
Updating LSU football's running back depth chart after four-star freshman was suspended
Freshman running back JT Lindsey was suspended by the university after he turned himself in to campus police last Friday to face a count of accessory after the fact to second-degree murder.
According to NOLA.com, authorities allege Lindsey housed two suspects in his dorm after the suspects were involved in a killing near Alexandria, LA. Lindsey is not alleged to have been involved in the crime, and Lindsey's attorney told NOLA.com that Lindsey was unaware that the suspects were wanted for murder.
LSU is down to three scholarship running backs. LSU lost another back earlier this summer when Trey Holly enrolled at Southern after navigating legal issues of his own at LSU.
Running back isn't a good position to be thin. SEC rushers take a beating vs. NFL-level defenders and depth can be critical to surviving a 12-game schedule. In the playoff era, where teams can play 15 games, it's even more important.
While LSU lacks quantity, the Tigers have quality talent in the backfield. LSU's run game struggled in 2024 but with more experienced backs and the addition of run game coordinator Alex Atkins, LSU is counting on an improved ground attack this fall. Here's how LSU's running back depth chart is shaping up.
RB1: Caden Durham, Sophomore
Durham is LSU's clear-cut No. 1 back. Durham surpassed 1,000 total yards as a true freshman while dealing with a lingering toe injury. He was explosive as a rusher and a threat out of the backfield.
Durham ran for six scores and averaged 5.3 yards per attempt. His 3.48 yards after contact per run ranked top 10 among SEC rushers and was one of the best after contact marks among true freshmen. As Durham steps into a feature role, he'll have more on his plate, but he's ready to carry the load.
"I think having Caden Durham as a second-year player, obviously, he's an electric player and a really good football player, but he still was a true freshman last year that came in in June, right? So, having him as a second-year player, he's a lot better football player today than he was at this time last year," LSU offensive coordinator Joe Sloan said.
RB2: Harlem Berry OR Kaleb Jackson
Behind Durham, LSU has two talented backs whol will battle for carries.
Berry was the No. 1-ranked running back in the class of 2025 and will make an immediate impact as a true freshman. Kelly doesn't shy away from playing young running backs -- we saw the opportunity Durham got last year -- and LSU won't waste time getting Berry involved.
"I think we all know his traits, right? Very smooth. He's got elite speed, catches the ball well," Brian Kelly said when discussing the freshman running back.
Kelly added that Berry will need to adjust to facing SEC-level tacklers, but Kelly said Berry "will have to play for us this year."
Jackson was a blue-chip recruit in the class of 2023 who flashed his talent as a true freshman before struggling to carve out a role in 2024. Jackson is a big and physical runner who's not afraid to run through defenders. Durham and Berry are dynamic and explosive, but Jackson provides LSU with a power back.
"Kaleb's had a great camp. And, you know, he's 230-plus pounds. He's physical. He's smart. It's just about getting into, you know, game situations where he makes good cuts and good decisions," Brian Kelly said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Jon Gruden says he's 'looking forward to having the truth come out' as damaging emails lawsuit proceeds
Former NFL coach Jon Gruden spoke about his lawsuit against the league after a Nevada Supreme Court determined that his case could proceed in court instead of arbitration on Monday. "I'm looking forward to having the truth come out and I want to make sure what happened to me doesn't happen to anyone else," he said in a statement to ESPN. Gruden sued the NFL in 2021 after he parted ways with the Las Vegas Raiders when leaked emails revealed "racist, sexist and homophobic" language. He filed a lawsuit against the league and commissioner Roger Goodell, alleging that a "malicious and orchestrated campaign" was used to destroy his career by leaking the emails. Gruden told ESPN that the release of the emails affected the Raiders' season. "The league's actions disrupted the whole season," Gruden said. "We were leading the division at the time, and they completely blindsided me and the team. "What happened wasn't right and I'm glad the court didn't let the NFL cover it up." The Nevada Supreme Court ruled in a 5-2 decision that "the arbitration clause in the NFL Constitution is unconscionable and does not apply to Gruden as a former employee." Gruden's lawyers applauded the ruling in a statement to Pro Football Talk. "We're very pleased with the Nevada Supreme Court's decision, not just for Coach Gruden but for all employees facing an employer's unfair arbitration process," Adam Hosmer-Henner of McDonald Carano LLP told the outlet. "This victory further vindicates Coach Gruden's reputation, and it clears the way to swiftly bringing him full justice and holding the NFL accountable." Gruden expressed hope for an NFL return in July when visiting the Lions. "Hopefully I'm not done," Gruden told reporters, via the Detroit Free Press. "I'm about to make a comeback. I'm working hard to maybe get one more shot, but hopefully some of these guys that fell off my branch, if you say it that way, maybe they can hire me cause I'm looking for a job. "I don't care if I coach at Jones Junior High," he added. "I'm going to coach again. I'm still coaching. I'm just not on a team officially, but I do have some private assignments I work on, and I wear some gear when I'm watching the games that nobody knows about who I'm pulling for."


