Is the national dialogue a futile exercise?
What do you think President Cyril Ramaphosa and colleagues mean when they talk about 'our people'? Do you feel included? Many don't.
There is reason for scepticism over Ramaphosa's plans for an inclusive national dialogue. His approach throughout his presidency has not been inclusive.
'Our people' usually means ANC.
Inclusivity is not evident in the list of 'eminent persons' whom he has named to guide 'a people-led, society-wide process to reflect on the state of our country in order for us to reimagine our future'.
People-led? Yet he chooses the leaders of the process. One example is Roelf Meyer, Ramaphosa's supposed adversary in the Codesa talks which preceded this country's first democratic elections.
Meyer may have taught Ramaphosa fly-fishing, but the National Party minister fell hook, line and sinker for ANC tricks.
ALSO READ: 'Bring all to dialogue': Experts insist national dialogue must be people-driven
His capitulation was so complete that the ANC in Soweto nominated Comrade Roelf for its parliamentary list in 1994.
Meyer declined but in 2004, he voted ANC and joined that party in 2006.
Ja, nee. By choosing Meyer, Ramaphosa will have alienated quite a few Afrikaners who won't feel included.
Why do we need a government-orchestrated national dialogue?
The nation is continually in dialogue.
We have regular elections and opinions are continually freely expressed across multiple platforms. Public participation is mandatory in many issues at all levels of government, even if this is often a tick-box exercise.
ALSO READ: Codesa 2 has many agendas to fill
South Africa is oversupplied with talk shops whose practical outcomes are negligible. We don't need more of that. And we can't afford it.
With economic growth at a low 0.8% in 2024 and unemployment now officially at 32.9%, it is reckless to splurge at least R700 million on this nebulous exercise.
After contestation over the national budget, you'd think Ramaphosa would be more circumspect about wasting money.
Big spenders of other people's money have no qualms about stretching price tags.
Starting at R700 million, the proposed national dialogue could easily end up costing more than the R1 billion spent on the Zondo inquiry into state capture. And what did we get for that? Zero significant prosecutions. In practical terms, this dialogue will yield even less.
This national dialogue is an attempt to shore up the ANC's political fortunes and boost Ramaphosa's legacy. If, as expected, the process takes about a year, it will segue into the local government elections.
ALSO READ: Thandiswa Mazwai says she would've accepted invite to national dialogue had Ramaphosa sent it
Ramaphosa's personally selected 'eminent persons' will have ample opportunity to sway opinions without appearing to be on the campaign trail. From this perspective, cashstrapped taxpayers could be funding the ANC's next local government election campaign.
Genuine dialogue requires a two-way exchange of ideas. Yet Ramaphosa and the ANC are implacably wedded to broad-based black economic empowerment (B-BBEE) in all its forms.
He recently defended it against arguments that B-BBEE stifles economic growth. A national dialogue would be beneficial if the ANC was able to listen, and to change course on B-BBEE.
A monologue or dialogue of the deaf won't help.
The aims of the national dialogue are to increase inclusivity, boost economic growth and create employment opportunities. The best way to do that is to scrap B-BBEE laws that are, by definition, exclusive.
Reimagine a future without race laws. Now you're talking.
NOW READ: Ramaphosa announces 'Eminent Persons Group' to guide national dialogue – These are the people appointed
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
21 minutes ago
- The South African
Criminal charges laid against Open Chats Podcasts' 'racist' slurs
The Patriotic Alliance's Liam Jacobs opened a case of hate crime against the hosts of the Open Chats Podcast over their controversial comments about coloured people. Others like the DA, ANC, and EFF have condemned the 'racist' slurs. A clip of the biweekly show, hosted by Mthokozisi Donald and Sino Kama, went viral on social media. In it, the duo and two other female guests perpetuated stereotypes about the racial minority. On his Facebook account, the PA's Liam Jacobs revealed that he had opened a case of hate speech and crimen injuria against the hosts of the Open Chats podcast at the Brooklyn Police Station in Tshwane. Jacobs called out the co-hosts and their guests over their 'deeply offensive and racist remarks' about coloured people. The PA senior leader – who has demanded a public apology – has vowed to take the matter up with the Equality Court and the South African Human Rights Commission. He posted of his actions: 'This is decisive action. This is justice. We will no longer be a punchline'. Jacobs revealed that he had acted on behalf of the PA and its president, Gayton McKenzie. On his own Facebook account, the Minister of Sports, Arts and Culture vowed to take legal action against the Open Chats Podcast and their broadcaster. He said, 'This was not live. Whoever is in charge of content control didnt see something wrong. 'We are giving you seven days to cancel that show. …You are going to learn. This is where we draw the line'. Meanwhile, fellow political parties, the ANC, DA, GOOD Party and the EFF, have condemned Open Chats Podcast's 'racist' comments. The parties have issued individual statements calling for a public apology and an investigation into the incident. The DA has reported the incident to the SAHRC. The DA shared in a statement about the Open Chats Podcast: 'This is not humour. It is not harmless 'pop culture commentary'.It is an assault on the dignity of a community and an attempt to reduce the lived realities of South Africans into cheap, demeaning stereotypes for the sake of online clicks. 