New Zealand PM proposes banning under-16s from social media
Live Events
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
New Zealand's prime minister on Tuesday proposed banning children under 16 from social media, stressing the need to protect them from the perils of big tech platforms.Regulators the world over are wrestling with how to keep children safe online, as social media is increasingly flooded with violent and disturbing content.Prime Minister Christopher Luxon unveiled draft laws that would force social media companies to verify users were at least 16 years old, or face fines of up to NZ$2 million (US$1.2 million).The proposed ban was modelled on that of Australia, which sits at the forefront of global efforts to regulate social media."This is about protecting our children. It's about making sure social media companies are playing their role in keeping our kids safe," Luxon said.It was not clear when the legislation would be introduced to parliament, but Luxon said he was hopeful of garnering support across the chamber.The laws were drafted by Luxon's centre-right National Party, the biggest member in New Zealand's three-way governing coalition.To be passed they would need the support of Luxon's two other coalition partners."Parents are constantly telling us that they are really worried about the impact that social media is having on their children," Luxon said."And they say they are really struggling to manage access to social media."Australia passed landmark laws in November banning under-16s from social media -- one of the world's toughest crackdowns on popular sites such as Facebook, Instagram and X.The move sparked a fierce backlash from big tech companies who variously described the laws as "rushed", "vague", and "problematic".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Meta in talks for Scale AI investment that could top $10 billion
Meta Platforms Inc . is in talks to make a multibillion-dollar investment into artificial intelligence startup Scale AI , according to people familiar with the matter. The financing could exceed $10 billion in value, some of the people said, making it one of the largest private company funding events of all time. The terms of the deal are not finalised and could still change, according to the people, who asked not to be identified discussing private information. A representative for Scale did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Meta declined to comment. Scale AI, whose customers include Microsoft Corp. and OpenAI, provides data labeling services to help companies train machine-learning models and has become a key beneficiary of the generative AI boom. The startup was last valued at about $14 billion in 2024, in a funding round that included backing from Meta and Microsoft. Earlier this year, Bloomberg reported that Scale was in talks for a tender offer that would value it at $25 billion. This would be Meta's biggest ever external AI investment, and a rare move for the company. The social media giant has before now mostly depended on its in-house research, plus a more open development strategy, to make improvements in its AI technology. Meanwhile, Big Tech peers have invested heavily: Microsoft has put more than $13 billion into OpenAI while both Inc. and Alphabet Inc. have put billions into rival Anthropic. Part of those companies' investments have been through credits to use their computing power. Meta doesn't have a cloud business, and it's unclear what format Meta's investment will take. Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg has made AI Meta's top priority, and said in January that the company would spend as much as $65 billion on related projects this year. The company's push includes an effort to make Llama the industry standard worldwide. Meta's AI chatbot — already available on Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp — is used by 1 billion people per month. Scale, co-founded in 2016 by CEO Alexandr Wang, has been growing quickly: The startup generated revenue of $870 million last year and expects sales to more than double to $2 billion in 2025, Bloomberg previously reported. Scale plays a key role in making AI data available for companies. Because AI is only as good as the data that goes into it, Scale uses scads of contract workers to tidy up and tag images, text and other data that can then be used for AI training. Scale and Meta share an interest in defense tech. Last week, Meta announced a new partnership with defense contractor Anduril Industries Inc. to develop products for the US military, including an AI-powered helmet with virtual and augmented reality features. Meta has also granted approval for US government agencies and defense contractors to use its AI models. The company is already partnering with Scale on a program called Defense Llama — a version of Meta's Llama large language model intended for military use. Scale has increasingly been working with the US government to develop AI for defense purposes. Earlier this year the startup said it won a contract with the Defense Department to work on AI agent technology. The company called the contract 'a significant milestone in military advancement.'
