
The History of How Vodka Became America's Spirit of Choice
The story of vodka's rise in the U.S. was closely intertwined with Cold War-era cultural politics and shifting consumer tastes shaped by strategic marketing. While whiskey had long symbolized tradition, rural Americana, and old-world nostalgia, vodka emerged as a sleek, modern alternative. It became a beverage adaptable to changing American lifestyles marked by countercultural politics and globalized consumer culture. Even amid today's craft cocktail renaissance and whiskey revivalism, vodka still stands as the most consumed spirit in bars and homes across the country—proof that Cold War cultural conflicts continue to shape our tastes.
Initially, Americans greeted vodka with limited enthusiasm. Late 19 th century newspapers depicted the spirit as a foreign, exotic drink, associated primarily with Russian immigrants who brought their drinking traditions with them.
In the 1930s, vodka gained its first meaningful foothold in the U.S. when a Russian immigrant named Rudolph Kunett brought the Smirnoff brand to Bethel, Conn. Over the next decade, the spirit remained mostly a curiosity—far down the pecking order of Americans' drink preferences.
Read More: The History Behind Why Canadians are Boycotting American Whiskey
Vodka made its real breakthrough during World War II. Businessman John G. Martin, president of the Connecticut based Heublein import company, acquired the struggling Smirnoff vodka brand from Kunett for $14,000 on a whim. In the following years, Martin realized that vodka had huge untapped potential. He emphasized the spirit's flavorlessness as a selling point, rather than a liability. The businessman marketed vodka as "Smirnoff's White Whiskey: No Smell, No Taste," an odorless, flavorless mixer suitable for blending into a wide range of cocktails.
Seeing some initial success with this advertising strategy in the 1940s, Martin heavily promoted a wide range of vodka-based drinks to grow the brand's appeal. He popularized not only the Moscow Mule, in its distinctive copper mug, but also the Bloody Mary and the Screwdriver, all of which became household names over the following decades. All of Martin's concoctions emphasized ease of consumption—only requiring one or two ingredients—as well as distinctive presentation.
In the first half of the 1950s, vodka sales exploded, rising from 40,000 cases in 1950 to over 4 million by 1955. As a flavorless mixer, vodka filled a gap in the American spirits market, providing bartenders and home drinkers alike with an unchallenging tipple to mix with anything on hand.
Interestingly, vodka's rise came against the complex backdrop of the Cold War. As major Cold War events like the Cuban Missile Crisis, the space race, and the Vietnam War fueled American anxieties and obsessions about Soviet power, the spirit found a way to slip past political divisions and into American homes—despite its connections with the Soviet enemy.
Companies were aware of the risks of vodka being swept up in Cold War politics. Their marketing campaigns took care to avoid anti-Soviet hostility by emphasizing aspects of Russian culture disconnected from contemporary geopolitics. Advertisers invoked images of Imperial Russia rather than Soviet communism, hyping vodka's sophistication and European heritage. High gloss ads for Smirnoff showed celebrities drinking the spirit in locations ranging from the Russian imperial court to exoticized jungle backgrounds.
The vodka bottle became an emblem of elegance and international flair. Observing Smirnoff's success, the company's competitors—brands like Samovar and Wolfschmidt—quickly seized on the same marketing strategy.
The transformation of vodka from derided immigrant liquor to acclaimed opulent spirit operated in tandem with a broader cultural shift: as the Baby Boomers came of age in the 1960s and 1970s, they became major consumers and increasingly rejected the cultural norms of the previous generation. Baby Boomers' parents drank whiskey, and they wanted to rebel.
To the Boomers, whiskey symbolized traditional masculinity and rural values, deeply rooted in American history and nostalgia for a simpler past. Vodka, conversely, signaled sophistication, fitting comfortably into this generation's desire for newness. Despite the fact that almost all vodka consumed in the U.S. was made in America, the spirit's global associations intertwined with baby boomers' desire for cosmopolitan connection. The spirit's association with Russia only emphasized its freshness—countercultural opposition to the Cold War led many a baby boomer to drink vodka as protest.
Heublein, the manufacturer of Smirnoff, attributed their success to a 'youth-sparked movement' as the boomers embraced the company's product.
