
Global leaders react to US strikes on Iran with calls for diplomacy
The
U.S. strike on Iran
fueled fears that Israel's war with Tehran could escalate to a wider
regional conflict
, and other countries began reacting Sunday with calls for
diplomacy
and words of caution.
President Donald Trump
had said Thursday that he would decide within two weeks whether to get involved. In the end, it took just days, and Washington inserted itself into Israel's campaign with its early Sunday attack.
It remained unclear early on how much damage had been inflicted, but Iran had pledged to retaliate if the U.S. joined the Israeli assault.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Dhoni's Exclusive Home Interior Choice?
HomeLane
Get Quote
Undo
Some have questioned whether a weakened Iran would capitulate or remain defiant and begin striking with allies at U.S. targets scattered across the Gulf region.
Here is a look at reactions from governments and officials around the world:
Live Events
Iraq
The Iraqi government condemned the
U.S. strikes on Iran
, saying the military escalation created a grave threat to peace and security in the
Middle East
. It said it poses serious risks to regional stability and called for diplomatic efforts to de-escalate the crisis.
"The continuation of such attacks risks dangerous escalation with consequences that extend beyond the borders of any single state, threatening the security of the entire region and the world," government spokesman Bassem al-Awadi said in the statement.
Iraq has close relations with both Washington and Tehran, which it has attempted to balance over the years. The country also has a network of powerful Iranian-backed militias, which so far have not entered the fray since the outbreak of the Israel-Iran war.
Also Read:
PM Modi speaks to Iranian President Pezeshkian; reiterates call for immediate de-escalation
Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia expressed "deep concern" about the U.S. airstrikes, but stopped short of condemning the move.
"The Kingdom underscores the need to exert all possible efforts to exercise restraint, de-escalate tensions, and avoid further escalation," the kingdom's
foreign ministry
said in a statement.
Saudi Arabia had earlier condemned Israel's strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities and military leaders.
Qatar
Qatar said it "regrets" escalating tensions in the Israel-Iran war.
Its foreign ministry in a statement urged all parties to show self-restraint and "avoid escalation, which the peoples of the region, burdened by conflicts and their tragic humanitarian repercussions, cannot tolerate."
Qatar has served as a key mediator in the Israel-Hamas war and is home to the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East.
Oman
Oman condemned the airstrikes, saying they escalated tensions in the region.
The U.S. airstrikes threaten "to expand the scope of the conflict and constitute a serious violation of international law and the United Nations charter," a spokesperson for Oman's foreign ministry said in a statement.
Oman was a mediator in the nuclear talks between Iran and the U.S. that have been upended by the Israel-Iran war.
Lebanon
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun said the U.S. bombing could lead to a regional conflict that no country could bear and called for negotiations.
"Lebanon, its leadership, parties, and people, are aware today, more than ever before, that it has paid a heavy price for the wars that erupted on its land and in the region," Aoun said in a statement on X. "It is unwilling to pay more, and there is no national interest in doing so, especially since the cost of these wars was and will be greater than its ability to bear."
Lebanon's new leadership, which came after Israel and the Hezbollah's militant group's devastating war, has urged the country to avoid being dragged into more conflict as it tries to rebuild itself and pull itself from yearslong economic crisis. Hezbollah has not taken military action against Israel in solidarity with its key ally Iran in the conflict, but has not yet commented on Washington's overnight strikes.
Prime Minister
Nawaf Salam said that Lebanon needs to stay away from any possible regional spillover from the conflict.
"It is increasingly important for us to adhere strictly to the supreme national interest, which is the need to avoid Lebanon being ... drawn into the ongoing regional confrontation in any way," Salam said in a post on X.
Also Read:
'The only path forward is diplomacy,' UN Secretary General after US attacks Iran
European Union
The European Union's top diplomat said Iran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon but she urged those involved in the conflict to show restraint.
"I urge all sides to step back, return to the negotiating table and prevent further escalation," EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said in a post on social media.
Kallas will chair a meeting of the 27-nation bloc's foreign ministers in Brussels on Monday, with the Israel-Iran war high on the agenda.
Italy
Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said Iran's nuclear facilities "represented a danger for the entire area" but hoped the action could lead to de-escalation in the conflict and negotiations.
The Italian minister also said he will speak later Sunday with the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Mariano Grossi, "to understand the consequences that there may be from a security point of view," after the U.S. attacks.
Italy is doing everything possible to help Italian citizens who want to leave Iran and Israel amid the conflict, he said.
United Nations
U.N. Secretary General Antonio Guterres said he was "gravely alarmed" by the use of force by the United States.
"There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control - with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world," he said in a statement on the social media platform X. "I call on Member States to de-escalate."
"There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy."
United Kingdom
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer called for Iran to return to the negotiating table to diplomatically end the crisis, saying stability was the priority in the volatile region.
The U.K., along with the European Union, France and Germany, tried unsuccessfully to broker a diplomatic solution in Geneva last week with Iran.
