logo
Airline bag policies are sexist and this court ruling against Ryan Air proves it

Airline bag policies are sexist and this court ruling against Ryan Air proves it

Independent15-05-2025

It's a tale of triumph, tenacity, and the timeless struggle of fitting a week's worth of essentials into a bag the size of a breadbox – passengers from all over the world inched forward in the age-old battle with airline luggage restrictions this week, after one brave passenge r took Ryanair, no less, and won.
The anonymous hero challenged Irish giant Ryanair after they were charged for hand luggage that, according to the court, could 'perfectly be transported in the cabin'. But a Spanish court ruled it to be an essential part of air travel, and deemed the fee 'abusive'. Ryanair were told they must reimburse the air traveller for hand luggage costs charged on five flights taken between 2019 and 2024.
The win is currently (presumably) being celebrated all over the world. For years, we've been at the mercy of arbitrary, inconsistent baggage rules that make travelling a nightmare, or – as evidenced this week – costly. And, while these restrictions clearly affect everyone, there's also no denying that women are the ones who bear the brunt of them. The system has sexism baked into it from the start.
For a start, the obvious: that women are the carriers of things. The spare charger, the extra hand sanitiser, an extra scarf for the chilly cabin (because higher oestrogen levels mean we also feel the cold more) and socks (for the same reason). We've got tampons and underwear stashed in there just in case, an eye mask, earplugs, headphones, books, extra ziplock bags for makeup to go through security smoothly for once, plenty of snacks. Oh, and everything the rest of the group forgot to pack. It's no coincidence that my partner likes to boast that he 'just travels lightly' and then proceeds to spend the rest of the trip asking whether I packed things he 'just didn't think about'.
Mums, of course, have all of the above plus a whole host of contingency plans rolled up in their backpacks. A ccording to one survey, parents (read: mostly mums) pack a minimum of 11 items – including a first aid kit – for their baby before even leaving the house to pop to the shops; when it comes to air travel, you do the maths. And, while it's definitely #NotAllDads, it's widely accepted (and documented) that mothers tend to handle chores, like packing, that require more mental effort – 60 per cent more than fathers, or 7 in 10 household tasks, in fact, says the University of Bath. All of which is to say: those women probably need a bigger bag.
Unlike one of my male friends, who never turns up to an airport more than an hour before his flight, we can't just roll up with a non-crease suit on, laptop and a wallet and hope for the best. Even if we're flying in and out for a meeting, we have flats because we can't travel in heels to pack, top-up makeup to take, and hair accessories (brushes, sprays, tongs, straighteners) to consider, so we don't rock up to a presentation looking a total state.
Even our physical differences have an impact: a friend tells me that she's constantly stopped by airline staff suspicious of the size of her cabin bag because it looks disproportionately big on her 5ft2in frame – her 6ft2in husband, she says, is never stopped with the same bag, because it just looks smaller on him.
Let's not forget that luggage has a rich history of sexism – we could have had the wheely suitcase decades earlier if it hadn't been for toxic masculinity and macho drivel. In 1970, a New Jersey-based luggage exec patented the first wheeled suitcase after watching a worker effortlessly glide a machine on a dolly through a warehouse. He quickly took a suitcase, clad with castors, into Macy's department store in Manhattan, to change the world of travel overnight. Only that didn't happen. Men buying suitcases saw it as a 'test of virility' to carry their heavy loads. Wheels were for babies, women and the weak. Investors (male) didn't buy the concept, and we were stuck with bad backs until the Nineties came around.
Of all the other well-documented misogyny that the air travel industry still can't seem to shift – it was only a few years ago that British Airways staff were forced to protest after the airline told female employees they must carry a handbag to work; just last year Spanish airline Vueling were told to pay a passenger €28,000 for denying a woman boarding 'because her cleavage was showing' – this one is perhaps the most common.
But, with any luck, with this week's court ruling on our side, maybe next time it'll be Ryanair doing the repacking. I rest my (jam-packed) case.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Primark release new beauty dupe of Sol De Janeiro travel set just in time for summer & it's £24 cheaper
Primark release new beauty dupe of Sol De Janeiro travel set just in time for summer & it's £24 cheaper

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Primark release new beauty dupe of Sol De Janeiro travel set just in time for summer & it's £24 cheaper

