Jury considering verdicts in trial of priest accused of sexual assaults
Christopher Brain, 68, from Wilmslow, Cheshire, was the leader of evangelical movement the Nine O'Clock Service (NOS), part of the Church of England, in Sheffield between 1986 and 1995.
He denies one count of rape and 36 counts of indecent assault between 1981 and 1995 against 13 women.
Prosecutors say NOS became a cult where Brain abused his position to sexually assault a 'staggering number' of women followers, exerting control over their lives and ostracising them from friends and family.
Inner London Crown Court previously heard that a 'homebase team' – referred to as 'the Lycra Lovelies' or 'the Lycra Nuns' – was set up to 'care for' Brain, with witnesses reporting seeing the defendant surrounded by attractive women in lingerie at his home looking after his needs.
Brain told jurors earlier this month that this was 'completely untrue'.
Prosecutor Tim Clark KC previously gave an overview of the alleged offences, relaying accounts from complainants who made various claims – including that Brain groomed them, would touch them during massages and re-enacted a film scene involving rape or sexual abuse over clothes.
Brain told jurors that some massages, intended to be for 'tensions' on his body, could evolve into 'sensual touching', which he said was between friends and 'no big deal'.
He denied touching anyone's breasts during massages while a part of NOS in Sheffield but admitted doing so after his involvement.
Brain said this was consensual and not forced.
Defence lawyer Iain Simkin KC asked Brain if he would continue touching someone sexually if they were uncomfortable and the defendant said he would not.
Brain rejected testimonies from alleged victims that he had tried to control people by making them wear the same clothing or lose weight, or that he discouraged them from maintaining friendships.
Asked if he tried to start a cult, Brain said he did not, adding that those involved were 'completely anti-cult'.
Jurors were sent out to start their deliberations by Judge Freya Newbery on Tuesday just after 12.30pm.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New trial ordered for Windsor man sentenced to life in prison for second-degree murder
The Court of Appeal of Ontario has ordered a new trial for a Windsor man serving a life sentence for second-degree murder. The panel of three Ontario Court of Appeal judges all agreed Justice Renee Pomerance made errors during the jury trial of John Wayne Pierre in September 2018. He was charged in 2016 in the death of Lesley Watterworth, who was his girlfriend at the time. The Crown argued that Pierre killed Watterworth in a fit of rage motivated by the fact that he recently found out she had a sexual relationship with another man. But his defence lawyer said her death amounted to manslaughter, not murder. While taking the stand in his own defence, Pierre testified in 2018 that the two began arguing after taking drugs. "I grabbed the knife off the stove and I started stabbing her," Pierre said in court. Medical professionals testified that Pierre's brain didn't function properly neurologically and that he had disorders related to stress, trauma and depression. Jury was not 'accurately' instructed, appeals court finds The panel of appeal court judges said the jury "was not accurately and sufficiently instructed" when it came to what's known as after-the-fact evidence — information brought up during trial about Pierre after Watterworth's death. The appeals court identified the Windsor justice misdirected the jury twice in her instructions prior to deliberations and did not provide a "limiting instruction" of the charge. The jury "was left unequipped with an accurate understanding of the law and the evidence," said Justice David Paciocco, the appeal court judge who authored the decision. Pierre's conviction has been set aside and the panel of judges has ordered a retrial.