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Amid sky-rocketing prices, can you get affordable homes under $300K in US cities? Check details
Looking for homes under $300K in US? Live Events Most affordable US cities to buy a home for $300k or less (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel Despite home prices continuing to outpace the budgets of many Americans, there are still major US cities where the average price is under $300,000. According to research, there are more than 140 locations across the US where the median listing price sits at $300,000 or less, including several major metros that offer affordability and modern metropolitan amenities.'The majority of these cities are in the South or Midwest,' explains Hannah Jones, senior economic research analyst at "These regions tend to offer more affordable homes as they have generally more space to grow and lower demand than a high-density city (such as New York or Boston)."While most U.S. homebuyers are grappling with steep prices and historically high mortgage rates, recent data from reveals that there are still areas across the country where homes are available for under $300, the COVID-19 pandemic, the median price of a typical U.S. home was below $300,000. Today, that figure has soared. According to the latest data from Redfin, the median home price in April was $437,864—an increase of 1.3% compared to the same time last surge in prices, driven by a pandemic-fueled buying spree and a long-standing housing shortage, has made homeownership increasingly out of reach—especially for first-time buyers. High mortgage rates have only added to the National Association of Realtors (NAR) estimates that to close the current affordability gap, the U.S. housing market needs:367,000 more listings priced at or below $170,000,416,000 more under $255,000, and364,000 more priced below $340, numbers underscore the urgent need for more affordable housing options to the company's report, the most affordable cities in the U.S. are largely located in the Midwest and the South. Among the 145 cities surveyed where the average home price is $300,000 or less are several major urban centers, including Detroit, St. Louis, Memphis, Baltimore, Indianapolis, and the biggest cities with the most affordable home prices are:Detroit, MI ($109,000)Birmingham, AL ($181,500)St. Louis, MO ($199,999)Memphis, TN ($218,200)Baltimore, MD ($249,900)Lubbock, TX ($249,975)Indianapolis, IN ($268,500)Pittsburgh, PA ($274,900)Decatur, GA ($279,000)Kansas City, MO ($281,250)Oklahoma City, OK ($285,855)Louisville, KY ($289,900)Tulsa, OK ($289,900)Baton Rouge, LA ($289,945)Philadelphia, PA ($289,999)El Paso, TX ($295,000)Columbus, OH ($295,900)Clearwater, FL ($299,250)Jacksonville, FL ($299,900)Myrtle Beach, SC ($299,900)Ocala, FL ($299,999)San Antonio, TX ($300,000)Some cities saw a sharp rise in home values during the pandemic. And while prices in these areas may still be lower than those in the country's most expensive metro regions, they can remain out of reach for local reports that a typical monthly payment on a Detroit home—priced at the city's median list of $109,000—would be about $762 for a 30-year fixed mortgage at a 6.8% interest rate. This estimate includes taxes, insurance, and interest, assuming a 20% down payment of $21, housing options are still hard to come by along the East Coast, especially in the Northeast where shortages persist. However, buyers may still find homes priced under $300,000 in cities like Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and the pandemic, home values surged in several cities. Although prices in these areas may still trail those in the nation's most expensive metro markets, they often remain unaffordable for many local to the median listing price for a home in Detroit is $109,000. Based on a 30-year fixed mortgage at a 6.8% interest rate—and assuming a 20% down payment of $21,800—the typical monthly cost, including taxes, insurance, and interest, comes to about $ affordable housing continues to be challenging along the East Coast, particularly in the Northeast, where inventory remains tight. Still, buyers may uncover properties under $300,000 in cities such as Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and Baltimore.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Jamie Dimon-led JPMorgan issues stern warning! Job hopping analysts to be fired; ‘if you accept a position with..'
Jamie Dimon has consistently voiced concerns about private equity firms attracting fresh finance graduates. Led by CEO Jamie Dimon, JPMorgan has issued a very stern warning to 'unethical' junior bankers who start looking at alternate job offers within 18 months of joining. A new letter, leaked on Litquidity's Instagram platform, warns the new recruits against job hopping. According to the letter, junior bankers securing alternative employment opportunities during their initial 18-month tenure risk immediate termination from JPMorgan amidst increasing competition for skilled professionals in Wall Street. The confidential correspondence to newly recruited JPMorgan analysts explicitly states that securing employment elsewhere would result in immediate dismissal from the bank, according to a New York Post report. What JPMorgan's letter says to new recruits "If you accept a position with another company before joining us or within your first 18 months, you will be provided notice and your employment with the firm will end," states the correspondence dated June 4, bearing signatures of JPMorgan's global banking co-heads Filippo Gori and John Simmons, the report said. The communication from both senior leaders emphasised that complete dedication and engagement are vital for achieving success in the investment banking analyst programme. Also Read | Donald Trump vs Elon Musk: Who has more to lose - US President or world's richest man? Stakes are high for both! The executives further stated that "missing any part of the training programme" might result in dismissal, whilst highlighting that "avoiding potential conflicts of interest is crucial to maintaining the trust and confidence our clients place in us." The leadership also announced a reduction in the timeline to attain associate position by six months, making it 2.5 years, aiming to retain exceptional talent. Whilst their correspondence did not explicitly reference private equity organisations, these firms have historically employed strategies to recruit junior banking professionals following their initial training period, the report said. Jamie Dimon's past warnings Jamie Dimon, the 69-year-old chief executive of JPMorgan, has consistently voiced concerns about private equity firms attracting fresh finance graduates with substantial salary packages that major US banks struggle to match. "I know a lot of you work at JPMorgan, you take a job at a private equity shop before you even start with us," Dimon had told a crowd of undergraduate business school students, terming it "unethical." During his address at Georgetown University's Psaros Center for Financial Markets and Policy in September, he expressed his disapproval, saying, "It puts us in a bad position, and it puts us in a conflicted position. You are already working for somewhere else, and you're dealing with highly confidential information from JPMorgan, and I just don't like it." Also Read | Will the Donald Trump administration be forced to give billions of dollars in tariff refunds? Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
