SMRs return to Korea's energy mix amid AI-driven power surge
Amid surging demand and limited grid capacity, SMRs emerge as controversial but viable option
Small modular reactors or SMRs are reemerging in the national energy conversation as South Korea reevaluates its energy strategy, driven by a sharp rise in electricity demand from artificial intelligence and data center expansion.
The new liberal administration under President Lee Jae Myung, who took office earlier this month, has expressed cautious support for SMRs. This marks a shift from the Democratic Party of Korea's stance under the Moon Jae-in administration, which pursued a nuclear phase-out.
While Lee has reiterated his opposition to expanding large-scale nuclear power, he views SMRs as a pragmatic, flexible energy solution compatible with Korea's decarbonization and energy security goals.
SMRs are advanced nuclear reactors that generate up to 300 megawatts of electricity — about one-third the capacity of traditional nuclear plants.
Their compact, factory-built design allows for modular deployment in remote or space-limited locations, making them an attractive alternative for industrial zones, small communities and even energy-intensive tech facilities.
SMRs use the same basic fission process as conventional reactors but are engineered for simpler, safer and more scalable use.
The growing appeal of SMRs also stems from their potential to address the surging power demands driven by AI technology.
South Korea is expected to add 732 new data centers by 2029, requiring a combined 49.4 gigawatts of contracted power. This is equivalent to more than half of the nation's peak capacity in 2022, according to the Industry Ministry.
As global tech firms look to low-carbon energy to power their operations, SMRs have emerged as a viable candidate to meet such needs.
In line with this shift, Democratic Party lawmaker Hwang Jung-a on June 12 proposed a bill titled the 'SMR Special Act,' which seeks to establish a national roadmap for SMR development.
The legislation includes provisions for administrative, technical and financial support for research and development projects, private-sector participation, workforce training and public engagement.
'This is a legislative measure in response to what advanced countries such as the US, UK, and Canada are already doing to support SMRs,' Hwang said.
However, the renewed push for SMRs has sparked concern among environmental groups.
The Korea Federation for Environmental Movements issued a statement calling SMRs a 'delusion of the nuclear industry,' raising safety concerns over radiation risks, particularly when reactors are located near urban centers.
Critics also argue that SMRs may have higher costs per kilowatt-hour than traditional nuclear plants and still produce radioactive waste without a clear disposal strategy.
Despite the criticism, advocates argue that SMRs offer advanced safety features, including passive cooling systems that allow reactors to shut down safely without external power in the event of an emergency.
'SMRs are the optimal energy source for addressing the climate crisis, energy security and the AI era,' said Korean Nuclear Society President Lee Ki-bog.
Korea's Nuclear Safety and Security Commission is also stepping in to support the shift. The agency announced plans to develop a regulatory framework to back the government's 'i-SMR' project. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power, the country's state-run utility, aims to secure regulatory approval by 2028.
Experts say that while Korea already possesses world-class nuclear technology, its industrial base remains narrow.
'Nuclear energy supplies around 30 percent of Korea's electricity, but only accounts for 10 percent of total fuel costs,' said Kim Sung-joong, a professor of nuclear engineering at Hanyang University.
