Latest news with #BatteryWasteManagementRules
Hindustan Times
5 days ago
- Business
- Hindustan Times
From battery waste to energy independence: India's critical minerals opportunity
India's fast-growing electric vehicle (EV) and energy storage sectors offer a tremendous opportunity: transforming battery waste into a strategic resource to reduce dependence on imported critical minerals. Despite having a vast domestic market, India still heavily relies on imports—especially from China—for key battery materials like lithium, cobalt, and nickel. As demand for these metals surges toward 2030, India stands at a crucial crossroads to build a robust recycling ecosystem aligned with the National Critical Minerals Mission (NCMM), positioning itself for long-term energy security and sovereignty. Critical minerals are essential to modern technologies—from EVs and smartphones to renewable energy and defence systems. But with global supply chains heavily dominated by China, India faces significant geopolitical risks. China's control over mineral processing and its tightening export regulations have exposed vulnerabilities in India's energy transition roadmap. In response, India has adopted a comprehensive strategy covering 30 critical minerals: boosting domestic exploration, acquiring overseas resources, and ramping up recycling infrastructure. Backed by a ₹34,300 crore investment, the NCMM seeks to strengthen local supply chains, foster research and development (R&D), and establish strategic reserves both domestically and internationally. Although India has large mineral reserves, only a fraction has been explored. This untapped potential offers a compelling opportunity for global partnerships and investments. India possesses reserves of critical minerals such as copper and potentially cobalt, and unlocking these in an efficient, sustainable manner could bolster the global supply chain. To ensure recycled materials play a pivotal role, India has introduced policies like Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) and the Battery Waste Management Rules (BWMR) 2022. These mandates require producers to meet escalating annual recycling targets for lithium-ion batteries, thereby reintegrating recovered metals into the production cycle. India is witnessing a gradual shift from informal to formal battery recycling. According to BDO India, domestic recyclers could supply up to 48% of the country's lithium-ion battery demand by 2030. This transition is powered by growing private investments and policy incentives, including tax exemptions on critical mineral imports and urban mining initiatives announced in the 2025 Union Budget. End-of-life batteries are a rich source of lithium, cobalt, and nickel—metals that are becoming increasingly scarce. Tapping into this resource pool is essential to narrowing the supply-demand gap and achieving energy transition targets. As global demand for critical minerals is expected to hit $80 billion by 2040 (IEA), countries worldwide—including Japan, Canada, Australia, and EU members—are actively building resilient supply chains. India's global alliances, such as the India-US Initiative on Critical and Emerging Technologies (iCET) and its partnership with Australia on critical minerals research (IACMRP), underscore the importance of international collaboration. Interestingly, several minerals—like lithium, cobalt, nickel, and vanadium—are listed as critical by multiple major economies, reinforcing the need for collective recycling strategies and global coordination. Despite promising initiatives, India faces several execution hurdles: India's strategy includes short-, mid-, and long-term goals: Recycling battery waste could save India billions in imports, create substantial employment in urban mining, and cement its status as the recycling hub of the Global South. Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) such as KABIL, ONGC Videsh, and Coal India are playing a critical role in acquiring overseas assets, while the NCMM's funding drives domestic integration. However, India's funding still lags global benchmarks. The European Union (EU) has proposed a €10 billion fund, and the US has allocated $400 billion through the Inflation Reduction Act. Scaling India's commitment over time will be essential to strengthening recycling infrastructure, driving R&D in hydrometallurgy, and integrating informal workers through IoT-linked systems. To unlock the full potential of battery recycling, India must overcome regulatory, technological, and financial hurdles while accelerating domestic capability building. A phased strategy—driven by AI, supported by global alliances, and backed by policy—can convert India's battery waste burden into an economic and strategic asset. With the right blend of vision, partnerships, and innovation, India can turn its critical minerals challenge into a sustainable competitive advantage—ensuring energy sovereignty and a resilient green-tech future. This article is authored by Chetan Jain, senior vice president – business operations, LOHUM.