Gender also played a key role. Vodka advertisers marketed the spirit as less challenging for women, even a diet option in some cases. As more women entered the workforce and companies targeted them as consumers, it changed the gender norms around alcohol. Recognizing this, Samovar upset the traditional rules of advertising in 1960 by hiring five women to help market their vodka.
Marion Johnson, the company's brand manager and one of the first female liquor advertising directors in the U.S., commented on this new strategy: 'Women generally do not like the taste of liquor. Vodka is said to have no taste. So they can be sociable and still enjoy themselves.' In contrast to this female focused pitch, many whiskey brands in the 1960s and 1970s continued to lean into names and imagery evoking age, tradition, and masculinity. Brands like Old Crow, Old Forester, and Old Grand-Dad sought to signal a deliberate link to a gendered past.
The entry of Stolichnaya into the U.S. market in 1972 further cemented vodka's status. Paradoxically, the brand benefitted from its Soviet origins. While Smirnoff and other brands touted their cultural heritage in the pre-Soviet Russian Empire, Stolichnaya entered the U.S. as the first ever Soviet-produced spirit. Through a brand deal with PepsiCo that also saw Pepsi sold in the U.S.S.R, Stolichnaya represented a novel economic exchange between the two superpowers. At a time when Cold War tensions heightened curiosity and suspicion about all things Soviet, American consumers flocked to the new vodka as an edgy, exotic choice—drinking vodka became simultaneously an act of defiance and fascination.
A 1974 ad for Stolichnaya displayed four vodka bottles and noted where they were made—Samovar: Schenley, Pa.; Smirnoff: Hartford, Conn.; Wolfschmidt: Lawrenceburg, Ind., and Stolichnaya: Leningrad, U.S.S.R. The tagline proudly trumpeted, 'Most American vodkas seem Russian. Stolichnaya is different. It is Russian.' These claims to authenticity exploded consumption of Stolichnaya, specifically, and vodka, more generally.
By 1976, vodka had unseated whiskey as the most consumed spirit in the U.S. Vodka's dominance continued through the 1980s and 1990s with the meteoric rise of Swedish brand Absolut, whose artistic advertising campaigns captured the imagination of a new generation of young Americans. The brand's minimalist bottle and bold, art-infused ads made it a cultural icon, feted in magazines and billboards across the country. During this period, flavored vodkas—from citrus to pepper to vanilla—also took off.
American tastes had also fully shifted toward light, easy-drinking spirits whose ad campaigns promised them versatility, fewer calories, and a sense of modern sophistication. Vodka's newfound status as the country's go-to liquor reflected how thoroughly it had reshaped the American drinking landscape.
The craft cocktail revolution of the 2000s—when high-end bars, aproned bartenders, and carefully curated liquor menus surged through the country—seemed to pose a threat to vodka's dominance. Craft bartenders often turned their nose up at the flavorless spirit, and the Wall Street Journal in 2009 triumphantly declared, 'vodka is passe.'
Yet, despite repeated claims of vodka's demise, it remains America's top-selling spirit. That's a testament to its successful reinvention during a crucial period of American cultural change. Whiskey, which has experienced a resurgence over the past 15 years, has never regained its mass-market dominance. The Cold War era fundamentally reshaped American drinking culture, aligning vodka's blank-slate versatility with new cultural identities less rooted in tradition and place, and more in global consumerism and modernist aesthetics. Reflecting on vodka's ascendance helps illuminate how consumer choices are deeply connected to broader cultural and political trends.
The story of vodka is the story of modern America, encased in a clear, flavorless spirit that appears neutral but retains cultural power.
