
Textile crisis between India and Bangladesh: Inside a logistical lockdown
By blocking imports of Bangladeshi garments via land, India is indirectly closing off its neighbour's access to its ports and airports, which are essential for its global exports. The decision appears to be a form of diplomatic retaliation.
On May 17, 2025, India announced the suspension of several Bangladeshi imports via its land border posts, including ready-to-wear garments. This sudden measure, reported by The Times of India, had an immediate effect. More than 30 lorries transporting garments were stranded in the neutral zone between Benapole (Bangladesh) and Petrapole (India), with an estimated value of 560,000 euros.
The ban also concerns other products, such as eggs, fish, onions and mustard seeds. However, it is the impact on the textile sector, the backbone of Bangladeshi exports, that is of greatest concern. In 2024, over a third of exports to India passed through these land corridors, before being redirected to ports such as Haldia or Jawaharlal Nehru (Mumbai) for shipment to Europe or the US. A logistical measure with strong political undertones
This decision did not come out of nowhere. It extends a movement that began in April, when New Delhi removed a transhipment facility granted to its neighbour since 2020. Thanks to this bilateral agreement, Bangladeshi exporters could transit via Indian ports and airports to ship their products to third-party markets, without entering the Indian market or passing through local customs.
This logistical facility, which is strategic for Bangladesh, served several objectives. It relieved the overloaded port of Chittagong, shortened shipping times to Western markets, and offered a competitive alternative to sometimes-failing local infrastructure. The textile sector, which accounts for over 80 percent of Bangladeshi exports, was the main beneficiary.
New Delhi justifies its about-face for technical reasons. These include the overloading of its own infrastructure, prioritisation of Indian exporters, and the need for better 'customs clarity', according to a notice published by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC). However, many analysts see it as a disguised political move. Pressure on Dhaka and strategic repositioning
Behind this technical decision lies a logic of power. Bangladesh is currently governed by an interim authority led by the economist Muhammad Yunus. In an institutional context marked by political fragility and internal tensions, New Delhi seems to be taking advantage of the situation to assert its regional influence. This imbalance reinforces its diplomatic room for manoeuvre, as bilateral relations have become strained in recent months, particularly around infrastructure projects supported by Beijing in Bangladesh.
The land ban acts as an indirect lock. Officially, India has not closed its ports to Bangladesh. However, by blocking the land transport of cargo to these infrastructures, it makes access almost impossible. Without another rapid logistical solution, Bangladeshi companies are forced to reorganise their entire export chain. A blow to the Bangladeshi textile industry
For textile manufacturers in Bangladesh, the situation is critical. Sea freight via national ports (Chittagong or Mongla) is slower, more expensive, and often congested. Direct air freight to Europe or North America, meanwhile, is economically inaccessible for most small to medium-sized enterprises in the sector.
'This decision risks causing delivery delays, contract breaches and a loss of international competitiveness,' warned a representative of the Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association (BGMEA), quoted by The Economic Times. The consequences could also be felt by Western brands, customers of Bangladesh, particularly in fast-moving segments or e-commerce deliveries. In India, industrialists are divided
On the Indian side, the measure has been met with mixed reactions. While some textile manufacturers welcome the reduction in low-cost foreign competition, distributors and retail chains are concerned. Bangladesh remains a major supplier of entry-level clothing, popular with Indian consumers with low purchasing power. In the event of shortages, prices could soar for certain items.
'In the short term, local producers will benefit. However, in the medium term, this risks creating an imbalance in the domestic market,' admitted an executive at the Apparel Export Promotion Council (AEPC), also quoted by The Economic Times. A step backwards on regional integration?
This logistical disruption also raises the question of the future of regional cooperation. Since 2010, India and Bangladesh have increased trade facilitation agreements, driven by a vision of South Asian economic integration. The unilateral suspension of these facilities, without notice, risks eroding mutual trust.
The Bangladeshi authorities have expressed their 'serious concern' and have begun discussions with New Delhi. However, the prospects for recovery seem slim in the immediate future. Especially as alternatives are limited. Routes through China or Myanmar are politically and logistically riskier, while Sri Lankan ports remain poorly connected to the Bangladeshi land network. A crisis with global side effects?
As the global textile industry remains fragile, in a context of cost inflation and time pressure, this decision could have repercussions far beyond South Asia. European and North American brands, dependent on Bangladeshi factories, could experience delays in the autumn/winter 2025 collections, or even revise their sourcing strategy if instability persists.
In the long term, the suspension of land transit by India could mark a turning point. It highlights the fragility of international logistics chains in the face of geopolitical decisions, but also the need for exporting countries such as Bangladesh to strengthen their port autonomy and trade resilience. This article was translated to English using an AI tool.
FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@fashionunited.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
India's HDB Financial gets market regulator nod for IPO
MUMBAI/BENGALURU, June 3 (Reuters) - India's markets regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), has approved the initial public offering (IPO) of HDB Financial Services, marking the HDFC group's first public float in seven years. According to a document published on the SEBI website on Tuesday, the regulator issued observations on the public listing, allowing the company to proceed with its IPO, a source with direct knowledge of the matter said. SEBI and HDFC Bank ( opens new tab did not immediately respond to a Reuters request for comment. In October, HDB Financial filed for an IPO of up to 125 billion rupees ($1.5 billion). HDFC Bank, which holds a 94.3% stake in the lender, will sell shares worth up to 100 billion rupees, while fresh shares worth up to 25 billion rupees will be issued. HDB Financial's listing follows new norms introduced by the country's central bank in 2022 that require large non-banking financial companies to be listed on stock exchanges by September 2025. For the quarter ended March 31, HDB Financial Services posted a profit of 5.3 billion rupees, while its net revenue came in at 26.2 billion rupees. The company's total loan book was 1.07 trillion rupees as of March-end. ($1 = 85.6540 Indian rupees)


Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Indian restaurant shut down by court order for 'smelling like curry'
The restaurant has been operating for more than 20 years and had tried to do something about the smell A popular curry house has been forced to close after two decades in business following complaints about it smelling of curry. Cinnamons Restaurant in Wheatley, Oxfordshire, had been operating for over 20 years when a complaint was made to South Oxfordshire District Council about the "curry odours" emanating from the restaurant in 2021. After environmental health officers visited and upheld the complaint, the Bangladeshi restaurant said they spent around £35,000 for a new extractor fan to combat the odour. However, another complaint was made and the curry house was served an abatement notice, which deemed Cinnamons' new ventilation system to be defective. Unable to afford the installation cost of a new system, which the restaurant claimed to be in the region of £50,000, Cinnamons was taken to court and forced to pay a £25,000 fine after pleading guilty in October 2024. Despite the funds spent, the council issued a further abatement notice and in May this year, Cinnamons announced that it could not afford the demands and would close in mid-June, making 10 people unemployed. South Oxfordshire District Council said they have no option but to prosecute "if measures are not introduced to solve the issue and abatement notices are breached" and that Cinnamons "admitted that they could have done more to mitigate the odour". Restaurateur Shirazul Hoque, 32, told PA Real Life: "The village wants the restaurant to stay, otherwise we would have closed before paying the £25,000 fine. "It's really hard for us and feels absolutely wrong as we love our village... it is hurtful to have our cuisine, which is loved, described as producing obnoxious odours that stink." All our employees have families and the chefs who live above the restaurant will be made homeless – it's a big punch in the gut." Cinnamons Restaurant has been operating in Wheatley, Oxfordshire, since 2000. Shirazul's uncles took over the business in 2012, and they have been serving Bangladeshi and Indian food there ever since. Many TripAdvisor reviews describe the restaurant as an important part of the community. "We are so lucky to have this restaurant in our village," one review reads. In 2021, the restaurant won the TripAdvisor Travellers' Choice award, which is given to businesses that consistently earn great reviews from travellers and are ranked within the top 10% in their field on TripAdvisor. That same year, an odour complaint was made to South Oxfordshire District Council against the restaurant. An officer from the Environmental Health Agency upheld the complaint. After over two decades of service, Shirazul claimed Cinnamons had never received such a complaint but as a result installed a roughly £35,000 ventilation system as demanded. "We wanted to resolve it because we've been here for 20 years, we love our village and we wanted to do something about it," Shirazul said. A higher specification ventilation model was suggested by a consultant, but the restaurant felt they could not afford the installation cost, estimated to be roughly £50,000, nor the maintenance cost. Despite the expensive work carried out by a reputable company with over 30 years of experience, Shirazul said, another complaint was lodged with the council. The Environmental Protection Team was sent to the restaurant and the odour was deemed to be unacceptable, and their ventilator defective. Cinnamons were then asked to rectify the ventilation system. "We weren't able to afford it," Shirazul said. "To be honest, business had not rebounded post-Covid, we'd not been making any profit so we didn't have the money for this." Since no action was taken, the restaurant was issued with an abatement notice and taken to court. Cinnamons pleaded guilty and accepted a £25,000 fine in October 2024. The issue of ventilation was still deemed unsolved however which left the restaurant facing a further expense estimated by Shirazul to be in the region of £50,000. On Monday May 19, Cinnamons realised they were unable to continue fighting the battle, telling their 10 employees