Government accused of ‘attack on low-paid workers'
Cian O'Callaghan's comments come after it was reported that the Government is delaying the introduction of a living wage until 2029.
Advertisement
Speaking during Leaders' Questions on Wednesday, he drew a comparison between the Government's treatment of senior leadership in semi-State organisations and its policies for low-paid workers.
Mr O'Callaghan said: 'Not content with creating a new 430,000 euro post for the housing czar, this Government now wants to increase pay for senior executives in semi-State organisations.
'Yesterday, (Public Expenditure Minister) Jack Chambers announced plans to change rules, which will see salaries soar.
'The heads of 30 semi-State bodies, from Horse Racing Ireland to RTÉ, are now potentially in line for massive increases.
Advertisement
'This is despite the fact that these CEOs received a combined 75 million in pay and perks over 10 years, according to Village magazine.'
He added: 'Strangely, even though I carefully studied the Minister's statement yesterday, I did not see any reference to economic headwinds, tariffs or global volatility.
'When it comes to gold-plated salaries for those at the top, it seems these concerns are not worth mentioning. Compare that with how people on low pay are treated and the Government's shameful decision to postpone the introduction of a living wage.
Taoiseach Micheál Martin (Brian Lawless/PA)
'Improvement in sick leave for ordinary workers has also been put on the chopping block. In a triple whammy, plans to introduce pension auto-enrolment have also been kicked down the road yet again.
Advertisement
'While all across the county people are struggling to make ends meet, keep their homes heated, rent paid and bills from piling up, this Government has mounted a despicable attack on low-paid workers.'
Mr O'Callaghan said housing costs more than double the EU average, bills have increased 80% since Russian invaded Ukraine, and the prices for goods and services are 42% higher than in other European countries.
'The cost of living is skyrocketing and the Government expects people to get by on 13.50 an hour. Why does this Government believe those at the top deserve bumper salary increases while low-paid workers are thrown under the bus?'
In response, Taoiseach Michaeál Martin said said the minimum wage had been significantly increased over the last number of years.
Advertisement
'Over the past three to four years, significant improvements were made to the minimum wage, workers' rights and sick leave pay.
'2022 was the first time a statutory right was given to employer-paid sick leave in the sick leave Act.
'The Deputy made the exaggerated comment that we are engaging in despicable action again workers. Sick leave has gone from three to five days, which was introduced in January 2024.
'The minimumn wage has been increasing significantly over the past number of years as a result of Government decisions – it will continue to increase.
Advertisement
'We decided to delay going from five to seven days. On the minimum wage, the delay is in respect of matching the living wage. It will be a matter for Low Pay Commission to determine the increase.'
On auto-enrolment, he said Government was 'going full steam ahead' with its plans.
'This Government, the two main parties in government, spent the last three to four years building up what was a very substantive programme in terms of getting auto-enrolment ready.
'In terms of the logistics of it, payroll providers and so on, the view was that it should start with the tax year in January as opposed to September – that is all.
'So let us not pretend it is some massive undermining of workers' rights or anything like that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
21 minutes ago
- Spectator
The good, the bad and the ugly of the Alaska summit
The three-hour Friday summit in Alaska between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin ended as well as it conceivably could have ended: as a big nothingburger. But that does not mean that Ukraine and its supporters can breathe a sigh of relief. Trump may be unhappy that the prospect of his Nobel Peace Prize remains elusive as Putin has not agreed to an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine. But it is far from clear that he will end up directing his anger against Russia. To be sure, it is a good thing that nothing of substance was agreed in Anchorage. Any big great-power bargain made over the heads of Europeans and Ukrainians, which Trump and Putin would then seek to impose on the hapless old continent, would mean the end of any semblance of a rules-based international order, in which borders of European nations are not redrawn by force. We can be reasonably confident that Putin would have been happy to agree to an immediate ceasefire in exchange for Ukraine meeting his maximalist demands – Ukraine's capitulation, the ceding of territories that Russians do not yet control, or a prompt election to unseat Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The failure to reach a deal with Trump suggests that the US administration has not bought into Russia's interpretation of the war and how to end it – at least not yet. The presence of Secretary of State Marco Rubio, once a Russia hawk, in the room might have played a role in preventing the worst-case outcome – unlike in Helsinki where the US president was left with Putin unsupervised for several hours. Yet, 'normie' Republicans must have felt more than a bit of shame about the spectacle that Trump orchestrated – the red carpet, the ride in the 'Beast', and the apparent warmth extended to a mass murderer and child kidnapper all reflect poorly on the United States – and help return Putin from pariah status to a respected global leader. Relatedly, while the summit did not bring about a catastrophe for Ukraine, neither is it likely to lead to better Ukraine policy in Washington. It is hard to imagine now a tightening of existing, congressionally mandated sanctions by the executive branch – never mind the bill put forward by Senators Graham and Blumenthal, imposing a de facto trade embargo on countries buying Russian oil and gas, getting through a Republican-controlled Senate. And, even if Trump does not stand in the way of military sales to Ukraine, it will have to be the Europeans who continue to do the financial heavy lifting – all while being held hostage by America's sluggish defence industrial base. Finally, an ominous, ugly thought. In his remarks, Vladimir Putin warned Kyiv and European capitals against 'throw[ing] a wrench' into the works of the emerging deal (whatever it may be) between Russia and the United States. Clearly, the Russian dictator is playing the long game here: hoping to peel off the United States away from the broader pro-Ukrainian coalition. By itself, the summit has not accomplished that goal yet, but it has likely opened new opportunities to lure Trump and his inner circle closer to Russia. Even before the summit, there was speculation about 'money-making opportunities' that could bring the two world powers closer together. The presence of US Treasury and Commerce Secretaries, Scott Bessent and Howard Lutnick, and Russia's Kirill Dimitriev, the head of the country's sovereign wealth fund – alongside 'tremendous Russian business representatives', as Trump put it – signalled a desire on both sides for normalisation of 'businesslike' relations. In practice, that might mean more investment, trade and other 'deals' – especially ones that generate cash for the Trump family enterprise. What lies at heart of the summit is that the US president neither understands nor cares about understanding Putin's motives and the threat he poses to the world. In contrast, Putin, a former KGB lieutenant colonel, has a solid grasp of what makes Trump and his entourage tick. He might make the occasional mistake and overplay his hand but he has focus, consistency, and a voracious appetite. And all of those, wrapped in a thoroughly delusional view of the world and Russia's place in it, were both on full display and unchallenged on Friday.
