UK new car market dipped in February
The UK new car market fell slightly in February, down 1.0% to 84,054 units, according to the latest figures from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders (SMMT).
In what is usually the smallest month of the year (accounting for only around 4% of annual volumes), February was the fifth consecutive month of decline, with a 4.0% reduction in fleet registrations – which have driven previous market growth. Private registrations rose by 4.6% to slightly increase overall market share to 35.6%, while the much smaller business sector rose by 3.3%.
Electrified vehicle uptake continued to grow, with plug-in hybrid vehicles (PHEVs) rising 19.3% and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) up 7.9%. Battery electric vehicle (BEV) registrations were up by 41.7% to 21,244 units, securing a 25.3% market share compared with 17.7% a year ago.
This dramatic increase compared with the rest of the market was unsurprising considering the forthcoming tax changes in April, which will see many EV models subject to the vehicle excise duty expensive car supplement (ECS) for the first time. This maintains the positive trajectory but still falls short of the 28% target for 2025 and, given February comes ahead of the March numberplate change, it is always one of the smallest and most volatile months.
Next month is likely to see a further surge in EV uptake, as buyers capitalise on the new '25 plate and take their last chance to avoid the punitive ECS which, from 1 April will add GBP2,125 over six years to the cost of BEVs with a list price above GBP40,000. The SMMT points out that relative to the rest of the market, BEVs are disproportionately affected by the ECS as higher production costs meaning the average BEV retails above the ECS threshold, a threshold which remains unchanged since its introduction in 2017. The introduction of this measure also risks disincentivising the used market as well as the new, impeding a faster, fairer transition.
Manufacturers have already underwritten the transition to the tune of more than £4.5 billion in discounts over the last year alone – on top of the billions invested in developing and bringing the vehicles to market. The SMMT maintains that such industry support is unsustainable which is why the current ZEV Mandate 'must arrive at measures which afford greater market flexibilities, incentivise private purchases, and both encourage and facilitate a faster rollout of charging infrastructure'.
Mike Hawes, SMMT Chief Executive, said: 'Although February's figures show a subdued overall market, the good news is that electric car uptake is increasing, albeit at huge cost to manufacturers in terms of market support.
'It is always dangerous, however, to draw conclusions from a single month, especially one as small and volatile as February. With the all-important March number plate change now upon us, and tax changes taking effect in April that will, perversely, dissuade EV purchases, we expect significant demand for these new products next month - but, long term, EV consumers need carrots, not ever more sticks.'
"UK new car market dipped in February" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand.
The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
a day ago
- CNBC
Gulf markets end higher, shielded from major turmoil after the U.S. strike on Iran
Markets across the Middle East ended mostly higher on Sunday after the United States entered the war between Israel and Iran and struck three key Iranian nuclear sites, Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. Stocks in Tel Aviv reached an all-time high on Sunday on bets that Washington's entrance into the conflict with Tehran would help it to come to an end, despite the Iranian Foreign Minister's insistence that the country could not return to diplomacy "while under attack." The broader TA-125 index was trading 1.77% higher on Sunday, while the TA-35, Tel Aviv's blue-chip index, was up 1.5%. Equities climbed in Israel last week after the country hit targets in Iran. In the Gulf, Saudi Arabia's Tadawul opened Sunday trading nearly half a percent higher before erasing earlier gains and closing down 0.3%. Qatar gained 0.2% and Bahrain's index added 0.3%. Bahrain, home to the U.S. Central Command, issued a "work from home mandate" on Sunday, urging citizens to "only use main roads when necessary to maintain public safety." Egypt's benchmark EGX30 was the major gainer in the region, closing 2.7% higher on Sunday. "The Gulf has distanced itself and has been calling for appeasement, supporting a peaceful resolution, and has gone as far as condemning Israeli aggression," Fadi Arbid, founding partner and CIO of Amwal Capital Partners, told CNBC. He explained that such rhetoric "has helped the Gulf isolate itself from conflict" and any significant short-term market impact, adding that the net mid-term is positive. "The market might be priced in on removing a big overhang, which is the Iranian threat," Arbid said, which "at least the international investor would look at positively" once the issue of Iran is removed. Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Qatar have all released statements in the last 24 hours, the UAE urged an immediate halt to escalation to "avoid serious repercussions" in the region, while Saudi Arabia expressed concern and Qatar said it "deplored deterioration" in the conflict between Israel and Iran. Investors will be watching for swings in the oil market when it opens later this evening, and whether Iran intends to block the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial waterway through which a quarter of the world's oil supply passes. Tanker Trackers, a website that tracks global oil shipments, said that as of 3:40 p.m. UAE time on Sunday, "tanker traffic is still moving in both directions within the Strait of Hormuz," citing AIS data. "Oil prices are likely to open higher, further increasing the geopolitical risk premium," Giovanni Staunovo, a commodity analyst at UBS told CNBC on Sunday, adding that oil will maintain a "risk premium for now," and prices will remain volatile in the near term as it is "unclear how the conflict might evolve." Prices fell 2% on Friday, before U.S. President Donald Trump moved to enter the war between Israel and Iran. Brent futures have jumped 11% since Israel's attack on Iran less than two weeks ago, and both Brent and U.S. crude oil have remained volatile since. Prices are expected to rise on Monday following Washington's strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. "Oil markets are likely to take the U.S. attacks as a substantial escalation of the war and price in elevated security of supply risks." Edward Bell, acting chief economist at Emirates NDB, told CNBC. He added that markets remain bound by headlines, not fundamentals and said to expect "big swings" in the coming days. "While there remains no interruption to flows of oil coming out of the Gulf and oil infrastructure has not come under direct attack, markets will still likely price in an elevated geopolitical premium," Bell said.
San Francisco Chronicle
a day ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
California insurance crisis could have dire consequences for affordable housing
Insurance bills have always been on the high side for Episcopal Community Services, a San Francisco nonprofit that operates more than 2,000 units of permanent supportive housing and serves a population insurers deem risky. But over the past few years, ECS has seen insurance costs skyrocket. Its premiums rose 84% last year, on top of 10% and 15% increases the previous two years. At the same time, ECS' deductibles quadrupled last year and reached $100,000 for some properties, forcing ECS to cover most of its own claims. Those rising costs were a factor in ECS' decision to lay off six employees this year, and staff members fear that continued increases could jeopardize essential but expensive ECS services, like the homeless shelter it operates or the seven hotels it leases for supportive housing. 'If we're gonna continue to operate the housing, we have to pay the insurance,' said Chris Callandrillo, ECS' chief program officer. 'We've got to get that from somewhere, and that burden is huge.' Across California, affordable housing developers say they're being squeezed by ever-rising premiums, increasingly convoluted coverage arrangements and deductibles so high that they're self-insuring for all but the most catastrophic losses. Advocates are pushing the federal government for relief in the form of subsidies for risk mitigation or the creation of a federally backed insurance product, but few solutions appear likely in the short term. According to an analysis of over 130 California properties financed by a key federal low-income tax credit and included in the national nonprofit Enterprise Community Partners' portfolio, median annual per-unit insurance expenses increased 142% from 2019 to 2024, from $409 to $989. From 2022 to 2024, some California affordable developers reported insurance expense increases as high as 500%. Without intervention, affordable housing providers say, these ballooning costs could force cuts to staffing or on-site services and imperil future projects at a time when demand for affordable units is as high as ever. The problem goes far beyond the affordable housing sector; statewide, insurers have sought perennial rate hikes, nonrenewed customers or ceased writing new policies as they grapple with wildfire-fueled losses and high construction costs. But over the past few years, insurance costs for affordable housing developments have been about 25% higher than for market rate developments in the same areas, said Jordann Coleman, senior vice president at Walnut Creek-based Heffernan Insurance Brokers, whose client base is 40% affordable housing. And affordable housing developers say they're especially vulnerable because they're already operating on razor-thin margins — and because unlike for their market-rate counterparts, the law limits their ability to pass on costs to tenants. 