E. Kyle Romero is an assistant professor at the University of North Florida. He studies the history of American foreign policy, immigration politics, and global consumer economics.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
24 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump's meeting with Putin is a win-win for European defense stocks, no matter the outcome
European defense stocks have further to run regardless of whether U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin achieve a breakthrough on the war in Ukraine later this week, market watchers say. Trump and Putin are slated to meet in person in Alaska on Friday, with a view to discuss what it would take to end the more-than-three-year conflict that began with Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022. Reports that the two heads of state would meet buoyed broader European equities on Thursday, but sank regional defense stocks . Concerns about Russian aggression had contributed to decisions by European governments and the NATO military alliance to drastically hike their defense budgets, benefiting security companies operating in the region . So far this year, the Stoxx Europe Aerospace and Defense index has surged by 52%. Following three consecutive days of losses after the Trump-Putin summit was announced, the index regained some ground, and was last seen trading 1.3% higher in Thursday's session. Market watchers told CNBC that a deal to end the fighting in Ukraine — which may not be on the horizon of Friday's meeting — was unlikely to throw Europe's defense growth off course. 'Win-win' for defense stocks In emailed comments to CNBC on Wednesday, Dmitrii Ponomarev, product manager at VanEck EU, pointed to a recent Financial Times report that Europe is "building for war," with arms sites expanding at roughly thrice the pace struck during peace time. He labeled this as "evidence that the current ramp is broader than Ukraine resupply alone." "No firm would add that much capacity if it depended only on Ukraine shipments; the bigger driver is NATO Europe's pivot to modernization and restocking under the new 5% of GDP long-term goal, of which about 3.5% is the truly comparable "core" defense spend, anchoring multi-year demand," he said. "Even with a peace deal, stockpiles don't magically refill: governments still face years of munitions and air-defense replenishment, so revenues likely shift from short-term surge programs toward steadier replenishment, sustainment, and long-horizon modernization." VanEck runs a $6.9 billion Defense ETF, which includes stakes in some of Europe's biggest defense stocks. Among the fund's top holdings are Italy's Leonardo , France's Thales and Sweden's Saab . Ponomarev said that companies that rely more heavily on deliveries to Ukraine or supplying short-cycle munitions "may feel a sharper de-rating if urgency fades" from any potential breakthrough emerging from this week's Alaska summit between the Russian and U.S. leadership. "[But] more diversified primes with long-cycle programs, services, and sustainment should be better placed to absorb near-term volatility," he said. Asked on Monday whether the European defense boom remained a long-term story regardless of the outcome in Ukraine, Christopher Granville, managing director of TS Lombard, said he "strongly agrees" that the momentum has further to run. "My call on European defense stocks since about 2023 — when it became clear that the Russian military was extremely powerful and was not going to be rolled out of those territories in eastern and southern Ukraine — has been buy on any weakness, on any temporary pullback, because this is a win-win for European defense stocks," he told CNBC's "Squawk Box Europe." Granville pointed out that either the negotiations would go off the rails on Friday — an outcome that he labeled "more than perfectly possible, if not likely" — or peace would be struck. The former would result in the need for America and Europe to replenish their arms inventories, he said, while the latter would lead to "a very powerful Russian military." "Although the words victory and defeat [would] be bandied around, [this would be] a Russian military which has to an extent, prevailed," he said. "That reality will force a continued increase in defense procurement by European governments, and it's also good for European defense stocks. Either way, it's a winner." Granville noted that markets had been discounting the second scenario's ability to benefit defense companies. "From time to time, those names pull back a bit — you should buy on that weakness in my opinion," he advised. 'At least a decade' of rearmament Defense company leaders have been telling CNBC in recent weeks that an end to the Ukraine war would be unlikely to derail the boost to European defense spending. In conversation with CNBC's "Worldwide Exchange" on Monday, Dimitrios Kottas, co-founder and CEO of Greek autonomous defense tech developer Delian Alliance Industries, said the timing of Europe's consensus to modernize defense capabilities was correlated with the invasion of Ukraine, but argued that this rearmament would last "at least a decade." "It's something that is driven by historical macroeconomic forces, [that are] much stronger than the current ongoing invasion in Ukraine," he said. Micael Johansson, CEO of Swedish defense giant Saab , meanwhile insisted the growth in European defense was "absolutely" a long-term trend. "I have a hard time seeing, after all that happened with the invasion in Ukraine and the aggressive neighbor that we have to the east … even if we get a ceasefire or peace deal that is reasonable with Ukraine, that [governments] would step back and say it's over," he said in an interview with CNBC toward the end of July. Earnings misses and downgrades The bull run this year hasn't been a continuously upward trajectory, even without questions surrounding the future of Ukraine. Shares of German arms manufacturer Rheinmetall shed 8% on Thursday, after the firm's earnings came in below expectations . The company said contracts had not been awarded during the reporting period given the election of a new government in Germany, but noted that an anticipated influx of orders in the second half of 2025 meant Rheinmetall was able to confirm its full-year guidance. Rheinmetall is one of the best performers in European defense this year, with its shares gaining roughly 160% over the course of 2025. In a Friday note, Deutsche Bank's Christoph Laskawi argued that Rheinmetall's second-quarter result "does not change the investment case by any means." "The order intake potential ahead remains significant and the win rate should be high which is the basis for sizeable revenue growth in the coming years," he said. Back in June , Citi's European Aerospace and Defence analyst Charles Armitage downgraded Hensoldt, Renk and Saab — whose shares have all more than doubled in value this year — to give them a "sell" rating. He argued at the time that the companies were "pricing in more growth than seems likely." A lot of optimism nevertheless still remains in the sector. "It's no surprise [defense] share prices have jumped sharply this year, maybe to unsustainable levels in the short term and a welcome resolution or ceasefire in Ukraine may see their prices soften," Neil Birrell, chief investment officer at U.K. investment management firm Premier Miton, told CNBC by email. "However, the spend on defence and related infrastructure is here to stay and will be taking place over the coming years and decades. The move to greater … regional self-reliance for defence, energy, food and raw materials is a very long-term one. Defence stocks will be big beneficiaries of that."


