Latest news with #AnchalBhatheja
Indian Express
13-07-2025
- Entertainment
- Indian Express
‘Metro In Dino' fails to understand love and desire among queer people
Written by Anchal Bhatheja In his latest film Metro In Dino, Anurag Basu attempts a delicate balancing act — interweaving tales of urban love and loss, including a subplot about a teenage girl questioning her sexuality. For a film released in 2025, in a post-Section 377 India, the inclusion of queer identity should have been a cause for celebration. But instead, Basu offers a muddled, poorly-researched, and at times, ethically disturbing narrative that does more harm than good. Rather than treating queerness with the care and nuance it demands, the film reduces it to confusion, experimentation, and invasive 'tests'— packaged as quirky coming-of-age comedy. The result is misrepresentation. And worse, it risks reinforcing the very stigmas queer youth are trying to escape. The confused teenager in question is portrayed with visible discomfort and internal conflict. Her friend, worried and unsure how to help, does something many Indian teens do when they feel lost—she calls a trusted adult for advice. That adult is her aunt, played by Sara Ali Khan. What unfolds should have been a moment for positive guidance or affirming support. Instead, the aunt shrugs off the girl's struggle: 'The internet has made you all confused.' Delivered with the smirk of someone trying to sound wise, this line encapsulates how mainstream narratives continue to treat queerness — as a phase, a fad, or a Western import. It implies that sexual fluidity is the by-product of too much screen time, not a valid part of someone's identity. In a country where access to affirming sex education is still rare, the internet has often been the only lifeline for queer youth. To mock that access is not only insensitive — it's reckless. The aunt's solution is equally flippant. 'Just kiss someone,' she says — girl or boy — and 'see if you get butterflies.' That's how you'll know who you love. But love, desire, and sexual orientation are far more complex. For many people, especially adolescents, queerness is not just about physical attraction. It's about emotional resonance, comfort, curiosity, and affinity. I myself came to understand my sexual orientation not through a kiss but through the depth of my emotional attraction to women — how I looked at them, connected with them, and longed to be around them. The 'kiss test' is not only reductive — it reinforces the idea that queer desire must be physically proven to be real. This approach contradicts decades of research in queer theory. Scholars like Eve Sedgwick and Adrienne Rich have argued that queer identity is not always anchored in sex or touch — it often begins with feelings, attachment, and even intellectual admiration. Many young queer people feel different long before they can name it. To reduce this complexity to butterflies from a kiss is not education — it's romanticised misinformation. But Metro In Dino goes further — and darker. Taking her aunt's advice literally, the girl decides to test her feelings by kissing her friend while she is asleep. A minor kissing another minor without consent, even framed as 'curiosity,' crosses a line. The scene is presented without consequences, without remorse, and without any acknowledgement of the violation. It plays directly into dangerous territory, implying that experimenting with someone else's body — without their permission —is a valid way to explore your sexuality. In a country where sex education is weak and consent is rarely discussed at home or school, this is an incredibly harmful message. Queerness, like all forms of love, must be rooted in respect and consent. To suggest otherwise is to risk enabling harmful behaviours in the name of 'self-discovery.' Representation carries weight. Especially when you're dealing with queer teenagers in India, where mental health risks are heightened, bullying is rampant, and acceptance is far from guaranteed. UNESCO (2018) data shows that over 50 per cent of LGBTQ+ youth in South Asia experience bullying, and more than 70 per cent conceal their identities in school and family settings. Many studies indicate that closeted youth are extremely prone to risks of depression, anxiety, and suicide. For these youth, visibility in media is not just representation — it's survival. Cinema has the power to affirm, reflect, and validate. But that requires care, research, and consultation with queer communities. Tokenism without understanding only adds to the problem. If you cannot represent queerness responsibly, you are better off not doing it at all. What Metro In Dino gives us is a caricature of confusion. It reinforces tropes and ignores the responsibility it has toward real lives, watching these stories unfold. Anurag Basu's intent may have been inclusion, but impact matters more than intent. The storyline in Metro In Dino is not just a missed opportunity. It's a disservice. To queer teens. To survivors of consent violations. To anyone who has struggled to name their identity in a world that still refuses to see them. Queer adolescence deserves space, dignity, and care. Not kisses without consent and 'confusion' as punchlines. Tell our stories. But tell them right. The writer is with Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
01-07-2025
- Business
- Business Standard
Notice to ICICI Bank for excluding visually impaired from digital banking
The Delhi High Court (HC) has issued a notice to the ICICI Bank in relation to a plea alleging that the bank's website and application are inaccessible to visually impaired people, reported Bar and Bench. In a plea filed by lawyer Anchal Bhatheja and businessman Rahul Jain, Justice Vikas Mahajan also sought a response from the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, and the Reserve Bank of India, according to LiveLaw. What does the plea say? The petitioners allege that the ICICI's Mobile Pay app, its website, and InstaBIZ app fall short of accessibility standards, making it difficult for visually impaired people to independently carry out essential financial activities such as logging in, accessing account statements, carrying out transactions, adding payees, etc. 'Given that the ICICI banking ecosystem—and the banking sector at large—increasingly relies on digital interfaces as the primary mode of service delivery, the exclusion of persons with disabilities from these platforms effectively denies them equal access to critical financial infrastructure,' the petitioners said, as quoted by LiveLaw. They added that due lack of accessibility, people with disabilities have to seek sighted assistance, compromising their privacy, autonomy and dignity. It also makes them vulnerable to financial fraud and emotional distress, Bar and Bench reported. The plea argues that the lack of basic features violates their fundamental rights under Articles 14 (equality), 19 (freedom), and 21 (right of life and liberty) of the Constitution. They also stated that the bank is in violation of the Supreme Court's ruling in Pragya Prasun vs Union of India, where the court affirmed that digital accessibility is an integral part of the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 of the Constitution.