SHOPPERS have been rushing to Primark for their holiday must-haves. From cheap hand luggage to bikinis, the budget retailer has everything you need. 2 2 And now it's selling a beauty pack you won't want to forget in your hand luggage. It's already brought out Sol De Janeiro dupes in the past including a range of body mists and bath products. But now Primark has upped the stakes with its new travel-friendly buy. For just £6 you can now get a lip balm, moisturiser and body mist to rival the designer brand. The Santorini Sunset travel bag costs just £6 making it way cheaper to the Sol De Janeiro option which retails for £30. The travel essentials come in a gorgeous almond and caramel scent much like the luxe brand's classic Chirosa collection. Primark's original line-up of Sol de Janeiro dupes was released in April last year and consisted of three holiday-esque fragrances. Then in January this year, fast fashion bosses added five more scents - including the Santorini Sunsets. Among the others are Capri Coast, Bali Blush, Rio Romance and Fiji Fiesta, and they all come in similar bottles to the £24 Sol de Janeiro viral Perfume Mists. The travel set comes in an orange travel bag to match and is under the 100ml limit for hand luggage making it perfect for any vacations this year. Why Sol de Janeiro's Bum Bum Cream is a cult favourite among beauty lovers Holiday Must-haves Primark has gone viral this year for its selection of cheap hand luggage. TikTok user Pia Blossom decided to put it's new carry on suitcase to the test and see how much the popular tiny bag can hold - while being within the regulations. It measures 40x20x25cm, when its wheels are removed, meaning it's fully compliant with Ryanair's underseat baggage dimensions (40x20x25cm) It's also ideal for EasyJet customers, with their under-seat cabin bag's maximum dimensions being 45x36x20cm, including handles and wheels. The airline claims this size allows you to 'bring all the essentials for a short trip' - but Pia decided to see if this was true for her. 'Shall we see how much we can fit in it?" she asked viewers. Getting to work, Pia managed to add a 'couple of dresses, a couple of jackets, cardigan, underwear, spare bra and [two pairs of] summery shoes.' 'I almost forgot pyjamas, but we got them in there, too. 'This is closing much easier than I thought it would, which feels like a challenge to put more in. 'I am so impressed with that.'

Awkward moment influencer 'blasting loud music' to make TikTok videos outside a restaurant in Monaco is 'asked to leave' by security
Awkward moment influencer 'blasting loud music' to make TikTok videos outside a restaurant in Monaco is 'asked to leave' by security

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Awkward moment influencer 'blasting loud music' to make TikTok videos outside a restaurant in Monaco is 'asked to leave' by security

This is the awkward moment a 'rude' influencer who was 'blasting loud music' to make TikTok videos is allegedly asked to leave by security. Aubrey Bella, a travel blogger, was enjoying a meal in Monte Carlo, Monaco, when a woman set up a tripod right in front of her view of the legendary casino. Known for being the second-smallest sovereign state in the world after Vatican City with a radius of just 0.8 square miles, Monaco's exclusivity attracts the ultra-wealthy. The influencer plugged her phone onto a stand with a built-in ring light and allegedly started blasting 'loud music' to make TikTok videos, according to Aubrey. She filmed the woman setting up her camera and she appears to tell other tourists to move out of her shot at one point. Aubrey said: 'When you just want to relax on vacation but "influencers" are out in the wild too.' The content creator was allegedly told by the manager of the restaurant to leave three times before they called security to ask her to leave the premises. 'She gets told to delete all photos and escorted off the property,' Aubrey added. The unnamed woman - who was sporting a white satin dress - was also reportedly standing there for more than an hour filming clips for her social media account. Aubrey wrote: 'True story: Hanging out in Monte Carlo in this picture perfect spot to watch all the cars drive-by and the casino… This influencer comes up towards our table and starts making TikTok videos. 'But the thing is… The sound was on so loud! She was there for over an hour IN FRONT OF OUR TABLE! Blasting music. 'The manager told her to leave three times. They finally had to call and escort her off the property and have her delete all the photos and videos because they were high profile people in the back of her videos.' Those who viewed Aubrey's clip commented their thoughts, with one writing: 'She deserves it.' Another said: 'Not the bombastic side eye when she is the one in the wrong!!' Aubrey responded: 'Rightttt, she was soooo rude.' This comes as a woman was baffled when she was handed a menu with no prices on it in a Michelin star restaurant in Monaco. Lili Claire, an Australian living in Paris, travelled to Monaco for a trip with her boyfriend and they decided to dine out at Le Grill, which is located inside the prestigious Hôtel de Paris Monte-Carlo. The content creator was allegedly told by the manager of the restaurant to leave three times before they called security to ask her to leave the premises But the 25-year-old was shocked when she opened her menu and there were no prices on any of the dishes. However, her boyfriend opened his menu and saw how much each dish cost printed along the side, with Lili alleging that Le Grill, which holds one Michelin star, gave out different menus based on gender. Some dishes were priced at eye-watering amounts, such as 320 euros (£271) for caviar and 80 euros (£67) for ricotta pasta. She filmed the bizarre experience and wrote: 'Just found out that fancy restaurants in France give out different menus to men and women. Menus with no prices for women and menus with prices for men.' The original clip, which was uploaded last year to Instagram, got more than 22million views and 1.4million likes. The cheapest starter on the menu at Le Grill is the smoked Scottish salmon with cream cheese and pickles for a whopping 65 euros (£55). Le Grill's grilled sea bass with fondant fennel, golden artichokes, small capers and basil costs 110 euros each (£93). And if you opt to have a side dish of mashed potatoes, fries or grilled vegetables, they will each cost you 18 euros (£15) A bowl of farmer's vegetables, pesto and small spelt will also set you back 60 euros (£50). F&B Director at Hotel de Paris Monte-Carlo told Femail: 'The menu with prices is always given to the customer who made the reservation. It's true that at Le Grill, the majority of reservations are made by men, but the opposite may also be true.'

