Allan government holding $400m from Growth Areas Infrastructure Contribution
Landowners and developers in the city's booming growth areas have coughed up more than $1.4 billion to fund desperately needed local infrastructure.
But the state government is banking more than $230 million, despite pleas from councils to fund key projects.
Melbourne's west is handing over almost as much as the north and south corridors combined but being snubbed on hundreds of millions of dollars worth of projects.
The levy – known as the Growth Areas Infrastructure Contribution – has been collected by councils from developers of new housing estates since 2010 to help fund local schools, services and recreational spaces.
It is then pooled by the state government who decides when and where it is allocated across seven areas, including Melton, Mitchell and Casey.
Despite desperate calls for funding to fix crumbling roads, new sporting fields and public transport services, figures showed just 72.4 per cent had been committed to projects as of March — leaving a $396 million gap.
Top contributor, Melton, had only had 51.2 per cent of the funds it had raised committed to local projects, according to the data — the lowest commitment rate.
Northern Melbourne – Mitchell, Hume and Whittlesea – were also being short changed, raising $130 million more than what had been committed to local projects.
Melbourne's southeast – Casey and Cardinia – are punching above their weight, with almost all of the funds collected flowing back to local projects.
A government spokesman claimed the publicly available figures were outdated and that the gap had decreased from $396 million to $234 million, with a total of $1.2 billion committed.
However, he refused to provide the data.
The most recent projects funded under GAIC have been the $60 million spent on the Ison Road Overpass in Werribee, $35 million towards a new school in Cobblebank, and more than $150 million for new bus services across Melbourne.
Property Council of Australia Victorian executive director Cath Evans said communities in Melbourne's west were waiting too long to see the benefits of GAIC funding.
'The purpose of the levy is to deliver timely infrastructure to support population growth — but delays in spending mean families are moving into new suburbs without the roads, schools and health facilities they urgently need,' she said.
City of Melton Mayor Steve Abboushi called on the state government to commit to a 'guaranteed percentage of funding and associated transparency' to help fund pools, libraries and active transport.
He urged the government to match a $15 million Commonwealth commitment to the new Plumpton Aquatic and Leisure Centre.
'As one of the fastest growing areas in Australia, we need urgent investment in transport infrastructure including additional train stations, bus services, and investment in associated infrastructure in public transport such as carparking,' he said.
Wingate Director of Research Andrew Perkins said while the intent behind GAIC was strong, delivery needed to 'keep pace' with growth to ensure communities get the infrastructure they need when they need it.
Opposition planning infrastructure spokesman Richard Riordan said greenfield developers were 'beyond frustrated' as he accused government of stockpiling the funds to help offset the budget.
It comes as furious Point Cook residents lashed Wyndham Council after they decided to spend $24 million in separate developer contributions in other parts of the LGA.
Point Cook resident Dwayne Kelly, who started a petition, said the decision had caused an 'uproar among Point Cook residents' who had been calling for new sporting facilities.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


7NEWS
2 hours ago
- 7NEWS
Mercedes-Benz EVs discounted by up to almost $70,000
It's no secret Mercedes-Benz's family of Electric Vehicle Architecture-based models – the EQE, EQE SUV, EQS and EQS SUV – have failed to fire. Now, Mercedes-Benz is offering huge discounts across the range of curvaceous large and extra-large sedans and SUVs with savings of between $23,814 and $69,839 based on a Victorian postcode. The company has over 100 new vehicles listed in stock across these four model lines on its website, and a look at in-stock vehicles reveals the largest discounts can be had on the Mercedes-AMG EQE53 sedan and Mercedes-Benz EQS450 limousine. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new Mercedes-Benz. Click here to get a great deal. The smallest discounts are actually on the most expensive member of this EVA-based lineup, the Mercedes-Maybach EQS680. Here's a breakdown of what's currently on offer, as of the morning of August 13, with pricing based on a private buyer with a Victorian postcode. EQE300 SUV 12 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $106,501 to $106,804 Savings of $24,735 to $27,956 EQE300 sedan 1 vehicle in stock Drive-away price of $106,409 Saving of $23,814 EQE350 SUV 2 vehicles in stock Drive-away price of $107,246 Saving of $32,623 AMG EQE53 SUV 37 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $123,417 to $136,825 Savings of $52,912 to $56,828 AMG EQE53 4 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $134,551 to $142,239 Savings of $66,677 to $69,839 EQS450 3 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $128,719 to $133,893 Savings of $64,278 to $66,405 EQS450 SUV 36 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $126,927 to $140,128 Savings of $53,405 to $57,970 Maybach EQS680 12 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $333,457 to $419,211 Savings of $8786 to $9273 Of this quartet, the EQE SUV is by far the most popular. Mercedes-Benz has delivered 594 this year to the end of July, up 5.7 per cent on the same period last year. It's followed by the EQE (90, down 13.5 per cent), the EQS SUV (22, down 72.2 per cent) and the EQS (2, down 66.7 per cent). Mercedes-Benz removed the ability to configure a new EQE and EQS from its website last year, and while the model pages for these vehicles are still active, they stopped appearing in the vehicle range menu in March – something which the company has blamed on a technical issue. Now, the EQE SUV and EQS SUV can no longer be configured via the website. The EQE and EQS entered production in 2021, with their SUV counterparts following in 2022. All received styling dramatically different from equivalent combustion-powered Mercedes-Benz models, with more curvaceous – some would say blobby – styling. Responding to criticism, Mercedes-Benz gave the EQS a facelift in Europe, bringing a more conventional grille, but this has yet to be confirmed for our market. Earlier this year, Mercedes-Benz paused deliveries of all EVA-based models in the US due to slow sales. The German automaker has said it's moving to a 'coherent design language' across its portfolio, and is also ditching separate EQ nameplates.


Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Mercedes-Benz EVs discounted by up to almost $70,000
It's no secret Mercedes-Benz's family of Electric Vehicle Architecture-based models – the EQE, EQE SUV, EQS and EQS SUV – have failed to fire. Now, Mercedes-Benz is offering huge discounts across the range of curvaceous large and extra-large sedans and SUVs with savings of between $23,814 and $69,839 based on a Victorian postcode. The company has over 100 new vehicles listed in stock across these four model lines on its website, and a look at in-stock vehicles reveals the largest discounts can be had on the Mercedes-AMG EQE53 sedan and Mercedes-Benz EQS450 limousine. CarExpert can save you thousands on a new Mercedes-Benz. Click here to get a great deal. Supplied Credit: CarExpert The smallest discounts are actually on the most expensive member of this EVA-based lineup, the Mercedes-Maybach EQS680. Here's a breakdown of what's currently on offer, as of the morning of August 13, with pricing based on a private buyer with a Victorian postcode. EQE300 SUV 12 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $106,501 to $106,804 Savings of $24,735 to $27,956 EQE300 sedan 1 vehicle in stock Drive-away price of $106,409 Saving of $23,814 EQE350 SUV 2 vehicles in stock Drive-away price of $107,246 Saving of $32,623 Supplied Credit: CarExpert AMG EQE53 SUV 37 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $123,417 to $136,825 Savings of $52,912 to $56,828 AMG EQE53 4 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $134,551 to $142,239 Savings of $66,677 to $69,839 EQS450 3 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $128,719 to $133,893 Savings of $64,278 to $66,405 Supplied Credit: CarExpert EQS450 SUV 36 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $126,927 to $140,128 Savings of $53,405 to $57,970 Maybach EQS680 12 vehicles in stock Drive-away prices of $333,457 to $419,211 Savings of $8786 to $9273 Of this quartet, the EQE SUV is by far the most popular. Mercedes-Benz has delivered 594 this year to the end of July, up 5.7 per cent on the same period last year. It's followed by the EQE (90, down 13.5 per cent), the EQS SUV (22, down 72.2 per cent) and the EQS (2, down 66.7 per cent). Mercedes-Benz removed the ability to configure a new EQE and EQS from its website last year, and while the model pages for these vehicles are still active, they stopped appearing in the vehicle range menu in March – something which the company has blamed on a technical issue. Supplied Credit: CarExpert Now, the EQE SUV and EQS SUV can no longer be configured via the website. The EQE and EQS entered production in 2021, with their SUV counterparts following in 2022. All received styling dramatically different from equivalent combustion-powered Mercedes-Benz models, with more curvaceous – some would say blobby – styling. Responding to criticism, Mercedes-Benz gave the EQS a facelift in Europe, bringing a more conventional grille, but this has yet to be confirmed for our market. Earlier this year, Mercedes-Benz paused deliveries of all EVA-based models in the US due to slow sales. The German automaker has said it's moving to a 'coherent design language' across its portfolio, and is also ditching separate EQ nameplates. MORE: Everything Mercedes-Benz MORE: Everything Mercedes-AMG MORE: Everything Mercedes-Maybach

Sky News AU
3 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Simply can't do it': Allan government's proposed work form home law branded ‘political stunt' it does not have power to implement
The Allan government has been accused of attempting to con voters with a new work from home law it does not have the power to implement. Premier Jacinta Allan has announced plans to make the ability to work from home two days per week a legal right, with the legislation to be introduced ahead of the 2026 Victorian election. However, Australian Industry Group CEO Inness Willox branded the move a 'political stunt' designed to capitalise on the pro-work from home sentiments which helped deliver Labor its landslide election victory at the May federal election. "It's hard not to think that the eyes are firmly on November 2026 with the Victorian Government here and they're trying to basically suck people in,' he said. 'It isn't a serious exercise at all. It's a little bit of snake oil peddling by the Premier and her cabinet. They're offering a pipe dream to what they hope are gullible people... (who will think) they will be able to work from home two days a week." While Labor is yet to reveal the precise details of its proposal, the Victorian government is reportedly planning to implement its plan using the state's Equal Opportunity Act. According to Mr Willox, though, the Victorian government does not have the legal power to implement its proposal. 'The Victorian Government has no legal right to meddle in this. They have no authority to order private sector workers back to work. They just simply can't do it,' he said. 'Victoria ceded their powers and responsibilities to the Commonwealth in 1995 when it comes to workplace relations, so they've got nowhere to go here.' The Australian Industry Group CEO said work from home arrangements were routinely worked out between businesses and their workforces and there was no need for the government's proposal. 'Different workplaces have different arrangements depending on the needs of the business and that's what the Fair Work Commission works on by the federal law. That's what business is doing, that's what employees are doing," he said. 'This is a solution in search of a problem.' Mr Willox also claimed if the government were able to implement its proposal it would have 'enormous' consequences for Victorian workers and the Victorian economy, with businesses likely to move their operations to other states. 'Victoria is already the highest taxing state for business, it's the worst compliance state for business and what this sends out is a message that Victoria is not open for business, that it's closed for business,' he said. 'It's the last thing the state needs. It's the last thing the country needs.' Citing Reserve Bank Governor Michelle Bullock's warning Australians' living standards were under threat from low productivity growth, Mr Willox said ideas like the Allan government's work from home proposal would make things worse. 'If this sort of decision goes ahead, things are just going to get worse,' he said. 'We're going to be talking about declining living standards, not about improving things. It's a huge risk here for the national economy, but particularly for Victoria. It's a bit of a sham and a shambles, quite frankly.'