Ankara, Damascus warn Israel over Syria action
"Israel is currently one of the biggest actors in this dark picture," he said of its ongoing military incursions since the overthrow of Syrian strongman Bashar al Assad late last year. "The emergence of chaos in Syria... appears to have become a priority for Israel's own national security," he said.
Standing next to him, Al Shaibani also warned against efforts to foster chaos in Syria. "We're facing new challenges that are no less dangerous than those we encountered during the years of war, foremost among them are repeated Israeli threats... through air strikes," he said.
Fidan said efforts to destabilise Syria could be clearly seen in the March bloodshed in the coastal Latakia and in the recent deadly violence that gripped the southwestern province of Sweida as well as in the northeast. — AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
6 hours ago
- Observer
The two-state solution: A political smokescreen
In what was presented as a legally and diplomatically significant development, countries participating in the International Conference on the Peaceful Settlement of the Palestinian Question and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution—co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and the French Republic — issued a final communiqué on July 29 at the United Nations headquarters in New York. Working groups were jointly chaired by Brazil, Canada, Egypt, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Jordan, Mexico, Norway, Qatar, Senegal, Spain, Türkiye, the UK, the European Union and the Arab League, with participation from several other nations. In their closing statement, the participants affirmed: 'Ending the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and implementing the two-state solution is the only path, under international law, to fulfil the legitimate aspirations of both Palestinians and Israelis; to end all forms of violence; to halt the destabilising actions of non-state actors; to ensure the security of both peoples; to establish the sovereignty of two states; and to achieve peace, prosperity and regional integration for the benefit of all peoples in the region'. They further stated: 'Accordingly, we commit to taking concrete, time-bound and irreversible steps towards a peaceful settlement of the Palestinian issue and the implementation of the two-state solution — through swift and practical measures that will result in the establishment of an independent, sovereign, economically viable and democratic Palestinian state, living side by side in peace and security with Israel. This would enable full regional integration and mutual recognition'. Following the conference, 15 countries — including France, Canada, Australia, Finland, New Zealand, Portugal, Iceland and Slovenia — announced their intention to officially recognise the State of Palestine during the upcoming United Nations General Assembly in September. Spain, Ireland and Norway had already extended such recognition in May 2024. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer also declared that UK would formally recognise the State of Palestine by September — unless Israel takes tangible steps to allow humanitarian aid into the Gaza Strip, commits to the two-state solution and halts the annexation of the West Bank. This reflects a conditional recognition — more a diplomatic tool to pressure Israel to ease its actions in Gaza than a principled shift in Britain's longstanding position. It is worth recalling that since the Palestinian National Council, led by the late President Yasser Arafat, declared the establishment of the State of Palestine in Algiers on November 15, 1988, a total of 147 out of 193 United Nations member states have officially recognised Palestine. This represents just over 75 per cent of the global body. This raises a critical question: what impact would further recognition bring — especially in the continued absence of recognition from the US, which remains firmly opposed to such initiatives and has openly criticised countries like France for taking that step? If 147 states have thus far been unable to compel Israel to respect international law or implement UN Security Council Resolution 242 — adopted on November 22, 1967, which calls for Israeli withdrawal from territories occupied during the 1967 war — what leverage will a few more recognitions provide? In July 2024, the International Court of Justice ruled that Israel's ongoing presence in the territories occupied in 1967 is illegal and that the country must end its occupation without delay. This decision joins a long list of resolutions and rulings issued by international bodies over the past seven decades, none of which have succeeded in compelling Israel to comply with international humanitarian law or to halt the suffering, starvation and devastation affecting over two million unarmed civilians in Gaza. Nor has it succeeded in stopping illegal settlement activity in the West Bank. Seen in this light, the recent initiative by the international community — particularly by influential Western powers — amounts to a political smokescreen: an attempt to deflect attention from the war crimes, human rights violations and unfolding humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza by shifting focus to the long-stalled two-state solution. Rather than applying serious pressure to end the current hostilities, the narrative of a two-state solution has been resurrected — despite widespread recognition that, under current conditions, such a solution remains unachievable. As long as Washington continues to offer unwavering protection to the occupying Israeli regime, meaningful progress remains elusive. Israel has had little incentive to adhere to international law, largely because such law has never been enforced in its case — since its establishment and recognition in 1948. Translated by: Badr al Dhafri The original version of this article was published in the print edition of Oman Arabic newspaper on August 7
