Apple changes App Store rules in EU to avoid hefty fines
Apple announced changes to its App Store payment rules in Europe as it hit a Thursday, June 26 deadline to address accusations of breaking EU digital competition rules – or face steep new daily fines. The European Commission in April slapped Apple with a fine of €500 million ($586 million) after concluding it prevented developers from steering customers outside its App Store to access cheaper deals in violation of the bloc's rules.
The EU warned Apple it had 60 days – until Thursday – to make changes to comply with the rules or face additional "periodic penalty payments", which it believed could be more than €50 million daily. Apple has changed the rules on the App Store effective Thursday, allowing developers to offer different payment options directly to consumers within their apps, arguing that the changes address the EU's concerns.
Apple has paid the €500 million fine but still plans to appeal the penalty on July 7 – and it hit out on Thursday at the extent of the changes sought by Brussels. "The European Commission is requiring Apple to make a series of additional changes to the App Store. We disagree with this outcome and plan to appeal," Apple said. EU spokesman Thomas Regnier said the commission took note of Apple's announcement "and will now assess these new business terms" to see if they are compliant with the bloc's Digital Markets Act (DMA). "As part of this assessment the commission considers it particularly important to obtain the views of market operators and interested third parties before deciding on next steps," Regnier added.
Apple has frequently hit out at the DMA antitrust rules, complaining it has no choice but to make the changes under threat of large fines. The EU reinforced its legal weaponry in recent years with major twin laws, the Digital Services Act and the DMA, which have provoked the ire of President Donald Trump. The US leader has slammed the EU's digital laws and taxes as "non-tariff barriers" to trade and many tech CEOs have aligned with his administration.
The EU and the United States are currently locked in negotiations to avoid Trump's sweeping tariffs on European goods but Brussels has insisted that the digital rules are a red line for the 27-country bloc.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Tariffs: France and Germany pursue different tacks towards US deal
France and Germany exhibited diverging strategies in the trade dispute between the EU and the US ongoing since mid-March, following a Council summit in Brussels on Thursday. While Germany is eager to reach a swift agreement at all costs, France emphasised the important that bloc should not display weakness. In a press conference after the summit, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said the Council encouraged the Commission to use the remaining two weeks to come to a swift agreement. But he said that the Council had encouraged von der Leyen to pursue the EU's own countermeasures if necessary. He said it was important to conclude something quickly and flagged the risks to the auto, chemicals and pharma sectors if 9 July arrives and the Trump tariffs take effect. 'My hope is that we can reach a swift conclusion,' French President Emmanuel Macron said after an EU summit on Thursday in Brussels, adding: 'However, this willingness should not be mistaken for weakness. We want to conclude quickly because it serves our collective interest, supports the stability of international trade, and benefits our businesses—but not at any price.' On Wednesday, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz criticized the Commission's strategy as overly technical and called for accelerating the negotiations by focusing on strategic sectors such as automobiles, steel, and energy, chemicals and pharma. The US currently imposes 50% tariffs on EU steel and aluminium, 25% on cars and a 10% baseline on all EU imports. Negotiations between the US and the EU have gained momentum since President Donald Trump and Commission President Ursula von der Leyen met at the G7 summit in Canada on 16 June, as the critical 9 July deadline approaches, after which Trump has threatened to impose 50% tariffs on all EU imports. On Thursday evening, EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen announced to EU member states that she had received a US counter-proposal to the EU's offer, though she did not disclose any details. For several months, the EU has been offering the US a zero-for-zero tariff deal on all industrial products, along with commitments to purchase strategic goods such as liquid natural gas and soybeans. However, few believe that securing 0% tariffs from the US is still a realistic possibility. 'Since they decided to impose multiple tariffs on their trade partners across the globe, the US now has an appetite for the revenue that tariffs generate,' an EU official said, implying that the US rejected the EU offer. The Commission is now reconsidering its approach to a future tariff-based deal, though the specific terms have yet to be determined. 'The prevailing assumption is that a 10% tariff might be the benchmark,' an EU diplomat said. 'On some areas 10% is not so much, the EU imposes 10% on a lot of imports of cars, whether they are Chinese or Japanese,' another EU official told Euronews, adding that 'for other products, such as aircraft, it's much more complicated because the production line is very interdependent between the US and the EU. That's why, you need a granular analysis.' If the EU manages to reach an agreement by 9 July, it will not be a comprehensive agreement, two senior EU diplomats said. 'The most realistic outcome would likely be a general framework or a 'principled agreement', due to time constraints,' an EU diplomat commented.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Von der Leyen touts EU-led alternative to mired WTO
