One-Michelin-starred Euphoria closes; 3rd high end closure in past month
Euphoria's chef-owner Jason Tan confirmed market talk about its closure in a social media post on Aug 8. Prior to the announcement, the restaurant had already disabled its reservations page and its premises on Tras Street were closed on days it was meant to be in operation.
Tan, who earned his first Michelin star at Corner House before striking out on his own with Euphoria five years ago, told The Business Times that he had been thinking about closing for almost a year. He added that while business was slow, the restaurant was still 'decent' and that the reasons for closing were personal.
'I've already achieved my personal goals, including being ranked in Asia's 50 Best (guide) and receiving the Michelin Guide's star recognition for nine years. I've been cooking for over 20 years and I would like to take a break.'
He already has other projects in the works, as 'I've already been approached by two separate investors who are potentially interested to open a nice casual concept. I have also been asked to be a culinary consultant for a restaurant and hotel project.'
In this year's Michelin Guide, eight one-star restaurants were dropped from the list due to closures. Alma and Euphoria add up to 10 restaurants – the first time that Michelin closures have hit double digits.
Meanwhile, Jeremy Gillon, executive chef-owner of the one-starred restaurant Jag, announced on social media that he was stepping down from his role after seven years. He told BT that he planned to spend some time in France to recharge and refresh creatively. The restaurant, however, will continue business as usual with the existing team at its STPI location in Robertson Quay.
Fine dining Japanese restaurant Imamura also announced its impending closure a week ago, making it the third high end eatery to call it quits in the past month.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Singapore-focused listed companies are having their turn in the spotlight
[SINGAPORE] The oft-heard complaint is that Singapore's market is too small and, beyond the banks, no one can make much money from investing in it. This year, the naysayers may find themselves pleasantly surprised. Case in point: Sheng Siong , Singapore's second-largest retailer, according to Maybank Research. With a market capitalisation of around S$3.1 billion, the supermarket operator is in the big league. Its share price has risen by some 26 per cent this year. The group's recent results are positive, with a 3.5 per cent year-on-year rise in net profit to S$72.3 million for the first half of 2025. Revenue was up 7.1 per cent at S$764.7 million. Maybank Research points out that Sheng Siong is doing well due to a raft of factors. Its prices are some 10 to 21 per cent lower than e-grocers; in addition, its fresh offerings, live seafood and long hours drive footfall. Sheng Siong's prospects look rosy as well. One reason is the sale of DFI Retail Group's Singapore food business , including Cold Storage and Giant supermarkets, to Macrovalue for S$125 million earlier this year. If Macrovalue prioritises Cold Storage over Giant, this could benefit Sheng Siong, which has a similar customer base to the latter. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Overall, Singapore consumers still have a preference for budget-friendly supermarkets and house-brand products, which favours Sheng Siong. Another plus point are the SG60 vouchers that have been given out. In total, some three million adults will get the vouchers, which are estimated to cost the government a total of S$2.02 billion, The Straits Times reported. Senior Minister of State for Trade and Industry Low Yen Ling said in a Facebook post on Jul 23 that over S$160 million worth of vouchers has been spent, with S$95.5 million at participating hawkers and heartland merchants. More than S$64.5 million was spent at participating supermarkets. Such spending will undoubtedly give Sheng Siong's top line a pleasant fillip. Other companies listed on the Singapore Exchange are also enjoying benefits from the government's investment in infrastructure. In January, the Building and Construction Authority projected total construction demand to range between S$47 billion and S$53 billion in 2025 . Among the beneficiaries is construction and property group Koh Brothers . The group has a hefty order book of more than S$1 billion with visibility up to 2029, executive chairman and group CEO Francis Koh said in its results release in August. Recently, the company won a S$999 million contract from Changi Airport for the construction of underground tunnels at the upcoming Terminal 5. The contract was won by a joint venture between Koh Brothers Building & Civil Engineering Contractor – a unit under the group's subsidiary Koh Brothers Eco Engineering – and Japanese company Penta-Ocean Construction. Koh Brothers' share price, which closed at S$0.29 on Wednesday (Aug 20), is up just over 100 per cent this year. Other beneficiaries will be those who have secured construction contracts to build Housing & Development Board (HDB) flats. Earlier this month, Minister for National Development Chee Hong Tat told the media that the HDB will launch about 55,000 Build-to-Order (BTO) flats between 2025 and 2027. These will be located in new areas including Mount Pleasant, Woodlands North Coast, Sembawang North and the former Keppel Club. The number of flats is around 10 per cent more than the earlier number of 50,000 flats that HDB had committed to launch. CGS International Securities is positive on construction and property firm Wee Hur . The company is a 'beneficiary of Singapore's construction upcycle', the investment house said. Wee Hur has a construction order book of S$629 million as at the end of H1 2025, bolstered by two BTO projects totalling S$439.4 million that were secured in May 2025. This extends its order book visibility to FY2029. CGS noted that Wee Hur also plans to take on one or two more projects, to increase its order book to S$1 billion.