Observer
9 hours ago
- Observer
Oman condemns Israeli PM's remarks on 'Greater Israel'
MUSCAT: The Sultanate of Oman has strongly condemned the statements made by the Prime Minister of the Israeli government and his claims regarding the so-called 'Greater Israel'. Oman expressed its categorical rejection of his illegal expansionist schemes, which blatantly violate international law and infringe upon the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people to establish their independent state on their lands in the West Bank, the Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem as its capital. In a statement issued on Thursday by the Foreign Ministry, Oman emphasised that these expansionist propositions pose a direct threat to the security and stability of the region, fuelling hostility and tension at a time when de-escalation, cooperation among regional states, and respect for the principles of national sovereignty and good neighbourliness are most needed. Oman also reaffirmed its steadfast stance in supporting the sovereignty and territorial integrity of regional states and its firm rejection of any schemes aimed at undermining national entities or altering the political geography of the region. Oman reiterated its unwavering commitment to supporting the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people, foremost among them their right to establish an independent state along the June 4, 1967 borders, with East Jerusalem as its capital, in accordance with international legitimacy resolutions and the Arab Peace Initiative. The Sultanate of Oman has called upon the international community to take a firm stance against these aggressive policies and to work towards safeguarding the rights of the Palestinian people, ensuring the achievement of a just and comprehensive peace in the region. Meanwhile, Arab nations have also slammed comments by Netanyahu apparently expressing support for the idea of an expanded 'Greater Israel', calling the remarks a threat to their sovereignty at an especially tense time for the region. Jordan condemned the prime minister's Greater Israel remarks as a "dangerous and provocative escalation" and "a threat to the sovereignty of states". A spokesman for its foreign ministry went on to reject what he called Netanyahu's "inflammatory" rhetoric and "delusional claims". Egypt also said that it had "requested clarification on this matter", characterising it as tantamount to a "rejection of the option of peace in the region". - Agencies
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Germany's Thyssenkrupp cuts targets as US tariffs weigh
FRANKFURT: Thyssenkrupp's shares slumped on Thursday as the struggling German industrial giant slashed its sales forecasts due to weak demand amid US President Donald Trump's tariff onslaught. The group, whose products range from steel to car parts and submarines, said it now expects sales to fall by five to seven percent in the current fiscal year. This compared to a previous forecast of a drop of up to three per cent. Thyssenkrupp's shares plunged seven percent on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange following the announcement. The group has long been struggling, particularly as its traditional steel business faces competition from Asia, but the turmoil triggered by Trump's tariffs have worsened its problems. "The past quarter was characterised by enormous macroeconomic uncertainty," said Thyssenkrupp CEO Miguel Lopez. "We are very much feeling the weak market environment in key customer industries such as the automotive, engineering and construction industries." The firm, one of Germany's best-known industrial groups that traces its history back to the 19th century, also posted a hefty net loss for the April-to-June period of 278 million euros ($325 million) — five times greater than a year ago. The results were hit by an impairment in the troubled steel division as well as restructuring costs at its auto unit. The company also gave a more cautious forecast for operating profits for the current fiscal year, which runs to the end of September. The firm expects them to be in the lower end of a previously announced range of 600 million to one billion euros. On a brighter note, its unit that makes submarines and warships reported a jump in sales and orders, driven by a boom in the defence sector triggered by the Ukraine war. Thyssenkrupp shareholders voted last week in favour of spinning off the division so it can benefit more from growing demand. It is part of a broader overhaul to split the entire group into a series of standalone businesses, but the plan has fuelled fears of further job cuts at the historic conglomerate. — AFP