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
High-speed driver busted by police after dangerous chase through London
A high-speed police pursuit through London has been captured on camera after a car was spotted travelling at double the speed limit and the wrong side of a carriageway. The Metropolitan Police has released footage of the police chase which shows officers following the vehicle through the streets of London as the car travels at dangerous speeds on the wrong side of various roads. The police manage to bring the car to a stop by driving up against the vehicle in a tactical move. The force confirmed a driver had been arrested and drugs, cash and phones were also seized. A force spokesman said: "Decisive police action is helping to remove drugs and dangerous drivers from London's streets."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
VAR might rule on yellow cards in future
The scope of the video assistant referee in the Premier League might be expanded in the future to include decisions on yellow cards and the awarding of corners, says Howard Webb. Referees' chief Webb says the game's law-makers, the International Football Association Board (Ifab), is reviewing how VAR operates and he is "open to discussions" about other uses. VAR, which has operated in the Premier League since the 2019-20 season, can currently only intervene in what are perceived as match-changing decisions - goals, straight red cards, penalties and mistaken identity. "There will definitely be discussions around possible extensions," Webb told BBC Sport. "Some believe we should use VAR more extensively for certain situations, but there are others who feel that shouldn't happen. "We try to align VAR delivery with the expectations of those involved in the English game, based on consultation with fans, coaches and players. The message we get is 'less is more' with VAR, and we've done pretty well in aligning our delivery with that expectation. "VAR has been in place for seven years and has pretty much stayed the same. If the game, or the people involved, tell us that greater use would be better for the game, then of course I'd be open - but we need to think carefully about the consequences, the ripple effects. "If you are talking about yellow cards that are delivered incorrectly, which could be impactful on the game, then you also have to think about wrongly not-issued yellow cards." Referee abuse 'worse than ever' Webb believes abuse of referees at all levels of the game is worse than it has ever been and says more support is being provided to support officials. In January, police launched an investigation after Michael Oliver received death threats online. In September, Anthony Taylor was temporarily stood down from officiating after being abused on social media. Taylor and his family were confronted by angry Roma fans in Budapest airport after the Italian side lost to Sevilla in the 2023 Europa League final, with video of the incident posted on social media. "People have a bigger platform than ever to voice opinions, but some of how that opinion is voiced is unacceptable," said Webb. "We saw examples with our officials last season. It happens with players and other participants in the game as well. It's a little bit of a reflection of society today - people express strong opinions, which is normal, and the game naturally creates split opinions in the grey zone. "But disagreement with an outcome doesn't give a license to abuse officials on certain platforms, including threats to the safety of officials and their families. That is wholly unacceptable. "We provide good support for officials, including psychological support, mental health and well-being. Support extends to their families, too." Webb says the introduction of VAR has increased scrutiny on officials' decision-making and can create perceptions of conspiracy of bias, though he says such perceptions are "wholly unjustifiable". He said: "Previously, referees made judgments in the moment based on what they saw. Now, VAR reviews decisions with more time and different angles. But that doesn't change the fact that some decisions remain grey. "If you think a penalty decision is wrong, you expect VAR to get involved. But if it's 50/50, half will think the original decision was right, and if VAR overturns it, those people will be disappointed. "The skill for us is recognising when a situation is truly grey and conversely when there is a truly clear one. But don't expect to agree with the final outcome every time." Coote unlikely to return to top-level refereeing Webb says it would be "tough" for David Coote to return to top-level refereeing after he was sacked for misconduct last year. Coote was dismissed by referees' body Professional Game Match Officials Limited (PGMOL) in December 2024 after a video emerged online of him making derogatory remarks about Liverpool and then manager Jurgen Klopp. On Tuesday, the Football Association (FA) issued an eight-week suspension and ordered Coote to have mandatory face-to-face education about the incident. "Under the circumstances, it's difficult [for him to return]," said Webb. "We stay in contact and care about him, but it would be tough." The 42-year-old has also been banned by Uefa for a separate video showing him sniffing a white powder when he was on duty at Euro 2024, which is organised by European football's governing body. "This was one individual who made poor choices outside the game," said Webb. "Our job was to assess the impact his role as an official had on those choices, given the stress officials face. "It was an opportunity to reflect on how we support officials and to address any gaps in external expertise, which we've done recently with new appointments. It doesn't reflect on the wider officiating culture or other officials' work. "David was a former colleague we cared about and wish well for the future, but his choices were individual to him and don't reflect the wider group." Premier League index Premier League table Premier League fixtures Follow your Premier League team and get news, analysis and fan views sent direct to you
