Kerala airport to charge THIS amount for parking stranded British F-35 stealth fighter
The aircraft was parked at Bay 4 under close monitoring of Central Industrial Security Force. Indian Defence Research Wing estimated the single day parking fee of F-35 to be ₹ 26,261 per day. Thus, as per this estimate, the parking fee of 22 days amounts to ₹ 5,77,742. Notably, the British authorities had declined an offer from Air India to move the fighter jet to hangar.
The report further mentions that the airport authorities have not finalised the exact fee structure and it is possible that the Indian government may cover the costs.
This incident is atypical as it is the first time this advanced fighter jet has been stranded abroad. During the prolonged stay, the fighter jet was guarded by a six-member team from the HMS Prince of Wales. The jet worth $110 million (£85-million) was towed from the tarmac to a hangar after several attempts to repair the aircraft proved to be unsuccessful.
A part of the HMS Prince of Wales Carrier Strike Group of the UK's Royal Navy, the fighter jet had taken off from a British aircraft carrier stationed approximately 100 nautical miles off Kerala's coast. The stealth combat jet made an emergency landing in Kerala on June 14 due to adverse weather and low fuel levels.
On Sunday, a team of technical experts arrived at Thiruvananthapuram airport on board the British Royal Air Force Airbus A400M to assess the F-35 jet. Visuals shared by ANI show F-35 being towed to the hangar from its grounded position at the airport.
'The F-35 fighter aircraft has been taken to the Air India hangar at Thiruvananthapuram International Airport in Kerala, where a technical team of UK Royal Air Force would try to repair it and take it back,' ANI quoted Defence sources as saying on July 6.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
Skoda Auto Volkswagen India adds Bentley to its India portfolio
Mumbai (Maharashtra) [India], July 7 (ANI): Skoda Auto Volkswagen India on Monday announced the addition of Bentley, the legendary British brand, as the sixth marque under the Group's umbrella. From July 1, 2025, Skoda Auto Volkswagen India has been exclusively importing, distributing and servicing Bentley vehicles across the country, deepening the Group's commitment to India's rapidly expanding luxury car arena. All marketing, sales, and after-sales operations will be conducted under a newly established entity, Bentley India, a group company of Skoda Auto Volkswagen India, which will oversee the brand's India strategy and retail network, according to a company statement. Abbey Thomas has been appointed as the Brand Director of Bentley India, leading the brand in the Indian market. According to the company's statement, Bentley India will have three new dealer partners across key cities, starting with Bengaluru and Mumbai, followed by New Delhi. These new showrooms will offer India's ultra-high-net-worth customers Bentley products. Piyush Arora, Managing Director and CEO of Skoda Auto Volkswagen India said, 'Welcoming Bentley into the SAVWIPL family is a proud milestone that completes our portfolio -- from the precision of German engineering to the timeless elegance and unmatched performance of British craftsmanship. India's appetite for uncompromising luxury is growing rapidly. Additionally, Abbey's deep understanding of the Indian market makes him the ideal leader to steer Bentley India toward new milestones.' Jan Bures, Executive Director, Sales, Marketing and Digital of Skoda Auto Volkswagen India, said, 'It's a proud moment for us in India to welcome Bentley into the SAVWIPL family. The ever-growing UHNI segment in India will benefit from this new association, and we, along with our new dealer partners, will ensure the best of luxury and performance for our customers.' For over two decades, Bentley has been a part of India's luxury car landscape. Headquartered in Pune, Skoda Auto Volkswagen India manages the Indian operations of six prestigious brands - Skoda, Volkswagen, Audi, Bentley, Lamborghini, and Porsche. It operates two manufacturing facilities in India - at Chakan, Pune, and Shendra, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar (formerly known as Aurangabad). (ANI)
India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
DRDO Mounted Gun System to boost Indian Army's firepower
