logo
#

Latest news with #BenjaminPicton

Australia faces a ‘guns or butter' problem: defence spending or social programmes?
Australia faces a ‘guns or butter' problem: defence spending or social programmes?

South China Morning Post

time3 hours ago

  • Business
  • South China Morning Post

Australia faces a ‘guns or butter' problem: defence spending or social programmes?

Australia confronts a 'guns or butter' choice between a bigger defence budget and expanding national disability insurance and other social programmes, according to multinational banking and financial services company Rabobank, which calls for economic statecraft to navigate a risky regional security environment. For now, the government is opting for 'butter', but it retains substantial fiscal headroom to bolster military spending when compared to peer economies, Rabobank economist Benjamin Picton said in a research note on Tuesday. The nation's debt is lower than that of counterparts as a share of its gross domestic product. Australian officials have warned that the nation faces its most complex strategic circumstances since World War II. The government aims to pivot its military posture to deterrence, including via drones and missiles, to complement a planned fleet of nuclear-powered submarines due to be delivered in the 2030s under the Aukus deal. A Virginia-class nuclear-powered attack submarine of the type Australia is set to acquire from the early 2030s. Photo: US Navy But Canberra is caught between the expanding military footprint of China, which is also Australia's biggest trading partner, and its traditional US ally that is seeking to check Beijing's expansion in the Asia-Pacific. Picton pointed out the contradiction of Australia deepening military engagement with Washington via Aukus to deter China while trying to keep defence spending low enough to 'remain relatively inoffensive' to Beijing. 'This have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too approach carries risk that Australia will be forced into supporting US foreign policy interests against its own, while also being underprepared if a major conflict were to break out, or if the US were to revise its strategic doctrine in the Western Pacific,' Picton said. As a result, Australia faces higher defence, social programmes and debt servicing costs which may put pressure on long-dated government bonds, Picton said.

Australia Must Choose Defense or Social Spending, Rabobank Says
Australia Must Choose Defense or Social Spending, Rabobank Says

Bloomberg

time7 hours ago

  • Business
  • Bloomberg

Australia Must Choose Defense or Social Spending, Rabobank Says

Australia confronts a 'guns or butter' choice between a bigger defense budget and expanding national disability insurance and other social programs, according to Rabobank, which calls for economic statecraft to navigate a risky regional security environment. For now, the government is opting for 'butter,' but it retains substantial fiscal headroom to bolster military spending when compared to peer economies, Rabobank economist Benjamin Picton said in a research note on Tuesday. The nation's debt is lower than that of counterparts as a share of its gross domestic product.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store