logo
#

Latest news with #2018WorldJuniorChampionship

NHL trade buzz: Multiple teams monitoring Carter Hart amid sexual assault trial verdict
NHL trade buzz: Multiple teams monitoring Carter Hart amid sexual assault trial verdict

Time of India

time17-07-2025

  • Sport
  • Time of India

NHL trade buzz: Multiple teams monitoring Carter Hart amid sexual assault trial verdict

Multiple teams monitoring Carter Hart amid sexual assault trial verdict (Credit: Getty Images) Carter Hart hasn't played a game in months, but his name is back in the National Hockey League spotlight for very different reasons. As the legal proceedings tied to the 2018 World Junior Championship case near a conclusion, Hart's future in the NHL is suddenly being revisited by several teams. — NHLRumourReport (@NHLRumourReport) More clubs watching the courtroom than the crease While free agency has come and gone for most, Hart's situation remains unique. Several NHL clubs are reportedly paying close attention to his trial, waiting to see how the proceedings unfold. If the verdict clears him, there's growing belief that interest will spike, quietly but quickly. Not every team is ready to take that leap, but a few are reportedly preparing for the possibility. Oilers step away, but others stay in the loop The Edmonton Oilers were among the first rumored to be considering Hart, as they looked for ways to bolster their goaltending situation. However, that interest has now cooled off. Still, around the league, conversations haven't stopped. Teams like the Detroit Red Wings and others are rumored to be keeping tabs on them. Along with a wait-and-watch approach until the trial concludes. Uncertainty lingers as the decision nears For now, Hart remains unsigned and off the ice. and with his future deeply tied to the outcome of the case, as the conversation around him has shifted from performance to possibility. Will this make teams feel comfortable giving him a second chance if he's cleared? The verdict may answer that question soon. But the decision from NHL clubs could take even longer. As the National Hockey League looks ahead to the upcoming season. Carter Hart's situation serves as a reminder of the complexities that can arise from the intersection of talent, accountability, and public image. His case has created uncertainty, but also presents opportunities for teams willing to weigh both the risks and rewards. Also Read: NHL trade rumors: Flames' Rasmus Andersson linked to potential trade for Stars' $31 million winger in wild proposal Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!

NHL sexual assault trial takes turn as lawyers argue alleged victim lied under oath to get 3.5 million
NHL sexual assault trial takes turn as lawyers argue alleged victim lied under oath to get 3.5 million

Time of India

time11-06-2025

  • Sport
  • Time of India

NHL sexual assault trial takes turn as lawyers argue alleged victim lied under oath to get 3.5 million

A composite image of five photographs show former members of Canada's 2018 World Juniors hockey team, left to right, Alex Formenton, Cal Foote, Michael McLeod, Dillon Dube and Carter Hart as they individually arrived to court in London (Credit: THE CANADIAN PRESS/Nicole Osborne) The 2018 World Junior Championship sexual assault trial has taken a dramatic turn, with defense lawyers delivering strong accusations against the woman who claims she was assaulted by a group of NHL players. During closing statements in a London, Ontario courtroom, lawyers representing former Ottawa Senators forward Alex Formenton said the woman fabricated her account of the night in question and lied under oath. Claim of financial motivation raised by defense One of the most explosive claims during the closing arguments came when the lawyer accused the woman of being driven by money, they told the court that the complainant is seeking 3.5 million dollars in damages. And argued that the pursuit of financial compensation has been a key motivator for her actions throughout the case. According to the defense, the woman's testimony contained critical inconsistencies. That should cast doubt on her entire narrative. They argued she was not too intoxicated to consent and that her decision to leave a bar and return to a hotel room with NHL player Michael McLeod was entirely voluntary. The defense added that her actions were deliberate and consensual and accused her of creating a false narrative to avoid personal shame and salvage a relationship with her then-boyfriend. They claimed that this alleged financial incentive calls into question her entire pursuit of justice, suggesting it has been shaped more by a potential settlement than by any genuine need for legal accountability. In their view, the accusation of assault became a convenient way for her to protect her personal reputation while opening the door for monetary gain. Text messages and consent at the Hockey Canada sex assault trial Defense portrays night as consensual and simple Throughout their final argument, Formenton's legal team pushed the idea that the events of June 18, 2018, were far less complex than the court was led to believe. According to them, the woman's own words confirmed she was moderately impaired but not incapacitated. Therefore, her ability to make decisions was not significantly diminished. The lawyer said the woman's request for someone in the room to engage in sex and Formenton's decision to participate made the encounter consensual in nature, not criminal. Read more: Matthew Tkachuk runs from Kane as Corey Perry mocks Gadjovich with 'turtle' sign in heated Game 3 As the trial approaches its final judgment, the court must now weigh the evidence and determine whether the defense's claims of consent and false testimony outweigh the accusations brought by the complainant. The outcome will have significant implications, not just for the defendants, but for public confidence in how such high-profile cases are prosecuted and judged.