Newsweek
24 minutes ago
- Newsweek
How Arctic Could Form Key Part of Ukraine Ceasefire Talks
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A ceasefire in Ukraine will be the focus for Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump when they meet in Alaska, but cooperation between Russia and the United States in the Arctic would also be a salient topic for discussion, a regional expert has told Newsweek. Andreas Østhagen, from the Fridtjof Nansen Institute in Oslo, said Anchorage is the natural location for the presidents to discuss the surrounding strategic region, which is drawing increasing attention from both countries. He said that oil and gas exploration, developing the Northern Sea route, and fishing are areas of mutual interest that could be discussed. Why It Matters Both Russia and the U.S. have prioritized the Arctic, making it a natural topic for a summit held in Alaska, which is the gateway to the region where the Bering Strait is a direct maritime passage between the Pacific and Arctic Oceans. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Getty What To Know The Russian and American presidents will meet at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage on Friday, during which the Trump administration will hope for a breakthrough in the Russia-Ukraine war. As well as the war in Ukraine, Østhagen said that Russia could discuss developing the Northern Sea route (NSR) into a commercial traffic lane, which is a Russian project that the U.S. plays a part in but is not the primary driver of. The NSR, which goes along the Arctic coastline, is the shortest shipping route between the western part of Eurasia and the Asia-Pacific region, and its strategic value chimes with Trump's statements about Greenland, which he wants to acquire. Through it sail container ships, oil tankers, bulk carriers transporting minerals and ores, and vessels servicing oil, gas and mining operations in Alaska and Siberia. It is becoming more navigable due to global warming. Under the Biden administration and Trump's first administration, efforts were made to expand collaboration between Russia and the U.S., focusing on enabling safer traffic through the Bering Strait, which divides Alaska from Russia, said Østhagen, who is also a senior fellow at the Arctic Institute. "If any shipping traffic takes that shortcut between Europe and Asia, it has to go via the Russian Arctic and via the Bering Strait," Østhagen said. The Bering Sea is also home to some of the most profitable fish stocks in the world, where not only Russia and the U.S. are actively fishing, but also other countries like China. There are potential plans for oil and gas development in the Arctic, and joint exploration in shared areas like the Chukchi Sea, north of the Bering Strait, could be considered, though profitability and political factors will influence such projects. "There's a lot to talk about in terms of practical functional cooperation, first and foremost to try to set up shipping or more oil and gas exploration in the Arctic," said Østhagen. What People Are Saying Andreas Østhagen, research director of Arctic and Ocean Politics at the Fridtjof Nansen Institute, told Newsweek: "The fact that both presidents have put the Arctic high on their agendas would make Alaska a natural point to discuss the region." "Russia perhaps could offer developing the Northern Sea route into a viable commercial traffic lane that's a Russian project, which the U.S. plays a part in, but is not the primary driver of," he said. What Happens Next The White House has described Friday's summit in Anchorage as a "listening exercise," for Trump. Before then, European leaders are likely to push for the U.S. to keep Ukraine's interests in mind.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Surprising Google Chrome bid upends Apple AI rumors