Time of India
23-04-2025
- Business
- Time of India
Delhi HC seeks Centre's reply on LG, Samsung plea against e-waste management policy hike
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday sought a response from the Centre on various petitions filed by electronic manufacturers, including LG Electronics India and Samsung India Electronics, challenging the electronic waste management policy that increased payouts to electronic-waste new rules mandate a minimum payment of Rs 22 per kg to recycle consumer electronics, the companies claim that it will triple their costs and benefit recyclers at their expense as the new prices were 5-15 times higher than the current prices. A division bench led by chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya issued notice to the Environment ministry on the petitions seeking setting aside of the electronic waste management rules which increased payouts to electronic-waste recyclers among other issues. The court will further hear the matter on May 16. Stating that the proposed rates were 'very high and should be reduced' and the government should let market forces determine the prices, counsel Vanita Bhargava told the court that the 2024 amendments in E-waste Management Rules 2022, the Plastic Waste Management Rules 2016, and the Battery Waste Management Rules, 2022 fixing the floor price and the ceiling price for the exchange of EPR certificate were 'manifestly arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and are ultra vires provisions of EP Act under which the Rules were framed. Instead of enforcing provisions of the EWM Rules, 2022 to monitor and check informal recyclers from processing in an environmentally unsound manner, the burden is being shifted to the producers without any cogent basis, she argued. Rules 15(9) and 15(10) of the amended E-waste Management Rules establish a mechanism for producers to fulfil their extended producer responsibility obligations through the purchase and sale of certificates, with the Central Pollution Control Board ensuring that the value of these certificates reflects the environmental impact of e-waste management. Samsung also said that 'the regulation of prices does not inherently serve the purposes of environmental protection ,' and this was 'expected to cause substantial financial impact'. LG in its petition stated that the government, through amendments, introduced a floor price and the ceiling price for the exchange of the extended producer responsibility certificates, and further, erroneously linked the exchange price of these certificates to the environmental compensation which was to be levied only in the event of a default by a producer. The rules "fail to take into consideration that merely by fleecing companies and taxing them in the name of the ' polluter pays principle ', the (government) objectives sought to be achieved cannot be achieved," the companies said.
Time of India
22-04-2025
- Business
- Time of India
Delhi HC seeks Centre's reply on LG, Samsung plea against electronic waste management policy hike
The Delhi High Court on Tuesday sought a response from the Centre on various petitions filed by electronic manufacturers, including LG Electronics India and Samsung India Electronics , challenging the electronic waste management policy that increased payouts to electronic-waste recyclers . As new rules mandate a minimum payment of Rs 22 per kg to recycle consumer electronics, the companies claim that it will triple their costs and benefit recyclers at their expense as the new prices were 5-15 times higher than the current prices. A division bench led by chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya issued notice to the Environment ministry on the petitions seeking setting aside of the electronic waste management rules which increased payouts to electronic-waste recyclers among other issues. The court will further hear the matter on May 16. Stating that the proposed rates were 'very high and should be reduced' and the government should let market forces determine the prices, counsel Vanita Bhargava told the court that the 2024 amendments in E-waste Management Rules 2022, the Plastic Waste Management Rules 2016, and the Battery Waste Management Rules, 2022 fixing the floor price and the ceiling price for the exchange of EPR certificate were 'manifestly arbitrary and violative of Article 14 and 19 of the Constitution of India and are ultra vires provisions of EP Act under which the Rules were framed. Instead of enforcing provisions of the EWM Rules, 2022 to monitor and check informal recyclers from processing in an environmentally unsound manner, the burden is being shifted to the producers without any cogent basis, she argued. Rules 15(9) and 15(10) of the amended E-waste Management Rules establish a mechanism for producers to fulfil their extended producer responsibility obligations through the purchase and sale of certificates, with the Central Pollution Control Board ensuring that the value of these certificates reflects the environmental impact of e-waste management. Samsung also said that 'the regulation of prices does not inherently serve the purposes of environmental protection ,' and this was 'expected to cause substantial financial impact'. LG in its petition stated that the government, through amendments, introduced a floor price and the ceiling price for the exchange of the extended producer responsibility certificates, and further, erroneously linked the exchange price of these certificates to the environmental compensation which was to be levied only in the event of a default by a producer. The rules "fail to take into consideration that merely by fleecing companies and taxing them in the name of the ' polluter pays principle ', the (government) objectives sought to be achieved cannot be achieved," the companies said.