Retired police officer's video interview of Hockey Canada ex-junior player accused of sexual assault played in court
Retired police officer's video interview of Hockey Canada ex-junior player accused of sexual assault played in court

Time of India

time28-05-2025

  • Time of India

Retired police officer's video interview of Hockey Canada ex-junior player accused of sexual assault played in court

Retired police officer Steven Newton, who had questioned accused Michael McLeod , testified as a new Crown witness on May 27 in the sexual assault trial of five former Hockey Canada junior players. Newton served with the London Police Service for 32 years and was the lead investigator in the 2018 case when he had interviewed McLeod in connection with the allegations against the hockey player. The Crown presented a recorded police interview from November 18, 2018, before the court during the testimony. In the one-hour-and-fifteen-minute video, Newton is seen questioning McLeod. Newton told McLeod the goal of the interview was to gather facts and determine whether a sexual assault had occurred as alleged by the victim. He said that if, during the interview, he believed he had grounds for a charge, he would stop and inform McLeod. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Has Honda Done It Again? The New Honda CR-V is Finally Here. TheFactualist Undo In the video, McLeod claimed that E.M. had offered oral sex. He said the group was drinking but not too intoxicated, adding, 'We had our heads on straight for the most part.' After having consensual sex with E.M., McLeod said he went to get food from the lobby. When he returned, he saw E.M. with another player, Carter Hart. McLeod said he recorded a video of E.M. giving consent because he was 'worried something like this might happen.' Live Events During the hearing earlier in the day, the defence finished cross-examining another witness, NHL player Brett Howden. A defence lawyer suggested that Howden may have downplayed his contact with E.M. during earlier interviews. Howden denied this, saying he couldn't recall the security footage. The case concerns allegations that a woman, known as E.M., was sexually assaulted in room 209 of the Delta Hotel in the early morning hours of June 19, 2018. Many members of the 2018 World Junior Championship team were in town at the time to celebrate their victory. The five defendants- McLeod, Dillon Dube, Cal Foote, Carter Hart, and Alex Formenton - have all pleaded not guilty to sexual assault; McLeod also faces a count of being party to the offence. They are not currently affiliated with any NHL teams.

Hockey Canada Sexual Assault Trial: Defense Suggests E.M. Goes From 'Sober' To 'Fun' Persona When She Drinks
Hockey Canada Sexual Assault Trial: Defense Suggests E.M. Goes From 'Sober' To 'Fun' Persona When She Drinks

Yahoo

time09-05-2025

  • Sport
  • Yahoo

Hockey Canada Sexual Assault Trial: Defense Suggests E.M. Goes From 'Sober' To 'Fun' Persona When She Drinks

Warning: coverage of the Hockey Canada trial includes details of alleged sexual assault that may be disturbing to readers. One of Alex Formenton's defense attorneys suggested the complainant in the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial has a different persona when under the influence of alcohol. Formenton is one of five former members of Canada's 2018 World Junior Championship team – the other four being Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Dillon Dube and Cal Foote – facing charges of sexual assault. McLeod is also facing an additional charge of sexual assault as party to the offense. All five men have pleaded not guilty to their charges. These charges are in relation to an incident that occurred back on June 18 and 19, 2018, when a woman, whose identity is protected by a publication ban and is referred to as E.M. in court documents, alleges she was sexually assaulted in a London, Ont. hotel room following Hockey Canada gala. Daniel Brown, one of Formenton's lawyers, began his cross-examination of E.M. Thursday afternoon. Since her testimony began last Friday, E.M. has continued to appear on video feed from another room in the courthouse. One of Brown's main lines of questioning centered around the complainant's personality when she is intoxicated versus when she is sober. After E.M. agreed with Brown that she is a more introverted and shy person, and drinking helps her 'break out of her shell,' Brown suggested that the complainant goes from 'sober' E.M. to 'fun' E.M. when she drinks. Brown used the complainant's first name in court instead of E.M. The complainant told Brown she did not like the alter ego suggestion, but Brown pressed on, mentioning the previously agreed-upon statement that E.M. had a boyfriend of three months at the time of the alleged incident. ' 'Fun' E.M. doesn't think about whether it is a good idea or a bad idea to cheat on her boyfriend,' Brown suggested. ' 'Fun' E.M. didn't think of the consequences. 'Fun' E.M. went off to a hotel with a guy she barely knew.' Brown asked who was to blame for 'sober' E.M. becoming 'fun' E.M. the night of June 18, 2018, and whether it was the complainant or one of the five defendants who was to blame. E.M. said it was her choice to drink, but she should be able to drink and 'not have happen to me what happened.' 'I should be allowed to do that and not worry about having something bad happen,' she said. Before this line of questioning, Brown asked the complainant who was to blame for what happened that night and whether it was someone else's faults. E.M. said she still had some blame sometimes on herself. 'Do you believe that it's easier to deny your deliberate choices than to acknowledge the shame, guilt and embarrassment that you felt about your choices?' Brown asked E.M. The complainant said she's not sure she agrees with that. 'I have a lot of blame for myself, but I think other people should be held accountable for that night,' she said. 'I Felt Like I Had No Option,' Complainant Tells Jury In Hockey Canada Sexual Assault Trial Warning: coverage of the Hockey Canada trial includes graphic details of alleged sexual assault that may be disturbing to readers. The events of that night, specifically what allegedly transpired at the Delta Armouries Hotel, were discussed in greater detail earlier Thursday when one of Hart's lawyers, Megan Savard, continued her cross-examination from Wednesday. Savard discussed how the complainant had testified at least twice in the trial that she had cried at points while in the hotel room, and that when this happened, she heard someone say, 'Don't let her leave – she's crying.' Savard said the first time E.M. mentioned this was when she was being questioned by David Humphrey, one of McLeod's lawyers, on Monday, and not during any of her previous police interviews or statements. In previous statements, Savard confirmed the complainant told police the men said 'come on, don't leave,' when she was asked if the men did anything to make her stay in the hotel room on the night of the alleged incident. Savard suggested that the way E.M. has now put it during the trial has a much more 'criminal' or 'severe' implication. But the complainant denied this. 'I stand by it,' E.M. said. 'I was just trying to get the words out. They didn't want me to leave, and they made sure I didn't by walking me back to the bed sheet.' Brown's cross-examination of the complainant is expected to continue on Friday, followed by questioning from other members of the players' defense counsel.