they were without a job. "It's very hard to share this story because I've spent a lot of my time in the business," Shirazul said. Asked what other restaurants can learn from his situation, Shirazul said: "Do due diligence in seeing how the council environmental health officers operate and learn the appeal process." He also says that on Sunday June 15, their last day of trading, the restaurant will be giving out free meals to anyone who comes through. "It's a gesture of thanks for all the support we've received through the difficulties of the last few years," he said. "It's a way of saying thank you for standing by us." South Oxfordshire District Council said in a statement: "The council has a legal duty to investigate nuisance complaints about smells from industrial, trade and business premises that could be a statutory nuisance. We always aim to advise and support businesses on how they can resolve issues. However, if measures are not introduced to solve the issue and abatement notices are breached, we have no option but to prosecute. "In the case of Cinnamons Restaurant in Wheatley, the Council's Environmental Protection Team has assessed the odour complaint following our procedures and legislation. An extensive investigation at this site determined a statutory nuisance existed in relation to the kitchen's ventilation systems. "Cinnamons Cuisine Limited, who run the restaurant, has since failed to follow our recommendations and has breached an environmental abatement notice on several occasions between October 2023 and April 2024. Cinnamons pleaded guilty to four charges ahead of a scheduled three-day court appearance on Wednesday 2 October 2024. "The District Judge at Oxford Magistrates' Court reviewed the evidence and statements provided by council officers and the company, and taking into consideration the revised guilty plea, the judge ordered that the company pay a total of £25,000 – this includes an £11,000 fine, an award of full costs of £12,000 to South Oxfordshire District Council, alongside a victim surcharge of £2,000. "As well as pleading guilty to the charges of statutory nuisance laid against them, Cinnamons admitted that they could have done more to mitigate the odour. The council can advise and assist where we can, but ultimately responsibility for fixing the problem sits with the business. "The business has been provided advice and guidance on steps they can take but to date have failed to follow our recommendations. "Cinnamons is still the subject of an ongoing legal case, and we will therefore not be in a position to comment any further on this case other than the information provided in the statement above."


NBC News
4 hours ago
- NBC News
Putin's demands to Ukraine underscore a position the West has always suspected: no compromise
Its publication also suggests that Western intelligence agencies are correct in their belief that Putin is not interested in compromise. The memorandum codifies what Putin has been saying all along — that the 'root causes' of the war are NATO's eastward expansion and fomenting Nazism in Ukraine. The memorandum is 'aimed at getting rid of the root causes of this conflict,' Putin's spokesman Dmitry Peskov told journalists Tuesday. 'It would be wrong to expect some immediate decisions and a breakthrough here,' he said, adding that 'we await the reaction to the memorandum' from Ukraine. Ukraine and its Western supporters say Russian claims of Nazism are absurd, particularly when the country is governed by Zelenskyy, who is Jewish. NATO and its backers contend that the alliance has only grown because former Soviet republics, such as Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, have voted to join in the hope of gaining protection from Russia. Not only is Ukraine unlikely to accept Russia's absolutist terms, scholars previously interviewed by NBC News believe that Russia knows they won't. Many see the peace talks as a charade that both sides know will fail, only prolonged to avoid the ire and impatience of President Donald Trump. Former-Russian President Dmitry Medvedev — always a hawkish voice — was unabashed in how he views these discussions at the lavish Ottoman-era Çırağan Palace. 'The negotiations in Istanbul are not needed for a compromise peace on unrealistic conditions invented by someone else,' Medvedev, now deputy chairman of Russia's Security Council wrote on the messaging app Telegram. Rather, he said the aim was 'quick victory and the complete destruction of the neo-Nazi government.' He said this goal was 'the point of the Russian memorandum, which was published yesterday.' All the while Russia, unlike Ukraine's attacks on military targets, continues to bombard Ukrainian civilians. On Tuesday it 'brutally attacked' the embattled city of Sumy, Zelenskyy said, killing at least three people and injuring 'many' more. With both sides still diametrically opposed, Trump's next move could prove pivotal. Having once promised to end the war in 24 hours, he has become so frustrated with the intractable reality that he has threatened to walk away. There are hopes of another Russian-American prisoner swap and even a meeting between the two presidents. And when the memorandum inevitably comes across Trump's desk, and he is asked about it during one of his question-and-answer sessions in the Oval Office, the president could react in several different ways, according to Nixey, the Russia expert in London. 'Either he will say, 'Yes, but look at what the Ukrainians have done to Russia, so this memorandum is unsurprising,' Nixey said. 'Or he will say, 'Putin is not playing ball. This hasn't turned out like I thought it would. I'm washing my hands of the whole thing.'