logo
Electrify 2515 celebrates renewable energy conversion of 60 Illawarra homes

Electrify 2515 celebrates renewable energy conversion of 60 Illawarra homes

Scores of households have been converted to run off renewable energy in a significant step towards the goal of electrifying an entire New South Wales postcode.
Tosca Lloyd is one of the lucky few to benefit from the Electrify 2515 community pilot, which has so far converted 60 homes in the Illawarra postcode.
She said saving money was just as important as addressing climate change.
"We see switching to renewables and electrifying as one and the same as addressing the cost of living crisis and also the climate crisis," Ms Lloyd said.
She was also motivated to get gas out of the house for health reasons because her young son suffers from a respiratory illness.
Ms Lloyd installed a "really big" solar system, a large battery, converted to a ducted heating system and installed an electric heat pump.
"All of that cost around $40,000, but we only ended up being out of pocket by around $32,000.
Another 440 households have signed up for the program.
Rewiring Australia founder Saul Griffith said the scheme was about starting small and then going big.
"So we know that 11 million Australian households have to get to zero emissions by probably 2040," he said.
"We thought we would really try to accelerate what that looks like in one community — that was the origins of 2515.
"We've had a great community response … 500 homes out of 4,000.
"That's about 15 per cent have signed up to participate."
The scheme has built-in equity measures — the more you earn, the lower the subsidy.
"A really kind of fabulous thing we found out about our community is a lot of the higher net-worth families are doing it for climate reasons," Dr Griffith said.
The Australian Renewable Energy Agency (ARENA) has funded the program to the tune of $5.4 million so far.
Endeavour Energy manages the network and its future-energy strategy manager James Hazelton said he was confident the grid could handle the added load and that customers would not face higher energy costs.
"But we also want to make it clear that through the journey to electrification, while customers are going to save money by having less fuel use and gas use, they are not going to face higher network charges," he said.
The network operator will closely monitor the program to determine whether improvements are required for converted households.
"We're using this as a case study to understand what's the right balance of visibility and network upgrades that might need to take place," Dr Hazelton said.
The Illawarra region, which includes the city of Wollongong and Port Kembla has become a hub for renewable development.
It remains to be seen whether a proposed offshore wind farm eventuates 20 kilometres off the coast, but in May the NSW government announced that the region had become the state's first "urban renewable energy zone".
Energy Minister Penny Sharpe said that meant preparations were underway for more green manufacturing opportunities, research, renewable energy storage facilities and trial of new grid technologies to improve solar uptake.
In January, federal Climate Change Minister Chris Bowen encouraged community energy projects similar to Electrify 2515 to apply for funding.
ARENA has confirmed it is also funding about half of a $13.8m home electrification pilot for 500 homes in South Australia.
"The primary project objective is to demonstrate the customer and sector benefits of demand flexibility and smart homes to help accelerate their deployment at scale," an ARENA spokesperson said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Retired publican lists $12m luxury apartment
Retired publican lists $12m luxury apartment

Daily Telegraph

time30 minutes ago

  • Daily Telegraph

Retired publican lists $12m luxury apartment

A retired publican has listed his luxury $12m apartment in a luxury Elizabeth Bay block full of big hitters. Ken Thompson, who sold his Blues Point Hotel to former Qantas chief Geoff Dixon for $6m more than a decade ago, has owned the three-bedroom, three-bathroom apartment with double parking and harbour views in the exclusive 'One Onslow' building since paying $5.05m off-the-plan in 2007. He's now listed it with BresicWhitney's Romany Brooks, hot on the heels of her selling a luxury penthouse to fashion icon Collette Dinnigan for about $7.2m in the nearby Tradewinds block alongside principal Shannan Whitney. MORE: Security guard sells apartment he won in lottery MORE:Lowes heir soaks up $24m pay day Brooks says Thompson's apartment is well-priced, compared with other newer buildings nearby that have recently sold for as much as $60,000 per sq m. 'I feel that around $40,000 per sq m, this delivers the scale downsizers are seeking and delivers on value,' Brooks says. She has deliberately chosen to market the apartment for sale without styling it. 'It has 3m ceilings and is 302sqm, I want buyers to feel the scale,' she said. 'Buyers being able to experience it unfurnished highlights the opportunity for them to create something special and showcases the quality finishes.' MORE: 2025 house price record broken twice in a week Thompson moved out of the second-floor apartment, which sits directly above the one Aussie Home Loans founder John Symond bought for $4.1m in 2011, after the death of his beloved wife, Elizabeth, and it's recently been rented out to the Canadian embassy at $5000 per week Other famous owners in the nine-unit boutique block include Joanna McNiven, widow of businessman John McNiven, who bought in for $9.7m in 2011 and mining entrepreneur Nick Curtis and his wife, Angela. Symond initially owned three units in the block, but sold two of them in 2018, including the sub-penthouse to the Curtises for $7.25m. Rosanna Hindmarsh, the wife of Canberra's construction industry boss John Hindmarsh, sold the penthouse for $20m in 2021 to businessman and philanthropist Thomas Yim and his wife, Denise. It had been Hindmarsh's construction firm that built the block. MORE: Billionaire chicken heiress's record breaking sale

