Exclusive-OnlyFans owner in talks to sell to investor group at about $8 billion value, sources say
OnlyFans owner Fenix International Ltd is in talks to sell the porn-driven company to an investor group at a valuation of around $8 billion, three sources familiar with the matter told Reuters.The group is led by the Forest Road Company, a Los Angeles-based investment firm, the sources said. Reuters could not identify the investors in the group.
The investor group and current deal value have not previously been reported.
OnlyFans, which exploded in popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic, is best known as an online platform that enables porn creators to charge subscribers for content. OnlyFans takes 20 per cent of creators' earnings.
In the year ended November 2023, the company generated $6.6 billion in revenue, according to a filing with British regulators. That is up from $375 million in 2020, and this rapid growth has attracted investor interest.
Some executives at Forest Road were part of a special purpose acquisition company that was in talks to take OnlyFans public in 2022, according to sources and filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
OnlyFans and Forest Road declined to comment.
One of the three sources and another source familiar with sale discussions said Fenix International Ltd is also in talks with other potential suitors.
The London-based company has drawn interest from several suitors in recent months.
Talks have been held at least since March, the people said. Three sources said a deal could be reached in the next week or two. The sources also cautioned that there was no certainty a deal will be struck and requested anonymity ahead of an official announcement.
An initial public offering is also being considered, three of the sources said.
The company's sole shareholder is Leonid Radvinsky, a Ukrainian American whose location could not be confirmed. He bought OnlyFans in 2018 and has paid himself at least $1 billion in dividends over the past three years, British filings showed.
Last year, Reuters published a series of investigative stories on OnlyFans that documented complaints in U.S. police and court records that child sexual abuse material and nonconsensual pornography has appeared on the site since 2019. The series also identified cases of sex traffickers using the platform to abuse and exploit women.
Porn makes OnlyFans untouchable for many big banks and investors, sources have told Reuters, because due diligence might find illegal content such as child sexual abuse material, trafficking victims and nonconsensual porn.
The New York Post reported on Wednesday the company was exploring a potential sale.
Founded in 2017, Forest Road is an investment firm interested in media, renewable energy and digital assets, according to its website. Its ventures have included a Formula E racing team and it in 2024 expanded its advisory business by acquiring a majority stake in ACF Investment Bank.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Trump touts 'done' deal with Beijing on rare earths, allowing Chinese students in US universities
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump touted ties with China as "excellent" on Wednesday (Jun 11), saying the superpowers reached a deal after two days of talks aimed at preserving a truce in their damaging trade war. Trump said on his Truth Social platform that China would supply rare earth minerals and magnets - vital elements for US industries - while Washington would allow Chinese students to remain in US universities. His post came hours after top US and Chinese negotiators announced a "framework" agreement late Tuesday following two days of marathon talks in London. "Our deal with China is done," Trump wrote, adding that the agreement was still "subject to final approval with President Xi (Jinping) and me". US stock markets showed little enthusiasm despite Trump's latest statements, with the broad-based S&P 500 and the Dow flat while the tech-heavy Nasdaq edged higher in morning deals. "CANDID" TALKS The two sides had agreed to reduce their tit-for-tat, triple-digit tariffs during talks in Geneva last month, but cracks appeared in the detente after Trump accused China of violating the deal. Washington was concerned about slower supplies of rare earths after Beijing in early April began requiring domestic exporters to apply for a licence, widely seen as a response to US tariffs. Rare earths are used in everything from electric vehicles to hard drives, wind turbines and missiles. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in London on Tuesday that US measures imposed when rare earths "were not coming" would likely be relaxed once Beijing moved forward with more license approvals. In his Truth Social post, Trump said China will supply "full magnets, and any necessary rare earths ... up front". Washington has infuriated Beijing by vowing to revoke the visas of Chinese students - a major source of revenue for US universities. On Wednesday, Trump said: "We will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities." The US president also said that under the deal, the United States would apply 55 per cent tariffs on Chinese goods - a combination of his 30 per cent additional levies and the rough average of pre-existing duties, a White House official said. He said Beijing would charge 10 per cent duties on US goods. The rates are the same as those that were previously agreed in the truce, which brought US tariffs down from 145 per cent and those imposed by China from 125 per cent. In a Chinese state media readout of the talks released Wednesday, Vice Premier He Lifeng, who headed Beijing's team in London, stressed the need for the two sides to strengthen cooperation in future dialogue. "As a next step, the two sides should ... continuously enhance consensus, reduce misunderstandings and strengthen cooperation," He Lifeng said, according to state broadcaster CCTV. Speaking to reporters in London, China International Trade Representative Li Chenggang said: "Our communication has been very professional, rational, in-depth and candid." Trump's announcement came as an international rights group said several global brands are among dozens of companies at risk of using forced labour through their Chinese supply chains because they use critical minerals or buy minerals-based products sourced from the Xinjiang region of China. The report by the Netherlands-based Global Rights Compliance says companies including Avon, Walmart, Nescafe, Coca-Cola and paint supplier Sherwin-Williams may be linked to titanium sourced from Xinjiang, where rights groups allege the Chinese government runs coercive labour practices targeting predominantly Muslim Uyghurs and other Turkic minorities. The report found 77 Chinese suppliers in the titanium, lithium, beryllium and magnesium industries operating in Xinjiang. It said the suppliers are at risk of participating in the Chinese government's 'labour transfer programs', in which Uyghurs are forced to work in factories as part of a long-standing campaign of assimilation and mass detention. Asked about the report, the Chinese Foreign Ministry said that 'no one has ever been forcibly transferred in China's Xinjiang under work programs'.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Meta finalizes investment in Scale AI, valuing startup at $29 billion
Meta Platforms has finalized an investment in Scale AI that values the startup at over $29 billion, Scale AI said on Thursday. Scale CEO and co-founder Alexandr Wang will join Meta to work on its AI efforts, with Scale's chief strategy officer, Jason Droege, to serve as its interim CEO, Scale AI added. Two sources familiar with the matter said that Meta's investment in Scale AI is $14.3 billion. The sources said that Wang will join a new "superintelligence" unit inside Meta to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI), a term that refers to machines that can match or surpass human capabilities.
