Suburb-wide electrification trials to be rolled out across Australia in bid to fuel transition away from gas
Suburb-wide electrification trials are set to be rolled out across the country under an intervention designed to help spark the household transition from gas.
The climate change and energy minister, Chris Bowen, has formally directed the Australian Renewable Energy Agency (Arena) to consider funding more pilots like Electrify 2515, a community-led initiative to electrify 500 homes in one postcode in Wollongong, NSW.
The pilot, the brainchild of local resident and Rewiring Australia co-founder Saul Griffith, offers subsidies to lower the upfront costs for households to install solar batteries and replace gas heaters, cooktops and hot water systems with electric alternatives.
The trial - backed by $5.4m in Arena funding - has received applications from more than 400 households in the 2515 postcode.
With Arena-backed electrification projects already underway in SA and the NT, the agency will now look to fund trials in the ACT, WA, Queensland, Victoria and Tasmania following the minister's direction.
The referral is the first time Bowen has used his ministerial powers to ask Arena to consider funding a specific type of project, and was part of a deal Labor struck last year with crossbenchers David Pocock, Jacqui Lambie, Lidia Thorpe and David Van to pass its Future Made in Australia laws.
Advocates such as Griffith and Pocock believe the small-scale pilots can provide a roadmap to electrify households nationwide, helping to slash greenhouse gas emissions while delivering cost-of-living relief.
Analysis in 2023 from the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) estimated that converting to all-electric appliances and an electric car could save an average homeowner as much as $2,250 per year on their power bills.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The major barrier for households to make the switch is often the prohibitive upfront cost of electric appliances, meaning any nationwide transition off gas likely hinges on government subsidies.
Guardian Australia understands Labor is considering a package to spur household electrification ahead of the federal election, due in May.
The federal government has already allocated $800m to upgrade more than 100,000 social housing properties with energy efficient appliances.
Pocock - who led the crossbench negotiations with Bowen - said support to help households switch to electric appliances was one of the 'highest impact, non-inflationary' policies a government could deliver during a cost-of-living crisis.
'Globally the built environment accounts for 39% of energy-related carbon emissions so electrification will also have a huge impact in our efforts to combat climate change,' he said.
Parliamentary Budget Office modelling, which Pocock commissioned in 2022, found it would cost about $11.3m over the forward estimates to subsidise the transition for 1,000 households.
Lambie welcomed Bowen's direction but questioned why the government hadn't acted sooner.
'Surely giving low-income people the chance to save money on their power bills would be a no-brainer?' she said.
'But they didn't, but thank God we have a strong crossbench and the government has come to the party.'
While the independent Arena board will decide which projects to fund, the federal government wants to see trials in every state and territory.
'Communities across Australia are seeing the benefits of the clean energy transformation, and the Albanese government is delivering the leadership and support they need to grasp those benefits,' Bowen said.
'Arena pilot projects supporting home electrification will help create valuable insights into how households can transition to renewables and smart energy systems to cut energy costs and reduce emissions.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
6 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Russia issues 'catastrophic' nuclear warning to US as Trump ponders Iran strikes
United States president Donald Trump has not yet ruled out whether to use American nuclear weapons to attack the underground Fordow enrichment site in Iran Russia has sent a stark warning to the USA as it considers whether to use tactical nuclear weapons in Iran. The Kremlin believes that even if the Americans were to use their weapons carefully the consequences would be "catastrophic". Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told the Russian TASS news agency there "have been a lot of speculation". Asked about media reports that Donald Trump was still deciding about what to do, and had not yet ruled out whether to use nuclear weapons to attack the underground Fordow enrichment site in Iran, Mr Peskov said: "This would be a catastrophic development. But there are so many speculations that in fact, it's impossible to comment on them." The heavily guarded mysterious Fordow bunker is built into the side of a mountain near the city of Qom, around 60 miles of Iran's capital Tehran. It remains the most heavily defended known enrichment site in Iran, buried some 80 to 90 metres underground. Israel is believed to lack the capability to destroy the site on its own and would need the help of American bombers. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has said the goal of attacking Iran was to eliminate its missile and nuclear program, which he described as an existential threat to Israel, and officials have said Fordow was part of that plan. Russia has presented itself as a possible mediating force between US-backed Israel and Iran, although Donald Trump has publicly been reluctant to accept the offer. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamene rejected US calls to surrender and warned that any military involvement by the Americans would cause 'irreparable damage to them'. US officials said this week that Trump had rejected an Israeli plan to kill Khamenei, later adding that there were no plans to kill him 'at least not for now'.