Starmer said Iran's nuclear program posed a grave threat to global security.
"Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the U.S. has taken action to alleviate that threat," Starmer said.
New Zealand
New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters urged "all parties to return to talks."
He wouldn't tell reporters Sunday whether New Zealand supported President Trump's actions, saying they had only just happened.
The three-time foreign minister said the crisis is "the most serious I've ever dealt with" and that it was "critical further escalation is avoided."
"Diplomacy will deliver a more enduring resolution than further military action," he said.
Hamas and the Houthis
Both the Houthi rebels in Yemen and Hamas have condemned the U.S. strikes. The Houthis vowed to support Iran in its fight against "the Zionist and American aggression."
In a statement on Sunday, the Houthi political bureau called on Muslim nations to join "the Jihad and resistance option as one front against the Zionist-American arrogance."
Hamas and the Houthis are part of Iran's so-called "Axis of Resistance," the collection of pro-Iranian proxies stretching from Yemen to Lebanon that for years gave Iran considerable power across the region.
China
A flash commentary from China's government-run media asked whether the U.S. is "repeating its Iraq mistake in Iran."
The online piece by CGTN, the foreign-language arm of the state broadcaster, said the U.S. strikes mark a dangerous turning point.
"History has repeatedly shown that military interventions in the Middle East often produce unintended consequences, including prolonged conflicts and regional destabilization," it said, citing the American invasion of Iraq in 2003.
It said a measured, diplomatic approach that prioritizes dialogue over military confrontation offers the best hope for stability in the Middle East.
South Korea
South Korea's presidential office held an emergency meeting on Sunday to discuss the potential security and economic ramifications of the U.S. strikes.
National security director, Wi Sung-lac, asked officials to coordinate closely to minimize any negative impacts on South Korea, emphasizing that the top priority is ensuring the safety of the South Korean people and the continuation of their stable daily lives, according to the presidential office.
Japan
Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told reporters Sunday it was crucial to calm the situation as soon as possible, adding that the Iranian nuclear weapons development also must be prevented.
Ishiba, asked if he supports the U.S. attacks on Iran, declined to comment. He was speaking to reporters after an emergency meeting with officials from key ministries over the U.S. military action.
Ishiba said officials are still assessing details and doing their utmost to protect the safety of the Japanese nationals in Iran, Israel and elsewhere in the region.
While the U.S. attacks on Iran do not affect Japan's stable energy supply for the time being, Ishiba said, he has instructed officials to "watch the development with a sense of urgency and take every precaution" to prevent an increase in oil and utility costs ahead of the summer when energy demand rises. Any conflict in the Middle East is a concern for resource-scarce Japan, most of whose oil imports come from the region.
Meanwhile, Japan's largest-circulation newspaper Yomiuri has distributed an extra edition on the attack in Tokyo.
Australia
Australia, which shuttered its embassy in Tehran and evacuated staff Friday, pushed for a diplomatic end to the conflict.
"We have been clear that Iran's nuclear and ballistic missile program has been a threat to international peace and security," a government official said in a written statement. "We note the U.S. President's statement that now is the time for peace."
"The security situation in the region is highly volatile. We continue to call for de-escalation, dialogue and diplomacy."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
12 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
When America joins Israel's war with Iran
The US bombing of key Iranian nuclear facilities Sunday will have significant geopolitical implications for regional stability, global geopolitics, and India's immediate and medium-term interests. However, for now, it doesn't appear that the US-Israeli attack on Iran is likely to go all the way, making it improbable that Iran will be completely denuclearised or that the Islamic regime in Tehran will fall. A severely weakened Iranian regime is likely to respond with military and grey-zone tactics, increasing political and economic instability in the region. Moreover, neither Israel nor the US appear to have an endgame in mind in this war. The US-Israel attack will deepen divisions and sharpen existing global geopolitical fault lines (REUTERS) There are at least six key implications of this ongoing war. First, West Asia is likely to revert to a period of chaos, conflict, and uncertainty, at least for some time. Despite Iran's strained relations with many of its neighbours, the US decision to bomb Iranian nuclear facilities and join Israel's military campaign will make it difficult for other regional powers to resume efforts to normalise relations with Tel Aviv. Iran and its regime may not be popular in the Sunni strongholds of West Asia, but neither is Israel, especially given its actions in Gaza and the ongoing humanitarian tragedy there. Russia and China are likely to increase their geopolitical influence in the region, and neither will miss opportunities to challenge Israel and the US, making the regional balance even more complex and unpredictable. Second, the attack will deepen divisions and sharpen existing global geopolitical fault lines. While the US and Israel may achieve immediate military gains, many others will be dissatisfied: With their geopolitical standing threatened, they might seek to undermine the dominance established by the US-Israel alliance in the region. Many in the Global South are likely to condemn the unilateral actions and violations of international law by the US and Israel. Meanwhile, China will look to exploit the emerging regional fractures, while Moscow will seek to