Revealed: This is how many Irish pubs closed in the last 20 years
The research found that from 2005 to 2024, the number of publican licenses went from 8,617 to 6,498, with over 2,100 pubs having closed in total.
DIGI has predicted up to 1,000 pubs to potentially close in the next 10 years.
'We are likely to see a further 600 to 1,000 pubs close over the coming decade,' said the report's author, Professor Foley.
'The addition of profound economic uncertainty through US trade tariffs and reduced levels of inbound tourism further threatens the financial foundations of family-owned pubs across the country.'
The report, along with Economist and Associate Professor Emeritus at DCU, Anthony Foley, has found that an average of 112 pubs have stopped trading each year.
The largest rate of closure was in rural countries, with the highest decreases at 37.2% in Co. Limerick, followed by 34.1% in Co. Offaly and 32.7% in Co. Cork.
Limerick has experienced pub numbers dropping from 478 to 300 since 2005.
The lowest decrease was in Co. Dublin at 1.7%, followed by 9.5% in Co. Meath and 10.8% in Co. Wicklow.
DIGI secretary Donall O'Keefe has called on the government to cut excise duty by 10% in the upcoming budget, stating that the Irish consumption of alcohol has fallen to average EU levels, meaning there is no justification for the high rate.
'With Irish consumption of alcohol having fallen to average EU levels, and likely to continue dropping, it is no longer justifiable that pubs should be faced with the second-highest excise rates in Europe,' he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Post
17 minutes ago
- Business Post
Darkening economic outlook clouds investors' view of AIB and Bank of Ireland
Business Post subscribers can read: • The specific issues driving the decline in the pillar banks' share prices • How the dip today compares with the decline recorded after Liberation Day • What banking experts have to say about the share price movement The drop in the share price of AIB and Bank of Ireland is based 'entirely off Irish sentiment' and our economy's dependence on foreign direct ...
Irish Examiner
3 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Return to office: a power grab masquerading as policy
Let's stop pretending return-to-office mandates are about collaboration. They're not about team culture or innovation. They're about control. Executives who built their power on parking passes, proximity, and title inflation are demanding a return to rituals that reinforce their relevance. The corner office means little when the top-performing team member is working from Kerry or Kraków. What we're witnessing isn't a strategy, it's a cultural counterattack from a generation that feels left behind. Productivity was never the issue. Microsoft, Meta, and other high-output firms have reported better retention and performance under hybrid models, while companies like Amazon and Google slashed thousands of jobs even as they pushed people back into buildings. In January 2025, Amazon targeted 14,000 managerial positions for elimination shortly after its RTO policy rollout. Meanwhile, leaders cited 'culture restoration' while morale tanked and attrition soared. When the people still getting results from home are the same ones being told to 'show commitment', the message becomes clear: it's not about performance. It's about presence and who gets to enforce it. Returning to the office is costly and the bill isn't paid by the executives. Workers who moved to affordable areas during lockdowns now face long commutes, higher fuel costs, and childcare disruptions just to sit in open-plan silence and take Zoom calls they could've done from home. Dublin rents are among the highest in Europe, with some counties reporting fewer than 50 affordable HAP units in total. The Simon Community's 2025 housing snapshot showed systemic undersupply across key Irish cities. For workers, the message is: subsidise the real estate contracts your employer signed in 2017 or risk being labeled 'non-collaborative.' That's not strategy. That's displacement policy in corporate packaging. At the same time, surveillance is spreading under the guise of productivity. From keystroke tracking to badge swipe audits, companies now monitor everything from meeting engagement to emotional tone. Axios and AI Now have detailed how AI-driven oversight tools are reshaping the workplace into a lab experiment with dashboards. Employees are told to bring their 'authentic selves' to work—but only if that self is camera-ready, always-on, and smiling for the engagement score. Trust has been replaced by telemetry. And the ones most exhausted by it are the ones being asked to prove themselves daily just by showing up. This isn't just about friction. It's about legacy leadership colliding with a workforce raised on outcomes, not optics. Gen Z and millennial workers don't equate facetime with effectiveness. They've grown up building in distributed environments where deliverables not desk hours are what matter. And while IT departments are designing global infrastructure for asynchronous, cross-time-zone work, executives are still measuring productivity by who's in the lift before 9am. That's not a policy gap, it's a values gap. People aren't quitting because they're disengaged. They're leaving because they've been gaslit into believing their best work only counts if it's performed under fluorescent lighting. The smartest workers are already spreadsheeting their exits, scanning visa options like Canada's Express Entry, Portugal's D7, or the Netherlands' highly skilled migrant programs. They're not running: they're reallocating. Because they've realised something leadership hasn't: proximity is not proof of commitment. And no one's commuting two hours a day to prove they can be trusted to do what they've already done for years. If your ability to manage depends on watching people sit at desks, you're not managing. You're supervising. And supervision is no longer worth the petrol. Not when real work happens in GitHub commits, Airtable dashboards, async feedback loops, and global collaboration channels that never needed a badge scan to begin with. The office didn't die. It just lost its monopoly. And workers aren't coming back to rebuild what's already been replaced. This isn't culture. It's regression. It's a last-ditch attempt to recentralize power in a workforce that's already outgrown it. And as teams quietly update their LinkedIn profiles and explore contracts in cities they've never visited, it's clear who's adapting and who's clinging to an era that no longer fits the work. Trust is the new currency. And those who don't invest in it are about to find out just how expensive nostalgia really is.
Irish Independent
3 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Over 4,400 Wexford farms could be affected under CAP proposed changes
'This isn't the way forward. CAP has long been the cornerstone of Irish agriculture. Faced with growing challenges like farm succession and food security, we must protect the CAP and our farming communities to prevent the decline of Irish farming.' This comes from a draft proposal at the European Commission with plans to merge CAP with EU cohesion, migration and infrastructure funding from 2028. This would mean CAP would no longer be standalone funded. 'The changes the EU is considering for the CAP payments could be disastrous for farming communities across Ireland, not least here in Wicklow–Wexford. The EU's budget operates in seven-year cycles, with the current one running from 2021 to 2027. 'Such a move would have far-reaching consequences for nine million farmers across 27 EU countries' Deputy Ó Súilleabháin said. He further said CAP plays a vital role in stabilising food prices, and was introduced to help keep food at an affordable price. 'Dairy farmers warn these proposals could trigger immediate inflation in food costs - at a time when the cost of living in Ireland is already soaring' Fionntán added. Deputy Ó Súilleabháin highlighted that 4,437 farms in Wexford could be affected under the proposed changes. 'Older farmers could lose their CAP payments when they start drawing their pensions, forcing them to choose between their pension and the farm if it hasn't yet been handed down to family' he said. He said that part-time farmers that rely on off-farm employment would also see their CAP support disappear. 'No one should be forced to make such choices. 'We support retaining the two-pillar CAP system, alongside reforms that guarantee a fairer deal for family farmers and halt the ongoing erosion of CAP funding' he said.
