Alleged WhatsApp from Su Haijin casts doubt on Sam Goi's timeline of dinner with Ng Chee Meng
Billionaire businessman Sam Goi has confirmed that he organised and paid for dinners attended by ministers and convicted money launderer Su Haijin, describing the gatherings as informal and held prior to the implementation of Singapore's COVID-19 restrictions in early 2020.
'It's all for friends and I paid for them all,' Goi told Bloomberg News in an interview from mainland China.
Photos showing Su dining with several PAP ministers began circulating widely on social media in the days following the ruling People's Action Party's strong showing in the 3 May general election. Former Reform Party chairman Charles Yeo shared the images along with commentary questioning the ministers' proximity to Su.
A separate photo of NTUC Secretary-General Ng Chee Meng — the PAP candidate who narrowly won Jalan Kayu SMC — with Su had surfaced earlier on Sammyboyforum the previous Saturday.
Goi's remarks appear to align with an earlier statement issued on 6 May by the press secretaries of Health Minister Ong Ye Kung and Transport Minister Chee Hong Tat.
The ministers said they had attended social dinners at the invitation of a friend, where Su happened to be present, and that they had no personal or professional relationship with him.
However, a WhatsApp message shared by Yeo has cast doubt on the timeline provided by Goi — particularly regarding a dinner involving Ng Chee Meng.
In the screenshot, allegedly sent by Su Haijin on 24 September 2021, Su wrote: 'What do you think? I'm having dinner with the minister,' alongside a photo of himself with Ng at a round dining table.
At least four individuals are visible in the images shared in the messages, suggesting a small group dinner.
The date is notable because, under COVID-19 regulations in force at that time, dining in was restricted to groups of no more than two people, unless all were from the same household.
Social gatherings across multiple tables were also not permitted. These restrictions were only eased on 22 November 2021, when group dining of up to five was allowed regardless of household status.
If accurate, the image and timestamp suggest the dinner took place during a period of active restrictions — contradicting Goi's claim that such events occurred before COVID-19 rules were introduced.
On Tuesday, Ng Chee Meng issued a statement acknowledging his presence at the dinner. He explained that it was part of his role to engage private sector stakeholders and stated that he had no further contact with Su after learning of the charges against him.
The photos circulated online show various combinations of Su with Ong, Chee, and other prominent individuals, including former PAP minister Lim Swee Say, billionaire Oei Hong Leong, businessman Sam Goi, and UOB-Kay Hian Chairman Wee Ee Chao.
In contrast to the dinner with Ng, there are no accompanying messages or metadata that would allow the dates of the other dinners to be verified.
Questions have also been raised about whether the meals were declared in line with civil service protocols.
Under the Public Service Code of Conduct, gifts or benefits exceeding S$50 must be declared. The PAP's 2015 Rules of Prudence also advise MPs to avoid accepting personal favours or hospitality that may give rise to a sense of obligation or perceived influence.
A media query was sent to Ministers Ong and Chee on 6 May to ask whether they had declared the dinners in accordance with civil service rules.