Surprising Google Chrome bid upends Apple AI rumors originally appeared on TheStreet. Alphabet has locked horns with the Justice Department over its dominance in the U.S. search market, with the U.S. Department of Justice courts angling to break the company up to end its monopoly. The stakes are high, given that Google is the largest search engine and Google Chrome is the largest browser, providing Alphabet unparalleled control over how Americans interact with the internet. While Alphabet is appealing a ruling to spin off its Chrome browser, rivals are drooling over the potential to acquire the search engine. 💵💰💰💵 And it's not just established big tech that's eyeballing it. Perplexity, the second-largest AI chatbot by market share, has made an unexpected, unsolicited, and surprising $34.5 billion bid to buy Chrome this week. Alphabet will unlikely agree to sell Chrome to Perplexity, founded by Aravind Srinivas, a former Google DeepMind intern and OpenAI employee. However, the bold move could still upend reports that Apple has been considering acquiring Perplexity to accelerate its AI program. Apple has a Google problem (and an AI problem) The launch of ChatGPT in 2022 kick-started a tsunami of research and development of AI chatbots. These large language models can quickly parse massive amounts of data to create more useful answers to user searches. ChatGPT is the Goliath, with a market share of nearly 80%, but Perplexity, also developed in 2022, is the second-largest player with a 10% market share. Other high-profile AI chatbots include Google's Gemini, Anthropic's Claude, Microsoft's Copilot, Meta Platform's Llama, and DeepSeek — a Chinese chatbot that created a stir earlier this year because it was reportedly developed for just $6 million. Absent from the list? has a long history of secretive development, taking its time to reinvent more user-friendly consumer electronics. Founder Steve Jobs was famous for his "one more thing" reveals at Apple conferences, and under current CEO Tim Cook, Apple has taken a measured approach to new products, preferring tweaks rather than major, revolutionary changes. Perhaps, unsurprisingly, this has led to a lot of criticism over Apple's progress on AI. Many believe Apple Intelligence is lagging severely behind rivals, leaving the company open to missing out on what could be the biggest technology trend since the dawn of the internet. Apple's Cook insists there's an AI plan in motion, but it's not only Apple fans who hope that's true. Investors are also eagerly awaiting a major splash, given that AI could help blunt the potential loss of $20 billion in revenue from Google, which pays Apple to be the default search engine behind its Safari browser. The DOJ says Apple's deal with Google is anticompetitive and a "pay-to-play" agreement that effectively locks out rivals, making it a cornerstone of its argument against Google's monopoly. Perplexity's bid to buy Chrome may squash Apple's M&A interest Rumors have swirled that Apple may accelerate its AI roadmap by acquiring Perplexity. Doing so would solve a few big challenges for Apple, providing it with immediate AI scale and a proven monetization strategy, given Perplexity's size and freemium model. It would also give it an answer engine that could mitigate some risks of losing Google as its search engine. The sheer size of Perplexity's offer may be enough to force Apple away from the table. Perplexity is reportedly valued at $18 billion, a manageable number for Apple given its size, borrowing power, and over $200 billion in short and long-term cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities. More AI Stocks: Jim Cramer drops jaw-dropping price target on Palantir stock post-earnings Morgan Stanley slaps eye-popping price target on Nvidia stock Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future Still, Apple's track record is smaller bolt-on deals, rather than huge splashes. Its largest acquisition was Beats, which cost it only $3 billion. Clearly, it has historically believed its engineers can build better mousetraps than rivals. Yet Tim Cook did leave the door open to larger deals in July. "We've acquired around seven companies this year,' said Cook on Apple's quarterly earnings conference call. 'We're very open to M&A that accelerates our road map… We are not stuck on a certain size company.' Nevertheless, Perplexity's $34.5 billion bid for Chrome, which it claims has venture capital backing, suggests that buying it outright may cost (a lot) more than $18 billion. If the deal goes through, however unlikely that may be, it would likely throw up an anticompetitive regulatory hurdle too large to overcome, given that combined, Safari and Chrome would represent browser market share north of 80%. Either way, Perplexity's unexpected bid for Chrome could mean any deal with Apple is on the back burner, if not off the stove Google Chrome bid upends Apple AI rumors first appeared on TheStreet on Aug 13, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Aug 13, 2025, where it first appeared.