Business Times
13 hours ago
- Business Times
Japan's exports log biggest drop in 4 years as US tariff impacts intensify
[TOKYO] Japan's exports posted the biggest monthly drop in about four years in July, government data showed on Wednesday (Aug 20), as the impact of US tariffs intensified, raising concerns about the outlook for the export-reliant economy. Total exports from the world's fourth-largest economy dropped 2.6 per cent year on year in July in value terms, the biggest monthly drop since February 2021, when exports fell 4.5 per cent. It was larger than a median market forecast for a 2.1 per cent decrease and marks a third straight month of decline after a 0.5 per cent drop in June. Despite the plunge in the value of exports, shipment volumes have so far held up as Japanese exporters have avoided major price hikes, said Takeshi Minami, chief economist at Norinchukin Research Institute. 'But they would eventually have to pass on costs to US consumers and that would further hamper sales in the coming months,' he said. Exports to the US in July fell 10.1 per cent from a year earlier, with automobiles slumping 28.4 per cent and automotive components down 17.4 per cent. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up However, automobile exports fell just 3.2 per cent in volume terms, suggesting Japanese automakers' price cuts and efforts to absorb additional tariffs have partly shielded shipments. The US imposed 25 per cent tariffs on automobiles and auto parts in April and threatened 25 per cent levies on most of Japan's other goods. It later struck a trade deal on Jul 23 that lowered tariffs to 15 per cent in exchange for a US-bound US$550 billion Japanese investment package. The agreed tariff rate on automobiles, Japan's largest export sector, is still far higher than the original 2.5 per cent, exerting pressure on major automakers and parts suppliers. Exports to other regions were also weak. Those to China were down 3.5 per cent, the data showed. Total imports in July dropped 7.5 per cent from a year earlier, compared with market forecasts for a 10.4 per cent fall. As a result, Japan ran a deficit of 117.5 billion yen (S$1 billion) in July, compared with a forecast of a 196.2 billion yen surplus. The outcome follows unexpectedly strong growth in gross domestic product (GDP) in the April-to-June quarter, separate data showed last week, fuelled by surprisingly resilient exports and capital expenditure. Economists said the strong exports growth in GDP data reflected differences in how the impact of price changes is factored in. Nevertheless, Norinchukin's Minami said that the Japanese economy has so far avoided the worst. 'As the tariff deal has at least reduced uncertainties, the Bank of Japan is likely to resume rate hikes as early as in October,' he said. REUTERS
Business Times
14 hours ago
- Business Times
Intel rescue will depend on Trump as investor — and pitchman
[WASHINGTON] A US government plan to take a stake in Intel would give the ailing chipmaker a powerful backer, even if a bigger challenge still lies ahead: finding enough paying customers. Wall Street analysts do not expect the money alone to turn around Intel's business, which has suffered from years of declining sales and the loss of market share. But there is a possibility that pressure from President Donald Trump will help the chipmaker line up more clients for its production arm – potentially justifying the cost of expanding domestic manufacturing. If the US ends up owning part of Intel, 'Trump kind of becomes your salesman,' said Dan Morgan, a senior portfolio manager at Synovus Trust who has covered the company since the 1990s. The president has this year secured trillions of US dollars' worth of pledges to invest in the US – even if some of those commitments are repackaged versions of existing plans. That includes a vow by Apple to spend US$600 billion on a domestic expansion. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), meanwhile, has pledged US$165 billion as part of a factory buildout in Arizona. This time around, the administration will need to pull off something with even longer odds: convincing sceptical prospective clients to use Intel for their manufacturing needs. The company has been trying to compete with TSMC in the so-called foundry business – manufacturing chips based on the designs of customers – but it has struggled to show it can match the industry leader's capabilities. 