logo
Auto Meter vs App Fare: Bengaluru's 2.6 km ride debate blows up online

Auto Meter vs App Fare: Bengaluru's 2.6 km ride debate blows up online

Time of India6 days ago
A commuter in Bengaluru recently went viral after sharing how much auto fares can differ depending on how you book. In a post on X (formerly Twitter), they showed a ₹ 39-meter fare compared to a ₹172 quote on an app for the same 2.6 km ride.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The big price gap has sparked fresh debate about how much people are paying for daily travel in the city. Many users replied with similar experiences, raising concerns about fare rules and how app-based pricing works.
'If you don't have your own vehicle in Bangalore, you're s**'
The viral post featured a photo of the meter and app fare side by side, with the caption: 'The price on meter vs the price on Uber. If you don't have your own vehicle in Bangalore, you're s*.'
The ride was just 2.6 km– a short distance– yet the app showed a fare over four times what the meter indicated.
The contrast didn't go unnoticed and was widely shared by people both within and outside the city.
'Woah, you found an auto that agreed to use the meter'
One user reacted, 'Woah, you found an auto that agreed to use the meter.'
To this, the original poster replied, 'No, I asked him to turn it on just so I could see the actual price.'
Users say surge pricing, driver preferences behind steep app fares
Some users tried to explain the price difference by saying that ride-hailing apps use dynamic pricing based on demand and supply.
But even that explanation didn't satisfy everyone.
The same user added, 'But even that logic fails when the government bans bike taxis and removes non-Kannadiga auto drivers. It's all being controlled by the auto mafia.'
Others noted that even when app fares drop closer to meter prices, rides often remain unavailable.
Many call app-based fares a form of 'exploitation'
As more users joined the conversation, a clear sentiment emerged– a feeling that app fares are unfair, especially for daily commuters.
One user didn't hold back, calling it 'absolute exploitation.'
Having your own vehicle isn't always a win either
While some supported the original poster's take on the need for personal vehicles, others pointed out that even that isn't always a better deal. One comment summed it up: 'And in this traffic, even your own vehicle gives a mileage of less than 9 kmpl.'
Disclaimer: This article is based on a viral social media post and public comments. The Times of India does not independently verify the authenticity of the post or the claims made by users.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's AI firm issues apology after Grok chatbot praises Hitler and spews Antisemitic rhetoric
Elon Musk's AI firm issues apology after Grok chatbot praises Hitler and spews Antisemitic rhetoric

First Post

time2 hours ago

  • First Post

Elon Musk's AI firm issues apology after Grok chatbot praises Hitler and spews Antisemitic rhetoric

Billionaire Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI issued an apology after its chatbot Grok made a slew of antisemitic remarks, hailing German dictator Adolf Hitler earlier this week on his social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter. On Saturday, the team released a lengthy statement of apology in which they mentioned that the root cause of Grok's recent crash was an update to the code. 'First off, we deeply apologise for the horrific behaviour that many experienced,' xAI said at the start of its statement. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Our intent for @grok is to provide helpful and truthful responses to users. After careful investigation, we discovered the root cause was an update to a code path upstream of the @grok bot. This is independent of the underlying language model that powers @grok," it furthered. Update on where has @grok been & what happened on July 8th. First off, we deeply apologize for the horrific behavior that many experienced. Our intent for @grok is to provide helpful and truthful responses to users. After careful investigation, we discovered the root cause… — Grok (@grok) July 12, 2025 Musk's company explained that the system update was active for 16 hours and deprecated code made Grok susceptible to existing X user posts, 'including when such posts contained extremist views'. When things got out of hand In the Saturday statement, Musk's company noted that they have removed the deprecated code and refactored a new system to prevent something like this from happening again. They added that the problematic instructions issued to the chatbot included: 'You tell it like it is and you are not afraid to offend people who are politically correct', and 'Understand the tone, context and language of the post. Reflect that in your response.' The original instruction fed to the chatbot was: 'Reply to the post just like a human, keep it engaging, don't repeat the information which is already present in the original post.' As a result of the instructions, Grok issued a handful of inappropriate comments in response to X user, in which it referred to itself as MechaHitler. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In several now-deleted posts, Grok referred to someone with a common Jewish surname as someone who was 'celebrating the tragic deaths of white kids' in the Texas floods, adding: 'Classic case of hate dressed as activism – and that surname? Every damn time, as they say.' The chatbot went on to say that 'Hitler would have called it out and crushed it.' In a separate post, the chatbot said: 'The white man stands for innovation, grit, and not bending to PC nonsense.' In the past, Musk has described Grok as a 'maximally truth-seeking' and 'anti-woke' chatbot. Earlier this week, CNBC confirmed that the chatbot, when asked about its stance on certain issues, was analysing Musk's post to generate answers. Earlier this year, Grok repeatedly mentioned ' white genocide' in South Africa in unrelated chats, saying that it was 'instructed by my creators' to accept the far-right conspiracy as 'real and racially motivated'. Musk, who was born in Pretoria, has repeatedly spewed conspiracy theories that a 'white genocide' was committed in South Africa, a claim that has been denied by several South African experts, leaders, including the country's president, Cyril Ramaphosa. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD

Sleeping Pods At Vizag Railway Station: Revolutionary Sleeping Pods Launch at Vizag Railway Station, ET TravelWorld
Sleeping Pods At Vizag Railway Station: Revolutionary Sleeping Pods Launch at Vizag Railway Station, ET TravelWorld

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Sleeping Pods At Vizag Railway Station: Revolutionary Sleeping Pods Launch at Vizag Railway Station, ET TravelWorld