Pune (Maharashtra) [India], July 7 (ANI): The Defence Research and Development Organisation has developed a new, powerful howitzer, the Indigenous 155mm/52 Calibre Mounted Gun System, which can quickly shoot and move. The DRDO lab, Vehicle Research and Development Establishment, has developed the MGS. The goal was to develop a fully indigenous system that could operate effectively in challenging terrain and engage enemy targets quickly and accurately. Speaking to ANI, Director VRDE G Ramamohana Rao said, 'This is a 155mm/52 calibre gun. Such guns already exist, but they are towed separately and take time to deploy. Our MGS is different. It is quick, just 80 seconds to deploy and 85 seconds to move. It is fully made in India and can also be exported to other countries' High mobility Artillery was a technology gap that needed to be addressed, for which the Mounted Gun System (MGS) was a viable solution. Accordingly, VRDE has taken up a Technology Demonstrator Project, 'Design and Development of 155mm/52 calibre Mounted Gun System (MGS) based on ATAGS'. The goal of this Technology Demonstrator (TD) project was to design & develop an indigenous Mounted Gun System. The gun system of ATAGS has been adapted to an 8X8 cross-country wheeled vehicle along with stabilisers and a necessary interface structure. State-of-the-art technologies in the area of carrier vehicles, stabilisers, Armoured Cabin, Ammunition handling cranes, on-board power sources and integrated compact electronic controllers have been developed in this project. Mounted Gun System (MGS) is a cross-country truck-mounted heavy artillery gun system (based on ATAGS 155mm/52Cal) with excellent shoot and scoot capability and the highest range of fire in this class. It has been indigenously developed by involving Indian Industries, DPSU, and Premier Academia, under the leadership of DRDO. MGS has high mobility in terms of gradient, side slope, trench crossing, and cross-country capability and can operate in both desert and mountainous terrain. Hence, the advantage of this system is that it can be rapidly deployed, matching the mobility of the mechanised forces, destroy the enemy targets and move out before retaliatory fire occurs. A total of 01 Nos. MGS has been realised through Indian Industries and has undergone proof testing and field trials. Technologies, design, process, and QAP have been finalised, and DcPP has been nominated for the Mounted Gun System. (ANI)
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Why India must cut its auto sector tariffs
India and the US have resumed trade talks with the July 9 deadline on tariffs looming. Without tariff reductions by India, the US will impose additional duties (26%) on all Indian exports. One central issue remains India's triple-digit automobile tariffs, which face a 25% retaliatory duty if unchanged. India must reduce auto tariffs. The prize isn't just avoiding Trump's retaliation. It is ending over 70 years of protectionism that has entrenched India's automobile sector in mediocrity. India's automobile tariffs are global outliers. Cars priced below $40,000 face effective tariffs of 70%. Above that price tag, effective tariff rates jump to 110%. Used cars get hit hardest at 137.5%. In contrast, China levies 15% on automobile imports, with higher rates on US cars. The European Union applies a uniform 10% on all non-EU car imports. South Korea charges 8% on cars. Japan imposes no tariffs. Since 1948, India has historically priced out foreign manufacturers in favour of the domestic auto sector. The rationale was to protect the infant auto industry by outright banning imports of fully-built cars. Only companies committed to local manufacturing were allowed to operate after 1953. Liberalisation since the 1990s ended licensing requirements. Tariff rates fell from 65% in 1992 to about 35% by 2000. This liberalisation in the auto sector was short-lived: By 2014, tariffs had climbed back into triple digits, peaking at 125%. India ranked third in car production in 2024, but only exported 14% of its total output. Homegrown manufacturers, Tata Motors and Mahindra, contributed only 2% to exports. In contrast, Japan exported nearly half its production. Spain, Germany, and South Korea, despite producing fewer vehicles than India, exported 89%, 77%, and 67% of their output, respectively. As centuries of trade theory predict, protectionism meant to nurture export giants ended up creating an octogenarian infant. Instead of fostering innovation and competitiveness, India's protectionism combined with relaxation