logo
Why China is searching for the next generation of ‘heroes'

Why China is searching for the next generation of ‘heroes'

Scroll.in08-07-2025
A tour guide competition was held in the central Chinese city of Wuhan in late May. This was not some fun contest. According to Chinese state media, it was a carefully conceived effort to 'attract and cultivate a group of politically firm and professionally skilled storytellers of heroes and martyrs in the new era'.
It symbolises the ambitious and far-reaching campaign launched by the Chinese state to revive the country's pantheon of national heroes and martyrs. The aim is to unite and mobilise the nation in what Chinese leadership see as the crucial final phase in the quest to become a modern global superpower.
On the same day as the Wuhan competition, but 750 miles further inland in Sichuan province, children from a kindergarten gathered with martyrs' family members to engage in traditional crafts. The official newspaper of the Chinese Communist party, the People's Daily, explained how this activity helped 'pass on the torch of heroes' to young generations.
And two weeks earlier, in China's eastern province of Shandong, representatives from the official state news agency, Xinhua, attended an immersive training session on hero spirit. By coming ' face to face ' with heroes of the past, the trainees were able to grasp the 'spirit' that had guided the extraordinary deeds of these ordinary people.
This 'facing up' to past heroes increasingly takes place through digital means. Thanks to developments in AI, and with the help of universities, museums and various government units, numerous Chinese people have now been 'reunited' or become 'acquainted' with family members martyred decades ago.
Activities such as these have become commonplace in recent years. They are encouraged, guided and overseen by an expanding architecture of laws and regulations. There are at least two reasons why the campaign to build a new 'spirit' of heroism and sacrifice requires attention beyond China-watchers.
Memory politics
The first reason is the increasingly global reach of the campaign. Just as China's economic statecraft is affecting global trade and finance, so too are Chinese memory politics spreading across the globe and reshaping the transnational memory landscape.
Beijing has become an active sponsor of commemorations that are concerned more with shaping the future than looking into the past. Recent examples include Victory Day celebrations in Moscow and Minsk, and joint commemorations in the Serbian capital, Belgrade, of the Chinese 'martyrs' of Nato's bombing of the Chinese embassy there in 1999.
China is also fostering bilateral memory partnerships in south-east Asia and Africa. And it has even resorted to memory diplomacy in seeking improved relations with the US by invoking the spirit of Sino-US cooperation during the second world war.
China's historical statecraft operates globally in the legal realm, too. Laws have come into effect that aim to promote patriotism and spread ' core socialist values ' among Chinese communities worldwide.
Chinese embassies and consulates are required to locate Chinese martyrs buried in their host jurisdictions, and erect and maintain memorials for them. They are also expected to organise commemorations involving local Chinese diasporic and expat communities.
Recent laws have been used to detain Chinese citizens living abroad. One example is Chinese artist Gao Zhen. Gao had been a permanent US resident for 13 years when he was detained in China in 2024 for his critical depictions of Mao Zedong a decade earlier.
Gao was charged with the crime of 'slandering China's heroes and martyrs' under a law that did not exist when he created and exhibited his artwork.
The second reason why China's martyrs and heroes campaign matters globally is possibly more disturbing. China has become an example of a growing body of cases where state actors seek to shape and control historical memory.
With several democracies beginning to show signs of democratic backsliding, the Chinese case is one of many that show that polar distinctions between 'liberal' and 'illiberal' systems are untenable.
Perhaps the most obvious example of a democracy in democratic recession is the US. Donald Trump, a constitutionally elected president, is relying on a series of executive orders to consolidate power and hamper critical debate.
One such directive, issued late in Trump's first term, entails a proposal to build a so-called 'national garden of American heroes'. The proposal was revived recently with an executive order on 'restoring truth and sanity to American history'.
The order aims to remove what the administration deems divisive and anti-American ideologies from national museums and public monuments.
Washington's efforts to control how history is presented seem to come straight out of Beijing's playbook. In 2020, during his July 4 address, Trump claimed: 'Our nation is witnessing a merciless campaign to wipe out our history, defame our heroes, erase our values, and indoctrinate our children.'
These words eerily resemble those used previously by Chinese president Xi Jinping to justify his campaign against what he calls 'historical nihilism' – attempts to 'destroy' the Chinese nation by eradicating its history.
Memory laws have also been adopted across Europe. The European Parliament, for example, has codified its own historical interpretations of the causes of the second world war in an attempt to counter what it labels Russian disinformation.
The causes and consequences of war have always been and will continue to be hotly debated among historians, and there is no need for the EU's bureaucracy to unilaterally 'resolve' these debates.
A problem with these bureaucratic efforts to codify historical interpretation is that they feed memory wars and fuel escalation. Even more damaging is that they emulate authoritarian practices of 'dictating' history and restricting debate.
These examples show that distinctions between authoritarian and democratic regimes are not as pristine as is often claimed. Increasingly, global memory practices are evolving and possibly converging on a fluid spectrum between these two poles.
China's new hero cult is an important case for shedding light on these dynamics.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sikh bizman, anti-Khalistan voice, dies mysteriously in US
Sikh bizman, anti-Khalistan voice, dies mysteriously in US

