‘Gold Card' Programs to Reduce Prior Auth ‘Underwhelming'

Medscape

07-07-2025

'Gold card' programs were supposed to make it easier for frustrated physicians to deal with insurers' burdensome prior authorization demands.
The idea: Insurers would reward doctors whose past prior authorization requests were typically approved by exempting them from red tape in the future.
At least 10 states have required insurers to establish gold card programs amid mounting concerns nationwide that overuse of prior authorization jeopardizes patient health. Last month, leading insurers joined with the White House in a voluntary pledge to reduce their use of the practice, which they contend is necessary to control costs and minimize unnecessary care.
But Texas' experience with gold card programs may signal the limits of that approach.
Only 3% of Clinicians Qualified
The Lone Star State was an early adopter, passing a 2021 law enabling health providers with a high prior authorization success rate to earn a 'gold card' exemption from insurers.
But statewide, only 3% of providers met that bar, according to a testimony provided by the Texas Department of Insurance earlier this year.
'I think it's safe to say that the impact of this law on prior authorizations for our physicians is underwhelming,' said Ezequiel 'Zeke' Silva III, MD, a San Antonio-based interventional radiologist who chairs the Texas Medical Association's Council on Legislation. 'We would have hoped for a greater percentage of our physicians to have been granted the 'gold card' status.'
At least nine other states have enacted gold card laws, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL).
Care Delayed and Denied
Physicians maintain that excessive prior authorization paperwork impedes timely patient care, with clinicians and staffers devoting 13 hours weekly to documentation, according to a 2024 American Medical Association survey.
Insurers view the review as a guardrail against unnecessary care driving up costs. Studies show that restricting prior authorization could boost premiums by 5.6%-16.7%, a Texas Association of Health Plans official testified during the legislative session.
In June, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott signed a revised version of the state's 'gold card' law — part of an emerging national attempt to streamline the prior review process. Cigna, Humana, UnitedHealthcare, and other large insurers have voluntarily committed to reducing the scope of claims involved, according to the America's Health Insurance Plans trade group.
Meanwhile, federal officials have finalized requirements that direct some insurers, including Medicaid and Medicare Advantage programs, to speed up responses to prior authorization requests, among other measures. Some of those requirements begin in 2026.
Gold Card Designs
As in other states, Texas' 'gold card' legislation applies only to state-regulated insurers, which comprise about one fifth of the state's market. Under HB 3812, which takes effect on September 1, insurers will evaluate health providers based on a year of prior authorization requests rather than 6 months under the 2021 law.
To be evaluated, providers must have submitted at least five requests for a specific health service during that period. To achieve 'gold card' status, insurers must approve at least 90% of requests, the same threshold as set by the 2021 law. But the new law stipulates that insurers review a broader pool of requests, including those made directly to the health plan as well as any related affiliates, according to the Texas Department of Insurance.
The new law continues to limit exemptions only to 'top-performing physicians' who repeatedly provide cost-effective care, said Blake Hutson, director of public affairs at the Texas Association of Health Plans. 'Even with the change to 1 year, and the bill also adds in a broader array of claims that will be looked at, you still have to meet 90%.'
A key addition requires insurers to release an annual report detailing how many exemptions they have granted or denied, making decisions more transparent to the public, Silva said. 'Not just what's being approved and what's not being approved, but to potentially evaluate for trends that presently we just have no ability to evaluate,' he said.
Gold card laws vary from state to state, and some exclude prescription drugs, according to an NCSL legislative summary. Other states with gold card programs include Arkansas, Colorado, Illinois, Louisiana, Michigan, New Mexico, Vermont, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
In Illinois, legislation passed last year targeted hospital services for Medicaid patients, as denial rates were routinely higher in that population, said Dave Gross, senior vice president of Government Relations and Communications at the Illinois Health and Hospital Association, Naperville, Illinois. 'We're not seeing this problem in the commercial space,' he noted.
Real-World Implications
To some degree, the 'gold card' concept makes intuitive sense, recognizing physicians who have a track record of getting their medical care requests approved, Ravi Gupta, MD, an assistant professor of medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, who has studied prior authorization patterns, said.
But Gupta raised equity concerns. Physicians in large medical groups and hospital systems will have access to staff and other resources to better navigate the prior approval process than those in smaller private practices.
Plus, he added, there's the potential that physicians who achieve exemptions may become 'more indiscriminate' about the services that they recommend.
Insurers' stated aim is to reduce unnecessary and low-value medical care through prior authorization gatekeeping, Gupta said. But a study he helped conduct, assessing policies across five Medicare Advantage insurers, found a significant lack of consensus on what treatments should be included. Treatments comprising only 12% of Medicare spending would have required prior authorization by all five insurers. Most of that consensus, he wrote, 'was devoted to a small number of costly services.'
The administrative burdens affect patients as well. Two thirds of patients with cancer in one 2023 study become personally involved, including calling the insurer or appealing a denial. The patients also reported less trust in insurers and the health system overall, which could have worrisome downstream effects, Fumiko Chino, MD, the study's lead author and an assistant professor of radiation oncology at Houston's MD Anderson Cancer Center, said.
'If you don't trust healthcare,' she said, 'why on earth would you get a vaccine or get cancer screening or get your blood pressure checked?'
More than X Percent?
Gupta views the leading health insurers' pledge as encouraging in concept — but he notes that they are voluntary commitments without any accountability.
In the interim, gold carding remains no more than a workaround, he said.
'Gold cards aren't really fixing that [prior authorization] problem,' he said. 'They're just rewarding certain clinicians who can demonstrate that they have been able to get through the prior authorization process successfully for X amount of time before they're rewarded with a gold card.'
In Illinois, regulators are still hashing out gold card rules, including whether the required 90% approval threshold will be based on a specific hospital service or a broader pool of services, Gross said. The hospital association also will closely watch whether Illinois' experience begins to mirror that in Texas, he said.
'We have some of the best hospitals in the country here in Chicago,' he said. 'If we end up with a 3% approval rating of gold cards, we're going to have to go back to the legislature.'