platform showed variation in subject-wise questions, further raising concerns about fairness and transparency.
The petitioners called the practice a violation of Articles 14 and 21, stressing that conducting the exam in a single shift would ensure a 'just, fair, reasonable, and equitable' competition.
UNI SNG RN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
NEET-PG 2025 be conducted in one shift, orders SC; says two shifts create arbitrariness, ET Education
Advt Advt New Delhi, In a significant order, the Supreme Court on Friday issued directions that the post-graduate medical entrance exam scheduled on June 15 be conducted in a single shift, saying holding it in two shifts "creates arbitrariness".A bench headed by Justice Vikram Nath directed the authorities to make arrangements for holding NEET-PG 2025 exam in one shift and to ensure that complete transparency is maintained and secured centres are identified."Any two question papers can never be said to be having an identical level of difficulty or ease," said the bench, also comprising Justices Sanjay Kumar and N V said normalisation may be applied in exceptional cases but not in a routine manner year after bench passed the order on pleas challenging a notification on holding the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test-Post Graduate (NEET-PG) 2025 examination in two top court said the total number of candidates who have applied for the examination is 2,42,678 and the test is held all over the country and not in one city."We are not ready to accept that in the entire country and considering the technological advancement in the country, the examining body could not find enough centres to hold the examination in one shift," the bench said."Holding examinations in two shifts creates arbitrariness and also does not keep all the candidates, who take the examination, at the same level," it said the examination is scheduled for June 15 and there was still more than two weeks for the examining body to identify further centres to hold it in one shift."We accordingly direct the respondents to make further arrangements for holding the examination in one shift and also ensure that complete transparency is maintained and secured centres are identified," the bench of the pleas was filed through advocate Sukriti Bhatnagar. Several lawyers, including advocate Tanvi Dubey, appeared in the counsel appearing for the respondents, including the National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences (NBEMS), said even if efforts were made to identify more centres, it might need more time which might result into delay in holding the NBEMS is entrusted with the responsibility of conducting postgraduate and postdoctoral examinations in approved specialities leading to the award of Diplomate of National Board and Doctorate of National Board and Fellow of National respondents said consequently, the counselling might also be delayed which would not be in line with the timeline fixed by the apex court."This argument is also not accepted as there is still sufficient time for the examining body to identify sufficient number of centres for holding the examination in one shift," the bench top court observed it would be open for the respondents to apply for extension of time, if they find they were not able to identify required number of the counsel for the respondents repeatedly said the process of identifying centres might not be completed by June 15, the bench said they could seek extension of time and the court would consider that."It is for you to identify and pay for it. If you don't want to spend money, it is a different thing," the bench counsel appearing for the respondents said it was not a question of money."Now you burn little midnight oil and try to find the centres," the bench said."We have given you liberty to seek extension," the bench said, adding, "You have already made up your mind that you are not going to be able to do it without even trying. Try at least".It noted the other issued raised in the plea was regarding disclosure of question papers and answer keys on NBEMS's website after the declaration of said this issue would be considered after the examinations are held and posted the matter for hearing on July apex court noted that counsel for the respondents have opposed the plea to conduct NEET-PG examination in one shift on two said as per respondents, the number of candidates to appear in the exam was too large and it was difficult for the examining body to find secured centres to hold the test in one said the second ground was that if examinations were held in one shift, unscrupulous elements might get involved and there could be the hearing, the counsel for the petitioners said NEET-PG exam was a rank-based test and even one marks would make a huge difference in whether the candidate would get the preferred stream."You tell us why do you hold examination in two shifts?," the bench asked the counsel appearing for the counsel said these examinations were held online and there were limited safe centres having required the counsel appearing for one of the respondents said the schedule fixed by the apex court would be disturbed as holding the examination in one shift within 15 days would be difficult, the bench said, "Don't give this kind of a threat that the whole year will go and this will happen and that will happen".The lawyer appearing for another respondent said they have identified about 445 centres for multi shift examination and if it was to be conducted in one shift, they will have to identify about 900 odd centres. PTI
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Punjab speaker seeks SAD rebel MLA Sukhi's response on July 29
Banga MLA Dr Sukhwinder Sukhi, who is facing a disqualification plea for defecting from the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) to the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), has been called by the Punjab Vidhan Sabha speaker for a hearing on July 29. The two-time MLA, who switched from the SAD to the AAP in August last year, will be given a chance to 'present his side'. The ruling party appointed Sukhi as the state vice-president for the Doaba zone on Saturday. According to the Tenth Schedule, included in the Constitution in 1985 and popularly known as the anti-defection law, a member can be disqualified if he or she voluntarily gives up membership of a party. Advocate HC Arora has filed a petition before the assembly speaker on the matter. Punjab Vidhan Sabha speaker Kultar Singh Sandhwan said the member has been asked to present his side. 'Dr Sukhi is an honourable member of the Punjab Vidhan Sabha, and he has the same legal rights as all other members,' the speaker said in response to a question about the status of the petition against the legislator during a press conference held here. Sukhi was scheduled to appear for a hearing on May 27, but since the speaker was not available that day, he was given a new date, said an official of the state assembly. Sukhi was inducted into the party by chief minister and AAP state chief Bhagwant Mann in Chandigarh on August 14, 2024. He was later appointed as chairman of the Punjab State Container and Warehousing Corporation (CONWARE). A doctor by profession, he first got elected to the state assembly from Banga seat in Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagar in the 2017 elections on a SAD ticket. He was again elected as a legislator in 2022.
