US weekly jobless claims steady at higher levels
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The number of Americans filing new applications for unemployment benefits was unchanged at higher levels last week as labor market conditions continued to steadily ease.
Initial claims for state unemployment benefits held steady at a seasonally adjusted 248,000 for the week ended June 7, the Labor Department said on Thursday. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 240,000 claims for the latest week.
Claims could remain elevated, with the school year ending this month as some states allow non-teaching staff to collect benefits during the long summer holidays.
Though there have been no widespread layoffs as employers hoard workers amid economic uncertainty spawned by President Donald's aggressive tariffs, the labor market is steadily losing steam. An immigration crackdown by the White House is also slowing employment gains. Nonfarm payrolls increased by 139,000 jobs in May, down from 193,000 a year ago.
A lagging measure of employment, the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW), has suggested a much slower pace of job growth between April 2024 and December 2024 than reported in the survey of establishments from which the nonfarm payrolls data is compiled. Economists said this partly reflected reduced labor supply because of immigration restrictions imposed by former President Joe Biden's administration in mid-2024.
The QCEW data is derived from reports by employers to the state unemployment insurance programs. Economists said the QCEW data raised the possibility that payrolls could be revised substantially down from April 2024 through May 2025. Much would, however, depend on the QCEW data for the first quarter.
"All things considered, we think the 2025 benchmark revision is most likely to revise down job gains from April 2024-March 2025 by 800,000-1.125 million, with the range for August's preliminary benchmark announcement about 200,000 higher," said Jonathan Millar, a senior economist at Barclays.
"This would trim monthly payroll gains over the benchmark period by about 65,000-95,000 per month relative to the current estimate of approximately 150,000 per month."
The claims report showed the number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, increased 54,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.956 million during the week ending May 31. Recently laid off workers are struggling to find work, though the median duration of unemployment dropped to 9.5 weeks in May after surging to 10.4 weeks in April.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How To Stop Living Paycheck to Paycheck When You Make Good Money
According to numerous reports, about half of all Americans say they live paycheck to paycheck. This isn't limited to low- or moderate-income households, either. Almost half of those earning six figures feel the same way. For You: Try This: If you're struggling to make ends meet and feel like you never have enough money to meet your financial goals — like saving for a down payment or paying off debt — you're not alone. But your situation isn't hopeless, either. GOBankingRates reached out to several financial experts about how to stop living paycheck to paycheck when you earn enough money not to. Here's what they said. Sean Fox, president of debt resolution at Achieve, suggested making a spending plan or a budget. 'Most people don't want to 'budget' because it sounds hard, tedious and complicated. It's not. It's just a way to understand your finances in simple terms, with an eye on goals you've set,' Fox said. 'That means taking time to consider what you really want in your life, both in the long run (e.g., retirement, vacations, buying a house) and short run (e.g., a new piece of furniture, clothing, time for your favorite hobby or pastime). Then you can build your spending plan around what it will take to reach those goals.' No matter how much money you earn, you should always keep track of your spending. It's all too easy to fall into the trap of lifestyle inflation, something that occurs when you start spending more because you start earning more. You could be earning $100,000 a year and still have very little to show for it at the end of the month…if you're not tracking your expenses. Knowing how much money you spend and on what can help you figure out where the problem areas are and fix them. 'Keep a record of every single expense (online and off) you and everyone in your household makes for a couple of weeks,' said Fox. 'Most people have some surprises, and are then in a better place to make some decisions on smart spending that's in line with the budget.' Find Out: The Federal Reserve found that 82% of American adults have a credit card, while over 40% regularly carry a balance. While not a guarantee, if you're living paycheck to paycheck while earning a decent income, chances are you have some credit card debt, too. If that's the case, Fox suggested paying off this debt first. 'With interest rates over 20%, this is a huge expense — both in terms of what you're paying to the credit card issuer and the fact that you're effectively paying much more than the purchase price of what you bought,' Fox said. 'Plus, if you are carrying debt and paying all that interest, you have no opportunity to do something positive with that money — like saving for retirement and other goals you've set.' If possible, increase your monthly payments to pay off your debt sooner. If that's not an option, see if you can get a balance transfer card or a low-interest debt consolidation loan instead. Depending on the new interest rate and term, you could end up paying less in interest and getting rid of your debt sooner. There are a lot of reasons why people who make plenty of money live paycheck to paycheck. One of the big ones is that they don't differentiate between wants and needs. 'Whether it's about 'keeping up with the Joneses' or just preferring to not do so, the lack of thinking about whether a given purchase will meet a 'want' or a 'need' fuels overspending and credit card debt,' said Fox. 'It is much easier to simply buy what you want than to develop the habit of stopping to consider each purchase, and whether you really need it in your life.' All of this leads to overspending and living beyond one's means. If you're living beyond your means, take the time to distinguish between your wants and needs. Once you've done that, see if you can take it one step further by living below your means. Living below your means 'provides some cushion, a way to save and insurance that you are not living paycheck to paycheck all the time,' said Fox. Similarly, find ways to limit your discretionary spending. 'Cutting back on nonessential purchases is a great way to stop living paycheck to paycheck,' said a Quicken spokesperson. 'It is important to consider how many nonessential purchases [you are] making each week that you could either go without or make more cheaply at home.' You don't have to do it all at once. You can use a budgeting app or expense tracker to see where your money is going. Or, once a month, you can look through your bank and credit card statements to find out what you spend money on — and start finding small ways to cut back. Having goals, whether they're short or long term, can help motivate you to get a hold of your finances. 