'Somebody's got to come up with a way to pay for that, and for us, it can't be rent,' said Linda Mandolini, CEO of Eden Housing, a Hayward developer with dozens of Bay Area affordable housing complexes. The amount Eden Housing has paid for insurance has risen every year since 2018, including a 20% jump this year on top of a 28% jump the previous year. Insurers have long considered affordable housing riskier to underwrite than market-rate housing — especially permanent supportive housing, where formerly homeless residents less used to living inside can spark fires or cause damage. But developers say insurance costs are out of step with claims, and they don't seem to take into account efforts to mitigate risks — such as hiring more security or replacing gas stoves with electric ones — or how affordable complexes can make neighborhoods safer and spur economic development over time. One insurer that writes policies for affordable housing developers declined to comment on its rationale for increasing premiums and deductibles, and another insurer did not respond to a request for comment. Before around 2020, it was possible to find a single insurer willing to underwrite an affordable housing provider's whole portfolio of properties, Coleman said. Now, she's sometimes working with up to 12 different insurers to piece together more scant coverage with higher deductibles — and each insurer has its own set of questions and restrictions. Coleman said she is increasingly reliant on more complicated risk-sharing arrangements, such as 'insurance towers' — Jenga-like stacks of policies where different insurers underwrite fractions of a single property (one of ECS' properties is underwritten by six insurers, Callandrillo said). In cases where clients have preexisting contracts that require lower deductibles than insurers are willing to grant, Coleman has also turned to deductible buy-down policies — additional coverage from a separate insurer that pays the difference in the case of a claim. 'The work is exponential, not just for us, but for our clients as well,' Coleman said. These days, it's rare that she has more than one option to offer a client. Most affordable developers are already working on shoestring budgets stretched thin by rising construction costs and still recovering from lower revenue from tenants who got out of the habit of paying rent during COVID-19. Because most expenses are nonnegotiables, such as payroll and maintenance, keeping up with insurance payments can mean dipping into funds earmarked for longer term projects. 'This is really depleting our property level reserve, our rainy day fund,' said Janelle Chan, CEO of East Bay Asian Local Development Corp., which has developed about 2,500 affordable units in Oakland. The nonprofit has diverted $12 million from its reserves over the last few years to pay for property expenses including insurance, increased utility costs and rent collection deficits, she said. As part of belt-tightening measures, the East Bay Asian Local Development Corp. is considering cutting community programming or stripping nice-to-have features from planned projects, Chan said. But if premiums stay high, affordable developers say, future projects could be in jeopardy if insurance — a prerequisite for securing loans — is just too expensive, or if developers' reserves have been too depleted to buy properties in the first place. 'We might have to put stuff on hold,' Mandolini said. Among Eden Housing's pipeline of 4,500 planned affordable homes is a complex for seniors at risk of homelessness in San Jose, converting the former Richmond Health Center into dozens of units of permanent supportive housing, and a 119-unit Liberation Park intended to revitalize a historically Black neighborhood in East Oakland. There's another even more serious risk: If mounting expenses cause developers to default, foreclosure can wipe out a property's low-income housing use designation — a more permanent setback for constructing affordable units. 'That's just a critical loss that can't be allowed to happen,' said Thom Amdur, senior vice president for policy and impact at Lincoln Avenue Capital, which invests in affordable housing across the country. Delays or defaults could threaten the region's ability to meet its housing goals. The Bay Area is required to plan to build close to 450,000 new units by 2031, of which 40% should be allocated for low- or very low-income residents, according to the state's Regional Housing Needs Determination. Affordable developers want the government to step in, either by subsidizing risk mitigation efforts or by stabilizing the insurance market through creating a federally backstopped insurance product or expanding FAIR plans — state-created insurers of last resort, such as the one in California — to cover more affordable housing. California lawmakers are considering a bill, AB1339, that would require the Department of Insurance to conduct a study on barriers to affordable housing insurance statewide. For now, developers continue to feel the squeeze. 'We're being asked to build more, and yet we are struggling to protect what we have,' Chan said. 'The candle's burning at both ends.'