'If the share of nuclear energy were increased to 50 percent, we could cut energy import costs by up to 11 trillion won ($8 billion).'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
4 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Look beyond military to secure peace: Lee
Liberal president visits Gwangju to seek reconciliation over thorny issues President Lee Jae Myung said Wednesday that military tensions between the two Koreas should give way to peace on the Korean Peninsula without a fight, adding that bygone are the days when South Korea relied on military strength for peace. "The era of relying solely on military power to safeguard the country is over," Lee noted in a Facebook post Wednesday commemorating the 75th anniversary of the Korean War outbreak on June 25, 1950. "It is more important to win without a fight than to win through a fight." Lee stressed that military standoffs on the Korean Peninsula will no longer contribute to peace, which he said is critical for the economic rebound of South Korea. "Making a country that will never experience war again is the right way (for a country) to reward people for their sacrifices and dedication," Lee said. Honoring the fallen Korean War heroes, Lee pointed to the fact that South Korea has become the first country in the world since the launch of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development to have transitioned from an aid recipient to a donor. "We rose again, held onto hope and overcame our wounds to move toward a better tomorrow," Lee said. "South Korea is regarded as a role model for developing countries around the world." Also, the country is now considered one of the top 10 economic powerhouses, rising from the ashes of the war that ended in 1953, Lee added. "South Korea of today would have never been created without the sacrifice and dedication of the soldiers and veterans who defended the nation at the war front, their bereaved families and all the people who lived through the scars of war," Lee noted. "I feel regretful that I could not adequately compensate and honor those who made extraordinary sacrifices to safeguard the nation," Lee also said, pledging to provide additional support for their dedication to the country. Lee skipped the commemoration ceremony of the 75th anniversary of the Korean War held in Daejeon on Wednesday morning. Lee's predecessor Yoon Suk Yeol attended the ceremony of the previous year — the only time during his presidency — and denounced North Korea's "despicable, irrational provocation" against South Korea regarding its growing military ties with Russia and its move to send trash balloons to South Korea. Instead, Lee went to visit the Sorokdo National Hospital, dedicated to the treatment of Hansen's disease patients. There, Lee acknowledged the patients' effort to preserve human dignity and cherish the community values, adding that people's prejudice toward the patients must be erased, according to the presidential office. Lee was the first South Korean president in history to have visited the facility. Later on Wednesday, Lee visited Gwangju in the southwestern region to address controversies related to the relocation of an air base to nearby Muan-gun in South Jeolla Province. Through a livestreamed debate held at the National Asian Culture Center in Gwangju, Lee hosted the meeting between the governor of the South Jeolla Province, the mayor of Gwangju and the county head of Muan-gun. The meeting revolved around the thorny issue of Gwangju's proposed relocation of the base. The long-awaited move has been touted as the chance for Gwangju to take advantage of the opportunities for land development.
Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Skilled immigration, Japan ties key to rebooting Korea's growth: KCCI
New report urges mega sandbox reforms, reshoring of fabs, $6tr Korea-Japan bloc to unlock new growth engines South Korea needs to attract 5 million highly-skilled foreign professionals and forge an economic alliance with Japan to tackle its demographic headwinds and counter rising trade protectionism, the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry proposed Wednesday. In a policy booklet roughly translates to "New Order, New Growth" delivered Tuesday to the government, parliament, and presidential office, the business lobby outlined structural fixes to help Korea escape the trap of slowing growth and a shrinking labor force. 'This is a time when growth is more necessary than ever. The global landscape is shifting dramatically, and the Korean economy, having failed to bring about lasting change, now faces the risk of zero growth,' wrote Chey Tae-won, chairman of SK Group and KCCI, in the booklet's preface. 'We must work with the new government to build future growth engines for the Korean economy. It's essential to find actionable solutions to reduce high costs by joining hands with global partners.' The proposal comes as the Lee Jae Myung administration works to finalize its national policy roadmap, with input from a new planning committee that is actively soliciting feedback from business and civil society. Among Korea's most pressing structural concerns is a declining working-age population coupled with a limited domestic market. The KCCI argued this can be alleviated by attracting skilled talent from countries such as Vietnam, Indonesia and Malaysia. Beyond addressing labor shortages, an influx of foreign professionals could be expected to stimulate consumption and increase tax revenues. Supporting this approach, studies cited in the proposal showed that a 3 percent increase in skilled and unskilled foreign labor leads to GDP growth of 1.46 percent and 0.85 percent, respectively, in the US, with comparable figures in Japan, underscoring the economic benefits of immigration. The plan recommends visa reforms inspired by Germany's Green Card system tailored for IT professionals, along with family friendly settlement policies. It also proposed reshoring major overseas semiconductor fabs to Korea to attract highly skilled workers on a large scale. In tandem with immigration, the KCCI urges Korea to deepen economic cooperation with Japan, a nation grappling with similar demographic and industrial challenges. The report argues that aligning the two economies could create a $6 trillion economic bloc, eclipsing Germany and positioning Korea and Japan as global rule-makers in trade and regulatory standards. 'If Korea and Japan become each other's second-largest domestic market, they can enjoy productivity gains even in aging societies,' the report said. Joint LNG procurement and coordinated production networks spanning Asia, the US, and the EU could lower costs and enhance competitiveness. The proposal envisioned an emerging Asian economic zone — including Korea, Japan, and other developing countries that could grow to $47.7 trillion by 2030, becoming the world's largest economic region, 1.3 times the size of the US economy. The booklet also called for a fundamental shift away from Korea's longstanding dependence on goods exports, which have fueled remarkable growth -- over 10,000 percent in GDP over 70 years -- but are now hampered by shrinking profit margins and rising protectionism. Manufacturing profitability has steeply declined, with net income per 10,000 won ($7.35) in sales dropping from 830 won in 1995 to just 320 won in 2024, reflecting structural challenges in the sector. To counter this, the KCCI advocated boosting service exports and primary income through strategic overseas investments, pointing to Japan's returns from foreign assets and the UK's robust service economy as benchmarks. One example the group suggested was the industrialization of Korean food and culture exports, including recipe licensing, cooking classes, kitchenware, and interior design, aiming to capture untapped non-tariff export value and open new global markets. To implement these changes, the KCCI proposed expanding Korea's regulatory sandbox into a 'mega sandbox' model. This framework would offer wide-ranging regulatory exemptions, aggressive private sector incentives, talent matching platforms and global-standard living conditions to attract and retain top international talent. The 250-page report was compiled by 13 experts, ranging from think tank researchers and law professors to industry consultants, including Kim Chang-wook, Boston Consulting Group's semiconductor lead in Korea, Suh Dong-hyun, economist at the Bank of Korea, and Kwon Seok-joon, a chemical and polymer engineering professor at Sungkyunkwan University.