Daily Mail
18 hours ago
- Daily Mail
He's one of Australia's leading minds on super - and he's got a sensible idea about changing Albo's laws. But do YOU think Jim Chalmers will budge on his flawed tax grab?
Treasurer Jim Chalmers has declared Labor has a 'mandate' for a sweeping plan to tax superannuation before assets are sold - despite a warning it could amount to a new form of death duties. Labor needs the Greens' support in the Senate to pass its Better Targeted Superannuation Concessions bill that would see a new 15 per cent tax levied on unrealised gains on balances above $3million. The Opposition and superannuation groups are opposed to the idea of taxing assets in a self-managed super fund before they are sold, based on the paper or notional value of holdings. Labor's policy would mark a radical departure from the usual practice of applying the capital gains tax once something has been sold. Now a leading superannuation expert - Professor Robert Breunig, the director of the Australian National University's Tax and Transfer Policy Institute - has argued the government should consider a change to its proposal. Prof Breunig said the government should look into allowing the unrealised gains tax to be paid years later, when someone eventually sells an asset. He likened it to the standard practice of paying undue council rates after a house had been sold. 'If you're going to tax unrealised gains, I think you should be giving people the opportunity to defer paying the tax until they dispose of the property,' he said. 'That would be my preferred policy.' But Chalmers on Wednesday rebuffed a suggestion Labor would revisit the concept of taxing unrealised gains, even though someone inheriting a self-managed super fund could be left with a new tax liability. 'First of all, we're not changing the policies we took to the election,' he told the National Press Club. 'We've got a mandate for that change... What we're looking for here is an opportunity to build on the progress that we've made, including in the economy as you point out. 'We're looking for, not opportunities to go back on the things that we have got a mandate for, we're looking for new ideas.' 'Inheritance' tax accusations Labor's tax on super balances above $3million could effectively amount to an inheritance tax, along with a new tax on franking credits - or tax refunds for owning shares in a company that has already paid company tax. Senator James Paterson, the Opposition's finance spokesman, said the government needed to explain if taxing unrealised gains on super amounted to an inheritance tax by stealth. 'Labor's super tax grab has been on the public record for two years,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'The Albanese Government should be able to fully explain the implications of their policy, including for people's wills. 'We should not be reliant on independent experts, the media or the Opposition to explain how this policy will work in practice. 'Jim Chalmers must be upfront about how his unrealised capital gains tax interacts with franking credits and inheritance.' A self-managed super fund can be passed on to a dependent or left to someone in a will. Professor Breunig said someone inheriting a self-managed super fund with more than $3million, upon the death of a parent, would effectively be paying a new form of inheritance tax with the 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains. 'Yes, sure it is, but that's true of a lot of our taxes - that's true with council rates,' he told Daily Mail Australia. 'It would be an inheritance tax if you were somehow paying back taxes on it - you inherit the liability.' A self-managed super fund, with a balance above $3million, would be subject to an unrealised gains tax if there was a property in the portfolio, under the government's Division 296 plan. That would be a departure from existing rules allowing someone to avoid paying the capital gains tax on a property they inherited, outside of a super fund. Prof Breunig said Treasury would benefit from being able to tax unrealised gains in a super portfolio, catching out those who left property in a self-managed super fund. 'Currently, we have a subsidy in the system that subsidies people passing out wealth to their children and you're kind of removing that subsidy,' he said. 'That is one of the attractions of the unrealised gains tax.' Future of the tax The Greens want the $3million threshold lowered to $2million but indexed for inflation. Prof Breunig said that would mean applying an unrealised gains tax to accounts typically producing an annual annuity, or guaranteed retirement living income, of $100,000. 'Two million's too low - how much money do people need to have a comfortable retirement?' he said. 'Now you're talking about a lifetime income stream that's more like $100,000, which for a lot of people isn't that much relative to how much they made in their lifetime.' Australian abolished inheritance taxes at a national level in 1979, with all the states getting rid of that tax by 1981. Labor's planned tax doesn't effectively levy a new charge on a superannuation fund balance being transferred to a loved one.