As Sam Goi has since confirmed that he paid for the meals, the remaining question is whether the ministers disclosed this hospitality. As of publication, no response has been received.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Paper
a day ago
- New Paper
Election spending in GE2025 outstrips that for GE2020
Some $10.7 million was spent on campaigning for the 2025 General Election, with about three-quarters of candidates having reported their expenses to the Elections Department (ELD). This figure already exceeds the total spending of $9 million by all candidates at the previous polls in 2020. As with previous elections, the bulk of the expenses this time, about $4.75 million, went towards non-online election advertising, such as the printing of posters, banners and fliers. Another $2.01 million was spent on online election advertising, which includes posts on social media and websites, and the boosting of such posts. With the return of physical rallies for the May 2025 election - after they were paused for the previous election due to the Covid-19 pandemic - candidates spent $1.33 million on holding these events. These amounts were calculated based on the expenses of 164 out of the 211 candidates, most of which were uploaded to ELD's website on June 13 after their submissions were announced in the Government Gazette. They comprised election returns of candidates from the ruling People's Action Party, the National Solidarity Party (NSP), People's Alliance for Reform (PAR), People's Power Party (PPP), Progress Singapore Party, Red Dot United (RDU), the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA), Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), Singapore People's Party (SPP), and the Singapore United Party (SUP) as well as two independent candidates. The remaining 47 candidates have until June 16 to submit their expenses. None of the WP candidates' expenses is available for inspection on the ELD's website so far. The return of physical rallies saw political parties divert some spending on print ads to rally-related expenses, while spending on online ads saw a smaller dip. Print advertising fell from about 60 per cent of election-related spending in 2020 to 44.4 per cent in 2025. Online advertising represented about 18.8 per cent of candidates' expenses at GE2025, compared with 22 per cent at the 2020 polls. On average, each candidate spent $64,959, with 19 candidates reporting no expenses, and NSP president Reno Fong reporting the highest expenses at $160,000. Based on expenses declared so far, the PAP had an average spending of $96,667 per candidate, or close to 30 per cent higher than at the last general election. Among the opposition parties, the SDP spent $50,009 per candidate, PSP spent $33,965, NSP spent $31,320, SPP spent $23,261, RDU spent $15,703, SUP spent $6,564, PAR spent $3,614, and PPP spent $2,017. Two SDA candidates have filed their expenses, declaring no spending. Among the PAP teams contesting group representation constituencies and which have submitted their expenses, the West Coast-Jurong West GRC team was the biggest spender. The team, led by Minister for Education Desmond Lee, spent $602,708 in all. The largest portion, or $290,290, went towards non-online election advertising. The PSP team it faced, led by party chairman Tan Cheng Bock, spent $180,560, with non-online election advertising accounting for the bulk of it at $98,540. The PAP took the constituency with 59.99 per cent of the vote, against the PSP's 40.01 per cent. The next biggest spender among the PAP's GRC teams was the Punggol GRC team, led by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, which spent $541,854 in all. However, unlike in West Coast-Jurong West GRC, more than half of the team's spending - $301,953 - went to online election advertising. The team won in the constituency with 55.17 per cent of the vote, against the WP's 44.83 per cent. The PAP's third-highest spending GRC team was the Aljunied GRC team, which spent $524,312. It lost in the constituency with 40.29 per cent of the vote against the WP team's 59.71 per cent.
Straits Times
2 days ago
- Straits Times
Election spending in GE2025 outstrips that for GE2020
As with previous elections, the bulk of expenses this time, about $4.75 million, went towards non-online election advertising. PHOTO: ST FILE Election spending in GE2025 outstrips that for GE2020 SINGAPORE – Some $10.7 million was spent on campaigning for the 2025 General Election, with about three-quarters of candidates having reported their expenses to the Elections Department (ELD). This figure already exceeds the total spending of $9 million by all candidates at the 2020 polls. As with previous elections, the bulk of the expenses this time, about $4.75 million, went towards non-online election advertising, such as the printing of posters, banners and fliers. Another $2.01 million was spent on online election advertising, which includes posts on social media and websites and the boosting of such posts. With the return of physical rallies this time – after they were paused for the previous election due to the Covid-19 pandemic – candidates spent $1.33 million on holding these events. These amounts were calculated based on the expenses of 164 out of the 211 candidates, most of which were uploaded to ELD's website on June 13 after their submissions were announced on the Government Gazette. They comprised election returns of candidates from the ruling People's Action Party, the National Solidarity Party (NSP), People's Alliance for Reform (PAR), People's Power Party (PPP), Progress Singapore Party, Red Dot United (RDU), the Singapore Democratic Alliance (SDA), Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) and