recover the influence it lost in West Asia — due to the fall of the Assad regime in Syria and now, through the attack on Iran — and spot an opportunity in the post-war scene. Interestingly, Europe has maintained a curious silence. However, it will inevitably ask why the US, which wanted its Nato partners to pay for their defence and abandoned Ukraine thus increasing Europe's insecurity, would resort to force in a distant country. Clearly, Trump has prioritised Israel over Nato allies; that rude reality won't be lost on Europe. Third, the American and Israeli attacks on Iran lack legitimacy under international law, and as a result, these will further undermine the credibility of the United Nations and weaken the influence of international law worldwide. For America's western partners, this presents several dilemmas. It will test their commitment to international legal frameworks as condemning the attack risks alienating Trump further, and not condemning it risks being seen as tacit support for an illegal action. Moreover, if they do not condemn the US action, the moral ground to criticise Russia will be considerably weakened. It also undermines the geopolitical standing of key western States, which were actively engaged in negotiations with the Iranian foreign minister in Geneva to end the conflict. They face the risk of losing credibility considering how Trump went ahead and bombed Iran ignoring the talks. Fourth, American engagement in the West Asian conflict could divert attention from Ukraine's ongoing war with Russia. The Iran war would be disastrous for Ukraine, especially as the US has been unable to bring Russia to the negotiating table. Meanwhile, Russia's gains on the battlefield are growing and Moscow shows no enthusiasm to negotiate a ceasefire with Kyiv. Fifth, the attempted denuclearisation of Iran will likely have the opposite effect internationally, prompting several other countries to consider developing their own nuclear weapons for after all those who possess nuclear weapons have little to fear. Rather than strengthening the global nuclear order, the US and Israel's military action to denuclearise Iran will end up weakening it, encouraging more States to pursue nuclear arms as insurance against potential threats. Ukraine gave up its nuclear arsenal, while Iran failed to reach the finish line; both faced significant consequences. Israel developed its nuclear programme secretly, North Korea built its nuclear weapons at great domestic cost, and India and Pakistan developed theirs despite sanctions and US pressure. The lessons are many, and will not be lost on nuclear aspirants around the world. Finally, for India, the war in West Asia will likely unsettle the country's grand plans for broader engagement with the region. Energy prices are likely to spike, while heightened geopolitical divides will challenge India's ability to manage regional fault lines. If the war spreads or persists, it could also impact Indian nationals in the region and the remittances they send home. Moreover, the Iran conflict will, at least for the moment, stall India's regional plans for the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) and the Chabahar port in Iran, projected as India's gateway to central Asia. Happymon Jacob teaches India's foreign policy at Jawaharlal Nehru University and is the editor of INDIA'S WORLD magazine. The views expressed are personal

Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pentagon Chief LAUDS 'Op Midnight Hammer' Success; 'Used Decoys To Misdirect,' Says Hegseth
/ Jun 22, 2025, 08:06PM IST The Pentagon has provided new details on the U.S. operation targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth praised the mission's execution, highlighting the use of decoys and coordinated air power. B-2 bombers launched from the U.S. and struck targets across Iran during an 18-hour mission. Officials described it as one of the most complex long-range strike operations in recent history. Watch.


Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘Obama will start a war with Iran to win re-election': Amid US strikes on Tehran, Donald Trump's old tweet resurfaces
A decade-old tweet from Donald Trump has come back to haunt him, at a time when he's leading a real war effort. As tensions between Israel and Iran exploded into open conflict, and the United States confirmed bombing three Iranian nuclear sites, Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz, an old Trump tweet from 2013 has gone viral for its eerie irony. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now 'Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly, not skilled!' Trump wrote on X (formerly Twitter), accusing Obama of planning a war to mask diplomatic failure. Similar posts from 2011 and 2012 echo the same idea: that Obama would start a war with Iran to boost poll numbers and win re-election. But now it's Trump who's ordering strikes on Iran, an action drawing both political backlash and international concern. 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran,' Trump warned Saturday night on social media, before announcing that US strikes had 'obliterated' Iran's nuclear infrastructure. He blamed Tehran for rejecting his nuclear deal and reiterated, 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON.' The irony wasn't lost on critics, who shared clips of Trump once saying Obama had 'no ability to negotiate' and would 'start a war with Iran' just to stay in power. Meanwhile, the fallout from the US strikes is spreading, Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi condemned the US action as a violation of the UN Charter and warned of "everlasting consequences." UN Secretary-General António Guterres called the attacks 'a dangerous escalation' and urged diplomacy over war. Israel's Prime Minister Netanyahu praised Trump's move, saying history would remember his 'bold decision' to stop Iran's nuclear ambitions. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Hamas declared full solidarity with Iran, calling the US action 'brazen aggression.' As the region teeters on the brink of broader war, Trump's resurfaced words from a decade ago are being replayed in a starkly new, and deeply ironic, context.