Illinois schools may be forced to change mascots under proposed law
The Brief
A proposed Illinois law would prohibit public schools from using mascots with derogatory names for people with disabilities.
Freeburg High School's mascot, the "Midgets," has drawn criticism from disability rights activists.
The school has resisted past calls to change the mascot, but the new legislation could force a change by 2028.
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. - A new bill introduced in the Illinois legislature could require schools across the state to change mascots that reference disabilities in a derogatory way.
The proposal comes as Freeburg High School, located about 25 miles from St. Louis, faces renewed criticism over its mascot, the "Midgets."
What we know
The activist group Mascots Matter filed a complaint in January with the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights, arguing that Freeburg's mascot violates federal anti-discrimination laws and offends people with dwarfism. The school prominently features the mascot's name and cartoonish imagery on buildings, its website, and social media.
In response to the complaint, a Democratic lawmaker from Rockford introduced a bill that would ban public schools from using mascots that include derogatory terms for people with disabilities.
The backstory
This is not the first time Freeburg High School has faced pressure to retire its mascot.
In 2014, the national organization Little People of America urged the school board to change the name, calling it derogatory, objectifying, and dehumanizing. However, the school ultimately kept the mascot after strong community support for its tradition.
What's next
The proposed legislation will now move through the Illinois General Assembly.
If passed, the law would give schools, including Freeburg, until 2028 to phase out old logos, uniforms, and other materials.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tensions rise in Los Angeles as police declare ‘unlawful' assembly
Tensions mounted in Los Angeles on Sunday afternoon as police clashed with protesters on a freeway and declared another protest outside the Metropolitan Detention Center 'unlawful.' Dozens of protesters were arrested throughout the day. About 300 National Guard members were deployed in the city, after President Trump made the extraordinary decision to send members of the military to counter what he called 'insurrectionist mobs.' The protesters, responding to the Trump administration's immigration raids in the city, blocked the 101 freeway starting at about 3:30 p.m. in Los Angeles. Police officers, firing tear gas canisters and other projectiles into the crowds, managed to clear the highway by 5 p.m. Hundreds of people continued to line the surrounding streets. Shortly after 3 p.m., the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) announced that a separate pocket of protesters outside the city's prison in Alameda was illegal and that arrests were underway. 'An UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY has been declared for the area of Alameda between 2nd St and Aliso St. A DISPERSAL ORDER has been issued. Arrests are being made,' the LAPD wrote on the social platform X. CNN reported that police officers were seen striking and pushing protesters and deploying flash-bangs and tear gas into the crowd. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass (D), who slammed Trump's decision to send the National Guard into the city, issued a warning to protesters who did not remain peaceful. 'We will always protect the constitutional right for Angelenos to peacefully protest. However, violence, destruction and vandalism will not be tolerated in our City and those responsible will be held fully accountable,' she wrote on X. She later said the chaos on Sunday was 'provoked by the administration.' Dan Bongino, the deputy FBI director, also issued a warning as tensions mounted through the afternoon. 'If you choose violence tonight, this message is for you. We will be investigating and pursuing all available leads for assault on a federal officer, in addition to the many arrests already made,' he wrote on X. All 23 Democratic governors issued a statement Sunday afternoon slamming Trump's decision to federalize California's National Guard, using a law that hasn't been used in decades, arguing it was both unnecessary and escalatory. California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) office sent a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Sunday asking him to rescind the order deploying armed forces into the city. Trump spoke briefly to reporters before boarding Air Force One en route to Camp David on Sunday afternoon. He said he would meet military leaders at the presidential retreat but did not say what they were meeting about. Asked by reporters whether he would invoke the Insurrection Act, which expands the president's powers during a national security crisis, Trump suggested the protests were not yet an 'insurrection.' However, soon after that, he described the protesters as an 'insurrectionist mob' in a post on Truth Social. 'I am directing Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and Attorney General Pam Bondi, in coordination with all other relevant Departments and Agencies, to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots,' Trump wrote. 'Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Howie Morales to forego run for governor, but says he's not done with politics
Jun. 8—SANTA FE — After more than 20 years in elected office, Howie Morales is planning to take a break from the political arena. New Mexico's lieutenant governor said Sunday he would not be running for governor next year, a decision he attributed to a desire to spend more time with his two teenage children. "I'm at peace not pursuing another statewide race," Morales told the Journal. "Right now, my commitment is to them." His decision leaves three Democrats in the 2026 gubernatorial contest — former U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, Bernalillo County District Attorney Sam Bregman and former Las Cruces Mayor Ken Miyagishima. The race has already seen big fundraising hauls from several candidates, even though there's still roughly a year until next year's primary election. Haaland announced last month she has received nearly $3.7 million in donations, while Bregman said he raked in more than $1 million in the five weeks after announcing his campaign. The fundraising amounts are both impressive and intimidating, Morales said. He also expressed concern about the role of money in state politics. As for what might comes next, Morales said he plans to finish out the roughly 18 months left on the term he was elected to in 2022. He also acknowledged possible interest in the president job at Western New Mexico University, after previous WNMU president Joseph Shepard stepped down in January following an ethics scandal. Specifically, Morales said he was "watching it closely" as