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Health care has been a job market bright spot, but Trump's budget bill looms over the industry
Proposed cuts to health insurance programs in the budget bill being pushed through Congress by President Donald Trump could put hundreds of thousands of health care jobs at risk — jeopardizing one of the few notably strong areas of the U.S. job market. Congressional Republicans are advancing a budget plan that would cause nearly 8 million people on Medicaid to lose their health insurance coverage, according to estimates by the Congressional Budget Office, with an additional 2 million people to lose coverage through the Affordable Care Act if Congress remains on track to let health insurance tax subsidies expire at the end of the year. Less funding for Medicaid and fewer people with health insurance would mean a drop-off in doctor's office visits, prescription refills and medical procedures — and, as a result, fewer workers needed to support those types of services. It could lead to the loss of nearly 500,000 health care jobs over the next decade, according to an analysis by George Washington University and the Commonwealth Fund. The expiration of the ACA tax subsidies, which were enacted in 2021, would result in the loss of an additional 140,000 jobs, a separate analysis from George Washington University found. 'Hospitals will close, health centers will close, pharmacies in some parts of the country will close because they will lose revenue,' said Leighton Ku, director for the Center for Health Policy Research at George Washington University, who worked on the analyses. 'There are going to be job losses, and we're talking about middle class jobs being lost.' That would be a blow to one of the strongest, steadiest areas of the job market in recent years. Health care accounted for nearly half of the jobs added in the U.S. in May, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Last year, around half of the 2.2 million jobs added to the economy were in health care-related sectors, according to an analysis by S&P Global. That has helped offset job cuts and stagnant growth in other sectors of the labor market, like retail and manufacturing. 'Right now, a lot of what is driving these positive headline numbers and bolstering the labor market is the health care sector,' said Allison Shrivastava, an economist with job listing site 'It's something that has been a constant. The health care sector has been a pretty big mainstay as the rest of the labor market has cooled.' The health insurance provisions are part of a broader spending bill that has passed the House and is currently making its way through the Senate. The legislation, which Republicans have dubbed the "Big Beautiful Bill Act," would cut around $800 billion from Medicaid, the health insurance program for the poor and disabled, in order to help offset some of the $4 trillion in tax cut extensions in the bill for individuals and corporations. A version of the bill currently in the Senate, which plans to start voting on the legislation next week, would go even further in reducing spending on Medicaid, by including a provision to limit states' use of taxes on hospitals and other health care providers that help states fund their share of the Medicaid program. The cuts would take a particular toll on health care providers in rural areas, where patients are more likely to be insured through Medicaid than those in metro areas. Researchers at Georgetown University found that 40% of children in small and rural towns receive their health insurance from Medicaid. Already, one-third of all rural hospitals in the country are at risk of closing because of financial difficulties, according to a report this month from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform. Also at risk are Community Health Centers, which employ more than 300,000 workers and receive a portion of their funding from the federal government. Those centers, which serve at least 32 million mostly lower-income patients a year, get about 40% of their revenue from Medicaid. 'Our health centers operate on razor-thin margins, so any kind of disruption in payments or reimbursements, even for a short time, can have a significant impact,' said Joe Dunn, chief policy officer for the National Association of Community Health Centers. 'About 40% of health centers are in rural America, and oftentimes they are the only primary care in that community. We have health centers in towns of a few hundred people, and there may not be any other kind of health care network there.' Absent any policy changes from Congress, the health care sector had appeared to be on track for continued growth — and largely isolated from wider concerns about tariffs and an economic slowdown. The number of job postings for doctors and surgeons on are about 90% higher than their pre-pandemic levels, listings for home health aides are up 46%, and openings for nurses are up 16%, Shrivastava said. Health care job postings on represent 27% of all active job listings and health care postings are beginning to make up a larger share of new job postings, according to data from ZipRecruiter. A loss of that hiring momentum from funding cuts would leave one less positive driver for the job market. 'Right now, the labor market as a whole is arguably in a stagnant position,' said Shrivastava. 'People are not wanting to leave their jobs, they're nervous about whether or not they'll be able to find another job, and companies aren't really looking to hire. Health care has been the exception to that.' This article was originally published on