Daily Mail
18 hours ago
- Daily Mail
3AW host Neil Mitchell sounds the alarm about Jim Chalmer's tax plan
Neil Mitchell has slammed Anthony Albanese 's government for having a plan to punish baby boomers as younger Australians increasingly decide elections. The 73-year-old 3AW host, from the boomer generation, suggested Treasurer Jim Chalmers had an agenda to tax older Australians over 60. 'Boomers beware. Jim Chalmers is taking about "intergenerational justice" in tax,' he said. 'That means a tax on boomers, who actually did a bit to build this country.' Chalmers used his National Press Club address this week to suggested Labor would use its landslide re-election to help younger Australians, with a hint about new taxes being considered to pay for this new relief. Millennials and Generation Z voters - born after 1981 - outnumbered boomers at the last election for the first time ever. 'The decisions we make in the 2020s will determine the sort of living standards and intergenerational justice that we have in the decades to come,' Chalmers said. 'I think there is a broad recognition of that.' Labor was re-elected last month with a plan to slash student debt by 20 per cent, saving the average graduate $5,520 at a cost to taxpayers of $16billion. It also offered tax cuts for low-income workers earning $18,200 to $45,000, with students, apprentices and part-time workers more likely to be young. This relief is set to cost the Budget $17.1billion over four years. That means Labor would either have to cut spending or increase taxes to fund relief that overwhelmingly favours the young, with Treasury only forecasting Budget deficits in coming years as gross government debt soars above $1trillion. That could see Labor review generous tax concessions on things like family trusts that can avoid paying tax on income generated from within the trust. Former Labor leader Bill Shorten lost the 2019 election proposing a new 30 per cent tax on family trusts as funds were distributed to beneficiaries. While that policy was scrapped, the government's upcoming productivity roundtable in August is expected to explore a range of new revenue-raising options, with Chalmers hinting at tax changes. 'The easiest thing in the world is for people to come to us and say we want you to dramatically cut the taxes in our part of the economy and spend dramatically more on our industry, without recognising that there are necessary trade‑offs associated with that,' Chalmers said. Treasurer Jim Chalmers used his National Press Club address this week to suggested Labor would use its landslide re-election to help younger Australians, with a hint about new taxes to pay for new relief The government is still proceeding with plans to impose a new 15 per cent tax on unrealised gains on superannuation balances above $3million, in a bid to raise $2.3billion a year in revenue. In Opposition, Albanese vowed to leave untouched franking tax credits for company shareholders and negative gearing tax breaks for investor landlords, even though house prices have surged at a faster pace since the pandemic. Labor also has no plans to introduce a capital gains tax on the family home. These existing arrangements favour boomers who were able to buy a house to live in cheaply after the capital gains tax debuted in 1985. Chalmers this week downplayed a point about government payments making up 27 per cent of the economy - the highest level since 1986 outside of the pandemic. 'It's not the highest spending since the 80s. I know that you mean absent Covid, but I think it's unusual that we absent Covid,' he said. 'Quite frequently I'll hear we've got the weakest growth in 40 years, or we've got the highest spending. That's not true.' Boomers still have political power with both Albanese and Opposition Leader Sussan Ley hailing from that generation, covering those born from 1946 to 1964. Chalmers belongs to Generation X, spanning 1965 to 1980, along with every state premier. Only the Northern Territory has a Millennial leader.