'By prioritizing your financial goals and having a time frame in mind, you can maximize your savings, stay motivated and move closer to the finish line,' said the Quicken representative. But don't fall into the trap of trying to achieve those goals all at once. Having that time frame is key. With it, you can avoid taking too long for a certain goal while also keep yourself moving toward it. For example, say you want to save your first $1,000 in an emergency fund. If you don't have quite that much money at the end of the month, that's OK. Start with a smaller sum — like $100, $200 or whatever you're comfortable with. If you know you want to save that amount within three months, break down your monthly savings goals accordingly — $1,000 divided by three. Once you've achieved a few short-term goals, you can start thinking about those long-term goals — like retirement. Joe DiSanto, a financial expert, consultant and the founder of Play Louder, suggested making a 'financial independence roadmap.' 'This is a long-term plan to reach your retirement goal, which includes a savings plan and required levels of investment return,' he said. As you work on your spending and savings habits, it's important to be consistent. 'You need to be consistent and make it part of your life,' said DiSanto. 'You can't 'wing it' or 'go with your gut feelings.' It's like going to the gym or maintaining a healthy diet. I use those examples specifically because most people struggle with that, too.' You can go about this in many different ways. For example, you could get an 'accountabili-buddy,' someone who can help you stay on track financially. Or you can do things like automate your savings or use a budgeting app. Whatever works for you, do it and be as consistent as possible. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 7 Luxury SUVs That Will Become Affordable in 2025 9 Downsizing Tips for the Middle Class To Save on Monthly Expenses This article originally appeared on How To Stop Living Paycheck to Paycheck When You Make Good Money
The Hill
39 minutes ago
- The Hill
Outdated apprenticeship laws are keeping Americans out of work
The U.S. is in the throes of a skilled-labor shortage. One answer to this problem is centuries old: apprenticeships. Apprenticeships can fill jobs and add a rung to the ladder of opportunity for people who cannot afford college. Yet many states lift that ladder out of reach by giving preferential treatment to existing apprenticeship programs over proposed new programs. That can change through legislation, federal executive action and litigation. Many trades train new workers through apprenticeship programs, where people learn on the job while earning a paycheck. But laws regulating apprenticeships have long stifled the creation of new programs that could train more needed workers. One example is the 'needs test.' In multiple states, proposed apprenticeship programs must show that there is a local 'need' for their program. This means that existing programs are protected against competition from new programs based on the theory that existing programs already meet industry needs. Some states even go so far as to allow established programs to file objections against proposed new programs. These 'competitors' vetoes' treat apprenticeship programs unequally, favoring established players (and their affiliated labor unions) over newcomers. Workers miss out on opportunities, consumers face increased costs and the labor shortage drags on. Beyond legislative reform, there are two ways to push back against these unfair laws: federal executive action and constitutional litigation. The National Apprenticeship Act, also known as the Fitzgerald Act, empowers the secretary of Labor to cooperate with states' labor agencies to promote standards for apprenticeships and increase apprenticeship opportunities. Department of Labor regulations create a system where state authorities can act on behalf of the department to register apprenticeship programs for federal purposes — that is, providing apprentice labor for projects operating under federal contracts or grants. The state's laws must meet certain requirements for the state to be eligible. This dynamic gives the Labor Department leverage over state laws that restrict access to apprenticeship opportunities. In 2007, for example, the Labor Department ended its partnership with California's apprenticeship agency due to the creation of a needs test. The department reasoned that the test 'limited, rather than promoted, apprenticeship opportunity.' Despite this, other states with similar needs tests remain federal partners. The first Trump administration sought to promote apprenticeship opportunities, and the second should follow this by pressuring states to drop needs tests in return for continued or renewed partnerships. There's also a constitutional path. Pacific Legal Foundation, where we work, brought a 2012 lawsuit challenging California's needs test, but the law was upheld in a Ninth Circuit decision in a different case the following year. Multiple courts have held that governments cannot shelter established businesses against competition from newcomers, but the Ninth Circuit upheld the needs test on the faulty premise that apprentices may need to have post-apprentice job opportunities protected. This justification holds no water in a climate with an insufficient supply of skilled workers. This reflects a sad trend in the law: Your right to earn a living for your family takes a backseat to lawmakers' favored interest groups. Your right to seek education so you can earn a living deserves just as much respect as many other rights we hold dear, like your right to speak freely. To paraphrase a Supreme Court decision, your need to feed your family 'may be as keen, if not keener by far, than [your] interest in the day's most urgent political debate.' This is especially true for those struggling to make ends meet. Too often, politicians believe that we need to adopt laws that shower marginalized groups with handouts and special favors. But what people really need is a fair shake — a chance to learn a trade and climb the ladder of opportunity. Yet the law often raises that ladder beyond reach. Leveling the playing field for apprenticeship programs will do far more than handouts to empower people to achieve the American Dream. Something is deeply wrong when we do not have enough workers at the same time families are struggling to put food on the table. We can address both problems by promoting apprenticeship programs. Much reform is needed of apprenticeship laws to maximize the potential these programs can provide. However, doing away with needs tests and giving equal treatment to existing and proposed apprenticeship programs is a good first step toward greater economic opportunity and lower costs for all. David J. Hoffa and Ethan W. Blevins are attorneys at Pacific Legal Foundation, a public interest law firm that defends Americans' liberty against government overreach and abuse.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
3 tips for planning your summer budget
Rodney Williams, SoLo co-founder and president, joins Wealth with Yahoo Finance Senior Reporter Allie Canal to explain how Americans are planning to spend their money this summer. Watch the video above to hear Williams's top tips for summer budgeting. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Wealth here.
