‘Liberty…can't be bartered on technicalities': SC directs judicial probe into delay in releasing prisoner who got bail
Underlining that 'liberty is a very valuable and precious right guaranteed to a person', the Supreme Court Wednesday asked the Principal District Judge, Ghaziabad, to inquire into jail authorities' delay in releasing a prisoner to whom it had granted bail. The jail authorities had allegedly cited the technical ground that the bail order did not mention the sub-clause of the provision under which the man was charged.
Directing the inquiry, a bench of Justices K V Viswanathan and N K Singh said, 'While episode is unfortunate. Each one of the stakeholders was aware what the offence was, what the crime number was, what the sections the applicant was charged with. In spite of this, the applicant has been sent on a spin and notwithstanding the order of this Court on April 29 (2025) and the release order of May 27 (2025), which to our mind was clear as daylight, the applicant has been released only on June 24 (2025).'
'Liberty is a very valuable and precious right guaranteed to a person. It cannot be bartered on these useless technicalities,' the bench said. It also directed the state of Uttar Pradesh to pay provisional compensation of Rs 5 lakh to the petitioner, Aftab, for loss of liberty due to the delay in releasing him.
'The authorities knew what the concerned section was and they themselves moved for correction. The net result is on this non-issue, the applicant has lost his liberty for at least 28 whole days. The only way we can remedy the situation is to order ad hoc monetary compensation… We order that the State of Uttar Pradesh pay a sum of Rs 5 lakh and report compliance on June 27,' the Supreme Court ordered.
The bench made it clear that the compensation already ordered 'will be provisional in nature' and that the final compensation amount would be calculated after the inquiry, and if any official is held responsible, the court would decide what portion of it should be paid by the official.
The court said, 'We only hope that no other convict/undertrial is languishing in jail on account of a similar technicality.' It added that the 'Director General (Prisons) has assured enquiry would be conducted on this aspect and it would be made sure that nobody suffers on this count.'
The accused was arrested for offences under section 366 (kidnapping or inducing woman to marry) of the Indian Penal Code and sections 3/5(i) of the Uttar Pradesh Prohibition of Unlawful Conversion of Religion Act. He approached the apex court, saying that he was not released as clause (1) of section 5 of the 2021 Act was not mentioned in the order, and sought modification of the April 29 order.
Hearing the matter on Tuesday, the Supreme Court asked the superintendent jailer of Ghaziabad district prison to appear before it in person, and the Uttar Pradesh director general of police (prisons) to appear through videoconferencing to ascertain what exactly happened.
On Wednesday, UP Additional Advocate General (AAG) Garima Prashad said the petitioner was released on Tuesday evening.
Justice Viswanathan, however, asked, 'Is sub-section not mentioned a valid ground to be taken by officers who are manning our prisons?' The court said that what needs to be looked into is the 'substance of the order' and not 'minor and irrelevant errors'.
'When there is no difficulty in identifying the prisoner and offences, nitpicking on court orders and on that pretext not implementing them and keeping the individual behind the bar would be a serious dereliction of duty,' the bench said in its order. 'If you keep people behind bars for this reason, what message are we sending?,' Justice Viswanathan asked, and wondered, 'What is the guarantee that many other people are not languishing for this reason?'
The DG (prisons) assured the court that prison officials would be sensitised so that such instances would never recur.
Prashad, meanwhile, referred to an Allahabad High Court judgment which said that release orders must be issued only after verifying the particulars. But the bench pointed out that the judgment dealt with an issue of forged orders.