At Thursday's EU summit in Brussels, European leaders discussed the possibility of overhauling the WTO's institutional framework, including its stalled dispute resolution mechanisms, to better reflect the current global trade landscape. 'The WTO hasn't worked for years,' German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said in a press conference following the summit, referencing persistent dysfunction under both the Trump and Biden administrations. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen presented leaders with different options of trade deals, labelling as the most attractive a closer cooperation between the EU and members of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP), a regional trade pact of 11 Pacific Rim countries and the UK. She introduced the initiative as a potential first step toward reshaping the global trade order. 'I said that we can think about this as the beginning of redesigning the WTO—of course, understanding what should be reformed positively within it,' von der Leyen told reporters after the summit. She stressed the importance of learning from the WTO's shortcomings and showing the world that 'free trade based on rules' remains achievable with a wide group of willing partners. 'This is a project we should truly engage in. CPTPP and the European Union—that's my team,' she said, adding that the EU must take the lead in managing this initiative. Asked whether the United States should be involved, von der Leyen replied: 'As far as I understand, the Americans left the CPTPP at a certain point.' This is not the first attempt to circumvent the WTO's paralysis. As a stopgap measure, 57 WTO members, including the UK, Paraguay, and Malaysia, have joined the Multi-Party Interim Appeal Arbitration Arrangement (MPIA), a mechanism that replicates the WTO Appellate Body's functions for participating members. However, the MPIA covers only 57.6% of global trade and does not address the broader institutional crisis. The WTO has been effectively paralysed since December 2019, when the US began blocking appointments to the Appellate Body, rendering the two-tier dispute settlement system non-functional. Major trade negotiations—such as those on eliminating harmful fisheries subsidies and reforming agricultural rules—remain stalled due to entrenched positions from key members, including the US, China, Japan, and the EU itself. With few signs of resolution, the WTO's future relevance is increasingly being called into question.
LeMonde
2 hours ago
- LeMonde
EU extends Russia sanctions again despite Hungary concerns
The EU's 27 leaders on Thursday, June 26 agreed to extend sanctions on Russia for another six months, resolving fears that Kremlin-friendly Hungary would let the measures lapse, officials said. The decision at a summit in Brussels means that the EU's sweeping sanctions over the war in Ukraine, including the freezing of more than 200 billion euros ($234 billion) in Russian central bank assets, will remain in force until at least early 2026. It comes after officials said they were preparing contingency plans to keep the bloc's economic punishment on Moscow in place should Hungarian leader Viktor Orban refuse to budge. EU counterparts had feared a refusal by Budapest to renew the measures could blow a massive hole in the leverage the bloc holds over Russia as the United States presses peace efforts. Orban took the decision to the wire the last time the sanctions – which need to be extended every six months – came up for renewal in January. But while the EU made sure its existing measures will remain in place, it failed to get clearance on a new package of sanctions due to a blockage by Hungary's ally Slovakia. Slovakian leader Roberto Fico refused at the summit to greenlight the new round of sanctions due to a separate dispute with Brussels over plans to cut off imports of Russian gas by the end of 2027. Slovakia remains dependent on Russian gas imports and earns money from transit fees for supplies piped across its territory. Fico held talks with EU chief Ursula von der Leyen earlier on Thursday but failed to get the concessions he wants and announced he would hold up approval of the sanctions package. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky urged EU leaders in a video address to adopt the strong package "targeting Russia's oil trade, shadow tanker fleet, banks, and supply chains that bring equipment or parts for making weapons". Officials say, however, that a push to lower a price cap on Russian oil exports has been shelved after Washington failed to back the push as part of a broader G7 initiative.