ITV News
21 minutes ago
- ITV News
'We didn't get there': Trump and Putin fail to reach Ukraine deal in Alaska talks
After talks with President Trump, Putin has hinted a deal is immiment, as ITV News US Correspondent Dan Rivers reports A deal on ending the war in Ukraine has not been reached, despite the efforts of US President Donald Trump during face-to-face talks with Russia's President Putin in Alaska. On Friday, the two leaders greeted one another on the tarmac of Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. They shook hands and smiled for pictures together before making their way to Trump's presidential limousine. They spoke for around two and a half hours before delivering a joint news conference. Standing next to Putin, Trump said: 'We had an extremely productive meeting, and many points were agreed to. 'And there are just a very few that are left. Some are not that significant. One is probably the most significant, but we have a very good chance of getting there.' However, Trump also admitted: 'There's no deal until there's a deal.' Putin claimed they had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' The meeting marked the Russian president's first time on US soil in more than a decade. Trump said he would call Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders to brief them on the talks. The US President pledged he would bring about an end to the conflict, which began after Russia 's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, on his first day in the White House. Despite not reaching any major breakthrough, Trump ended his remarks by thanking Putin and saying, 'we'll speak to you very soon and probably see you again very soon'. When Putin smiled and offered, 'next time in Moscow,' Trump said 'that's an interesting one' and said he might face criticism but 'I could see it possibly happening'. The Russian president also praised the talks in the press conference, describing them as a "reference point" from which the conflict could be resolved. He went on to say he hoped they would mark the start of restoring "businesslike, pragmatic relations" between the two countries. Meanwhile, the UK's Ministry of Defence has said British personnel are ready to arrive in Ukraine just "days" after Moscow and Kyiv agree to put fighting on hold. The UK Government earlier this summer backed international efforts to set up a "Multinational Force Ukraine", a military plan to bolster Ukraine's defences once the conflict eases, in a bid to ward off future Russian aggression. "Planning has continued on an enduring basis to ensure that a force can deploy in the days following the cessation of hostilities," an MoD spokesperson said. It follows stern remarks from Trump last month, where he revealed a deadline for Russia to negotiate a ceasefire or face heavy tariffs, following his "disappointment" in Putin. At the beginning of August, Trump announced the repositioning of US nuclear submarines over what he described as "inflammatory" remarks by the deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev. The war has caused heavy losses on both sides and drained resources. Ukraine has held on far longer than some initially expected since the February 2022 invasion, but it is straining to hold off Russia's much larger army.
ITV News
21 minutes ago
- ITV News
Embarrassment for Trump and acceptance for Putin, after Alaska summit yields no deal on Ukraine
World Russia Ukraine This was supposed to be the foreign policy high point of Donald Trump 's second term. A further step towards the Nobel Peace Prize. A crowning victory against all the doubters and naysayers. Except it wasn't. No sooner than he'd landed, the schedule was ripped up. No one-on-one meeting with Vladimir Putin, instead it was to be a three on three, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff. Then the widened talks were cancelled, the working breakfast binned and the press conference turned into a brief statement with no questions. Despite Putin suggesting an agreement had been reached, President Trump soon contradicted that interpretation, saying 'There's no deal until there's a deal'. There were no details about what they discussed, no read-out on the points of alignment and no attempt to come up with some wording on a statement. This was a diplomatic embarrassment for Trump, leaving him exposed as having been played by Putin. The Russian leader walked away no doubt smiling, happy with the photos of him shaking hands with the leader of the free world, touted in Russia as evidence Putin was back on the world stage. And crucially he gained the one other commodity he needs in this war: time. The talks left just a tiny glimmer of hope that a further summit may happen. The ball has been duly kicked into the diplomatic long grass, leaving Putin free to push further in the Donbass, safe in the knowledge that there appears little immediate chance of Trump imposing punitive new sanctions on Russia.