Will the tech behind the teen social media ban work? These questions remain unanswered
Will the tech behind the teen social media ban work? These questions remain unanswered

SBS Australia

timean hour ago

  • SBS Australia

Will the tech behind the teen social media ban work? These questions remain unanswered

Technologies to enforce the Australian government's social media ban for under 16s are "private, robust and effective". That's according to the preliminary findings of a federal government-commissioned trial that has nearly finished testing them. The findings, released on Friday, may give the government greater confidence to forge ahead with the ban, despite a suite of expert criticism. They might also alleviate some of the concerns of the Australian population about privacy and security implications of the ban, which is due to start in December. For example, a report based on a survey of nearly 4,000 people and released by the government earlier this week found nine out of 10 people support the idea of a ban. But it also found a large number of people were "very concerned" about how the ban would be implemented. Nearly 80 per cent of respondents had privacy and security concerns, while roughly half had concerns about age assurance accuracy and government oversight. The trial's preliminary findings paint a rosy picture of the potential for available technologies to check people's ages. However, they contain very little detail about specific technologies, and appear to be at odds with what we know about age-assurance technology from other sources. The social media ban for under-16s was legislated in December 2024. A last-minute amendment to the law requires technology companies to provide "alternative age assurance methods" for account holders to confirm their age, rather than relying only on government-issued ID. The Australian government commissioned an independent trial to evaluate the "effectiveness, maturity, and readiness for use" of these alternative methods. The trial is being led by the Age Check Certification Scheme — a company based in the United Kingdom that specialises in testing and certifying identity verification systems. It includes 53 vendors that offer a range of age assurance technologies to guess people's ages, using techniques such as facial recognition and hand-movement recognition. According to the preliminary findings of the trial, "age assurance can be done in Australia". The trial's project director, Tony Allen, said "there are no significant technological barriers" to assuring people's ages online. He added the solutions are "technically feasible, can be integrated flexibly into existing services and can support the safety and rights of children online". However, these claims are hard to square with other evidence. On Thursday, the ABC reported the trial found face-scanning technologies "repeatedly misidentified" children as young as 15 as being in their 20s and 30s. These tools could only guess children's ages "within an 18-month range in 85 per cent of cases". This means a 14-year-old child might gain access to a social media account, while a 17-year-old might be blocked. This is in line with results of global trials of face-scanning technologies conducted for more than a decade. An ongoing series of studies of age estimation technology by the United States' National Institute of Standards and Technology shows the algorithms "fail significantly when attempting to differentiate minors" of various ages. The tests also show that error rates are higher for young women compared to young men. Error rates are also higher for people with darker skin tones. These studies show that even the best age-estimation software currently available — Yoti — has an average error of 1.0 years. Other software options mistake someone's age by 3.1 years on average. This means, at best, a 16-year-old might be estimated to be 15 or 17 years old; at worst, they could be seen to be 13 or 19 years of age. These error rates mean a significant number of children under 16 could access social media accounts despite a ban being in place, while some over 16 could be blocked. Yoti also explains businesses needing to check exact ages (such as 18) can set higher age thresholds (such as 25), so fewer people under 18 get through the age check. This approach would be similar to that taken in Australia's retail liquor sector, where sales staff verify ID for anyone who appears to be under the age of 25. However, many young people lack the government-issued ID required for an additional age check. It's also worth remembering that in August 2023, the Australian government acknowledged that the age assurance technology market was "immature" and could not yet meet key requirements, such as working reliably without circumvention and balancing privacy and security. We don't yet know exactly what methods platforms will use to verify account holders' ages. While face-scanning technologies are often discussed, they could use other methods to confirm age. The government trial also tested voice and hand movements to guess young people's ages. But those methods also have accuracy issues. And it's not yet clear what recourse people will have if their age is misidentified. Will parents be able to complain if children under 16 gain access to accounts, despite restrictions? Will older Australians who are incorrectly blocked be able to appeal? And if so, to whom? There are other outstanding questions. What's stopping someone who's under 16 from getting someone who is over 16 to set up an account on their behalf? To mitigate this risk, the government might require all social media users to verify their age at regular intervals. It's also unclear what level of age estimation error the government may be willing to accept in implementing a social media ban. The legislation says technology companies must demonstrate they have taken "reasonable steps" to prevent under-16s from holding social media accounts. What is considered "reasonable" is yet to be clearly defined. Australians will have to wait until later this year for the full results of the government's trial to be released, and to know how technology companies will respond. With less than six months until the ban comes into effect, social media users still don't have all the answers they need. Lisa M. Given is a professor of information sciences and director of the Social Change Enabling Impact Platform at RMIT University.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store