Korea Herald
6 hours ago
- Korea Herald
SMRs return to Korea's energy mix amid AI-driven power surge
Amid surging demand and limited grid capacity, SMRs emerge as controversial but viable option Small modular reactors or SMRs are reemerging in the national energy conversation as South Korea reevaluates its energy strategy, driven by a sharp rise in electricity demand from artificial intelligence and data center expansion. The new liberal administration under President Lee Jae Myung, who took office earlier this month, has expressed cautious support for SMRs. This marks a shift from the Democratic Party of Korea's stance under the Moon Jae-in administration, which pursued a nuclear phase-out. While Lee has reiterated his opposition to expanding large-scale nuclear power, he views SMRs as a pragmatic, flexible energy solution compatible with Korea's decarbonization and energy security goals. SMRs are advanced nuclear reactors that generate up to 300 megawatts of electricity — about one-third the capacity of traditional nuclear plants. Their compact, factory-built design allows for modular deployment in remote or space-limited locations, making them an attractive alternative for industrial zones, small communities and even energy-intensive tech facilities. SMRs use the same basic fission process as conventional reactors but are engineered for simpler, safer and more scalable use. The growing appeal of SMRs also stems from their potential to address the surging power demands driven by AI technology. South Korea is expected to add 732 new data centers by 2029, requiring a combined 49.4 gigawatts of contracted power. This is equivalent to more than half of the nation's peak capacity in 2022, according to the Industry Ministry. As global tech firms look to low-carbon energy to power their operations, SMRs have emerged as a viable candidate to meet such needs. In line with this shift, Democratic Party lawmaker Hwang Jung-a on June 12 proposed a bill titled the 'SMR Special Act,' which seeks to establish a national roadmap for SMR development. The legislation includes provisions for administrative, technical and financial support for research and development projects, private-sector participation, workforce training and public engagement. 'This is a legislative measure in response to what advanced countries such as the US, UK, and Canada are already doing to support SMRs,' Hwang said. However, the renewed push for SMRs has sparked concern among environmental groups. The Korea Federation for Environmental Movements issued a statement calling SMRs a 'delusion of the nuclear industry,' raising safety concerns over radiation risks, particularly when reactors are located near urban centers. Critics also argue that SMRs may have higher costs per kilowatt-hour than traditional nuclear plants and still produce radioactive waste without a clear disposal strategy. Despite the criticism, advocates argue that SMRs offer advanced safety features, including passive cooling systems that allow reactors to shut down safely without external power in the event of an emergency. 'SMRs are the optimal energy source for addressing the climate crisis, energy security and the AI era,' said Korean Nuclear Society President Lee Ki-bog. Korea's Nuclear Safety and Security Commission is also stepping in to support the shift. The agency announced plans to develop a regulatory framework to back the government's 'i-SMR' project. Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power, the country's state-run utility, aims to secure regulatory approval by 2028. Experts say that while Korea already possesses world-class nuclear technology, its industrial base remains narrow. 'Nuclear energy supplies around 30 percent of Korea's electricity, but only accounts for 10 percent of total fuel costs,' said Kim Sung-joong, a professor of nuclear engineering at Hanyang University. 'If the share of nuclear energy were increased to 50 percent, we could cut energy import costs by up to 11 trillion won ($8 billion).'