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Sikh bizman, anti-Khalistan voice, dies mysteriously in US

Amritsar: US-based businessman and social activist Sukhi Chahal – known for his anti-Khalistani views -- has died under suspicious circumstances in California. Jaspal Singh, a close friend of Sukhi, said on Saturday that Sukhi was invited to dinner by an acquaintance at their residence on Thursday. "Shortly after dinner, his health suddenly deteriorated, and he died on the spot," Singh said, adding that Sukhi was in good health, and his sudden and unexplained death has raised several questions. Sukhi was widely known for his outspoken criticism of Khalistani elements abroad, he said. According to Singh, what raises suspicion is that Sukhi died ahead of the August 17 Khalistan Referendum event in Washington DC, which he was opposing tooth and nail, Singh said. Founder and CEO of The Khalsa Today, Sukhi Chahal was receiving frequent death threats from pro-Khalistan elements. Yet, he remained steadfast in his views and continued his advocacy fearlessly, said Boota Singh Kaler, one of his acquaintances in California. He further said that his death has triggered a wave of grief among pro-India communities. "Police are investigating the incident," Kaler said, adding that the autopsy report will reveal the truth. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Why Your Current Make-Up Routine Might Be Aging You Learn More Undo by Taboola by Taboola Sukhi would advise Indian immigrants to follow US laws and stay away from crimes. "The United States is a society of law and order. Crimes like assault by foreign visitors will not be tolerated. If you break the law in US, your US visa can be revoked, and you may be ineligible to return to the US," Sukhi posted on his X account recently. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !

Disturbing Videos Of Israeli Hostages Spark Protests At Tel Avivs ‘Hostage Square'
Disturbing Videos Of Israeli Hostages Spark Protests At Tel Avivs ‘Hostage Square'

India.com

time2 hours ago

  • India.com

Disturbing Videos Of Israeli Hostages Spark Protests At Tel Avivs ‘Hostage Square'

A sense of urgency and desperation filled the air in Tel Aviv's "Hostage Square" on Saturday as protestors gathered, following the release of disturbing videos showing emaciated Israeli hostages still being held in Gaza, CNN reported. The videos, released by militant groups Hamas and the Palestinians, depicted Israeli hostages Evyatar David and Rom Braslavski in a visibly fragile state, sparking widespread outrage and concern. The undated footage of David is juxtaposed with images of starving Palestinian children. They are among fifty hostages that remain in the territory, at least 20 of whom are believed to be alive, as per CNN. The videos were released as ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas have stalled, and Palestinians in Gaza face a mounting starvation crisis. According to CNN, the United States' special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, attended the protest in Tel Aviv, one day after visiting a controversial US-backed aid distribution site in the Gaza Strip. Witkoff later held a nearly three-hour meeting with around 40 representatives of the hostage families, which was described as "very emotional". During the meeting, Witkoff emphasised that ceasefire negotiations between Israel and Hamas should be "all or nothing," with all 50 hostages in Gaza being returned to Israel in one go. "The plan is not to expand the war, but to end it. We think the negotiations should be changed to all or nothing. End the war and bring all 50 hostages home at the same time - that's the only way," Witkoff reportedly said. "Someone will be to blame" if the remaining living hostages do not return to Israel still alive, Witkoff said, according to the forum. According to the forum, Witkoff said that the US will "get your children home and hold Hamas responsible for any bad acts on their part" and "do what's right for the Gazan people." "We have a plan to end the war and bring everyone home," he reportedly added. The hostage families, who have frequently said that ongoing fighting in Gaza endangers their loved ones - on Saturday called for an end to the war in the territory and a "comprehensive deal" that would see the remaining hostages freed.

