Vietnam orders ban on popular messaging app Telegram
A report on the government's news portal on Friday said Vietnam's telecommunications department at the Ministry of Science and Technology sent letters to internet service providers warning that there were 'signs of law violation' on Telegram.
The ministry said internet service providers should 'deploy solutions and measures to prevent Telegram's activities in Vietnam'.
The letter dated May 21 ordered the providers to take measures against Telegram and report back to the ministry by June 2.
Almost 70 percent of 9,600 channels on Telegram in Vietnam contain 'poisonous and bad information', the government said in its report on the app, quoting police. Groups and associations on Telegram, involving tens of thousands of people, had disseminated 'antistate documents' and were involved in 'reactionary activities', the government added.
The government also claimed that some groups on Telegram also used the app to sell users' data, and were involved in drug trafficking or had 'terrorist' links.
Vietnam's hardline administration generally moves swiftly to stamp out dissent and arrest critics, especially those who find an audience on social media.
New rules came into force in Vietnam last year that required platforms such as Facebook and TikTok to verify user identities and hand over data to authorities, in what critics described as the latest attack on freedom of expression in the communist-ruled country.
In a statement to the Reuters news agency, a representative of Telegram said the company was 'surprised' by the Vietnamese government's move.
'We have responded to legal requests from Vietnam on time. The deadline for the response is May 27, and we are processing the request,' the Telegram representative said.
An official at Vietnam's Science and Technology Ministry told the Reuters news agency that the decision followed Telegram's failure to share user data with the government as part of criminal investigations.
Telegram was still available in Vietnam as of Friday.
According to the Data Report website, there were 79.8 million individuals using the internet in Vietnam at the start of 2025, and according to the data extraction company SOAX, there were 11.8 million Telegram users.
With close to one billion users worldwide, Telegram has been involved in controversies across the world related to security and data breach concerns.
Telegram's Russian-born founder and chief executive, Pavel Durov, was detained at a Paris airport and later charged with several counts of failing to curb extremist and 'terrorist' content on the app. He reportedly remains in France and is unable to leave without authorisation from authorities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Russia restricts calls on WhatsApp, Telegram as internet control tightens
Russia has announced restrictions on voice calls made on the WhatsApp and Telegram messaging apps, the latest moves by Moscow to tighten its control over the internet. The curb on calls is set to impact WhatsApp's estimated 96 million monthly users in Russia and Telegram's more than 89 million users, according to Russian media monitoring service Mediascope. In a statement on Wednesday, Russia's media and internet regulator, Roskomnadzor, justified the measure as necessary for fighting crime. 'According to law enforcement agencies and numerous appeals from citizens, foreign messengers Telegram and WhatsApp have become the main voice services used to deceive and extort money, and to involve Russian citizens in sabotage and terrorist activities,' the regulator said. 'Repeated requests to take countermeasures have been ignored by the owners of the messengers,' it said. Moscow wants the online messaging services to provide access to user data upon request from law enforcement. 'Access to calls in foreign messengers will be restored after they start complying with Russian legislation,' Roskomnadzor said. While authorities said only voice calls on the platforms were restricted, users in Russia also reported that video calls were also affected. Since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, Moscow has been expanding control over the Russian part of the internet. Security services have frequently claimed that Ukraine was using Telegram to recruit people or commit acts of sabotage in Russia. The Russian government adopted a law last month punishing online users for searching content deemed illicit by authorities. Plans are also in place for popular messaging services to be replaced by a domestic Russian app called Max, which critics fear will allow authorities access to the data. A WhatsApp spokesperson said in a statement that the encrypted messaging app 'defies government attempts to violate people's right to secure communication, which is why Russia is trying to block it from over 100 million Russian people'. In a statement sent to the AFP news agency, Telegram said that it 'actively combats misuse of its platform, including calls for sabotage or violence, as well as fraud', and removes 'millions of pieces of harmful content every day'. Telegram, which was developed by Russian tech entrepreneur Pavel Durov, faces longstanding accusations in several countries, including Russia, of not doing enough against criminal users.
