G7 leaders should ignore Donald Trump outbursts at Alberta summit: Chrétien
Chrétien, speaking Thursday at a conference in Calgary, said leaders can't predict what Trump might do, the president can be a bully and it would be best if the rest of the G7 leaders ignored any outbursts.
'If he has decided to make a show to be in the news, he will do something crazy,' Chrétien said.
'Let him do it and keep talking normally.'
Tweet This
Click to share quote on Twitter: "Let him do it and keep talking normally."
Chrétien said leaders should follow the example set by Prime Minister Mark Carney when he visited Trump at the White House last month.
'When Trump talked about Canada to be part of the United States, (Carney) just said, 'Canada is not for sale, the White House is not for sale, Buckingham Palace is not for sale,'' Chrétien said.
Story continues below advertisement
'Trump said 'Never say never' (but Carney) didn't even reply. He just moved on with the discussion. It's the way to handle that.'
Carney is hosting Trump and world leaders from France, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdom, Italy and the European Union for the three-day summit starting Sunday in the Rocky Mountains southwest of Calgary.
Get breaking National news
For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy
Chrétien, who was speaking alongside his former deputy prime minister and finance minister John Manley, also said he supported Carney's decision to invite India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi to the summit.
Carney has been criticized for the invitation, including by a member of his own Liberal caucus, due to ongoing tensions between Canada and India over foreign interference and the 2023 killing of Sikh separatism activist Hardeep Singh Nijjar in B.C. The RCMP has said it has evidence linking members of the Indian government to Singh's death.
Story continues below advertisement
'It's always good to talk,' Chrétien said of the Modi invite. 'They will be able to talk and they will see there are other problems.'
'You have to navigate. You cannot always go on your high horse for every little problem you're confronted with.'
Chrétien was one of two former Canadian prime ministers speaking at the conference, which is being hosted by the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy and the G7 Research Group.
The university says the conference is meant to bring experts and officials together to explain key issues G7 leaders are facing heading into the summit.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith also spoke at the conference.
She said the possibility of an economic and security deal between Canada and the United States being signed at the G7 would be an extraordinary step.
Story continues below advertisement
But she urged Canada to continue finding new trading partners even if the relationship between the two countries begins to smooth over.
'Let's not take our foot off the gas,' Smith said.
Former prime minister Joe Clark was to give the closing keynote speech.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
8 minutes ago
Flight attendant union asks jobs minister not to intervene in Air Canada negotiations
The Canadian Union of Public Employees released a statement on Friday afternoon urging Federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu not to intervene in negotiations by invoking Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code, thereby permitting collective bargaining to continue and allowing the parties to negotiate a resolution. Air Canada had previously asked CUPE to consider binding interest arbitration, which would bring an arbitrator into the negotiations to make decisions on key agenda items that the two sides haven't been able to agree on. After CUPE declined that request earlier this week, Air Canada then asked Hajdu to make a referral under Section 107 that the negotiation be sent to arbitration. Hajdu gave CUPE until noon on Friday to respond. We thank the union for their response. We strongly urge the parties to work with federal mediators and get a deal done. Time's precious and Canadians are counting on you, Hajdu's press secretary said in a statement to CBC News. Air Canada warned Friday it is cancelling around 500 flights previously scheduled to take off today in anticipation of the work stoppage, with a full stoppage looming Saturday. The airline said on X that as of noon on Friday, 294 flights had been cancelled and more than 55,000 passengers had been impacted. It said it would notify customers of cancellations through email and text message, adding it recommends against going to the airport unless they have a confirmed booking and their flight still shows as operating. An Angus Reid Institute poll released on Friday suggested that four in five Canadians — about 84 per cent — believe it's unfair that Air Canada flight attendants are only paid for work when the plane is in the air. This is a key sticking point in negotiations that led to the impasse. The weighted survey came from a randomized sample of 1,507 Canadian adults, with a margin of error of +/- 2.0 percentage points, 19 times out of 20. With files from CBC's Jenna Benchetrit
Vancouver Sun
8 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Wife's ADHD cited by Federal Court in reasons for delaying deportation of man from India
A Federal Court judge has temporarily stopped the deportation of a man from India over Ottawa's handling of health concerns by his Canadian wife who has ADHD, and financial problems his departure would cause his sister. Jagjit Singh, a citizen of India, came to Canada in 2021 on a temporary resident visa and made a refugee claim for asylum. While that claim was being processed, he met a Canadian woman, in November 2024, and married her the following January. The woman, identified only by the initials L.B., in the court decision, submitted a spousal sponsorship for her new husband to become a permanent resident of Canada a couple of weeks later, after which he withdrew his refugee claim. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. While one arm of the immigration system was processing the spousal sponsorship, another arm was dealing with a man who was no longer seeking refugee protection and so had overstayed his original visa. In May his wife was notified she met the eligibility requirements to sponsor Singh and, in July, Singh was given a removal date for August. He asked Canada Border Services Agency officials to delay his deportation until after his wife's application was adjudicated. CBSA refused his request. Singh then sought intervention from the Federal Court to delay his removal. His case was heard by Federal Court Justice Avvy Yao-Yao Go on Tuesday and her decision was released the same day. Lawyers for Singh claimed five grounds for a delay, including various ways that the CBSA mishandled and misapplied evidence in the case to a degree suggesting they had not reviewed the submission Singh had made. The judge said not all of Singh's grounds were persuasive, but only one serious issue was needed for a stay to be granted, and she saw one. 