of foreign investment limits has encouraged foreign automakers to manufacture for its captive market. By 2024, seven-in-ten passenger cars sold domestically were from foreign-controlled companies such as Maruti Suzuki, Hyundai, Toyota and Kia. Maruti Suzuki alone accounted for 41% of domestic sales. Protectionism has also shaped vehicle quality. To meet local price pressures, foreign-controlled brands sell older or stripped-down models. Hyundai's Indian line-up lags its global fleet by a generation. Between 2014 and 2016, popular Indian models received a zero-star safety rating in international crash tests, missing basic features like airbags. Dual airbags became mandatory in India only in 2022. In the emerging global trade order, high tariffs on foreign cars undermine India's export successes in auto parts. India's auto components sector — engine parts, transmission systems, electrical components, and chassis parts — remains competitive. On components, India imposes a 10-15% tariff. In FY24, Indian companies exported nearly $6.79 billion worth of auto components to the US, its largest market. India's finished car exports to the US totalled only $8.9 million in the same period. Before the recent escalation, the US imposed standard most favoured nation (MFN) rates of 2.5% on passenger cars and auto parts, and 25% on light trucks. In April-May 2025, the US imposed retaliatory tariffs of 25% on both automobiles and auto components from India. The globally competitive components sector, often supplied by MSMEs, will pay the price for protecting large and uncompetitive domestic car manufacturers. The real obstacle to reform lies not in Washington, but India's domestic automobile lobby, which has perfected a system of resisting liberalisation. Lobbying has layered tariffs with surcharges and shifting exemptions that leave effective rates unchanged despite nominal tariff cuts. The FY26 budget illustrates this obfuscation. The government slashed the basic customs duty on cars priced over $40,000 from 100% to 70%, and eliminated the 10% social welfare surcharge. However, it simultaneously introduced a 40% agriculture infrastructure and development cess applicable solely to imported vehicles, leaving the effective rate unchanged at 110%. Even government documents described this as a 'decrease in tariff rate with no change in effective rate'. Tariffs on used cars seem to follow the same formula. The basic duty dropped from 125% to 70% and the 12.5% surcharge vanished, but a 67.5% cess cancelled the cut. Commercial vehicles, with an overlapping set of entrenched interests, saw no effective reduction. Only motorcycle tariffs were cut. Completely built-up large-capacity models — think Harley Davidsons — dropped from 50% to 30%. None of this is new. In 2012, the Society of Indian Automobile Manufacturers warned that any cut in duties 'has to be avoided at all cost' because reducing tariffs would risk domestic investment, manufacturing, and jobs. This stance aligned perfectly with that of the Make in India call — by raising tariffs and choosing national champions. But protectionism is complex. During UK-India trade talks, Tata Motors, India's auto lobby titan, stood to gain from lowering British car tariffs to 10% through its Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) subsidiary. JLR now faces its own challenge as 23% of its sales come from the US, where new 25% tariffs on UK automobiles threaten profitability. On electric vehicles (EVs), Tata Motors dominates India's EV segment but continues arguing against easing the 100% tariff on imported EVs until 2029. Tesla's blocked entry demonstrates how firmly this line has held. Since 2021, Tesla CEO Elon Musk has requested a 40% tariff rate for imported EVs. Domestic automakers opposed any reduction unless Tesla committed to local manufacturing. That proves difficult in India's regulatory labyrinth. General Motors exited after accumulating over $1 billion in losses. Ford followed in 2021 after $2 billion in losses and 4,000 job cuts. As talks head to Washington, the real question isn't India's national interest versus Trump's demands. It is whether India will finally choose consumers and small manufacturers over an auto lobby that masks its lack of competitiveness with patriotism. Shreyas Narla is a research scholar and Shruti Rajagopalan is a senior research fellow with the Mercatus Center at George Mason University. The views expressed are personal.