New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Jon Gruden ready for ‘truth' to come out in legal battle with NFL over leaked emails
Former head coach Jon Gruden is 'looking forward' to the 'truth' coming out over his allegations that the NFL and commissioner Roger Goodell had leaked disparaging emails that Gruden had sent before his resignation as head coach of the Raiders in 2021. In a statement to ESPN, less than 24 hours after the Nevada Supreme Court ruled in his favor to prevent the league from forcing Gruden's suit into a closed-door arbitration, the Super Bowl-winning coach reiterated his claim that the league had a hand in the whole situation. 'I'm looking forward to having the truth come out, and I want to make sure what happened to me doesn't happen to anyone else,' Gruden said. Jon Gruden speaks with the media following an NFL football game against the Pittsburgh Steelers in Pittsburgh, Sept. 19, 2021. AP 'The league's actions disrupted the whole season,' Gruden added. 'We were leading the division at the time, and they completely blindsided me and the team.' 'What happened wasn't right and I'm glad the court didn't let the NFL cover it up,' he added in his statement. The emails in question were published by the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times in October 2021 and showed Gruden using racist, sexist and anti-gay language in messages sent to then-Commanders general manager Bruce Allen in the years before Gruden's coaching tenure in Las Vegas. The emails came up during the NFL's inquiry into the Commanders' toxic work environment, and Gruden claims they were leaked to force him to resign as head coach of the Raiders, something he eventually did. Jon Gruden watches the Detroit Lions training camp with former Monday Night Football and current NBC announcer Mike Tirico at Meijer Performance Center. Lon Horwedel-Imagn Images ESPN reported the league will next petition the Nevada Supreme Court for a rehearing. If that fails, the NFL would then appeal to the United States Supreme Court. The Nevada Supreme Court ruled in Gruden's favor in a 5-2 decision, but the court did not determine the merits of Gruden's legal claims, only making the call on the NFL's attempt to push the case into a private arbitration.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mike Florio: Jon Gruden email leaker will likely be revealed
Mike Florio of Pro Football Talk joins Yahoo Sports' Jason Fitz and Caroline Fenton to discuss the latest on Jon Gruden's lawsuit against the NFL and why he thinks the person who leaked the emails that led to Gruden's firing could be revealed soon. Hear the full conversation from Yahoo Sports Daily on YouTube. View more Video Transcript Give us the SparkNotes about this case and what it could potentially mean. Not just for Gruden, but for the NFL as well. Gruden threw a Hail Mary pass to the full seven-judge court, and yesterday they found by a 5-2 vote that the case must proceed in open court with full blown. Discovery with public scrutiny of whatever is available through the filings and court proceedings, etc. So we're gonna find out unless this thing gets overturned by the US Supreme Court or it gets settled, we're gonna find out who ordered the code red against Jon Gruden, which kind of tells me. The case is probably gonna get settled before it comes to that point. Jon Gruden might not want to settle, but there might be a certain dollar amount where he says, yeah, you know what, that, that sounds pretty great. Let's say he doesn't. Jon Gruden isn't necessarily hurting for cash at this point in his life and his career if he doesn't have a price, and some of these things do come to light, and he does have his day in court. Obviously, you don't know I don't know what might be locked behind some NFL files, but how damaging could this be to a league that feels impenetrable? Well, we have to look at the context here. There was an investigation that was conducted into the Washington Football Organization that resulted in the accumulation of hundreds of thousands of pages of emails. A small handful of those emails were harvested and specifically selected by someone to be used against Jon Gruden. There weren't many people that had access to those emails, so we will find out who had access to those emails and. Whoever it was, depending upon who it was, once we find that out, that will depend and that will determine the damage that's done. Was it the commissioner? We don't know. Was it Daniel Snyder? We don't know. But again, there aren't many people that had access to these emails, and that's the first question. That's the most important question. And the NFL will probably go kicking and screaming trying to keep anyone from knowing the answer to that question. Who was it? That sent the emails first to the Wall Street Journal, and then when that didn't take Gruden out to the New York Times on a Monday and then by Monday night he was gone. Regardless of what Gruden does or doesn't do, does he settle? Does he take it all the way to the end? Somebody targeted the coach of one of the 32 franchises to be fired during the season. But what is the most likely outcome from this Jon Gruden versus the NFL? Oh, really, the first question is do they take it to the U.S. Supreme Court and what happens there? There are some fascinating political wrinkles that apply here that we don't have time to get into, but if and when they face discovery, I think Jon Gruden made an offer that he will be unable to justify refusing because it'll be the kind of money that you just don't say no to, and who knows? Maybe Jon Gruden goes from being persona non grata to head coach of an NFL team coincidentally, when the 2026 hiring cycle rolls around. Close