university officials move forward with a presidential search. A Silver City native and former educator, Morales served as Grant County clerk before being appointed to fill an open state Senate seat in 2008. He ran unsuccessfully for governor in 2014, but won a three-way Democratic primary race to be the party's lieutenant governor nominee in 2018. Morales, running on a ticket with Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham, was then elected lieutenant governor that year and reelected four years later. In the lieutenant governor post, Morales presides over the Senate during legislative sessions and serves as acting governor while Lujan Grisham is traveling outside New Mexico. Earlier this year, Morales signed more than 30 executive orders freeing up state funding for disaster recovery efforts in the Ruidoso and Roswell areas while Lujan Grisham was on a trade mission in Asia. Morales, 52, said he's worked well with the governor and described working with rural New Mexico communities as one of his top accomplishments as lieutenant governor. While Morales ruled out a run for governor next year, he said that doesn't mean he might not run for elected office again in the future. "I'm not in any way saying I'm retiring from politics," he said in the Sunday interview, citing his relatively young age and political connections. Meanwhile, Morales is not the only high-profile Democrat to decide against a 2026 gubernatorial campaign after considering such a run. U.S. Sen. Martin Heinrich did likewise in January, just two weeks before Haaland announced her candidacy. Whomever wins next year's Democratic primary will likely be the favorite in the general election race, since no Republican has won a statewide contest since former Supreme Court Justice Judith Nakamura did so in 2016. The GOP field is still taking shape, with several potential candidates mulling over possible runs. Rio Rancho Mayor Gregg Hull is the only Republican who has confirmed his candidacy so far, though Hull postponed his planned campaign launch earlier this month. Some groups have already issued endorsements in the Democratic primary race, but Morales said it's still too early to say whether he'll publicly back a candidate.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Soaking the rich — as Mamdani and other lefties want —won't pay for a supersized NYC gov't
Mayoral candidate and Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani vaulted into contention in this month's Democratic primary by pledging to supersize city government. 'He knows exactly how to pay for it, too,' his campaign brags. Does he, though? Mamdani's platform — free child care, more public housing and an end to bus fares or CUNY tuition, just to name a few — wouldn't come cheap. Advertisement New Yorkers can have all of it, he promises, for the bargain-basement price of $10 billion in new revenues — less than a tenth of the current city budget. Mamdani is very much lowballing his agenda's price tag. Yet even if he weren't, he still wouldn't likely be able to deliver. Advertisement Most of his plans rely on a pair of tax hikes on corporations and millionaire earners, totaling $9 billion. He doesn't have authority to implement either. Should his cocktail of social-media savvy and socialism land him in Gracie Mansion, he'd need Gov. Kathy Hochul and state lawmakers to OK these 'revenue raisers.' New York's local governments, the city included, can't set their own personal or business income-tax rates. Between the city's 1975 brush with insolvency, and its more recent fiscal profligacy, that's understandable. Here's another good reason: Candidates sometimes don't understand themselves how taxes work — and Mamdani is clearly one of them. Advertisement Mamdani regularly compares the top state corporate tax rates of New York (7.25%) and New Jersey (11.5%). These are essentially the state tax rates on businesses profits related to their activity in a state. Mamdani says he'd 'match' New Jersey's rate. On the one hand, that would be a windfall—for Albany, which collects the state corporate tax, not for New York City, where most is generated. Yet Mamdani doesn't get that New York City's biggest firms already pay far more than they would on the other side of the Hudson. Before anyone cuts a check to Albany, city businesses pay the Business Corporation Tax, at least 6.5% for small businesses and as much as 9%. On their remaining income, companies pay the state Corporation Franchise Tax, plus a surcharge to support the MTA. Advertisement All-in, the top state-local rate for businesses in the city is generally just over 17.4%. For them, 'matching' New Jersey would be a meaty tax cut. But say Albany implemented Mamdani's $5 billion hike (after all, lawmakers pushed unsuccessfully for a smaller corporate tax increase this year). That would push the top combined corporate tax rate to a stratospheric 22%. Nor would the proceeds flow automatically to the five boroughs. It would still be 'Albany's' money. Mamdani would need to persuade lawmakers and the governor to spend the proceeds his way. He may find his friends in Albany aren't so friendly when money's involved. Compare that to North Carolina, which is phasing out its corporate tax. It's no coincidence that state has been scooping up new corporate headquarters. Or Pennsylvania, which is in the process of reducing its top corporate rate from 10% percent in 2022, to 8% this year, toward the goal of 5% in 2031. Soak-the-rich rhetoric aside, even Albany can't ignore the explosion of remote work and the danger of pushing major employers to shift operations or direct expansions elsewhere. Advertisement This isn't the only facet of tax policy Mamdani doesn't get. His other big tax increase would have city residents with incomes over $1 million pay the city an extra 2% of their earnings (on top of their Medicare, Social Security, paid family leave and state and federal income taxes). A growing body of data show people with high incomes and residences in other states limit their time in New York to reduce their exposure to the bigger bite taken by state taxes. Here's yet another wrinkle: New York taxes people on their activity in the state, even if they don't live here. By contrast, since 1999, the city levies an income tax only on its residents — and, as with the business taxes, only with Albany's blessing. Advertisement Plenty of people tolerate this extra tax, which tops out at just under 3.9%. But a two-point jump would measurably affect behavior. A couple making $1 million would avoid about $53,000 in city taxes by moving to Westchester or Nassau — up considerably from the $35,000 they would save now. That's effectively an $18,000 bonus for every millionaire earner who decamps for the 'burbs. Advertisement If Mamdani prevails, his followers will abruptly encounter fiscal realities they are ill-equipped to manage — mainly because they've been told to ignore them. Ken Girardin is a fellow of the Manhattan Institute.