Scroll.in
2 hours ago
- Scroll.in
Kolkata Police defends arrest of Pune student, says ‘hate speech not free speech'
The Kolkata Police on Sunday said that 'hate speech should not be misconstrued as freedom of speech'. This came amid an uproar after the arrest of a 22-year-old law student in Gurugram for social media posts related to Operation Sindoor that allegedly hurt religious sentiment. The student, identified as Sharmishta Panoli, is a fourth-year business and law student at a Pune university. She had reportedly made the comments on Instagram but later deleted the post and issued an apology on X. A case was filed against Panoli at Kolkata's Garden Reach Police Station on May 15. The 22-year-old was arrested on Friday, after which she was brought to Kolkata on a transit remand and remanded to judicial custody till June 13. Several politicians, including many from the Bharatiya Janata Party, have questioned Panoli's arrest. On Sunday, the Kolkata Police claimed a few social media accounts were spreading false information that the 22-year-old had been 'unlawfully arrested' for 'opposing Pakistan'. 'This narrative is mischievous and misleading,' it stated. 'Expressing national pride and patriotism is a thing that every citizen and organisation stands for. Kolkata Police being no different, stands firmly with the citizens of India.' Some social media accounts are spreading false information that Kolkata Police has unlawfully arrested a law student for opposing Pakistan. This narrative is mischievous and misleading. Expressing national pride and patriotism is a thing that every citizen and organisation… — Kolkata Police (@KolkataPolice) June 1, 2025 The Kolkata Police reiterated that the case was registered on the basis of allegations that Panoli had posted a video that was insulting to religious beliefs and under the appropriate section of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. It stated that she was 'apprehended lawfully' from Gurugram. 'Hate speech targeting any religious figure or community or any class of citizens of India which has potential to incite disharmony and hatred between different communities is a punishable offence in the newly implemented Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita,' said the police. Hate speech and abusive language should not be misconstrued as freedom of speech and expression as enshrined in Article 19(1)(a) of the Constitution, it said. It added: 'At the time when the whole country stood united and our brave citizens were fighting at the frontier, posting such content on social media which is insulting and demeaning to any class of citizens of India is most abominable act. Any such act will only benefit our enemies.' The Kolkata Police stated that it acted lawfully in accordance with the procedures established by law. 'The accused was not arrested for expressing patriotism or for personal belief; legal actions were taken for sharing offensive content which promotes hatred among the communities,' it added. We urge the all concerned to act responsibly and refrain from doing anything that would benefit our enemies.' On Saturday, BJP's West Bengal unit chief and Union minister Sukanta Majumdar described Panoli's arrest as 'vote-bank vendetta'. 'No riots. No unrest. Yet [West Bengal Chief Minister] Mamata Banerjee's police acted overnight – not for justice, but for appeasement,' he alleged. 'But when TMC [Trinamool Congress] leaders insult Sanatan Dharma, call Jai Shri Ram a gaali, mock Maha Kumbh, and push communal poison – there's no FIR [first information report], no arrest, no apology.' Sanatana Dharma is a term some use as a synonym for Hinduism. BJP leader Suvendu Adhikari claimed that 'action is taken only on Sanatanis', The Indian Express reported. 'I do not want to comment on what the girl has said, but what these people [Trinamool Congress] are doing is appeasement politics of a particular community, who are their vote bank,' the newspaper quoted the leader of the Opposition in the West Bengal Assembly as saying. Andhra Pradesh deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan on Friday said that the Kolkata Police had acted swiftly and arrested Panoli. 'But what about the deep, searing pain inflicted upon millions when elected leaders, MPs of TMC, mock Sanatana Dharma?' he asked on X. 'Where is the outrage when our faith is called 'Gandha Dhar'? Where is their apology? Where is their swift arrest?' The National Democratic Alliance partner and Janasena Party chief added that blasphemy must always be condemned. 'Secularism isn't a shield for some and a sword for others,' he said. 'It must be a two-way street. West Bengal Police, the nation is watching. Act justly for all.' Congress MP Karti P Chidambaram too accused the Kolkata Police of 'blatant misuse of police powers'. 'These inter-state arrests for social media posts (unless it's clearly demonstrated that it has led to a law and order situation) are blatantly a misuse of police powers,' Chidambaram said on X. On the other hand, Trinamool Congress MP Sagarika Ghose claimed that Panoli said 'directly abused a religion, reported The Indian Express. 'Free speech does not allow hate speech,' Ghosh told the newspaper. 'The Kolkata Police was acting on a warrant that they were duty bound to execute. The notice was served, but the family was absconding. The Kolkata Police just did duty.' The Kolkata Police had earlier said that several attempts were made to serve a legal notice to Panoli, but she and her family were untraceable. A court then issued an arrest warrant, after which she was tracked and arrested. The first information report was filed under sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita pertaining to promoting enmity between groups, deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage the religious feelings, intentional insult with the intent to provoke a breach of peace and statements that incite public mischief.