The AAG said DG (prisons) has instituted an enquiry at the level of deputy inspector general (DIG) of police, Meerut. However, the court said that a judicial enquiry would be more appropriate.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
United News of India
11 minutes ago
- United News of India
Telangana ACB summons IAS officer over Formula E case
Hyderabad, June 25 (UNI) Telangana's Anti-Corruption Bureau has asked special chief secretary Arvind Kumar to appear before it on July 1 in connection with the financial irregularities in the Formula E race during the BRS regime. This comes days after the former minister and BRS working president KT Rama Rao was interrogated by the ACB for almost eight hours on June 16. Kumar had appeared before the ACB in January this year. Senior IAS officer Arvind Kumar has once again been summoned by the ACB in connection with the alleged irregularities over the transfer of Rs 54 crore from the state exchequer to the Formula E race. Kumar was the secretary of the municipal affairs and urban development (MAUD) department with KT Rama Rao as the minister when the fund transfer happened. He is currently in charge of state's disaster management department where he was shunted after the Congress government assumed office. The IAS officer has been designated as accused number 2 in the Formula E case, followed by the then HMDA's chief engineer, BLN Reddy, who is accused number 3. The ACB has accused KT Rama Rao of committing irregularities in the Formula E case, directly transferring funds to the organisers when the official sponsors backed out. Rao maintained that procedures were jumped because it was election time and he had done it to save the image of the state. He also said that the transferred sum was still lying in the account of the Formula E organisers but the Congress government has so far not made any attempt to retrieve the funds. The BRS government wanted the Formula E race to be held in 2024 after its success in 2023 but the event was cancelled by the Congress government after it came to power, citing huge costs. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) has also taken up the case. UNI XC RN
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Special Mumbai court acquits two in gangster Ravi Pujari extortion case due to involuntary confession
Mumbai: A special MCOCA court on Tuesday acquitted two accused in an extortion case allegedly connected to gangster Ravi Pujari. The court observed that the confession was a result of threat and inducement, and involuntary, as the parents of the accused were kept in police custody and police officers were present in the confessional room. The case relates to alleged extortion threats made by gangster Pujari to a builder and his family members, demanding Rs 2 crore between Nov 26, 2018, and Jan 18, 2019. However, acquitting the duo, William Rodrigues (30) and Akash Shetty (40), the judge said, "On testing the truth of the confession, it appears that it is not made voluntarily and it is not free from threat and inducement. Therefore, no presumptive evidential value is attached to the confession and it cannot be the basis of conviction of the accused." In the 53-page judgement copy made available on Thursday, the judge pointed to the presence of police officers in civil clothes and the investigating officer inside the confession room. The judge said that the evidence of the police was not genuine. The judge noted that two police officers who departed did not deny the presence of the parents of the accused in their office. "Under such circumstances, as per arguments advanced by the defence counsel, the possibility cannot be ruled out that the parents of William were kept in the custody of the police and thereafter by use of threats about the action against the parents, William was sent for recording of confession. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Here's The Price for a 1-Day Walk-in Shower In 2025 Homebuddy Learn More Undo On this ground also, the confessional statement of William is not looking… to be a voluntary one," the judge said. The victim's family was involved in the building construction business. The extortion threats were related to their construction projects. The prosecution alleged that Rodrigues and Shetty were involved in collecting information about the victims and providing it to the then-wanted accused Pujari. It was also submitted that Pujari attempted to threaten the victim's brother and explicitly threatened to kill his son as part of the extortion. The prosecution's case alleges that Pujari obtained the phone numbers of the victim's family through Shetty. Pujari was deported in 2020 and the trial against him was separated. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai The prosecution submitted that Rodrigues expressed his willingness to confess on Feb 1, 2019. Subsequently, the DCP was appointed to record the confessional statement, and Rodrigues was held in separate police custody at Azad Maidan before the statement was taken. The confessional statement was documented in two parts. The Special Public Prosecutor argued that the confession was "free and voluntary, without any threat," and that it "established the guilt of both the accused and their involvement in the organised syndicate crimes with gangster Ravi Pujari". The prosecutor further stated that Rodrigues was given a sufficient 24-hour opportunity and was kept separately, with the confession corroborated by the victim's evidence. However, the defence lawyer strongly challenged the voluntariness and admissibility of the confession. It was submitted that the mandatory 24-hour period was not properly given to the accused and alleged that the confession was recorded under duress. The defence submitted that the confession was "manipulated" and "retracted at its earlier opportunity," therefore arguing it "cannot be relied upon".
Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Two booked for defrauding Rs 45 lakh from woman promising job to son
Thiruvananthapuram: Two men allegedly defrauded Rs 4.5 lakh from a 43-year-old woman by promising her son a job in merchant navy in Iran. Vizhinjam police filed a case on the complaint of Usha Ambrose of Chowara at Adimalathura and booked Thanjavur native Venkitesh and Vizhinjam native Maneesh, 23, under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections 316 (2) for criminal breach of trust and 318 (4) for cheating. According to the complainant, the accused provided her son a flight ticket to Iran from Mumbai. However, in the absence of a valid offer letter and visa, he was not allowed to fly. "Maneesh was my daughter's classmate and the money was paid after he guaranteed the job at any cost. We travelled to Mumbai in April for my son to board the flight. However, the accused did not provide the offer letter and visa, despite us requesting several times. Finally, I asked the accused to return my money, but Venkitesh claimed that he did not receive any. Maneesh then challenged me to move legally to get the money. He even behaved rudely with me. We paid him the money trusting him, but he cheated us," said Usha. Vizhinjam police said the accused were summoned to the station to verify the allegation. "We contacted Venkitesh over the phone and told him to appear in person. The probe is on to check their involvement in other visa fraud cases as well," said police.