No duty concessions to US on agri, dairy, GM foods: An explainer
No duty concessions to US on agri, dairy, GM foods: An explainer

The Print

time3 hours ago

  • The Print

No duty concessions to US on agri, dairy, GM foods: An explainer

Earlier, this duty was to be imposed from August 1. The President has also not specified the penalty which he has announced on India for buying crude oil and military equipment from Russia. With the US not able to finalise a deal with India so far, US President Donald Trump on Thursday announced imposition of an additional 25 per cent import duty on Indian goods entering American markets from August 7. New Delhi, Aug 2 (PTI) India has toughened its stance on extending duty concessions on agri products, dairy and GM foods in the proposed bilateral trade agreement (BTA) with the US. Here is a list of Q&A (questions and answers) to explain reasons behind India's stand and impact of US tariffs on labour-intensive sectors: * What is the India-US bilateral trade agreement (BTA)? – India and the US entered into negotiations for a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial BTA in March 2025 with a target to complete the first tranche/phase of the pact by fall (October-November) of 2025. So far, five rounds of talks have been completed. For the next round, the US team, headed by Assistant US Trade Representative for South and Central Asia Brendan Lynch, is visiting India from August 25. * What is the aim of the BTA? – Normally in a trade agreement, two trading partners either significantly reduce or eliminate import duties on the maximum number of goods traded between them. Besides, they ease norms to promote trade in services and increase two-way investments. The India-US BTA is aimed at more than doubling the bilateral trade to USD 500 billion by 2030 from the present USD 191 billion. *What are the major demands of the two countries from each other in the BTA? – The US wants duty concessions on certain industrial goods, automobiles, especially electric vehicles, wines, petrochemical products, agri goods, dairy items, apples, tree nuts, and genetically-modified crops. India is seeking the removal of this additional tariff (25 per cent now) and cut in tariffs on steel and aluminium (50 per cent), auto sector (25 per cent), labour-intensive sectors, such as textiles, gems and jewellery, leather goods, garments, plastics, chemicals, shrimp, oil seeds, grapes, and bananas. *How much tariff is imposed by the US on Indian goods at present? – India's average import duty is about 17 per cent, while the US' is 3.3 per cent. On April 2, the US announced to impose 26 per cent duty (16 per cent reciprocal tariff and 10 per cent baseline tariff). At present, only the baseline tariff is in force. It is over and above the existing import duty on Indian goods. For example, before April 2, the Indian textiles were attracting a 6-9 per cent tariff in America. With the baseline tariff, it rose to 16-19 per cent. But from August 7, the sector will attract a 31-34 per cent duty. The baseline tariff will be replaced by 25 per cent duty notified on July 31 by the White House. However, certain products are exempted from these tariffs such as pharmaceutical, electronics and energy products. * From when the 25 per cent duty will come into force? – The duty, announced this week, will come into force from August 7 (9.30 am IST). The executive order has also clarified that goods in transit until October 5, 12:01 am eastern daylight time (EDT), or 09:30 am IST, will be subject to a 10 per cent tariff, provided that such goods have entered into transit before August 7 12:01 am EDT. *Why India is not ready to provide duty concessions on dairy, agri and GM foods? – Agri: Farm livelihoods are at stake. This is a politically and economically sensitive area as over 700 million people in India's rural economy are dependent on the sector. If India removes tariffs, cheap, subsidised US grains could flood Indian markets during global price crashes. Unlike the US, where agriculture is corporatised, Indian farming is a livelihood issue. Tariffs are essential to protect small farmers, manage price volatility, and ensure food security. Dairy: India wants to safeguard its small farmers. GTRI stated that the US argues that India's GM-free feed certification and facility registration protocols effectively bar American dairy imports. 'Indian rules prohibit imports from animals fed with animal-derived feed'”for example, butter from a cow fed meat'”due to religious sensitivities. India considers this policy non-negotiable,' GTRI has said. GM Food: These are created by inserting specific genes, often from bacteria, viruses, other plants, or occasionally animals, into a plant's DNA to introduce new traits, such as pest resistance or herbicide tolerance. Allowing the import of GM products such as soybean meal and distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) for animal feed would affect India's agricultural exports to the EU, a key destination for Indian exporters. PTI RR ANU ANU This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store