HP owed over $940 million by Mike Lynch's estate, ex-business partner, UK court rules
HP was seeking to recoup its losses from Lynch – who died last year when his luxury yacht sank off Sicily – and Autonomy's former chief financial officer, Sushovan Hussain.
The U.S. technology giant sued Lynch and Hussain accusing them of masterminding an elaborate fraud to inflate the value of Autonomy, which HP bought for $11.1 billion in 2011 before the deal spectacularly unravelled.
HP wrote down Autonomy's value by $8.8 billion within a year and brought a $5 billion lawsuit against Lynch and Hussain in London, with a judge ruling in HP's favour in 2022.
Lynch, once hailed as Britain's answer to Bill Gates, had always maintained his innocence and blamed HP for failing to integrate Autonomy into the company.
He was acquitted of criminal charges over the deal in the U.S. and had intended to appeal the High Court's 2022 ruling, a process which was on hold pending Tuesday's decision on damages.
Judge Robert Hildyard ruled HP sustained losses of over 646 million pounds ($871.8 million) in relation to the difference between what HP paid for Autonomy and what HP would have paid "had Autonomy's true financial position been correctly presented".
Hilyard also said HP was entitled to another 51.7 million pounds in relation to "personal claims for deceit and/or misrepresentation against Dr Lynch and Mr Hussain", plus another $47.5 million in relation to losses suffered by group companies.
HP said at a hearing last year that it was seeking up to $4 billion. Hussain settled with HP earlier this year.
($1 = 0.7412 pounds)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Wiegman echoes Southgate as England take back-door route to final
LONDON - An unprecedented third successive major final appearance engineered by a series of extraordinary comebacks and a manager similarly lauded and hammered at the same time - there is a familiar feel about England at the Women's Euros. Tuesday's 2-1 victory over Italy, secured via a last-gasp equaliser in normal time then a winner two minutes from the end of extra time, propelled the defending champions into a final against either Germany, who they beat to lift the title in 2022, or Spain, who they lost to in the World Cup final two years ago. Under the guidance of the extraordinarily successful coach Sarina Wiegman, England have reached an unprecedented level of consistency, yet, far from lauding the Dutchwoman's influence, there is an undercurrent of feeling that they have somehow made it this far this time despite, not because, of her decisions. Wiegman has been steadfast - some say stubborn - in her selection approach during the tournament despite England's starting team often failing to spark. They trailed Sweden 2-0 in the quarter-finals, looking toothless, until finally she turned to the bench and substitute Michelle Agyemang rescued the match, which England eventually won via a crazy 14-shot penalty shootout. After making only one change to the starting lineup - and that perhaps more due to the racist abuse swirling around Jess Carter than her shaky performance - Wiegman watched in her usual motionless style as hot favourites England were outrun and outplayed by Italy for an hour on Tuesday. Eventually she turned to her bench, throwing on strikers Agyemang and Aggie Beever-Jones with five minutes to go, having introduced 2022 hero Chloe Kelly after 77 minutes. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Singapore's domestic recycling rate drops to all-time low of 11% Singapore Sota parent portal taken down for urgent patching following global cyberattack alerts Singapore HDB launches 10,209 BTO and balance flats, as priority scheme for singles kicks in Singapore Five teens arrested for threatening boy with knife, 2 charged with causing hurt Singapore Local buyers are key to recovery of prime district condo market Singapore Ex-Tanjong Pagar United footballer charged with assault after Singapore Premier League match in Feb Singapore COE prices for cars mostly unchanged; premium for commercial vehicles up 2.9% Singapore Cyclist charged after allegedly hitting elderly pedestrian, killing him Agyemang, 19, was the saviour again as she equalised deep into stoppage time and, with a penalty shootout that England would definitely not have wanted after missing four of their seven attempts in the quarter-final, Kelly then won it with two minutes to spare. Wiegman said her overwhelming emotion was relief and praised the quality and energy of her substitutes - which of course begged the question of why she took so long to bring them on. FAMILIAR FEEL It all had a very familiar feel after Gareth Southgate was both lauded and vilified during England men's run to the Euro 2024 final having also reached the 2020 final and the semi-finals of the 2018 World Cup. Southgate was widely criticised for his failure to react to changes made by Italy and Croatia in those earlier defeats, but, like Wiegman, the louder the outside noise, the more he dug his feet in. He reached a nadir in the Euro 2024 last 16 game against Slovakia, when, trailing 1-0 having barely managed a shot on goal all night, he waited until the fourth minute of stoppage time to introduce striker Ivan Toney, before Jude Bellingham eventually equalised and England won in extra-time. It was a similar story in the semi-finals before England won on penalties and in the final he waited until the 70th minute to bring on Cole Palmer, the team's most dangerous player whenever he got on the pitch, who immediately equalised before England eventually lost 2-1. Southgate had turned a desperately poor England team into a brilliantly consistent one, but rather than celebrate that "success", there were plenty of critics ready to claim that his cautiousness robbed the country of the chance of glory. Wiegman already has the Euro 2022 trophy in the cabinet - as well as the 2017 title with the Netherlands - and there are of course many other coaches now watching from home who would give their right arm to be in her place heading into the final. Yet, just as with Southgate and even with her vast experience and glittering CV, should England be trailing again on Sunday, she surely needs to find it in herself to loosen the stays and not rely on another last-minute rescue act. REUTERS