Qatar Tribune
9 hours ago
- Qatar Tribune
Russia restricts calls via WhatsApp and Telegram
Agencies Russian authorities announced Wednesday they were 'partially' restricting calls in messaging apps Telegram and WhatsApp, the latest step in an effort to tighten control over the internet. In a statement, government media and internet regulator Roskomnadzor justified the measure as necessary for fighting crime, saying that 'according to law enforcement agencies and numerous appeals from citizens, foreign messengers Telegram and WhatsApp have become the main voice services used to deceive and extort money. The regulator also alleged that 'repeated requests to take countermeasures have been ignored by the owners of the messengers.' There was no immediate comment from either platform. Russian authorities have long engaged in a deliberate and multipronged effort to rein in the internet. Over the years, they have adopted restrictive laws and banned websites and platforms that won't comply. Technology has been perfected to monitor and manipulate online traffic. While it's still possible to circumvent restrictions by using virtual private network services, those are routinely blocked, too. Authorities further restricted internet access this summer with widespread shutdowns of cellphone internet connections. Officials have insisted the measure was needed to thwart Ukrainian drone attacks, but experts argued it was another step to tighten internet Digital Development and Communications Ministry said this month that along with internet providers, it was working on a 'white list' of essential websites and services users could access during shutdowns.
Al Jazeera
13 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
President Dina Boluarte signs into law Peru's amnesty bill despite outcry
Peruvian President Dina Boluarte has signed into law a controversial piece of legislation that would shield the military, police and other government-sanctioned forces from prosecution for human rights abuses committed during the country's decades-long internal conflict. On Wednesday, Boluarte held a signing ceremony at the presidential palace in Lima, where she defended the amnesty law as a means of honouring the sacrifices made by government forces. 'This is a historic day for our country,' she said. 'It brings justice and honour to those who stood up to terrorism.' But human rights groups and international observers have condemned the bill as a violation of international law — not to mention a denial of justice for the thousands of survivors who lived through the conflict. From 1980 to 2000, Peru experienced a bloody conflict that pitted government forces against left-wing rebel groups like the Shining Path. Both sides, however, committed massacres, kidnappings and assaults on unarmed civilians, with the death toll from the conflict climbing as high as 70,000 people. Up until present, survivors and family members of the deceased have continued to fight for accountability. An estimated 600 investigations are currently under way, and 156 convictions have been achieved, according to the National Human Rights Coordinator, a coalition of Peruvian human rights organisations. Critics fear those ongoing probes could be scuttled under the wide-ranging protections offered by the new amnesty law, which stands to benefit soldiers, police officers and members of self-defence committees who face legal proceedings for which no final verdict has been rendered. The legislation also offers 'humanitarian' amnesty for those convicted over the age of 70. Peru, however, falls under the jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which ordered the country's government to 'immediately suspend the processing' of the law on July 24. The court ruled against past amnesty laws in Peru. In cases of severe human rights violations, it ruled that there can be no sweeping amnesty nor age limits for prosecution. In 1995, for instance, Peru passed a separate amnesty law that would have prevented the prosecution of security forces for human rights abuses between 1980 and that year. But it was greeted with widespread condemnation, including from United Nations experts, and it was eventually repealed. In the case of the current amnesty law, nine UN experts issued a joint letter in July condemning its passage as a 'clear breach of [Peru's] obligations under international law'. But at Wednesday's signing ceremony, President Boluarte reiterated her position that such international criticism was a violation of her country's sovereignty and that she would not adhere to the Inter-American Court's decision. 'Peru is honouring its defenders and firmly rejecting any internal or external interference,' Boluarte said. 'We cannot allow history to be distorted, for perpetrators to pretend to be victims, and for the true defenders of the homeland to be branded as enemies of the nation they swore to protect.' Peru's armed forces, however, have been implicated in a wide range of human rights abuses. Just last year, 10 soldiers were convicted of carrying out the systematic rape of Indigenous and rural women and girls. Drawing from Peru's Truth and Reconciliation Commission report, the human rights group Amnesty International estimates that the country's armed forces and police were responsible for 37 percent of the deaths and disappearances that happened during the conflict. They were also credited with carrying out 75 percent of the reported instances of torture and 83 percent of sexual violence cases. Francisco Ochoa, a victims' advocate, spoke to Al Jazeera last month about his experiences surviving the 1985 Accomarca massacre as a 14-year-old teenager. He had been in the corn fields preparing to sow seeds when soldiers arrived and rounded up the residents of his small Andean village. Despite having no evidence linking the villagers to rebel groups, the soldiers locked many of them in their huts, fired into the structures and set them ablaze. As many as 62 people were killed, including Ochoa's mother, eight-year-old brother and six-year-old sister. 'The first thing I remember from that day is the smell when we arrived,' Ochoa, now 54, told journalist Claudia Rebaza. 'It smelled like smouldering flesh, and there was no one around.' When asked how he and other survivors felt about the amnesty law, Ochoa responded, 'Outraged and betrayed'.