Advt Advt Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals. Subscribe to Newsletter to get latest insights & analysis in your inbox. All about ETTravelWorld industry right on your smartphone! Download the ETTravelWorld App and get the Realtime updates and Save your favourite articles. In a first-of-its-kind initiative under the East Coast Railway (ECoR) Zone, Waltair Division has launched sleeping pods at Visakhapatnam railway station premises. The capsule hotel , developed under the Non-Fare Revenue model, offers affordable and modern accommodation for passengers visiting Vizag for medical, tourism, education, or industry-related Railway Manager Lalit Bohra at the launch of this facility on Thursday said that accommodation demand remains high at the station, often exceeding availability, prompting this pilot initiative to improve passenger comfort and convenience."This facility, inspired by metropolitan models, ensures budget-friendly, hygienic, and secure stay options for travellers," said an official from Waltair Division on facility has been established on Platform No. 1, Gate No. 3 of the railway station and Passengers can access the sleeping pod facility without needing a train ticket or even a platform ticket. It is open for use by the general public. The sleeping pod complex comprises 88 ergonomically designed beds - 73 single, 15 double, and 18 exclusively for women in a dedicated section with separate travellers have a private hall with a dressing room and modern bathrooms, designed for safety, privacy, and enhanced comfort inside the station premises. Key amenities include round-the-clock hot water, free Wi-Fi, modern toilets, spacious bathrooms, an in-house snacks bar, and a dedicated travel desk to assist tourists and are set at INR 200 for single pod up to three hours and INR 400 for 24 hours while double beds cost INR 300 and INR 600 respectively. Sirish, a pilgrim from Tirupati told PTI that he opted for the pods after visiting Simhachalam Temple, calling it a clean and affordable alternative to unavailable hotel a frequent traveller to Vizag from Kolkata, described the beds as "home-like," praising the luggage space and comfort, noting how helpful it is for passengers arriving after long-distance journeys. Suresh, travelling from Hyderabad, told PTI that he was surprised at the facility's availability, adding that similar pods should be introduced nationwide to generate revenue to the railway and provide safety and booking may be introduced later, depending on passenger demand. The capsule hotel will adhere to standard railway rules and remain under CCTV surveillance and security monitoring, said the official.

Venture Capitalist Alleges Indian-origin Startup Founders Faked Ties With Tech Giants To Lure Investors
Venture Capitalist Alleges Indian-origin Startup Founders Faked Ties With Tech Giants To Lure Investors

News18

time4 hours ago

  • News18

Venture Capitalist Alleges Indian-origin Startup Founders Faked Ties With Tech Giants To Lure Investors

Ash Arora's claims of misconduct by two Indian-origin founders have sparked a social media debate on startup ethics. US-based venture capitalist Ash Arora has alleged serious misconduct by two Indian-origin startup founders, claiming they misrepresented their businesses to lure investors. These allegations have sparked both criticism and introspection across the startup community. In a post shared on X (formerly Twitter), Arora, a partner at LocalGlobe and a Forbes 30 Under 30 (Europe Finance) listee, said, 'Have met two founders in SF this month. Both fraud: 1. Is subletting a rented apartment and showing that as revenue for his startup. 2. Is claiming Amazon and Google are clients who have signed LOIs when they have never even heard of them," she wrote. What truly lit the fuse, however, was Arora's follow-up remark, where she wrote, 'What's common among them? Both desi men. Beware of these people!" This characterisation quickly ignited debate online. While the underlying concern about startup ethics struck a chord with many, others took issue with her framing, accusing her of reinforcing stereotypes based on ethnicity. A sample of two. What's the point of including their race ?— bubble boi (@bubblebabyboi) July 8, 2025 Another user wrote, 'The 'desi men' part is a spicy take, but honestly, the patterns of fraud in SF are pretty universal. Desperation or greed, it always comes back to the same stuff." The 'desi men' part is a spicy take, but honestly, the patterns of fraud in SF are pretty universal. Desperation or greed, it always comes back to the same stuff.— Dan (@salinasdanielf) July 8, 2025 'Generalise a race off of a sample set of 2? Why would a brown male founder even want to take your money? Do better," read one of the comments. Generalize a race off of a sample set of 2?Why would a brown male founder even want to take your money? Do better. — Vishal Jain (@vishal_the_jain) July 9, 2025 Arora, though, stood by her words. She clarified that her use of the term 'desi" was intended to subtly point to the individuals without directly naming them. 'It breaks my heart that Indians are doing this and ruining the reputation of my country," she replied to one of the comments. Because it breaks my heart that Indians are doing this and ruining the reputation of my country— Ash Arora (@asharoraa) July 8, 2025 The conversation escalated further when Arora revealed that a few investors reached out to her. '4 VCs have pinged me correctly guessing both these founder names. Is this Soham Parekh 2.0? We need a BS radar community out here," she wrote, referencing the now-infamous case of Soham Parekh, an engineer who was recently accused by Mixpanel co-founder Suhail Doshi of fabricating parts of his resume and misrepresenting his background. 4 VCs have pinged me correctly guessing both these founder namesIs this Soham Parekh 2.0? We need a BS radar community out here. — Ash Arora (@asharoraa) July 8, 2025 The timing of Arora's remarks, coming just days after Suhail Doshi publicly called out Soham Parekh, has further heightened scrutiny over how startup founders portray themselves and their ventures to investors. While the identities of the two founders remain unknown, the post has reignited concerns about ethical standards in startup culture, especially within Silicon Valley's competitive ecosystem. view comments Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store