Technology glitches mar second day of testimony at Hockey Canada trial
Technology glitches mar second day of testimony at Hockey Canada trial

New York Times

time29-04-2025

  • Sport
  • New York Times

Technology glitches mar second day of testimony at Hockey Canada trial

LONDON, Ont. — The Crown showed jurors a number of surveillance videos and at least one photo from social media during Tuesday's proceedings in the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial, which were cut short by technical issues. In a sweltering hot courtroom on her second day of testimony, London Police detective Tiffany Waque, the Crown's first witness, played clips of videos that showed players from the 2018 Canadian World Juniors team and the complainant in the Hockey Canada sexual assault trial drinking, talking at the bar and dancing at Jack's — a bar and nightclub on Richmond Street that is popular amongst university and college students. Advertisement The video clips from a June evening in 2018, prior to the alleged incident at the Delta Armouries Hotel, are the first pieces of evidence presented in the Crown's case against the five defendants. Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote are all facing sexual assault charges in connection with the alleged incident; all five players pleaded not guilty last week. The complainant, then 20, alleges that she was sexually assaulted in the hotel following a Hockey Canada gala celebrating the team's 2018 World Junior Championship run. At multiple points during Waque's testimony, the surveillance videos, many of which were not accompanied by sound, were paused to allow her to identify for the jury who was in the video and which camera angles from within Jack's — the main bar, an auxiliary bar, the dance floor — captured the video. One of the first videos showed Brett Howden approaching the complainant at the bar; a short time after, he returned with McLeod. The complainant and McLeod could be seen on video talking and, at one point, taking a shot together. Later, in another silent surveillance video, Waque identified McLeod and the complainant dancing together amid a crush of other people and strobing lights. In addition to surveillance video, Waque also showed jurors multiple videos from Drake Batherson and one from McLeod that show the players in various stages of revelry throughout their night at Jack's — jumping, singing and dancing together. One video showed Batherson, Howden and Cale Makar dancing to The Killers' 'Mr. Brightside' song. Another video showed Tyler Steenbergen and Makar with Chris Brown's 'Yeah 3x' in the background. A third video showed McLeod, Batherson, Howden, Foote and Maxime Comtois huddled in a semicircle, facing the camera, singing along to the song 'Pursuit of Happiness' by Kid Cudi: I'm on the pursuit of happiness and I know Everything that shine ain't always gonna be gold Advertisement Matt Maccarone, who was identified as a 'sponsor but not part of the team,' was shown in multiple videos talking with players at the bar. Jurors also saw one video that featured Howden, McLeod and Jake Bean, the latter of whom was sitting on Maccarone's shoulders. The five players who are defendants in the case watched the videos from their respective defense tables. There were multiple delays in Tuesday's proceedings because of technical issues within the courtroom. Justice Maria Carroccia, who is presiding, explained that there was a piece of equipment that was 'overheating' because of the temperature of the courtroom. Carroccia dismissed the jurors early for the day telling them: 'We've got no choice. We can't get the equipment to work properly and … it's very, very hot.' — The Athletic's Dan Robson contributed reporting remotely from Toronto. (Photo by Peter Power / AFP via Getty Images)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store