A villa we booked in Portugal was infested with mould, slugs, and ants... why won't Booking.com refund?
A villa we booked in Portugal was infested with mould, slugs, and ants... why won't Booking.com refund?

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

A villa we booked in Portugal was infested with mould, slugs, and ants... why won't Booking.com refund?

Organising a holiday for 20 people is not for the fainthearted. Sarah* started the planning for her girls holiday in December 2023, and after a year and a half of waiting she couldn't wait to get away. The villa in Portugal she booked was the perfect getaway for her and her girlfriends. But when they arrived, their dream holiday couldn't be further from what they expected. Sarah had the difficult task of organising the holiday for the large group while in New York, where she currently works. When she found a villa in Portugal on with enough bedrooms, a pool and a jacuzzi, she thought she'd struck gold. The villa, which cost €2,700 (£2,274) for three nights for 20 people, was perfect for the BBQs, pool days and private chef they had planned. While there were some mixed reviews, they were 'not a super precious group,' says Sarah. The villa, while listed on the booking website, was managed by French online property manager Homerez. Despite their involvement, Sarah had been in direct touch with the host who had arranged an airport transfer for the group for €600, which she paid via bank transfer. Fast forward to the first bank holiday in May this year, Sarah and her friends met at Lisbon airport to start their holiday. The group - which included a pregnant woman and a 71-year old - arrived on Friday evening and were met by the host's daughter, aged 17, who Sarah says was 'essentially managing the property', and son, aged 19. This chaotic arrival was a sign of things to come. Ants, slugs and mould everywhere Straight off the bat, Sarah and her friends found the property to be musty and very run down. There were some other obvious problems with the property when they arrived - including a toilet that didn't flush - which they raised with the host's daughter on arrival. But it wasn't until they went to sleep that they realised the severity of the issues. A few members of the group were put up in the outbuilding, which had not been included in the listing. They had to dry their sheets with a hairdryer before getting into bed, and the host's children revealed someone had recently tried to break in. Elsewhere, there were ant infestations and slugs in the main building, with rising damp and black mould everywhere, including on a baby's highchair and chopping board. There were other issues with the rooms, including a hole punched in one bedroom door and covered with a picture frame, as well as dirty beds. The outside areas were unkept, with a broken patio, shredded pergola fabric, a dirty swimming pool and mouldy bean bags. One of the fridges, which was left outside, was so filthy that the group had to throw away the food they'd bought for the weekend. Sarah says that the villa pictured on and Homerez was unrecognisable from the one they stayed at. She says, 'the photos were clearly from 2 or 3 years' and the host, who Sarah thinks lives in Paris for most of the year, 'clearly doesn't know how bad it is.' We've lost thousands after booking new villa By the next morning, the group decided to book another villa, which set them back €2,600 for the remaining two nights. When they contacted the host to tell her they'd be leaving, she said the group was lying but insisted they check out by 11am. She did not offer a refund. Despite this, Sarah and her friends refused to let the experience ruin the holiday. 'Everyone had a great time, we made great memories but it was a constant stress the whole weekend,' she says. 'We were constantly planning the next thing, trying too find a restaurant for dinner.' For the last day of the holiday, the group had paid €1,000 for a private chef, which was not refundable, but their new villa had little space to accommodate. Instead, they were forced to spend an additional €1,200 to hire a bar for the meal. They also did not receive the return airport transfer they had paid for. Instead, the host said the group had damaged the property, despite being there for just 12 hours. When Sarah got in touch with they offered her a refund of just over €500, representing just 20 per cent of the value of their three-night stay. She says that while she understands acts as an intermediary, she wants to know why there is no process for vetting accommodation. 'Surely, they have a duty of care to make sure it's all accurate.. At the moment, I have €2,600 on my credit for the new accommodation. 'Once I take into consideration the €500 refund, we have €2,100 that we need to pay off. That's another €100 which doesn't sound much but everyone's got different incomes.' The property manager Homerez told Sarah that the group had left the villa in a bad state and offered no refund. It did not respond to This Is Money's request for comment. told This Is Money: 'We offer a wide range of accommodation options to suit all budgets, supported by a review system that helps guide customers in choosing their stay. 'We can see this property has hosted successful stays, however we are sorry to hear that it did not meet the customer's expectations. 'After reviewing the photographs provided, we have issued a further partial refund. 'If a customer arrives at a property that does not meet their expectations, our customer service team is available 24/7 to assist and resolve any issues promptly.' It did not respond to questions about its vetting procedure. has since refunded Sarah and her friends another €500, but it still leaves the group out of pocket. It is also currently unclear whether the money will be refunded as cash or as credit - and the whole experience has put the group off from ever using the booking giant again.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store