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Apple and Google face more UK antitrust scrutiny over mobile ecosystems
LONDON :Britain's competition regulator said it plans to designate Apple and Google with so-called strategic market status for their role in mobile ecosystems, as it steps up scrutiny of what it has described as their duopoly. The plans announced on Wednesday follows findings by an inquiry group at Britain's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) that a number of markets relating to mobile internet browsers were not working well for consumers or businesses. Apple's Safari and Google's Chrome dominate the mobile browser market on iPhones and Android devices, respectively. A strategic market status (SMS) designation allows the CMA to impose interventions on a firm, such as requiring it to adhere to specific behaviour so as not to undermine fair competition. In Apple and Google's cases, they could be forced to offer more features and give users the option actively to choose their preferred mobile browser, if recommendations from the CMA's inquiry group are accepted. Both Apple and Google pushed back against the CMA's proposals, with Google calling the step "disappointing and unwarranted." "It is ... crucial that any new regulation is evidence-based, proportionate and does not become a roadblock to growth in the UK," Google's senior director for competition, Oliver Bethell, said. Apple said separately it was concerned that the new rules being considered would undermine the privacy and security protections expected by its users.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
Director of commercial market maker involved in price or market rigging conspiracies pleads guilty
SINGAPORE: A sole director of a company providing commercial market making services for securities was involved in four conspiracies to rig the market or price for share or unit counters listed on the Singapore Exchange (SGX). Through his involvement, his company GTC earned S$3.48 million (US$2.72 million) in fees from the market-making services. Huang Yiwen, a 41-year-old Singaporean, pleaded guilty on Wednesday (Jul 23) to 24 charges under the Securities and Futures Act, with another 88 charges to be taken into consideration for sentencing. The court heard that Huang, also known as Leo, was the sole director, shareholder and operator of GTC Group and holds a Masters in Finance from the University of New York. The role of a market maker is to continuously provide both bid and ask quotes for a given security, helping to provide liquidity and reduce volatility in the security. In return, the market maker earns a profit from the bid-ask spread, which is the difference between the market maker's buying and selling price, and may also receive a commission from the issuer of the security. While SGX allows companies to engage market makers to provide liquidity in the market, a market maker is not allowed to do anything to create a false or misleading appearance of active trading. However, when the officers of three listed companies that engaged him asked him to rig the prices of their securities, he did so. Using his expertise, he created a false impression in the prices of the securities. Among other methods, he used the technique of "marking the close", by purchasing small amounts of shares at the close of each trading day, in order to push up the price and secure a favourable closing price for the day. To create a favourable impression of his performance as a market maker and in hopes of attracting genuine market participants to trade, Huang roped in two licensed representatives to cross-trade shares with him to create a false trading volume in five listed entities, without any genuine change in beneficial ownership. The prosecution said he was the mastermind of this conspiracy, giving directions to the two licensed representatives and promising them a profit for their involvement. The four conspiracies involve three schemes for three companies: New Silkroutes Group and Tee International Limited, both companies listed on the SGX, and AGV Group Limited, a company listed on the Catalist board of SGX. Officers from those companies are accused along with Huang. They include: New Silkroutes Group's then-chief executive Goh Jin Hian, 56, who is the son of former prime minister Goh Chok Tong; then-group chief executive of Tee International Phua Chian Kin, 65; and then-CEO of AGV Ang Nam Wah Albert, 58. The fourth conspiracy is a cross-trade scheme involving two other two men approached by Huang: Tay Sze Chien, a 41-year-old trading representative with Philip Securities, and Tan Wei Liang, a 46-year-old trading representative with Maybank Kim Eng Securities. Huang approached the men for help to increase the traded volume of his clients' counters, as the liquidity of the counters was poor. The men could buy shares and units from Huang on the market before selling them back at a higher price, allowing the men to profit from the trades. Deputy Public Prosecutors David Koh and Sheldon Lim said Huang abused his position as a commercial market maker and was motivated by the "significant personal gain he stood to make", as GTC earned more than S$3 million in fees from the companies over the entire period. His actions caused "severe distortion" to the market for the relevant counters, added the prosecutors, who sought about 27 months and six weeks' jail for Huang. He will return to court in August for sentencing.
