Latest news with #BRGavai-led
NDTV
4 days ago
- Politics
- NDTV
'Even If Not Convicted...': Supreme Court Jabs Probe Agency On Conviction Rate
New Delhi: The Enforcement Directorate 's conviction rate - 0.1 per cent of 5,892 money laundering cases filed in the first six months of this year - has been red flagged, again, by the Supreme Court. The court also took a shot at the federal agency's habit of incarcerating suspects for extended periods while they try to build a case - a habit called out by the opposition - and said, "... and even if they are not convicted, you have been successful in sentencing them almost without a trial for years together." The stinging reprimand came as a Chief Justice BR Gavai-led bench was reviewing a May judgement on JSW Steel's acquisition of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd, or BPSL. The court had then said JSW's resolution plan for BPSL was "illegal". But in July that verdict was recalled after petitions filed by both sides, as well as public lenders like the State Bank of India; the court said certain facts had to be reconsidered. However, it was sharp observations on the efficacy of the ED that raised eyebrows. The topic came up when a lawyer referred to the agency's investigation into BPSL. To this the Chief Justice quipped, "Here also the ED is there?" Appearing for the agency, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta complained of a "narrative being built on YouTube" (against the ED and its investigation timelines), and pointed to what he said was a little-known fact - that it had recovered Rs 23,000 crore in laundered cash. "In some cases, when politicians are raided and cash was found, our (cash-counting) machines stopped functioning... we had to bring new machines," he declared. The court, however, reminded the Solicitor General it does not "decide matters on narratives". "I don't see news channels... I see headlines in newspapers in the morning for 10-15 minutes only," the Chief Justice responded, and seized on a more pertinent point. "What is the conviction rate?" the Chief Justice asked. Mr Mehta acknowledged that conviction rates are 'very low' but blamed 'ills plaguing the criminal justice system'. The Chief Justice then shot back, "Even if they (suspects in money laundering cases) are not convicted you have been successful in sentencing them almost without a trial for years..." The exchange follows different benches of the Supreme Court criticising the 'high-handedness' of the ED, particularly in money laundering cases involving opposition leaders. In March the government told Parliament - as the ED was grilling RJD patriarch Lalu Prasad Yadav - that the agency's decadal conviction rate for cases against politicians is 1 per cent. In fact, last year there were multiple instances in which the Supreme Court hauled up the ED over its handling of cases, including telling it it cannot "keep filing chargesheets to keep people in jail". That rebuke was delivered by then-Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna after the ED filed supplementary chargesheets to claim denial of bail to an accused jailed for 18 months. The court made a similar observation in April the year before; Justice Krishna Murari and Justice CT Ravikumar said, "Without completing investigation, a charge sheet cannot be filed by an investigating agency only to deprive an arrested accused of his right to default bail..." READ | "Probe Agency Can't Arrest Accused If...": Supreme Court's Big Ruling These mattes came to a head in a furious political row over the arrest and incarceration of AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal and Manish Sisodia in the alleged liquor policy scam case. Both were jailed for months before being given bail by the Supreme Court. The opposition has repeatedly criticised the government over its use, they say, of federal investigative agencies like the ED to 'target and harass' rival politicians, particularly before elections. In response, the ruling BJP has just as repeatedly denied such claims, and said each investigative agency works independently towards its goal of rooting out all corruption.
Time of India
28-07-2025
- Politics
- Time of India
Three-year law practice rule for judicial services exam applies prospectively: SC
The Supreme Court on Monday said its May 20 verdict fixing a minimum three-year law practice criterion to appear in entry level judicial services examination would apply prospectively and not affect the recruitment notices initiated prior to the judgment. Chief Justice B R Gavai-led bench on May 20 barred fresh law graduates from appearing in entry level judicial services examination and fixed a minimum three-year law practice criteria . Explore courses from Top Institutes in Please select course: Select a Course Category MCA Others CXO Data Science Data Science PGDM Healthcare Design Thinking Operations Management Leadership Finance Technology Digital Marketing Product Management Data Analytics Cybersecurity MBA others Artificial Intelligence healthcare Management Degree Public Policy Project Management Skills you'll gain: Programming Proficiency Data Handling & Analysis Cybersecurity Awareness & Skills Artificial Intelligence & Machine Learning Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT Master of Computer Applications Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details On Monday, the bench, also comprising Justices Justices K Vinod Chandran and N V Anjaria, refused to examine a plea of Naveed Bukhtiya and five others, who are practising lawyers, and have challenged the recruitment notification of May 14 of the Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission as it did not mandate the three-year practice rule. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Japanese AI invention allows you to speak 68 languages instantly. The idea? Genius. Enence 2.0 Undo "You are saying that it was done only to defeat the purpose of the judgement. Was the full court of the High Court aware that the CJI is likely to pronounce the judgment on May 20," the CJI asked. The CJI clarified the verdict would apply prospectively to future judicial recruitments and does not disturb any selections that have already started. Live Events "We have clarified in the judgment that this will not be applicable to any process which has already started and will be applicable only for the next recruitment year," the CJI said in the order. The plea was then dismissed as withdrawn.