'Beside money, Intel needs customers,' Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon said in a note to clients. 'Is it conceivable that as part of something like this the administration might 'encourage' customers to use Intel's capacity (either directly, or indirectly through tariff policy or other regulation)? We don't know.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up SoftBank Group this week agreed to buy US$2 billion in Intel shares, raising the possibility that the Japanese conglomerate could use the company for chipmaking. Founder Masayoshi Son, who has forged a close relationship with Trump, has ambitions to develop AI chips that would compete with Nvidia. Investors cheered the idea, sending Intel shares up 7 per cent on Tuesday (Aug 19). The stock had rallied 23 per cent the previous week, when Bloomberg News first reported that the government was discussing the plan. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick confirmed this week that the government is discussing a plan to own part of Intel, casting the idea as a bid to convert Chips and Science Act grants into equity. The company had been poised to get about US$11 billion from that programme – initiated by a 2022 law signed by President Joe Biden – and the investment is expected to be roughly that same amount, people familiar with the deliberations have said. 'We need to make our own chips here,' Lutnick said. 'We cannot rely on Taiwan.' Intel, based in Santa Clara, California, declined to comment. It was a striking turnabout for Intel chief executive officer Tan Lip-Bu, whom Trump had criticised earlier this month. The US president had urged the executive to resign over his past ties to China, but Trump changed his stance after meeting Tan at the White House. It's an optimistic moment for a company plagued by upheaval and decline in recent years. Previous CEO Pat Gelsinger had bet that a factory expansion plan – centreed on an ambitious new facility in Ohio – would turn around Intel's fortunes. The aim was to transform Intel into a chip foundry and make semiconductors for outside clients, a growing business that turned TSMC into a trillion-US dollar company. The Chips Act money was meant to help make that vision come true. Biden and Gelsinger even held a groundbreaking ceremony for the Ohio site in 2022, promising 20,000 construction jobs and a fresh start for the domestic chip industry. But the economics of the plant don't work without big outside customers – especially because it's meant to feature cutting-edge technology that will be costly to adopt. Intel has repeatedly delayed the project, which isn't currently slated to be ready until the 2030s. Jay Goldberg, an analyst at Seaport Research Partners, estimates that it would take about US$20 billion for Intel to get its next-generation manufacturing technology online. Moreover, the government's cash-for-equity deal isn't necessarily a better arrangement than the original Chips Act grants, Rasgon said. 'Funding a buildout with no customers probably won't end well for shareholders, of whom the US government would be the largest under this situation,' he said. It also doesn't change Intel's standing in the technology industry. It has fallen behind in producing the kinds of chips most prized for AI tasks – an area now dominated by Nvidia. So-called hyperscalers – the largest data centre operators, like Alphabet's Google, which are now committing upwards of US$80 billion per year to buying new hardware – aren't going to settle for lesser chips because the government tells them to, Cowen analyst Joshua Buchalter said. It's not clear how the US investment fixes a problem that stems from a lack of competitiveness, he said. 'You can't force hyperscalers to use less performant processors or else you're inhibiting their competitiveness globally,' Buchalter said. TSMC is the go-to chip foundry for much of the tech industry, including Apple, Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. Intel, though, has yet to prove it can keep pace with global chip designers and manufacturers again – let alone act as the linchpin for a revival of domestic production. 'Intel still has to deliver,' Morgan said. 'Will this stake really make a whole lot of difference?' BLOOMBERG