CNA
6 hours ago
- CNA
Commentary: How China beat Trump before the trade battle even started
LONDON: In the cult film The Princess Bride, the hero Westley tricks a villain, Vizzini, into killing himself in a battle of wits. Vizzini has to choose between two cups of wine, one of which Westley says is poisoned. In fact, Westley's cup is also poisoned, but he survives: he had spent years building up immunity to the toxin. Through long and careful preparation, Westley won the battle of wits long before it had begun. Substitute Xi Jinping for Westley and Donald Trump for Vizzini, and this week's US-China trade talks in London make a lot more sense. They didn't end in the US lying dead on the ground, but not far off. The sides agreed on a comically vague framework of co-operation, with the US asking for a handshake to seal the deal – an activity at which Donald Trump, as it happens, is famously poor. THE CLEAR WINNER Nor is he much good at negotiating. Beijing is the clear winner in these early skirmishes. Trump has now lifted most of the extraordinarily punitive tariffs he has imposed on China since his inauguration. What he got back this time was China vaguely promising to lift the restrictions on rare earth exports it imposed on April 4, as plaintively requested by his chief economic adviser Kevin Hassett. As I wrote recently, China's decision in April to cut off exports of certain rare earth minerals is a much more surgical strike than previous ineffectual scattergun restrictions. The restrictions of the early 2010s were undermined by the expansion of mineral production outside China and through smuggling by its notoriously lawless miners and processors. The latest round of restrictions focuses on the less common 'heavy' rare earth elements such as dysprosium, which has no large rival producers outside China and whose price shot higher after the controls were announced. Since the 2010s, Beijing has clamped down heavily on wildcat rare earth production and smuggling. Production is dominated by a small number of tightly state-controlled companies, and the latest controls are imposed via 'dual-use' export licensing for products used in defence manufacturing. This makes it much easier for the authorities to control the supply chain. The Chinese state certainly has its own issues with judgment and co-ordination. Its rare earth controls are threatening economies Beijing is trying to pull out of the US orbit. European car manufacturers have complained volubly. CLEARING A LOW BAR Alienating all buyers of rare earths is politically risky, but China is at least differentiating somewhat between European companies and American ones. Suppliers to Volkswagen, which has more than 30 plants in China, were among the first to receive a licence to buy rare earths. Beijing is managing to clear the low bar of exceeding the Trump administration's competence by some distance. US weapons, although formidable, are harder to target precisely. Just as the UK was wrongly convinced that its trade deficit with the EU gave it the superpower Brexit weapon of access to the British consumer, Trump thought prohibitive tariffs on Chinese imports would bring Beijing to heel. There's no doubt China is vulnerable, having maintained dependence on overseas demand by clinging to its traditional export-oriented growth model. But Trump's untargeted tariffs meant US companies risked losing key industrial inputs, as well as shelves potentially emptying of consumer goods. As for the US's own attempts to use export controls to crimp China's economy, its tools have proved too easily circumvented. Joe Biden's administration used restrictions on US technology and outward investment to slow China's technological development in semiconductors and other sectors, and leaned on allies to do the same. It didn't really work. China rapidly developed its own chip technology. Similarly, it's unlikely that Trump's recent restrictions on the export of chip software will allow the US to regain ground lost to China. Trump's attempt to fight on China's own ground of controlling critical physical inputs by restricting exports of ethane, a gas used in the chemical industry, is more likely to damage his country's companies and those of allies. The US still has some extremely powerful weapons, such as restricting access to the global dollar payment system, but their use on a large scale is untested. The triumph of the serenely calculating Westley over the bombastically ignorant Vizzini is a truly great moment in cinema. If Trump wants to win the next round, he is going to have to assess the ordnance at his disposal and deploy it far more accurately. History does not suggest this is a likely outcome.