'Such content fans the flames of division and undermines the constitutional values of equality, human dignity, and social cohesion'. Meanwhile, the Deputy Minister for Youth and Persons with Disabilities, Mmapaseka Steve Letsike, criticised the Open Chats Podcast. Letsike – who previously condemned Podcast and Chill's MacG over his comments about media personality and actress Minnie Dlamini, stated that the remarks about coloured people 'undermine the values of inclusivity and respect that our society strives to uphold'. She shared in a statement: 'All media platforms, including podcasts, must adhere to the regulations that ensure fair and responsible communication. We value freedom of expression, but it must be balanced with accountability.' 'Addressing hate speech does not mean limiting or prohibiting freedom of speech. It means keeping hate speech from escalating into something more dangerous, particularly incitement to discrimination, hostility, and violence, which is prohibited under our constitutional law.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
eNCA
26 minutes ago
- eNCA
Ramaphosa speaks to Trump ahead of 30% US tariffs
JOHANNESBURG - President Cyril Ramaphosa called President Donald Trump ahead of the US imposition of 30-percent tariffs on South African exports on Thursday and the leaders agreed to "further engagements", the government said. The South African government has been negotiating hard to avoid the tariffs, the highest in sub-Saharan Africa, which it says could cost around 30,000 jobs. The presidents' telephone call on Wednesday was about bilateral trade matters, Ramaphosa's office said. "The two leaders undertook to continue with further engagements recognising the various trade negotiations the US is currently involved in," it said in a statement. "Respective trade negotiating teams will take forward more detailed discussions." Ramaphosa "reached out through a phone call to President Trump yesterday morning as part of bolstering South Africa's negotiation efforts on the trade agreements," the ministry of the presidency said separately. The United States is South Africa's second-largest trading partner by country after China.
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
‘Dual membership not a punishable offence': SACP not scared of ANC ultimatum
SACP secretary-general Solly Mapaila expressed frustration with the lack of progress that the alliance is making in dealing with the country's challenges. The South African Communist Party (SACP) is undeterred by an ultimatum from the ANC ahead of next year's local government elections. ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula told reporters on Wednesday that the SACP's decision to contest the election implies that their members will have to choose between the two parties. 'The implication of that decision says choose between the SACP and the ANC,' he said. Mbalula said the ANC shares strategic information with the SACP, but this could also change. 'We share our strategy in terms of contesting elections, and they also attend our strategy workshops. They participate in all the processes led by the ANC in terms of the appointment of public representatives and so on. This decision means that all of those things will be reviewed in terms of how we work with them,' he said. Don't give up ANC membership However, SACP spokesperson Mbulelo Mandlana said dual membership 'is not a punishable offence'. 'The principle of dual membership in the alliance predates the electoral era of the South African revolution. The inconveniences of the era of elections should not be used to justify undermining the centrality of the principle of dual membership.' Mandlana also said the SACP would not be held ransom by the ANC. 'The decisions of the individual alliance organisations are not subject to review by other organisations of the alliance; if that were the case, then the alliance would not be an alliance of equals but a subordination of some organisations by others. 'Against that backdrop, the very preposition that the ANC was engaged in an attempt to persuade the SACP against the express provisions of its national congress on contesting elections is not just incorrect but is contemptuous of the SACP as an organisation and indeed its members,' he said. Inside knowledge Mandlana said the SACP understands the implications of its decision to contest elections and would not interfere with the ANC's strategy. 'The ANC has a right to invite whom it wants to invite into its election strategy meetings, the SACP will not interfere in that. The same is true of the SACP,' he said. What about SACP leaders in government? The ultimatum has sparked concerns that SACP members who currently hold prominent positions in local and national government could be left out in the dark. In the longer term, it may raise questions about the future of Minister of Science, Technology and Innovation Blade Nzimande and newly-appointed higher education minister Buti Manamela in Cabinet. Mandlana said SACP members in parliament and Cabinet have the right to be there since the party campaigned for the ANC in the previous elections. ALSO READ: 'If they want to bring sanctions, let them': Mbalula challenges Trump administration ANC 'arrogance' On the weekend, SACP secretary-general Solly Mapaila expressed frustration with the lack of progress that the alliance is making in dealing with the country's challenges. He blamed the ANC for this and described the party as arrogant. 'We are sick of attending meaningless meetings with the ANC. The ANC is arrogant to us, they sometimes tell us take it or leave it,' he told supporters at the party's 104th anniversary in KwaZulu-Natal. ALSO READ: Mbalula denies that ANC could not afford a venue to host NEC meeting