'There is at least one serious issue with respect to the Officer's assessment of the evidence the Applicant submitted in support of his deferral request, and the Officer's interpretation of the scope of their discretion,' Go wrote in her decision. She found the border officer did not properly consider the issue of irreparable harm. 'Irreparable harm refers to harm which cannot be compensated in money; it is the nature rather than the magnitude of the harm,' her judgment says. It doesn't have to be the person being deported that is harmed, it can be 'specific harm that is demonstrated in regard to any persons directly affected by the removal, and who will be remaining in Canada.' In this case, Go found that there was evidence of harm to Singh's wife, who has ADHD, and to Singh's sister, who will suffer financially because the couple pay to live in her house. The CBSA officer's dismissal of the concerns was not based on evidence before the court, Go said. 'In the case before me, there is evidence that L.B. suffers from ADHD which impairs her ability to manage time, stress, focus and everyday responsibilities and that the Applicant provides her with support by, among other things, helping her maintain daily structure and reminders for medications and appointments, and providing her with emotional stability and mental health support. The evidence before the Court also indicates L.B. cannot rely on other family members to support her. 'The evidence before the Court further indicates that the Applicant's sister has put her house on sale in light of the Decision denying the Applicant's request to defer his removal.' In court, the government argued the couple's spousal sponsorship application faces further investigation due to 'possible bona fide concerns,' suggesting CBSA wants to see whether their marriage is a sham for immigration purposes. Singh's lawyers responded that the couple has not been asked for any information in that probe, so the delay is the government's fault, not Singh's. 'In the end,' Go wrote, 'taking into consideration the irreparable harm to the Applicant's spouse on the one hand, and the inconvenience to the Respondent caused by delay in removal on the other, I find that granting the stay until the underlying (application for judicial review) is determined would be just and equitable in all the circumstances of the case.' Go said Singh could stay in Canada until that review happens. • Email: ahumphreys@ | X: AD_Humphreys Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here .
Winnipeg Free Press
8 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Bad diets, too many meds, no exercise: A look inside the latest ‘Make America Healthy Again' report
WASHINGTON (AP) — A report that U.S. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has promised will improve the health of America's children does not call on the government to make significant changes to its food or farming policies, according to a draft document obtained by The Associated Press. The 'Make America Healthy Again' strategy report is supposed to be one of Kennedy's signature achievements as the nation's health secretary, giving the government a roadmap to help its citizens lose weight, reduce chronic diseases and exercise more. Before coming to Washington, Kennedy had spent much of his career decrying the harms of chemicals sprayed on crops, prescription drugs, ultraprocessed foods, and vaccines. His coalition, then, has expected him to take bold action as the nation's top health leader. But a draft of the so-called 'MAHA' report, first reported by The New York Times Thursday night, mostly calls on the government to further study chronic diseases, bad air quality, Americans' diets and prescription drug use. The report lays out four problem areas – poor diet, chemical exposure, lack of physical activity and overuse of medications — that are to blame for chronic diseases in the U.S. The White House has held off on publicly releasing the report, which was submitted to President Donald Trump on Tuesday. The latest report is the policy companion to a 'MAHA' report released in May, which was found to have several errors in it. White House spokesman Kush Desai refused to confirm whether the copy obtained by the Associated Press was a final version, though HHS officials have insisted the report has been finalized since Tuesday. 'President Trump pledged to Make America Healthy Again, and the Administration is committed to delivering on that pledge with Gold Standard Science,' Desai said. 'Until officially released by the White House and MAHA Commission, however, any documents purporting to be the second MAHA Report should be considered as nothing more than speculative literature.' Some in the agricultural industry had warily anticipated the report, fearing it would call for bans or investigations into the use of pesticides and herbicides that farmers in the U.S. regularly spray on crops to control weeds and enhance yields. Other farmers were concerned about how the report may target the use of corn syrup, a common sweetener, in American foods. Both products have been a central talking point in Kennedy's 'MAHA' movement, which has attracted a diverse coalition of suburban and rural moms, Trump supporters and liberals concerned about the nation's food supply. Instead, the report calls for an 'awareness' campaign to raise confidence in pesticides. Concerns from the agricultural industry waned as the report hit the president's desk, with one of Kennedy's closest advisers, Calley Means, calling for MAHA supporters to work with major farm companies on Tuesday. Means also acknowledged that the 'pace of political change' can be frustrating. 'We need to build bridges,' Means said, adding that: 'We are not going to win if the soybean farmers and the corn growers are our enemy.' Wednesdays What's next in arts, life and pop culture. Means did not respond to a request for comment on Friday. A spokesman for Kennedy also declined to comment. The report urges the National Institutes of Health – which is facing a 40% cut to its budget under the Trump administration – to undertake several studies on Americans' health, including research on vaccine injury, autism, air quality, water quality, prescription drugs, and nutrition. The report also calls for changes to the foods served in schools and hospitals, something that will be hard to deliver with the Trump administration's funding cuts, said Kari Hamerschlag, the deputy director of the food and agriculture at the nonprofit Friends of the Earth. Earlier this year, the Republican-led administration wiped out $1 billion set aside that helped food banks and schools procure food directly from local farmers. 'This is not going to transform our food and farming system,' Hamerschlag said. 'This is not going to make people healthier. They need to put resources behind their recommendations.' ___
