
India should take a cue from Vietnam, Japan and insist written statement before announcing US trade deal: GTRI
GTRI, in a report released on Sunday, called for India to take a cue from the experiences of countries like Vietnam and Japan and insisted that India should ask for a jointly issued, written statement before acknowledging any agreement.
There appears to be a contradiction in the understanding of the recently agreed-upon trade deals between the US and Vietnam, as well as the US and Japan.
Citing a Japanese government document released on July 25, GTRI asserted that it revealed significant discrepancies between Japan's understanding of a new trade deal with the US and how President Donald Trump had portrayed it.
"To avoid similar misrepresentation, India must insist on a jointly issued, written statement before acknowledging any agreement," GTRI suggested.
Trump claimed on July 22 that the agreement secures massive Japanese investments, strong tariff protections, and guaranteed access for U.S. farm exports, including rice. However, Japan's official summary, published by its Cabinet Secretariat, describes a far more limited framework--still under negotiation and lacking binding commitments, according to GTRI analysis.
Trump stated that Japan would invest USD 550 billion in the U.S., with 90 per cent of the profits remaining in America. But Japan's version tells a different story. It says the USD 550 billion includes a mix of equity, loans, and guarantees from state-backed institutions, not a lump-sum investment.
Trump announced that Japan would significantly open its markets to US agricultural exports, including rice.
However, according to a Japanese government document cited by GTRI, this limitation is restricted to procurement under its existing Minimum Access (MA) scheme, and only applies "depending on domestic demand and supply conditions."
In effect, Japan reserves the right not to import US rice if there is no market need.
Another area of divergence is found in automotive exports, as noted by GTRI.
Trump claimed Japan would remove additional safety testing for US-made vehicles.
Japan's document, according to GTRI, confirms that it will allow imports of American cars without additional testing, provided they meet Japanese road safety standards.
"In other words, this is not a blanket exemption; US manufacturers must still comply with Japanese technical norms," GTRI inferred. (ANI)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Opec+ countries to boost oil production by 547,000 barrels per day
A group of countries that are part of the Opec+ alliance of oil-exporting countries has agreed to boost oil production, a move some believe could lower oil and gasoline prices, citing a steady global economic outlook and low oil inventories. The group met virtually on Sunday and announced that eight of its member countries would increase oil production by 547,000 barrels per day in September. The countries boosting output, including Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Kazakhstan, Algeria and Oman, had been participating in voluntary production cuts, initially made in November 2023, which were scheduled to be phased out by September 2026. The announcement means the voluntary production cuts will end ahead of schedule. The move follows an Opec+ decision in July to boost production by 548,000 barrels per day in August. Opec said the production adjustments may be paused or reversed as market conditions evolve. When production increases, oil and gasoline prices may fall. But Brent crude oil, which is considered a global benchmark, has been trading near $70 per barrel, which could be due to a potential loss of Russian oil on the market and a large rise in crude inventories in China, according to research firm Clearview Energy Partners. President Trump has not obviously relented from his threat to sanction Russian energy if the Kremlin does not reach a peace deal with Ukraine as of August 7, potentially via secondary tariffs on buyers, Clearview Energy Partners said in an analyst note Sunday. The eight countries will meet again on September 7, Opec said in a news release.


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Odias in US express concern over 25% tariffs on India
Bhubaneswar: The US's sweeping 25% tariffs on Indian exports have sparked concern among the Odia diaspora in North America, with professionals and entrepreneurs warning of far-reaching economic fallout. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Calling the move short-sighted, they fear it could fuel inflation in the US, hurt bilateral trade, and strain ties between the two nations at a time when global cooperation is critical. "The tariffs remind me of Kalidasa's branch-cutting metaphor. Experts feel it will harm the US more than India," said Debashis Sahoo, associate professor of computer science, engineering and paediatrics at the University of California, San Diego. Tariffs can lead to inflation by increasing the cost of imported goods and raw materials. When businesses face higher input costs due to tariffs, they often pass these on to consumers in the form of higher prices. "The prices of clothes, diamonds, and pharmaceuticals imported from India will increase, and consumers will end up paying more. However, the final effect still needs to be studied," said Akshaya Mohanty, a businessman from Rhode Island. Sanjay Dalai, an IT professional, said, "The tariffs will hurt US companies sourcing intermediate goods from India, such as automobile parts and IT hardware. Indian exporters will also suffer, particularly in sectors like steel, aluminium, engineering goods, textiles, and automobile parts." Dalai said that the move could adversely affect US-India relations, especially at a time when cooperation is crucial in technology, defence and critical minerals. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Sahoo said that if India imposes retaliatory tariffs, it could further harm US exporters by restricting access to key markets. "Together, these effects could weaken America's economic competitiveness and slow down growth," said Sahoo. He added that the resulting price hike is likely to fuel inflation and reduce consumer spending.


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Two strong economies': Canada's trade minister pledges to continue trade talks with US; urges dialogue despite Trump's new tariffs
Canada's trade minister Dominic LeBlanc Canada's trade minister Dominic LeBlanc said on Sunday that his country is prepared to continue working toward a new trade agreement with the US, despite leaving Washington without a deal and facing increased tariffs from the Trump administration. 'We're prepared to stick around and do the work needed,' LeBlanc said in an interview on Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan. 'We believe there's a great deal of common ground between the United States and Canada in terms of building two strong economies that work well together,' he said as quoted by CBS News. The White House announced last week that tariffs on Canadian goods not covered under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) would rise from 25% to 35%. The move was justified by concerns over immigration and fentanyl, with the administration claiming Canada has not done enough to address those issues. LeBlanc described the decision as 'disappointing' but emphasised that talks would continue. He said discussions with US trade representative Jamieson Greer and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick had been 'constructive, cordial conversations.' 'We're encouraged by the conversations with Secretary Lutnick and Ambassador Greer,' he said. 'But we're not yet where we need to go to get the deal that's in the best interest of the two economies.' The tariff hikes are part of a broader trade crackdown announced by Trump last week, targeting more than 60 countries. Canada, the US' second-largest trading partner, was the most significant nation affected. In 2024, Canada bought roughly $350 billion in US goods and exported $412 billion to the American market, according to Census Bureau data. In a separate Face the Nation interview on Friday, Greer pointed to Canada's earlier retaliatory tariffs under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau as a reason for the increase. 'If the president's going to take an action and the Canadians retaliate, the United States needs to maintain the integrity of our action... so we have to go up too,' he said, reported CBS News. 'Our view is the president is trying to fix the terms of trade with Canada, and if there's a way to a deal, we'll find it,' Greer added. 'And if it's not, we'll have the tariff levels that we have.' Responding in a statement Friday, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said he was 'disappointed' by the US action, noting that 'Canada accounts for only 1% of US fentanyl imports and has been working intensively to further reduce these volumes.' LeBlanc said Sunday that Carney is expected to speak with President Trump 'over the next number of days,' describing their relationship as 'business-like' and 'respectful.' 'We understand and respect totally the president's view in terms of the national security interests. In fact, we share it,' LeBlanc said. 'And what we've said to our American counterparts is, how can we structure the right agreement where we can both continue to supply one another in a reliable, cost-effective way that preserves jobs essential to the American economy? But the same thing is true, obviously, in Canada as well. ' Relations between the two countries have grown increasingly tense since Trump took office in January and floated the idea that Canada could become the '51st state.' Carney rejected the notion during a May Oval Office meeting, saying Canada is 'not for sale.'