Singapore People's Party (SPP), as well as two independent candidates. The remaining 47 candidates have until June 16 to submit their expenses. None of the Workers' Party candidates' expenses are available for inspection on the ELD's website so far. The return of physical rallies saw political parties divert some spending on print ads to rally-related expenses, while spending on online ads saw a smaller dip. Print advertising fell from about 60 per cent of election-related spending in 2020 to 44.4 per cent in 2025. Online advertising represented about 18.8 per cent of candidates' expenses at GE2025, compared with 22 per cent at the 2020 polls. On average, each candidate spent $64,959, with 19 candidates reporting no expenses, and NSP president Reno Fong reporting the highest expenses at $160,000. Based on expenses declared so far, the PAP had an average spending of $96,667 per candidate, or close to 30 per cent higher than at the last general election. Among the opposition parties, the SDP spent $50,009, PSP spent $33,965, NSP spent $31,320, SPP spent $23,261, RDU spent $15,703, SUP spent $6,564, PAR spent $3,614, and PPP spent $2,017 per candidate. Among the PAP teams contesting group representation constituencies and which have submitted their expenses, the West Coast-Jurong West GRC team was the biggest spenders. The team, led by Minister for Education Desmond Lee, spent $602,708 in all. The largest portion, or $290,290, went towards non-online election advertising. The PSP team it faced, led by party chairman Tan Cheng Bock, spent $180,560, with non-online election advertising accounting for the bulk of it at $98,540. The PAP took the constituency with 59.99 per cent of vote, against its PSP opponent's 40.01 per cent. The next biggest spender among the PAP's GRC teams was the Punggol GRC team, led by Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong, which spent $541,854 in all. However, unlike in West Coast-Jurong West GRC, more than half of the team's spending – $301,953 – went to online election advertising. The team won in the constituency with 55.17 per cent of the vote, against the WP's 44.83 per cent. PAP's third highest spending GRC team was the Aljunied GRC team, which spent $524,312. It lost in the constituency with 40.29 per cent of the vote against the WP team's 59.71 per cent. Join ST's WhatsApp Channel and get the latest news and must-reads.
Business Times
2 days ago
- Business Times
New York real estate industry appeals broker-fee case ruling
[NEW YORK] Real estate groups are challenging a ruling by a federal judge that allowed New York City to begin enforcing a new law requiring landlords, rather than their tenants, to pay fees for hiring listing brokers. US District Judge Ronnie Abrams on Tuesday (Jun10) denied a request by the Real Estate Board of New York, the New York State Association of Realtors and others to pause the law while their lawsuit proceeds. The ruling was another setback for the industry's legal fight against the measure, which went into effect on Wednesday (Jun 11). The groups on Thursday filed an appeal of Abrams' decision to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The City Council adopted the measure in November to end the longstanding practice of tenants being forced to pay costs incurred by landlords to hire the brokers who list their properties, which can add thousands of dollars to housing costs. The real estate industry argued the new law branded brokers as villains and would force landlords to raise rents to cover the costs of hiring them. New York City renters who settle on apartments that have broker fees pay an average of almost US$13,000 to secure the keys to a property, which frequently includes thousands of dollars in fees for brokers hired by landlords to secure tenants, according to an analysis by StreetEasy released last year. Roughly 40 per cent to 50 per cent of listings on StreetEasy have required lease signers to pay the commissions of agents hired by their new landlords, which have typically ranged from one month's rent to 15 per cent of the annual bill. The Real Estate Board contends that the law, known as Fairness in Apartment Rental Expenses Act, or FARE Act, interferes with exclusive agreements that landlords sign with brokers to list their properties and find tenants, in violation of the Constitution's bar against state laws impairing private contracts. It also argues the law violates the free-speech rights of landlords and brokers who publish real estate listings and then seek to receive compensation from tenants for the cost of the listing service. The industry's lawsuit alleges that the law will make rent-stabilised apartments too costly to operate and force landlords to raise rents to cover the cost of broker fees. The industry says tenants usually pay less over the life of a lease when commissions are paid separately, and that some are already refusing to pay broker fees even though the law hasn't taken effect yet. A state-approved broker-fee ban was briefly in place in February 2020, just before the first Covid lockdown brought the rental market to a near halt. By the time renter demand began rising the next year, a court had struck down the state law and brokers were eager to capitalise on what quickly became a very competitive market where prices have continued to rise. The law could dramatically change the dynamics of the city's highly competitive rental market, where prices have soared since pandemic restrictions began easing in 2021. The median cost of new Manhattan leases was US$4,571 in May, reaching another all-time high, according to appraiser Miller Samuel and Douglas Elliman. Prices have also set records in the outer boroughs. BLOOMBERG
